<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">edscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Education and science journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1994-5639</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2310-5828</issn><publisher><publisher-name>RSVPU</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17853/1994-5639-2021-6-43-83</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">edscience-2212</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЩИЕ ВОПРОСЫ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>GENERAL EDUCATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Оценивание в образовании: современные тенденции, проблемы и противоречия (обзор научных публикаций)</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Assessment in education: Current trends, problems and contradictions (review of scientific publications)</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0235-1640</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шмигирилова</surname><given-names>И. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shmigirilova</surname><given-names>I. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Шмигирилова Ирина Борисовна - кандидат педагогических наук, доцент кафедры математики и информатики, Scopus ID 57210787308, Researcher ID O-9939-2018.</p><p>Петропавловск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Irina B. Shmigirilova - Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Informatics, 7210787308, Researcher ID O-9939-2018.</p><p>Petropavlovsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">rinankzu@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7235-1016</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Рванова</surname><given-names>А. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Rvanova</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Рванова Алла Сергеевна - кандидат педагогических наук, доцент кафедры математики и информатики.</p><p>Петропавловск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alla S. Rvanova - Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Informatics.</p><p>Petropavlovsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">alla_rv@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8957-8746</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Григоренко</surname><given-names>О. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Grigorenko</surname><given-names>O. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Григоренко Ольга Викторовна - кандидат физико-математических наук, доцент, заведующая кафедрой высшей математики, Researcher ID AAO-9344-2020.</p><p>Новосибирск</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga V. Grigorenko - Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Higher Mathematics, Researcher ID AAO-9344-2020.</p><p>Novosibirsk</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ogrigorenko2311@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Северо-Казахстанский государственный университет им. М. Козыбаева</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>M. Kozybaev North Kazakhstan State University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Сибирский государственный университет геосистем и технологий</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>06</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Шмигирилова И.Б., Рванова А.С., Григоренко О.В., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Шмигирилова И.Б., Рванова А.С., Григоренко О.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Shmigirilova I.B., Rvanova A.S., Grigorenko O.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/2212">https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/2212</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Современные взгляды на цели и содержание образования во всем мире меняют точку зрения и на оценивание в образовании: значительно расширяются его цели и функции, внедряются новые формы и инструменты оценивания, пересматриваются роли обучающихся и педагогов в оценочной практике. Мировые тенденции в области образовательной оценки находят свое отражение в национальных системах образования, многие из которых осуществили переход на критериальное оценивание. Этот процесс сопровождается стремительным ростом объема научно-методических публикаций по данной проблеме, уменьшая возможности ученых и практикующих педагогов осмыслить совокупные свидетельства в данной области исследований, что представляется важным на этапе реформирования. Решению данной проблемы может способствовать аналитический обзор источников, представляющий обобщение международного опыта развития оценивания в образовании.</p><p>Цель статьи - на основе анализа научных публикаций осмыслить и обобщить современные тенденции, сложившиеся в мировой теории и практике оценивания образовательных результатов обучающихся, выявить проблемы и противоречия как потенциальную основу возникновения рисков в оценочных практиках, определить актуальные направления исследований по совершенствованию оценивания в образовании.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. Материалами для исследования послужили научные публикации последних 30 лет, раскрывающие вопросы образовательного оценивания. Отбор источников осуществлялся методами дескриптивного и библиометрического анализа. В работе с содержанием материалов применялись сравнительный и аспектный анализ.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты</title><p>Результаты. Широкий диапазон целей оценивания подтверждает значимость оценки как компонента образовательной системы, но при этом влечет за собой возникновение противоречий между отдельными целями, которые проявляются в оценочных дихотомиях: формирующее и суммирующее оценивание, оценка по норме и оценка по критерию. Несмотря на противопоставление формирующей и суммирующей оценок, проведенный анализ свидетельствует о необходимости их интеграции. Многообразие теоретических подходов к толкованию форм оценивания, неоднозначное определение и использование терминологии, множественность моделей критериального оценивания, качественно различных подходов к разработке критериев и созданию на их основе оценочных рубрик являются источниками рисков, проявляющихся в практике образовательного оценивания. Кроме того, препятствием на пути обеспечения эффективного оценивания учебных достижений обучающихся является недостаточный уровень компетентности педагогов как оценщиков, неготовность самих учащихся к принятию на себя ответственности за результаты своего обучения.</p></sec><sec><title>Научная новизна</title><p>Научная новизна. С критических позиций представлены идеи и обобщены результаты дискуссий по проблемам оценки образовательных результатов обучающихся в научных источниках. Проведенный анализ может выступить основой для дальнейших исследований с целью построения упорядоченной теоретической базы оценивания в образовании.</p></sec><sec><title>Практическая значимость</title><p>Практическая значимость. Анализ плюсов и минусов международного опыта в области оценивания в образовании может послужить обретению ученым и практикующими педагогами более объективного взгляда на новые подходы к оцениванию образовательных результатов обучающихся, что будет способствовать минимизации проявления возможных рисков при разработке инструментов и процедур оценивания и внедрении их в образовательную практику.