edscienceОбразование и наукаThe Education and science journal1994-56392310-5828RSVPU10.17853/1994-5639-2026-6-61-78edscience-5164Research ArticleОБЩИЕ ВОПРОСЫ ОБРАЗОВАНИЯGENERAL EDUCATIONФилантропическая модель распространения научных знаний: историко-этический анализ (1982–2024 гг.)The philanthropic model of scientific knowledge dissemination: a historical and ethical analysis (1982–2024)https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4868-1664Кесада КастроГ. А.Quezada CastroG. A.

Кесада Кастро Гильермо Александр – преподаватель юридического факультета  

Лима

Guillermo Alexander Quezada Castro – Lecturer, Faculty of Law

Lima

c21331@utp.edu.pehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1012-570XКесада КастроМ. д. П.Quezada CastroM. d. P.

Кесада Кастро Мария дель Пилар – преподаватель юридического факультета

Лима

María del Pilar Quezada Castro – Lecturer, Faculty of Law

Lima

c20853@utp.edu.pehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6661-9928Кастро АрельяноМ. д. П.Castro ArellanoM. d. P.

Кастро Арельяно Мария дель Пилар – преподаватель юридического факультета

Лима

María del Pilar Castro Arellano – Lecturer, Faculty of Law

Lima

maripili_1728_19@hotmail.comКесада КастроХ. Э.Quezada CastroJ. E.

Кесада Кастро Хесус Энрике – студент магистратуры (государственное управление)

Арекипа

Jesús Enrique Quezada Castro – Master’s Student (Public Management)

Arequipa

jesus.quezada@estudiante.ucsm.edu.pehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-1637Бартурен МондрагонЭ. М.Barturen MondragónE. M.

Бартурен Мондрагон Элиана Марица – преподаватель юридического факультета

Чиклайо

Eliana Maritza Barturen Mondragón – Lecturer, Faculty of Law

Chiclayo

barturenm9@gmail.comТехнологический университет ПеруUniversidad Tecnológica del PerúУниверситет Алас ПеруаносUniversidad Alas PeruanasКатолический университет Санта-МарияUniversidad Católica de Santa MaríaУниверситет Сеньор де СипанUniversidad Señor de Sipán2026060620262866178Copyright © Кесада Кастро Г.А., Кесада Кастро М., Кастро Арельяно М., Кесада Кастро Х.Э., Бартурен Мондрагон Э.М., 20262026Кесада Кастро Г.А., Кесада Кастро М., Кастро Арельяно М., Кесада Кастро Х.Э., Бартурен Мондрагон Э.М.Quezada Castro G.A., Quezada Castro M., Castro Arellano M., Quezada Castro J.E., Barturen Mondragón E.M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/5164

Введение. Принцип благотворительности – один из фундаментальных столпов биоэтики, обеспечивающий защиту достоинства участников в ходе научных исследований. Цель исследования – проанализировать пул научных работ, связанных с принципом благотворительности в распространении научных знаний, и выявить ключевые научные издания, авторов, публикации, термины и общие характеристики подобных работ. Методология, методы и методики. Проведен библиометрический анализ статей, проиндексированных в базе данных Scopus, в соответствии с рекомендациями PRISMA. Был проанализирован 581 документ с использованием интерфейса Biblioshiny. Результаты и научная новизна. Результаты исследования демонстрируют рост числа публикаций, связывающих принцип благотворительности с медицинской этикой, автономией, информированным согласием, распределительной справедливостью и паллиативной помощью. Наиболее значимыми журналами стали Journal of Medical Ethics, AMA Journal of Ethics и Nursing Ethics, все они входят в первый квартиль Scopus. Самым цитируемым документом (420 цитирований) оказалась статья «Beyond „Do No Harm“: The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research». Тематическая эволюция показала интеграцию принципа благотворительности с вопросами научного образования и биоэтической подготовки. Практическая значимость. Результаты подчеркивают важность укрепления научного и биоэтического образования, что может быть полезно для профессиональной деятельности и подготовки будущих исследователей.

