edscienceОбразование и наукаThe Education and science journal1994-56392310-5828RSVPU10.17853/1994-5639-2025-3-36-53edscience-4190Research ArticleПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕVOCATIONAL EDUCATIONПути повышения качества естественно-научного образования в КазахстанеOn improving the quality of natural science education in Kazakhstanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1350-1248АхметоваБ. С.AkhmetovaB. S.

Ахметова Ботагоз Саликовна – кандидат биологических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Астана

Botagoz S. Akhmetova – Cand. Sci. (Biology), Leading Scientist, Astana

akhmetovabotagoz@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-5516БерикхановаА. Е.BerikkhanovaA. Е.

Берикханова Айман Еженхановна – кандидат педагогических наук, профессор, Алматы

Aiman Е. Berikkhanova – Cand. Sci. (Education), Professor, Almaty

brr.aiman@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7441-7931МухамедхановаА. К.MukhamedkhanovaA. K.

Мухамедханова Алмагуль Кенесхановна – кандидат исторических наук, ассоциированный профессор, главный научный сотрудник, Астана

Almagul K. Mukhamedkhanova – Cand. Sci. (History), Chief Scientific Officer, Astana

almagul_2008@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-0988ЖакияноваЖ. Г.ZhakiyanovaZ. G.

Жакиянова Жанна Гашкеновна – PhD (педагогика), главный научный сотрудник, Астана

Zhanna G. Zhakiyanova – PhD (Education), Chief Scientific Officer, Astana

shanserik@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3465-4734АлиханкызыГ.AlikhankyzyG.

Алиханкызы Гулия – кандидат педагогических наук, главный научный сотрудник, Астана

Guliya Alikhankyzy – Cand. Sci. (Education), Chief Scientific Officer, Almaty

GAlikhankyzy@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6030-7299АрхиматаеваА. Ж.ArkhymatayevaA. Zh.

Архыматаева Айнур Жаксылыковна – PhD (история), заведующая лабораторией социально-гуманитарных наук, Астана

Ainur Zh. Arkhymatayeva – PhD (History), Head of the Laboratory of Social Sciences and Humanities, Astana

a.arhymataeva@uba.edu.kzНациональная академия образования имени Ибрая Алтынсарина Министерства просвещения Республики КазахстанNational Academy of Education named after Ybyrai Altynsarin of the Ministry of Education of the Republic of KazakhstanКазахский национальный педагогический университет имени АбаяAbai Kazakh National Pedagogical UniversityКазахский национальный университет имени Аль-ФарабиAl-Farabi Kazakh National University2025040320252733653Copyright © Ахметова Б.С., Берикханова А.Е., Мухамедханова А.К., Жакиянова Ж.Г., Алиханкызы Г., Архиматаева А.Ж., 20252025Ахметова Б.С., Берикханова А.Е., Мухамедханова А.К., Жакиянова Ж.Г., Алиханкызы Г., Архиматаева А.Ж.Akhmetova B.S., Berikkhanova A.Е., Mukhamedkhanova A.K., Zhakiyanova Z.G., Alikhankyzy G., Arkhymatayeva A.Z.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/4190

Введение. Современные мировые процессы глобализации предъявляют особые требования к технологическому развитию государств, которое базируется на естественно-научном и инженерном образовании. Цель статьи – анализ существующих программ и методик обучения естественным наукам в Казахстане и выработка рекомендаций по внесению изменений в содержание программ естественно-научного обучения для общеобразовательных школ. Методология, методы и методики. На основании системного, проблемного и проектного подходов проведено мониторинговое исследование оценки учителями содержания школьного образования по учебным предметам естественно-научного направления, в том числе анализ международного опыта внедрения STEM-образования в процессы обучения естественным наукам и эффективности влияния обновленной Типовой учебной программы обучения на состояние преподавания блока естественно-научных дисциплин в общеобразовательных школах Республики Казахстан. Результаты. Установлено, что в процессах обучения необходимо усилить внимание к формированию и развитию навыков научного мышления и междисциплинарную интеграцию. Подтверждено, что практико-ориентированное обучение помогает понять, как развиваются научные знания, сформировать понимание сквозных концепций и дисциплинарных идей науки и техники. Практическая значимость. Разработан ряд рекомендаций по внесению изменений в содержание программ по учебным предметам естественно-научного цикла в Республике Казахстан.