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Modern views on the goals and content of education around the world are changing the viewpoints on educational assessment: the goals and functions of assessment are expanded, new assessment forms and tools are being introduced, the roles of students and teachers in assessment practice are revised. Global trends in educational assessment are reflected in national education systems, many of which have made the transition to criteria-based assessment. This process is accompanied by a rapid increase in the volume of scientific and methodological publications on this issue, reducing the ability of scientists and practising educators to comprehend the cumulative evidence in this area of research, which is important at the stage of reform. The solution to this problem can be facilitated by an analytical review of sources, representing a generalisation of international experience in the development of educational assessment.</p></sec><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. Based on the analysis of scientific publications, the current research is aimed to comprehend and generalise the current trends prevailing in the world theory and practice of assessment of student learning outcomes, to identify problems and contradictions as a potential basis for the occurrence of risks in assessment practices, to determine the current research directions towards the improvement of assessment in education.</p><p>Methodology and research methods. The scientific papers of the last thirty years, revealing the issues of the education process assessment, have been used in the research. Sources were selected through the methods of descriptive and bibliometric analysis. The comparative and aspect-based analyses were employed in the research.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The wide range of assessment goals confirms the significance of the assessment as the education component; however, it results in some contradictions between the goals, which appear in estimated dichotomies: formative and summative assessment, norm-based and criteria-based assessment. Despite the contrapositive between the formative and summa-tive assessments, the analysis conducted shows the necessity of their integration. The variety of theoretical approaches to the interpretation of assessment forms, the ambiguous definition and use of terminology, the multiplicity of criteria-based assessment models, qualitatively different approaches to the development of criteria and the creation of assessment rubrics on their basis are sources of risks in the practice of educational assessment. In addition, an obstacle to ensuring effective assessment of students’ educational achievements is the insufficient level of competence of teachers as assessors, the unpreparedness of students themselves to take responsibility for the results of their learning.</p></sec><sec><title>Scientific novelty</title><p>Scientific novelty. From a critical standpoint, the ideas are presented and the results of discussions on the problems of assessing the educational results of students in scientific sources are summarised. The analysis performed can serve as a basis for further research to build an ordered theoretical framework for assessment in education.</p></sec><sec><title>Practical significance</title><p>Practical significance. An analysis of the pros and cons of international experience in the field of educational assessment can help scientists and practising teachers gain a more objective view of new approaches to the assessment of student learning outcomes, thereby contributing to the minimisation of the manifestation of possible risks in the development of assessment tools and procedures and their implementation in educational practice.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>оценивание в образовании</kwd><kwd>реформы оценивания</kwd><kwd>формативная оценка</kwd><kwd>оценка для обучения</kwd><kwd>суммирующая оценка</kwd><kwd>критериальное оценивание</kwd><kwd>нормированное оценивание</kwd><kwd>оценочные рубрики</kwd><kwd>оценочная грамотность педагога</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>educational assessment</kwd><kwd>assessment reforms</kwd><kwd>formative assessment</kwd><kwd>assessment for learning</kwd><kwd>summative assessment</kwd><kwd>criteria-based assessment</kwd><kwd>norm-based assessment</kwd><kwd>аassessment rubrics</kwd><kwd>assessment literacy of teachers</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Исследование проведено при финансовой поддержке Комитета науки Министерства образования и науки Республики Казахстан (грант № AP08956027 «Инновационные подходы к оцениванию учебных достижений обучающихся в условиях обновления содержания математического образования»). Авторы также выражают искреннюю благодарность рецензентам, замечания которых были полезны в работе над статьей</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">The present research was performed under the financial support of the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (grant No. A08956027 “Innovative Approaches to the Assessment of Educational Achievements of Students in Terms of Updating the Content of Mathematical Education”). The authors also express their sincere gratitude to the reviewers, whose comments were useful in the work on the article</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taras M. Assessment for Learning: understanding theory to improve practice // Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2007. Vol. 31 (4). P. 363-371. DOI: 10.1080/03098770701625746</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taras M. Assessment for learning: Understanding theory to improve practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2007; 31 (4): 363-371. DOI: 10.1080/03098770701625746</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ball S. Introduction: The Great Education Debate (1976-2016) // In: The education debate. 3rd ed. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Bristol University Press, 2017. P. 1-12. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10018968/1/250102.pdf (date of ac-cess:19.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ball S. Introduction: The great education debate (1976-2016). In: The education debate [Internet]. 3rd ed. Bristol, UK; Chicago, IL, USA: Bristol University Press; 2017 [cited 2020 Aug 19]. p. 1-12. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10018968/1/250102.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Palmatier R. W., Houston M. B., Hulland J. Review articles: purpose, process, and structure // Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2018. Vol. 46. P. 1-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Palmatier R. W., Houston M. B., Hulland J. Review articles: Purpose, process, and structure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science volume. 2018; 46: 1-5. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-017-0563-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baird J., Hopfenbeck T. N., Newton P. E., Steen-Utheim A. T. State of the Field Review: Assessment and Learning, Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Report OUCEA/14/2. 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263654863 (date of access: 21.