Introduction. The principle of beneficence is one of the fundamental pillars of bioethics, ensuring the protection of the dignity of participants in scientific research. Its significance extends to medical practice, technology, and professional ethics. Aim. This study aims to analyse the body of scholarly work relating to the principle of beneficence in the dissemination of scientific knowledge, and to identify key academic journals, authors, publications, terminology, and general characteristics of such works. Methodology and research methods. A bibliometric analysis was conducted on articles indexed in the Scopus database, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A total of 581 documents were analysed using the Biblioshiny interface. Results and scientific novelty. The findings of the study demonstrate an increase in the number of publications linking the principle of beneficence to medical ethics, autonomy, informed consent, distributive justice, and palliative care. The most prominent journals identified were the “Journal of Medical Ethics”, the “AMA Journal of Ethics”, and “Nursing Ethics”, all of which are ranked in the first quartile in Scopus.The most cited document (420 citations) was the article “Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research”. Thematic evolution revealed the integration of the principle of beneficence with issues relating to scientific education and bioethical training. Practical significance. The results highlight the importance of enhancing scientific and bioethical education, which could be beneficial for professional practice and the training of future researchers.

благотворительностькачествообразованиеэтиканаучное исследованиеbeneficencequalityeducationethicsscientific researchReferencesChinn C.A., Malhotra B.A. Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a gtheoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education. 2002;86(2):175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001Chinn C.A., Malhotra B.A. Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a gtheoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education. 2002;86(2):175–218. doi:10.1002/sce.10001Squire K.D., Jan M. Mad city mystery: developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2007;16(1):5–29. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9037-zSquire K.D., Jan M. Mad city mystery: developing scientific argumentation skills with a place-based augmented reality game on handheld computers. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2007;16(1):5–29. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-9037-zWeil C., Larraín M., Galaz C., Solís K., Concha L. Scientific education as a support of social mobility.Estudios Pedagógicos. 2009;35(1):63–78. doi:10.4067/S0718-07052009000100004Weil C., Larraín M., Galaz C., Solís K., Concha L. Scientific education as a support of social mobility.Estudios Pedagógicos. 2009;35(1):63–78. doi:10.4067/S0718-07052009000100004Driver R., Asoko H., Leach J., Scott P., Mortimer E. Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher. 1994;23(7):5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X023007005Driver R., Asoko H., Leach J., Scott P., Mortimer E. Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher. 1994;23(7):5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X023007005Hodson D. Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education. 2003;25(6):645–670. doi:10.1080/09500690305021Hodson D. Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education. 2003;25(6):645–670. doi:10.1080/09500690305021Berland L., McNeill K. A learning progression for scientific argumentation: understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education. 2010;94(5):765–793. doi:10.1002/sce.20402Berland L., McNeill K. A learning progression for scientific argumentation: understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education. 2010;94(5):765–793. doi:10.1002/sce.20402Mackenzie C., McDowell C., Pittaway E. Beyond “Do No Harm”: the challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies. 2007;20(2):299–319. doi:10.1093/jrs/fem008Mackenzie C., McDowell C., Pittaway E. Beyond “Do No Harm”: the challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies. 2007;20(2):299–319. doi:10.1093/jrs/fem008Ravitsky V., Wilfond B. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2007;6(6):8–17. doi:10.1080/15265160600934772Ravitsky V., Wilfond B. Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2007;6(6):8–17. doi:10.1080/15265160600934772Thomasma D. Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1983;98(2):243–248. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-98-2-243Thomasma D. Beyond medical paternalism and patient autonomy: a model of physician conscience for the physician-patient relationship. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1983;98(2):243–248. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-98-2-243Sacristan J.A., Aguaron A., Avendaño C., Garrido P., Carrion J., Gutierrez A., et al. Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2016;10:631–640.doi:10.2147/PPA.S104259Sacristan J.A., Aguaron A., Avendaño C., Garrido P., Carrion J., Gutierrez A., et al. Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2016;10:631–640.doi:10.2147/PPA.S104259Miller R. Globalizing justice: the ethics of poverty and power. Oxford Academic. 2010. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581986.001.0001Miller R. Globalizing justice: the ethics of poverty and power. Oxford Academic. 2010. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199581986.001.0001Jones G., Whitaker M. Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clinical Anatomy. 2012;25(2):246–254. doi:10.1002/ca.21223Jones G., Whitaker M. Anatomy’s use of unclaimed bodies: reasons against continued dependence on an ethically dubious practice. Clinical Anatomy. 2012;25(2):246–254. doi:10.1002/ca.21223Alcântara F. Perception of physiotherapists on bioethical aspects in palliative care. Revista Bioética. 2021;29(1):107–114. doi:10.1590/1983-80422021291451Alcântara F. Perception of physiotherapists on bioethical aspects in palliative care. Revista Bioética. 2021;29(1):107–114. doi:10.1590/1983-80422021291451Jones K.A., Semple M. Ethics in clinical trials. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. 2017;18:586–589. doi:10.1016/j.mpaic.2017.07.005Jones K.A., Semple M. Ethics in clinical trials. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine. 2017;18:586–589. doi:10.1016/j.mpaic.2017.07.005Beil M., Proft I., Van Heerden D., Sviri S., Van Heerde P. Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. 2019;7(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6Beil M., Proft I., Van Heerden D., Sviri S., Van Heerde P. Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care. Intensive Care Medicine Experimental. 2019;7(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6Padala P.R., Jendro A.M., Padala K.P. Conducting clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic: investigator and participant perspectives. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2020;6(2):1–4. doi:10.2196/18887Padala P.R., Jendro A.M., Padala K.P. Conducting clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic: investigator and participant perspectives. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance. 2020;6(2):1–4. doi:10.2196/18887Gauthier S., Leuzy A., Racine E., Rosa-Neto P. Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease: past, present and future ethical issues. Progress in Neurobiology. 2013;110:102–113. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.01.003Gauthier S., Leuzy A., Racine E., Rosa-Neto P. Diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease: past, present and future ethical issues. Progress in Neurobiology. 2013;110:102–113. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.01.003Caro-Romero H.D. Heritable genome editing: an exploratory study from the bioethical principle of beneficence. Revista Colombiana de Bioética. 2020;15(1):1–17. doi:10.18270/rcb.v15i1.2732Caro-Romero H.D. Heritable genome editing: an exploratory study from the bioethical principle of beneficence. Revista Colombiana de Bioética. 2020;15(1):1–17. doi:10.18270/rcb.v15i1.2732Jansen L.A. Medical beneficence, nonmaleficence, and patients’ well-being. The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2022;33(1):23–28.Jansen L.A. Medical beneficence, nonmaleficence, and patients’ well-being. The Journal of Clinical Ethics. 2022;33(1):23–28.Tucak I., Vinković M. Arguments for and against the introduction of compulsory vaccination for health care workers. InterEULawEast. 2022;9(1):1–32. doi:10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.1Tucak I., Vinković M. Arguments for and against the introduction of compulsory vaccination for health care workers. InterEULawEast. 2022;9(1):1–32. doi:10.22598/iele.2022.9.1.1Felthous A.R. The medical ethics of hospitalizing inmates with severe mental illness. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health. 