Introduction. Modern world globalisation process requires special technological development of states, which is based on natural science and engineering education. The aim of this article is to analyse existing programmes and methods of teaching natural science in Kazakhstan and to develop recommendations for making changes to the content of natural science education programmes in secondary schools. Methodology and research methods. A monitoring study was conducted on teachers’ assessment of the content of school education in natural science subjects, utilising system-based, problem-based, and project-based approaches. This study included an analysis of international experiences in implementing STEM education within the teaching processes of natural sciences, as well as an evaluation of the effectiveness of the updated Model Curriculum for natural science education in general education schools in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Results. It was found that in the learning process, it is essential to enhance attention to the formation and development of scientific thinking skills and interdisciplinary integration. The findings confirm that practice-oriented training facilitates an understanding of how scientific knowledge evolves and helps to cultivate an appreciation for cross-cutting concepts and disciplinary ideas within science and technology. Practical significance. A series of recommendations has been formulated to enhance the curriculum of academic programmes in the natural sciences in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

школьное образованиеестественно-научная подготовкаестественно-научное образованиематематикаматематическое образованиешкольная наукашкольная математикаSTEMschool educationnatural science trainingnatural science educationmathematicsmath educationschool scienceschool mathematicsSTEMReferencesOECD. Measuring Student Knowledge & Skills: A New Framework for Assessment. Paris: OECD Publications; 1999. 81 p. doi:10.1787/9789264173125-enOECD. Measuring Student Knowledge & Skills: A New Framework for Assessment. Paris: OECD Publications; 1999. 81 p. doi:10.1787/9789264173125-enErduran S., Wong S.L. Science curriculum reform on ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ across national contexts: case studies of curricula from England & Wales and Hong Kong. In: Mansour N., Wegerif R., eds. Science Education for Diversity: Theory and Practice, Cultural Studies of Science Education. Vol. 8. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013:179–201. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_9Erduran S., Wong S.L. Science curriculum reform on ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ across national con texts: case studies of curricula from England & Wales and Hong Kong. In: Mansour N., Wegerif R., eds. Science Education for Diversity: Theory and Practice, Cultural Studies of Science Education. Vol. 8. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013:179–201. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_9OECD. Long-term trends in performance and equity in education. In: PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:10.1787/c031cfc4-enOECD. Long-term trends in performance and equity in education. In: PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:10.1787/c031cfc4-enOECD. Changes in performance and equity in education between 2018 and 2022. In: PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:10.1787/da799b6c-enOECD. Changes in performance and equity in education between 2018 and 2022. In: PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2023. doi:10.1787/da799b6c-enНациональный отчет «Результаты Казахстана в PISA-2022». Астана: Министерство просвещения Республики Казахстан, АО «Национальный центр исследований и оценки образования «Талдау» им. А. Байтұрсынұлы»; 2024. 169 с.Nacional’nyj otchet “Rezul’taty Kazahstana v PISA-2022” = National Report “Kazakhstan’s Results in PISA-2022”. Astana: Ministry of Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan, A. Baitursynuly National Centre for Education Research and Assessment “Taldau” JSC; 2024. 169 p. (In Russ.)Аналитический отчет «Результаты Казахстана в международных исследованиях качества образования: исследование причин отставания». Под ред. С.А. Ирсалиева. Центр анализа и стратегии «Белес»; 2020. 308 с.Analiticheskij otchet “Rezul’taty Kazahstana v mezhdunarodnyh issledovanijah kachestva obrazovanija: issledovanie prichin otstavanija” = Analytical report “Kazakhstan’s Results in International Studies of the Quality of Education: A Study of the Reasons for Lagging Behind”. Ed. by Irsaliev S.A. BELES Centre for Analysis and Strategy; 2020. 308 p. (In Russ.)NSES National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 1996. 272 p. doi:10.17226/4962NSES National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 1996. 272 p. doi:10.17226/4962NGSS National Research Council. Next Generation Science Standards: Forstates, by States. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2013. 532 p. doi:10.17226/18290NGSS National Research Council. Next Generation Science Standards: Forstates, by States. Washington D.C: National Academies Press; 2013. 532 p. doi:10.17226/18290Shapiro L.J., Kraus R.V. Rhode Island College The NGSS and the Historical Direction of Science Education Reform. Science Educator. 2022;28(2):63–74.Shapiro L.J., Kraus R.V. Rhode Island College The NGSS and the Historical Direction of Science Education Reform. Science Educator. 