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baird J., Hopfenbeck T. N., Newton P. E., Steen-Utheim A. T. State of the field review: Assessment and learning, Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment Report OUCEA/14/2 [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 21]; Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263654863</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bennett R. E. Formative assessment: a critical review // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 2011. Vol. 18 (1). P. 5-25. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bennett R. E. Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 2011; 18 (1): 5-25. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lau A. M. Formative good, summative bad? - A review of the dichotomy in assessment literature // Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 40 (4). P. 509-525. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lau A. M. Formative good, summative bad? - A review of the dichotomy in assessment literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2016; 40 (4): 509-525. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gikandi J. W., Morrowa D., Davisa N .E. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature // Computers &amp; Education. 2011. Vol. 57 (4). P. 2333-2351 DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gikandi J. W., Morrowa D., Davisa N. E. Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers &amp; Education. 2011; 57 (4): 2333-2351. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бодоньи М. А. Зарубежный и отечественный опыт использования современных технологий в формирующем оценивании [Электрон. ресурс] // Отечественная и зарубежная педагогика. 2020. Т. 1. № 3 (68). С. 78-95. Режим доступа: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/382850089.pdf (дата обращения: 23.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bodony M. A. Foreign and domestic experience of the use of modern technologies in formative assessment. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 23]; 3 (68): 78-95. Available from: https://publica-tions.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/382850089.pdf (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pepper D. KeyCoNet. 2013 Literature Review: Assessment for key competences. 2013. 35 p. Available from: http://keyconet.eun.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=b1475317-108c-4cf5-a650-dae772a7d943&amp;groupId=11028 (date of access: 12.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pepper D. KeyCoNet 2013 literature review: Assessment for key competences [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Jul 12]. 35 p. Available from: http://keyconet.eun.org/c/document_li-brary/get_file?uuid=b1475317-108c-4cf5-a650-dae772a7d943&amp;groupId=11028</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Siarova H., Sternadel D., Mašidlauskaitė R. Assessment practices for 21st century learning: review of evidence, NESET II report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2017. Available from: https://nesetweb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/AR1_20172.pdf (date of access: 08.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Siarova H., Sternadel D., Mašidlauskaitė R. Assessment practices for 21st century learning: Review of evidence, NESET II report [Internet]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 08]. Available from: https://nesetweb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/AR1_20172.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Потемкина Т. В., Пуденко Т. И. Независимая оценка качества образования: общественная экспертиза в зарубежной и отечественной практике // Образование и наука. 2015. № 10 (129). С. 64-79. DOI:10.17853/1994-5639-2015-10-64-79</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Potemkina T. V., Pudenko T. I. Independent evaluation of the quality of education: social expertise in foreign and Russian practice. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2015; 10: 64-79. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2015-10-64-79 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">DeLuca C., LaPointe-McEwan D., Luhanga U. Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures // Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2016. Vol. 28 (3). P. 251-272. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">DeLuca C., LaPointe-McEwan D., Luhanga U. Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2016; 28 (3): 251-272. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Темняткина О. В., Токменинова Д. В. Современные подходы к оценке эффективности работы учителей. Обзор зарубежных публикаций // Вопросы образования. 2018. № 3. С. 180-193. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-180-195</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Temnyatkina O. V., Tokmeninova D. V. Modern approaches to teacher performance assessment. An overview of foreign publications. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2018; 3: 180-193. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-180-195 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шадриков В. Д., Шадрикова И. А., Педагогическое оценивание: учебное пособие [Электрон. ресурс] Москва: Университетская книга. 2018. 156 с. Режим доступа: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/286820966.pdf (дата обращения: 07.12.2020). 15. Harlen W. On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes // Assessment and Learning. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2012. P. 87-102. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/books/assessment-and-learning-2e/n6.xml (date of access: 21.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shadrikov V. D., Shadrikova I. A. Pedagogicheskoe ocenivanie = Pedagogical assessment [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House Universitetskaja kniga; 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 07]. 156 p. Available from: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/286820966.pdf (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Newton P. E. Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2007. Vol. 14 (2). P. 149-170. DOI: 10.1080/09695940701478321</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harlen W. On the relationship between assessment for formative and summative purposes. In: Assessment and learning [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2012 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. p. 87-102. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/books/assessment-and-learning-2e/n6.xml</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Archer E. The Assessment Purpose Triangle: Balancing the Purposes of Educational Assessment // Frontiers Education. 2017. Vol. 4. Article 41. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2017.00041/fun (date of access: 23.07.2020). DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00041</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Newton P. E. Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2007; 14 (2): 149-170. DOI: 10.1080/09695940701478321</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 1998. Vol. 5 (1). P. 7-74. DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Archer E. The assessment purpose triangle: Balancing the purposes of educational assessment. Frontiers Education [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jul 23]; 4, Article 41. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2017.00041/full DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2017.00041</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Black P., Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment // Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability. 2009. Vol. 21 (1). P. 5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black P., Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 1998; 5 (1): 7-74. DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Black P. Formative assessment - an optimistic but incomplete vision // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2015. Vol. 22 (1). P. 161-177. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black P., Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability. 2009; 21 (1): 5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dixson D. D., Worrell F. C. Formative and Summative Assessment in the Classroom // Theory Into Practice. 2016. Vol. 55 (2). P. 153-159. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black P. Formative assessment - an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2015; 22 (1): 161-177. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пинская М. А. Формирующее оценивание: оценивание в классе [Электрон. ресурс]. Москва: Логос, 2010. 264 с. Режим доступа: http://school257-newiz.ucoz.ru/dok/formirujushhee_ocenivanie-avtor_m.a-pinskaja.pdf (дата обращения: 23.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dixson D. D., Worrell F. C. Formative and summative assessment in the classroom. Theory into Practice. 2016; 55 (2): 153-159. DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1148989</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harlen W. Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning-tensions and synergies // The Curriculum Journal. 2005. Vol. 16 (2). P. 207-223. DOI: 10.1080/09585170500136093</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pinskaya M. A. Formiruyushcheye otsenivaniye: otsenivaniye v klasse = Formative assessment: Classroom assessment [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House Logos; 2009 [cited 2020 Jul 23]. 264 p. Available from: http://school257-newiz.ucoz.ru/dok/formirujushhee_ocenivanie-avtor_m.a-pinskaja.pdf (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Newton P. E. Validity, purpose and the recycling of results from educational Assessment // Assessment and Learning. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2012. P. 264-276. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/books/assessment-and-learning-2e/n16.xml (date of access: 21.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harlen W. Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning-tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal. 2005; 16 (2): 207-223. DOI: 10.1080/09585170500136093</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sadler D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems // Instructional Science. 1989. Vol. 18. P. 119-144. Available from: http://michiganassess-mentconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/Formative-Assessment-and-Design-of-Instruction-al-Systems.pdf (date of access: 25.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Newton P. E. Validity, purpose and the recycling of results from educational Assessment. In: Assessment and learning [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2012 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. p. 264-276. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/books/assessment-and-learning-2e/n16.xml</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taras M. Assessment - Summative and Formative - some theoretical reflections // British Journal of Educational Studies. 2005. Vol. 53 (3). P. 466-478. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sadler D. R. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science [Internet]. 1989 [cited 2020 Jul 21]; 18: 119-144. Available from: http://michiganassessmentconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/Formative-Assessment-and-De-sign-of-Instructional-Systems.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sjogren A. The long run consequences of being graded in elementary school: paper presented at the Final Conference of the RTN Network “Economic of Education and Education Policy in Europe” (EEEPE). London: LSE, 2009. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46470357 (date of access: 29.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taras M. Assessment - summative and formative - some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2005; 53 (3): 466-478. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Butt G. Making Assessment Matter. London: Bloomsbury Continuum, 2010. 156 p. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ptgvb4wAAAAJ&amp;hl=en (date of access: 28.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sj6gren A. The long run consequences of being graded in elementary school. In: Final Conference of the RTN Network “Economic of Education and Education Policy in Europe: (EEEPE) [Internet]. London: LSE; 2009 [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://www.re-searchgate.net/publication/46470357</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Silfver E., Sjoberg G., Bagger A. An ‘appropriate’ test taker: the everyday classroom during the national testing period in school year three in Sweden // Ethnography and Education. 2016. Vol. 11 (3). P. 237-252. DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2015.1085323</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Butt G. Making assessment matter [Internet]. London: Bloomsbury Continuum; 2010 [cited 2020 Jul 28]. 156 p. Available from: https://scholar.google.com/citations?us-er=ptgvb4wAAAAJ&amp;hl=en</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Courtney S. Post-panopticism and school inspection in England // British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2016. Vol. 37 (4). P. 623-642. DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2014.965806</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Silfver E., Sjoberg G., Bagger A. An ‘appropriate’ test taker: The everyday classroom during the national testing period in school year three in Sweden. Ethnography and Education. 2016; 11 (3): 237-252. DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2015.1085323</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Болотов В. А. Прошлое, настоящее и возможное будущее российской системы оценки качества образования // Вопросы образования. 2018. № 3. С. 287-297. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-287-297</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Courtney S. Post-panopticism and school inspection in England. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 2016; 37 (4): 623-642. DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2014.965806</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шаповалова О. Н., Ефремова Н. Ф. Дидактический потенциал формирующего оценивания метапредметных результатов школьников: российский и зарубежный опыт [Электрон. ресурс] // Мир науки. Педагогика и психология. 2019. Т. 7. № 6. Режим доступа: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/94PDMN619.pdf (дата обращения: 22.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bolotov V. A. The past, present, and possible future of the Russian education assessment system. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2018; 3: 287-297. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-287-297 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Четвертных Т. В. Метапредметное содержание формирующего оценивания // Вестник Костромского государственного университета. Серия: Педагогика. Психология. Социокинетика. 2019. № 2. С. 21-25. DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2019-25-2-21-25</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shapovalova O. N., Efremova N. F. The didactic potential of formative assessment of meta-disciplinary results of schoolchildren: Russian and foreign experience. Mir nauki. Peda-gogika i psikhologiya = World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 22]; 7 (6). Available from: https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/94PDMN619.pdf (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cisterna D., Gotwals A.W. Enactment of Ongoing Formative Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Development and Practice // Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2018. Vol. 29 (3). P. 200-222. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chetvertnykh T. V. Comprehensive content of formative evaluation. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika = Bulletin of the Kostroma State University. Series: Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociokinetics. 2019; 2: 21-25. DOI: 10.34216/2073-1426-2019-25-2-21-25 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hill J., West H. Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment // Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020. Vol. 45(1). P. 82-97. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cisterna D., Gotwals A. W. Enactment of ongoing formative assessment: Challenges and opportunities for professional development and practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2018; 29 (3): 200-222. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Phelps R. P. Synergies for better learning: an international perspective on evaluation and assessment // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2014. Vol. 21 (4). P. 481-493. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.921091</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hill J., West H. Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2020; 45 (1): 82-97. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Torrance H. Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment // Oxford Review of Education. 2012. Vol. 38 (3). P. 323-342. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2012.689693</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Phelps R. P. Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2014; 21 (4): 481-493. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.921091</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Henderson M., Ryan T., Phillips M. The challenges of feedback in higher education // Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 44 (8). P. 1237-1252. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Torrance H. Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education. 2012; 38 (3): 323-342. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2012.689693</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harrison C. J., Konings K. D., Dannefer E. F., Schuwirth L. W., Wass V., Van der Vleuten C. P. Factors influencing students’ receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures // Perspectives on Medical Education. 2016. Vol. 5 (5). P. 276-284. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-016-0297-x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harrison C. J., K6nings K. D., Dannefer E. F., Schuwirth L. W., Wass V., Van der Vleuten C. P. Factors influencing students’ receptivity to formative feedback emerging from different assessment cultures. Perspectives on Medical Education. 2016; 5 (5): 276-284. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-016-0297-x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dann R. Assessment as learning: blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice // Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2014. Vol. 21 (2). P. 149-166. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Henderson M., Ryan T., Phillips M. The challenges of feedback in higher education. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019; 44 (8): 1237-1252. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вилкова Л. В. Реализация формирующего оценивания учебных достижений обучающихся: проблемы и пути решения // Научно-педагогическое обозрение. 2019. № 4 (26). С. 7-13. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2019-4-7-13</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dann R. Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy &amp; Practice. 2014; 21 (2): 149-166. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Четвертных Т. В. Готовность педагогов к проведению формирующего оценивания в образовательном процессе [Электрон. ресурс] // Вестник Омского государственного педагогического университета. Гуманитарные исследования. 2018. № 4 (21). С. 146-150. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36961492 (дата обращения: 21.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vilkova L. V. Implementation of formative assessment of students’ educational achievements: problems and solution. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoye obozreniye = Pedagogical Review. 2019; 4 (26): 7-13. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2019-4-7-13 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шмигирилова И. Б., Рванова А. С., Таджигитов А. А. Педагогическая мастерская как форма развития оценочной компетентности учителя математики [Электрон. ресурс] // Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2020. № 6. С. 87. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44595518 (дата обращения: 21.12.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chetvertnykh T. V. Teachers’ readiness for using the forming assessment in the educational process. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Gumani-tarnyye issledovaniya = Bulletin of the Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanities Research [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 27]; 4 (21): 146-150. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36961492 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit43"><label>43</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Florez M. T., Sammons P. Assessment for learning: effects and impact. Oxford University Department of Education. 2013. 32 p. Available from: https://www.education-developmenttrust.com/EducationDevelopmentTrust/files/5a/5a6d6203-ec49-4d33-9c5d-42c188184807.pdf (date of access: 03.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shmigirilova I. B., Rvanova A. S., Tadzhigitov A. A. Pedagogical workshop as a form of development of estimated competence of a mathematics teacher. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 21]; 6: 87. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44595518 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit44"><label>44</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herman J. L., Osmundson E., Silver D. Capturing quality in Formative assessment practice: Measurement challenges, CRESST Report 770. Los Angeles: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing. 2010. 26 p. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512648.pdf (date of access: 16.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Florez M. T., Sammons P. Assessment for learning: Effects and impact [Internet]. Oxford University Department of Education; 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. 32 p. Available from: https://www.educationdevelopmenttrust.com/EducationDevelopmentTmst/files/5a/5a6d6203-ec49-4d33-9c5d-42c188184807.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit45"><label>45</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Velasco L. C., Tojar J-C. Competency-Based Evaluation in Higher Education - Design and Use of Competence Rubrics by University Educators // International Education Studies. 2018. Vol. 11 (2). P. 118-132. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v11n2p118</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herman J. L., Osmundson E., Silver D. Capturing quality in formative assessment practice: Measurement challenges, CRESST Report 770 [Internet]. Los Angeles: National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing; 2010 [cited 2020 Jul 16]. 26 p. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512648.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit46"><label>46</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ефремова Н. В. Концептуальная модель оценки компетенций студентов // Современные наукоемкие технологии. 2019. № 7. С. 169-174. DOI: 10.17513/snt.37607</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Velasco L. C., Tojar J-C. Competency-based evaluation in higher education - design and use of competence rubrics by university educators. International Education Studies. 2018; 11 (2): 118-132. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v11n2p118</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit47"><label>47</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wiliam D. Standards in examinations: a matter of trust? // The Curriculum Journal. 1996. Vol. 7 (3). P. 293-306. DOI: 10.1080/0958517960070303</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Efremova N. Conceptual model of evaluation of competence of students. Sovremen-nyye naukoyemkiye tekhnologii = Modern High Technologies. 2019; 7: 169-174. DOI: 10.17513/snt.37607 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit48"><label>48</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sadler D. R. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education // Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2005. Vol. 30 (2). P. 175-194. DOI: 10.1080/0260293042000264262</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wiliam D. Standards in examinations: A matter of trust? The Curriculum Journal. 1996; 7 (3): 293-306. DOI: 10.1080/0958517960070303</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit49"><label>49</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dann R. Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London: Routledge Falmer, 2002. 176 p. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?id=EGVCe-r-bX-wC&amp;hl=ru (date of access: 18.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sadler D. R. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2005; 30 (2): 175-194. DOI: 10.1080/0260293042000264262</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit50"><label>50</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wikstrom C. Criterion-Referenced Measurement for Educational Evaluation and Selection. Department of Educational Measurement Umea University Thesis. 2005. 46 p. Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:143588/FULLTEXT01.pdf (date of access: 21.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dann R. Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process [Internet]. London: Routledge Falmer; 2002 [cited 2020 Jul 18]. 176 p. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?id=EGVCe-r-bXwC&amp;hl=ru</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit51"><label>51</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hornby W. Assessing using grade-related criteria: a single currency for universities? // Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2003. Vol. 28 (4). P. 435-454. DOI: 10.1080/0260293032000066254</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wikstrom C. Criterion-referenced measurement for educational evaluation and selection [Internet]. Department of Educational Measurement Umea University Thesis; 2005 [cited 2020 Jul 21]. 46 p. Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:143588/FULLTEXT01.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit52"><label>52</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ling L., Yuen B., Loo W., Prinsloo C. Students’ Conceptions of Bell Curve Grading Fairness in Relation to Goal Orientation and Motivation // International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2020. Vol. 14 (1). DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2020.140107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hornby W. Assessing using grade-related criteria: a single currency for universities? Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2003; 28 (4): 435-454. DOI: 10.1080/0260293032000066254</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit53"><label>53</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Красноборова А. А. Критериальный подход в оценивании учебных достижений учащихся [Электрон. ресурс] // Педагогическое образование и наука. 2009. № 6. С. 91-94. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17062493 (дата обращения: 20.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ling L., Yuen B., Loo W., Prinsloo C. Students’ conceptions of bell curve grading fairness in relation to goal orientation and motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 2020; 14 (1). DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2020.140107</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit54"><label>54</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пинская М. А., Иванов А. В. Формирующий подход: критериальное оценивание в действии [Электрон. ресурс] // Народное образование. 2010. № 5. С. 192-201. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15516810 (дата обращения: 01.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krasnoborova A. A. The criteria assessment in the concentration of students. Pedagog-icheskoye obrazovaniye i nauka = Pedagogical Education and Science [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 Jul 20]; 6: 91-94. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17062493 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit55"><label>55</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абекова Ж. А., Оралбаев А. Б., Ермаханов М. Н., Джакипов А. С. Совершенствование учебного процесса при критериальном оценивании, его главные преимущества и особенности [Электрон. ресурс] // Успехи современного естествознания. 2015. № 1 (2). С. 295-296. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23068809 (дата обращения: 01.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pinskaya M. A., Ivanov A. V. Formative approach: Criteria-based assessment in action Narodnoye obrazovaniye = People’s Education [Internet], 2010 [cited 2020 Jul 20]; 5: 192-201. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=15516810 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit56"><label>56</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липатникова И. Г. Оценивание как диагностическая процедура формирования конечных результатов обучения по математике [Электрон. ресурс] // Педагогическое образование в России. 