2016;2(1):127–134. doi:10.1016/j.jemep.2016.01.009Felthous A.R. The medical ethics of hospitalizing inmates with severe mental illness. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health. 2016;2(1):127–134. doi:10.1016/j.jemep.2016.01.009Niveau G., Welle I. Forensic psychiatry, one subspecialty with two ethics? A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics. 2018;19:1–10. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0266-5Niveau G., Welle I. Forensic psychiatry, one subspecialty with two ethics? A systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics. 2018;19:1–10. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0266-5Louw J.M., Marcus T.S., Hugo J.F.M. Patientor person-centred practice in medicine? A review of concepts. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine. 2017;9(1):1–7. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1455Louw J.M., Marcus T.S., Hugo J.F.M. Patientor person-centred practice in medicine? A review of concepts. African Journal of Primary Health Care and Family Medicine. 2017;9(1):1–7. doi:10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1455Acuña A.M.A., Moreno J.C.R., Neira J., Ribero O.F. Ethical principles and dilemmas in the discourse of healthcare practitioners involved with end-of-life care based on the advanced directives document. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2023;51(1):1–11. doi:10.5554/22562087.e1046Acuña A.M.A., Moreno J.C.R., Neira J., Ribero O.F. Ethical principles and dilemmas in the discourse of healthcare practitioners involved with end-of-life care based on the advanced directives document. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2023;51(1):1–11. doi:10.5554/22562087.e1046Kayser J.B., Mooney-Doyle K., Lanken P.N. Definitions and policy. ERS Monograph. 2016;1–20. doi:10.1183/2312508X.10008216Kayser J.B., Mooney-Doyle K., Lanken P.N. Definitions and policy. ERS Monograph. 2016;1–20. doi:10.1183/2312508X.10008216Fadda M., Fiordelli M., Amati R., Falvo I., Ibnidris A., Hurst S., et al. Returning individual-specific results of a dementia prevalence study: insights from prospective participants living in Switzerland. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021;36:207–214. doi:10.1002/gps.5416Fadda M., Fiordelli M., Amati R., Falvo I., Ibnidris A., Hurst S., et al. Returning individual-specific results of a dementia prevalence study: insights from prospective participants living in Switzerland. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2021;36:207–214. doi:10.1002/gps.5416Hirsch A. Well-being – more than health? Ethik in der Medizin. 2021;33(1):71–88. doi:10.1007/s00481-021-00608-3Hirsch A. Well-being – more than health? Ethik in der Medizin. 2021;33(1):71–88. doi:10.1007/s00481-021-00608-3Robertson D.W. Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1996;22(5):292–299. doi:10.1136/jme.22.5.292Robertson D.W. Ethical theory, ethnography, and differences between doctors and nurses in approaches to patient care. Journal of Medical Ethics. 1996;22(5):292–299. doi:10.1136/jme.22.5.292Raus K., Mortier E., Eeckloo K. The patient perspective in health care networks. BMC Medical Ethics. 2018;19:1–8. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0298-xRaus K., Mortier E., Eeckloo K. The patient perspective in health care networks. BMC Medical Ethics. 2018;19:1–8. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0298-xSchultz B.N., Tolchin B., Kraschel K.L. The “rules of the road”: ethics, firearms, and the physician’s “lane”. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2020;48(4_suppl):142–145. doi:10.1177/1073110520979415Schultz B.N., Tolchin B., Kraschel K.L. The “rules of the road”: ethics, firearms, and the physician’s “lane”. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2020;48(4_suppl):142–145. doi:10.1177/1073110520979415McCullough L.B., Coverdale J., Chervenak F.A. Teaching professional formation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic Medicine. 2020;95:1488–1491. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003434McCullough L.B., Coverdale J., Chervenak F.A. Teaching professional formation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic Medicine. 2020;95:1488–1491. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003434Reisman E.C. Ethical issues confronting nurses. Nursing Clinics of North America. 1988;23(4):789– 802.Reisman E.C. Ethical issues confronting nurses. Nursing Clinics of North America. 