2022;28(2):63–74.Zhang H., Wan D. Status of Chinese Science Education Reforms: Policies and Development Frame-work. In: Liang L., Liu X., Fulmer G., eds. Chinese Science Education in the 21st Century: Policy, Practice, and Research, Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. Vol. 45. Dordrecht: Springer; 2017. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9864-8_1Zhang H., Wan D. Status of Chinese Science Education Reforms: Policies and Development Frame work. In: Liang L., Liu X., Fulmer G., eds. Chinese Science Education in the 21st Century: Policy, Prac tice, and Research, Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education. Vol. 45. Dordrecht: Spring er; 2017. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9864-8_1Pietrocola M., Gurgel I., Gurgel Ivã, eds. Crossing the Border of the Traditional Science Curriculum: Innovative Teaching and Learning in Basic Science Education. Sense Publishers; 2017. 256 p.Pietrocola M., Gurgel I., Gurgel Ivã, eds. Crossing the Border of the Traditional Science Curriculum: Innovative Teaching and Learning in Basic Science Education. Sense Publishers; 2017. 256 p.Thomas G.P. What is and what will be science learning (theory) in science education reform and practice? Stories and reflections. In: Jagodzinski J., ed. The Precarious Future of Education, Education, Psychoanalysis, and Social Transformation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017:139–158. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-48691-2_6Thomas G.P. What is and what will be science learning (theory) in science education reform and practice? Stories and reflections. In: Jagodzinski J., ed. The Precarious Future of Education, Edu cation, Psychoanalysis, and Social Transformation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2017:139–158. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-48691-2_6Nelson G., Landel C. A collaborative approach for elementary science. Educational Leadership. 2007;64(4):72–75.Nelson G., Landel C. A collaborative approach for elementary science. Educational Leadership. 2007;64(4):72–75.Levy A.J., Pasquale M.M., Marco L. Models of providing science instruction in the elementary grades: a research agenda to inform decision makers. Science Educator. 2008;17(2):1–18.Levy A.J., Pasquale M.M., Marco L. Models of providing science instruction in the elementary grades: a research agenda to inform decision makers. Science Educator. 2008;17(2):1–18.Jones M.G., Edmunds J. Models of elementary science instruction: roles of science specialists. In: Appleton K., ed. Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum in association with AETS; 2006:317– 343.Jones M.G., Edmunds J. Models of elementary science instruction: roles of science specialists. In: Appleton K., ed. Elementary Science Teacher Education: International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum in association with AETS; 2006:317– 343.Kácovský P., Jedličková T., Kuba R., Snětinová M., Surynková P., Vrhel M., et al. Lower secondary intended curricula of science subjects and mathematics: a comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland and Slovenia. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2022;54(3):384–405.Kácovský P., Jedličková T., Kuba R., Snětinová M., Surynková P., Vrhel M., et al. Lower secondary in tended curricula of science subjects and mathematics: a comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland and Slovenia. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2022;54(3):384–405.Grajkowski W., Ostrowska B., Poziomek U. Core Curriculum for Science Subjects in Selected Countries – Study Report. Educational Research Institute; 2014. Accessed May 25, 2024. http://eduentuzjasci.pl/en/publications/1147-core-curriculum-for-sciencesubjects-in-selected-countries-study-repGrajkowski W., Ostrowska B., Poziomek U. Core Curriculum for Science Subjects in Selected Countries – Study Report. Educational Research Institute; 2014. Accessed May 25, 2024. http://eduentuzjasci.pl/en/publications/1147-core-curriculum-for-sciencesubjects-in-selected-countries-study-repNational Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington D. C: The National Academies Press; 2011. 400 p. doi:10.17226/13165National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington D. C: The National Academies Press; 2011. 400 p. doi:10.17226/13165Рудской А.И., Боровков А.И., Романов П.И., Киселева К.Н. Анализ опыта США и Великобритании в развитии STEM-образования. Научно-технические ведомости СПбПУ. Естественные и инженерные науки. 2017;23(2):7–16. doi:10.18721/JEST.230201Rudskoy A.I., Borovkov A.I., Romanov P.I., Kiseleva K.N. Analysis of the experience of the USA and Great Britain in the development of STEM-education. Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti SPbPU. Es testvennye i inzhenernye nauki = Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University Journal of Engi neerings Sciences and Technology. 2017;23(2):7–16. (In Russ.) doi:10.18721/JEST.230201Газдиева Б.А., Тавлуй М.В., Фаткиева Г.Т., Сагындыкова Ж.О. Развитие предпринимательского и STEAM-обучения в контексте обновления содержания образования. Вестник КГУ им. Ш. Уалиханова. Серия филологическая. 2018;1(2):287–292.Gazdieva B.A., Tavlui M.V., Fatkieva G.T., Sagyndykova J.O. Development of entrepreneurial and STEAM-learning in the context of updating the content of education. Vestnik KGU im. Sh. Ualihan ova. Serija filologicheskaja = Bulletin of the Kokshetau University Sh. Ualikhanov. Philological Series. 2018;1(2):287–292. (In Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.