2016. № 7. С. 177-182. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26638542 (дата обращения: 02.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abekova Zh. A., Oralbaev A. B., Ermahanov M. N., Dzhakipova A. S. Method of forming of educational-cognitive activity student at criterion evaluation knowledge Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya = Advances in Current Natural Sciences [Internet], 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 20]; 1 (2): 295-296. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23068809 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit57"><label>57</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соколова Е. В. Конструирование диагностических заданий в условиях критериального оценивания достижений учащихся в изучении школьного курса геометрии [Электрон. ресурс] // Преподаватель XXI век. 2016. № 4-1. С. 277-287. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27633963 (дата обращения: 02.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lipatnikova I. G. Assessment as a diagnostic procedure of forming the final results of teaching mathematics. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 20]; 7: 177-182. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26638542 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit58"><label>58</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lok B., McNaught C., Young K. Criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments: compatibility and complementarity // Assessment &amp;Evaluation in Higher Education. 2016. Vol. 41 (3). P. 450-465. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1022136</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolova E. V. Construction of diagnostic tasks in the conditions of criteria-based assessment of students’ achievements in the study of school geometry course. Prepodavatel’ XXI vek = Teacher XXI Century [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 20]; 4: 277-287. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27633963 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit59"><label>59</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown G., Bull J., Pendlebury M. Assessing student learning in higher education. London: Routledge, 1997. 317 р. Available from: https://archive.org/details/assessingstu-dent1997brow_kl150 (date of access: 03.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lok B., McNaught C., Young K. Criterion-referenced and norm-referenced assessments: Compatibility and complementarity. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016; 41 (3): 450-465. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1022136</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit60"><label>60</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barrie S., Brew A., McCulloch M. Qualitatively different conceptions of criteria used to assess student learning. Proceedings of the AARE-NZARE Conference. Melbourne. 1999. Available from: https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/1999/bre99209.pdf (date of access: 03.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown G., Bull J., Pendlebury M. Assessing student learning in higher education [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1997 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. 317 p. Available from: https://ar-chive.org/details/assessingstudent1997brow_kl150</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit61"><label>61</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wiliam D. Assessing authentic tasks: alternatives to mark-schemes [Internet]. // Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education. 1994. Vol. 2 (1). P. 48-68. Available from: https://www.dylanwiliam.org/Dylan_Wiliams_website/Papers_files/Nomad.PDF (date of access: 04.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barrie S., Brew A., McCulloch M. Qualitatively different conceptions of criteria used to assess student learning. In: Proceedings of the AARE-NZARE Conference [Internet]; 1999; Melbourne. 1999 [cited 2020 Aug 03]. Available from: https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publica-tions/1999/bre99209.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit62"><label>62</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Green S. Criterion referenced assessment as a guide to learning - the importance of progression and reliability. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Evaluation in Education in Southern Africa International Conference. 10-12 July 2002. Johannesburg. Available from: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/109693-criterion-refer-enced-assessment-as-a-guide-to-learning-the-importance-of-progression-and-reliability.pdf (date of access: 04.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wiliam D. Assessing authentic tasks: Alternatives to mark-schemes. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education [Internet]. 1994 [cited 2020 Aug 04]; 2 (1): 48-68. Available from: https://www.dylanwiliam.org/Dylan_Wiliams_website/Papers_files/Nomad.PDF</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit63"><label>63</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popham W. J. Criterion-referenced Measurement: Half a Century Wasted? // Educational Leadership. 2014. Vol. 71 (6). P. 62-66. Available from: http://www.educationallead-ership-digital.com/educationalleadership/201403?pg=65#pg65 (date of access: 05.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Green S. Criterion referenced assessment as a guide to learning - the importance of progression and reliability. In: Association for the Study of Evaluation in Education in Southern Africa International Conference [Internet]; 2002 July 10-12. Johannesburg; 2002 [cited 2020 Jun 04]. Available from: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/109693-criterion-refer-enced-assessment-as-a-guide-to-learning-the-importance-of-progression-and-reliability.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit64"><label>64</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Григоренко О. В., Рванова А. С., Шмигирилова И. Б. Проблемы внедрения критериального оценивания в школьную практику [Электрон. ресурс] // Сибирский учитель. 2020. № 2 (129). С. 13-19. Режим доступа: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43044448 (дата обращения: 21.07.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popham W. J. Criterion-referenced measurement: Half a century wasted? Educational Leadership [Internet], 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 05]; 71 (6): 62-66. Available from: http://www.educationalleadership-digital.com/educationalleadership/201403?pg=65#pg65</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit65"><label>65</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Linn R. L. Criterion-referenced measurement: a valuable perspective clouded by surplus meaning // Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 1994. Vol. 13 (4). P. 12-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1994.tb00564.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigorenko O. V., Rvanova A. S. Shmigirilova I. B. Problems of introduction of crite-ria-related assessment in school education practice. Sibirskiy uchitel’ = Siberian Teacher [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 27]; 2 (129): 13-19. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43044448 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit66"><label>66</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sadler D. R. The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards // Higher Education. 2014. Vol. 67 (3). P. 273-288. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Linn R. L. Criterion-referenced measurement: A valuable perspective clouded by surplus meaning. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 1994; 13 (4): 12-14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1994.tb00564.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit67"><label>67</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dawson P. Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice // Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2017. Vol. 42 (3). P. 347-360. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sadler D. R. The futility of attempting to codify academic achievement standards. Higher Education. 2014; 67 (3): 273-288. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-013-9649-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit68"><label>68</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision &amp; Curriculum Development, 2005. 370 р. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509029 (date of access: 11.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dawson P. Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2017; 42 (3): 347-360. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit69"><label>69</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Haraway D., Flinders D. Rubrics in Context // Rubric Nation: Critical Inquiries on the Impact of Rubrics in Education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age, 2015. P. 119-134. Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/fse_facbooks/130 (date of access: 11.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wiggins G., McTighe J. Understanding by design [Internet]. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision &amp; Curriculum Development; 2005 [cited 2020 Jun 11]. 370 р. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509029</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit70"><label>70</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chan Z., Ho S. Good and bad practices in rubrics: the perspectives of students and educators // Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 44 (4). P. 533-545. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1522528 (date of access: 11.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Haraway D., Flinders D. Rubrics in context. In: Rubric nation: Critical inquiries on the impact of rubrics in education [Internet]. Charlotte, NC: Information Age; 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 11]. p. 119-134. Available from: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/fse_facbooks/130/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit71"><label>71</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Humphry S. M., Heldsinger S. A Two-Stage Method for Classroom Assessments of Essay Writing // Frontiers in Education. 2019. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jedm.12223 (дата обращения 11.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chan Z., Ho S. Good and bad practices in rubrics: The perspectives of students and educators. Assessment &amp; Evaluation in Higher Education. 2019; 44 (4): 533-545. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1522528</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit72"><label>72</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chadha P., et al. A Rubric Guide for New Academics, Practitioner Research Project Report. TU Dublin. 2019. Available from: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ltcpgdprp/23 (date of access: 11.08.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Humphry S. M., Heldsinger S. A Two-stage method for classroom assessments of essay writing. Frontiers in Education. 2019; DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12223</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit73"><label>73</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jescovitch L. N., Scott E. E., Cerchiara J. A., Doherty J. H., Wenderoth M. Pat, Merrill J. E., Urban-Lurain M., Haudek K. C. Deconstruction of Holistic Rubrics into Analytic Rubrics for Large-Scale Assessments of Students’ Reasoning of Complex Science Concepts // Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2019. Vol. 24, Article 7. Available from: https://https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10166313 (date of access: 13.06.2020). DOI: 10.7275/9h7f-mp76</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chadha P., et al. A rubric guide for new academics, practitioner research project re-portn[Internet]. TU Dublin; 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 11]. Available from: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/ltcpgdprp/23/</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit74"><label>74</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Randel B., Apthorp H., Beesley A. D., Clark T. F., Wang X. Impacts of professional development in classroom assessment on teacher and student outcomes // The Journal of Educational Research. 2016. Vol. 109 (5). P. 491-502. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2014.992581</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jescovitch L. N., Scott E. E., Cerchiara J. A., Doherty J. H., Wenderoth M. Pat, Merrill J. E., Urban-Lurain M., Haudek K. C. Deconstruction of holistic rubrics into analytic rubrics for large-scale assessments of students’ reasoning of complex science concepts. {Tactical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 13]; Vol. 24, Article 7. Available from: https://https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10166313 DOI: 10.7275/9h7f-mp76</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit75"><label>75</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Емельянова И. Н., Теплякова О. А., Ефимова Г. З. Практика использования современных методов оценки на разных ступенях образования // Образование и наука. 2019. № 21 (6). С. 9-28. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-9-28</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Randel B., Apthorp H., Beesley A. D., Clark T. F., Wang X. Impacts of professional development in classroom assessment on teacher and student outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 109 (5): 491-502. DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2014.992581</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit76"><label>76</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Emelyanova I. N., Teplyakova O. A., Efimova G. Z. Modern evaluation methods at various levels of education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 6 (21): 9-28. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-9-28 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Emelyanova I. N., Teplyakova O. A., Efimova G. Z. Modern evaluation methods at various levels of education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 6 (21): 9-28. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-9-28 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