1988;23(4):789– 802.Macklin R. Applying the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2003;29:275–280.Macklin R. Applying the four principles. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2003;29:275–280.Chervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Skupski D., Chasen S.T. Ethical issues in the management of pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2003;58(7):473–483. doi:10.1097/01.OGX.0000071485.75220.AEChervenak F.A., McCullough L.B., Skupski D., Chasen S.T. Ethical issues in the management of pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2003;58(7):473–483. doi:10.1097/01.OGX.0000071485.75220.AERosner F. Ethical dilemmas for physicians in time of war. Israel Medical Association Journal. 2010;12(3):133–135.Rosner F. Ethical dilemmas for physicians in time of war. Israel Medical Association Journal. 2010;12(3):133–135.Bates R. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2004;(27)3:341–347. doi:10.1016/j.evalprog-plan.2004.04.011Bates R. A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Evaluation and Program Planning. 2004;(27)3:341–347. doi:10.1016/j.evalprog-plan.2004.04.011Solimini R., Busardò F.P., Gibelli F, Sirignano A., Ricci G. Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;30;57(12):1314. doi:10.3390/medicina57121314Solimini R., Busardò F.P., Gibelli F, Sirignano A., Ricci G. Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;30;57(12):1314. doi:10.3390/medicina57121314Bouquet F. Ethical evaluation of biomedical research. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 1998;34(2):197–201.Bouquet F. Ethical evaluation of biomedical research. Annali dell’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. 1998;34(2):197–201.Nnate D.A. Treatment withdrawal of the patient at end of life: an analysis of values, ethics and guidelines in palliative care. Nursing Open. 2021;8(3):1023–1029. doi:10.1002/nop2.777Nnate D.A. Treatment withdrawal of the patient at end of life: an analysis of values, ethics and guidelines in palliative care. Nursing Open. 2021;8(3):1023–1029. doi:10.1002/nop2.777Bourret R., Vialla F., Martinez E. The principle of autonomy in the opinions of the National Consultative Ethics Committee: what are the limits? Médecine & Droit. 2015;133:90–98. doi:10.1016/j.meddro.2015.01.002Bourret R., Vialla F., Martinez E. The principle of autonomy in the opinions of the National Consultative Ethics Committee: what are the limits? Médecine & Droit. 2015;133:90–98. doi:10.1016/j.meddro.2015.01.002Ezeome I.V. Gamete donation – a review of ethical and legal issues. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2022;26(3):1–10. doi:10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i3.14Ezeome I.V. Gamete donation – a review of ethical and legal issues. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2022;26(3):1–10. doi:10.29063/ajrh2022/v26i3.14Akard T.F., Gilmer M.J., Hendricks-Ferguson V.L. Ethical considerations in oncology and palliative care research during COVID-19. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nursing. 2022;39(3):178–184. doi:10.1177/27527530221073298Akard T.F., Gilmer M.J., Hendricks-Ferguson V.L. Ethical considerations in oncology and palliative care research during COVID-19. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nursing. 2022;39(3):178–184. doi:10.1177/27527530221073298Keown J. The logical link between voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Cambridge Law Journal. 2022;81(1):84–108. doi:10.1017/S0008197321001057Keown J. The logical link between voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Cambridge Law Journal. 2022;81(1):84–108. doi:10.1017/S0008197321001057Murphy M. Exploring the ethics of a nurses’ strike during a pandemic. American Journal of Nursing. 2022;122(3):49–54. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000823000.39601.b1Murphy M. Exploring the ethics of a nurses’ strike during a pandemic. American Journal of Nursing. 2022;122(3):49–54. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000823000.39601.b1Sabin J.E., Cocoros N.M., Garcia C., Goldsack J.C., Haynes K., Lin N.D., et al. Bystander ethics and Good Samaritanism: a paradox for learning health organizations. Hastings Center Report. 2019;49:18–26. doi:10.1002/hast.1031Sabin J.E., Cocoros N.M., Garcia C., Goldsack J.C., Haynes K., Lin N.D., et al. Bystander ethics and Good Samaritanism: a paradox for learning health organizations. Hastings Center Report. 2019;49:18–26. doi:10.1002/hast.1031

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.