<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">edscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Education and science journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1994-5639</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2310-5828</issn><publisher><publisher-name>RSVPU</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17853/1994-5639-2016-8-66-85</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">edscience-702</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПСИХОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>СУБЪЕКТИВНЫЕ КРИТЕРИИ КОНТРОЛЯ СОБСТВЕННОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ РОССИЙСКИХ И СЛОВЕНСКИХ РУКОВОДИТЕЛЕЙ: СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОЙ КОМПЕТЕНЦИИ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>SUBJECTIVE CRITERIA OF SELF-ACTIVITY CONTROL OF THE RUSSIAN AND SLOVENIAN MANAGERS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Боштянчич</surname><given-names>Е.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Boštjančič</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"/><email xlink:type="simple">eva.bostjancic@ff.uni-lj.si</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Исмагилова</surname><given-names>Ф. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Ismagilova</surname><given-names>F. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"/><email xlink:type="simple">f.s.ismagilova@urfu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Миролюбова</surname><given-names>Г. С.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Miroljubova</surname><given-names>G. S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"/><email xlink:type="simple">gmirolyubova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Янша</surname><given-names>Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Jansha</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"/><bio xml:lang="en"/><email xlink:type="simple">nina.janza@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Университет Любляны</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ljubljana University</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Уральский федеральный университета им. Б. Н. Ельцина</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>85</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Боштянчич Е., Исмагилова Ф.С., Миролюбова Г.С., Янша Н., 2016</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Боштянчич Е., Исмагилова Ф.С., Миролюбова Г.С., Янша Н.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Boštjančič E., Ismagilova F.S., Miroljubova G.S., Jansha N.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/702">https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/702</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. В статье представлены результаты первого этапа российско-словенского кросс-культурного исследования, целью которого является выявление ключевых факторов, оказывающих влияние на выбор российскими и словенскими руководителями критериев контроля управленческой деятельности.</p></sec><sec><title> Методика исследования</title><p> Методика исследования. Сбор эмпирической информации производился на основе опросника «Субъективные критерии контроля эффективности деятельности» («СКК») Г. Миролюбовой, Ф. Исмагиловой. Для обработки результатов исследования использовались корреляционный анализ с применением непараметрических критериев (тау-b Кендалла и ро Спирмена), Mann – Whitney U-test и метод описательной статистики. Расчет данных осуществлялся с помощью программного пакета SPSS Statistics 17,0. Результаты. Исследование, часть которого изложена в публикации, носит сравнительный характер и включает три этапа. На первом изучалось различие позиций руководящих работников России и Словении относительно самоконтроля управленческой деятельности. В российской части исследования к участию были привлечены слушатели и выпускники Президентской программы подготовки управленческих кадров, которая осуществляется на базе Бизнес-школы Уральского государственного федерального университета им. Б. Н. Ельцина (Екатеринбург). Исследование показало, что в структуре субъективных критериев контроля у менеджеров примерно в равном соотношении представлены обе группы как измеряемых, так и слабоизмеряемых параметров. Достоверные различия выявлены между средними значениями измеряемых критериев всех видов (натуральных, бинарных критериев соотношения и соответствия) в российской (56,11) и словенской (60,39) выборках.</p></sec><sec><title>Научная новизна</title><p>Научная новизна. Контроль деятельности – способность человека влиять на процесс и результат собственной работы – чрезвычайно важный аспект профессиональной компетенции ведущих специалистов и управленцев, который следует учитывать в программах их профессиональной подготовки и который, к сожалению, пока слабо представлен в содержании обучения российских менеджеров. Исследование подтвердило и расширило теоретические положения о национальных культурных различиях в управленческих практиках оценки эффективности своей работы.</p></sec><sec><title>Практическая значимость</title><p>Практическая значимость. Предложенная диагностическая модель, подтвердившая свою практическую состоятельность, и разработанный на ее основе опросник могут рассматриваться как рабочие инструменты для мониторинга содержания деятельности и измерения показателей ее контроля у руководителей различных организаций. Результаты диагностики, в свою очередь, могут служить материалом для коррекции образовательных программ по подготовке менеджеров в вузах и содержания курсов повышения квалификации.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. The results of the first stage of the Russian-Slovenian crosscultural research are provided in the present article; the purpose is identification of the key factors that have an impact on the choice of control criteria of a management activity by the Russian and Slovenian leaders.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Methods. Empirical information acquisition was made on the basis of the questionnaire «Subjective criteria of monitoring of activities performance» by G. Miroljubova and F. Ismagilova. The correlation analysis using nonparametric criteria (Kendall’s tau-b and Spearman’s rho), Mann – Whitney U-test and a method of descriptive statistics were used to process the received results of the research. Calculation of data was performed by means of a software package SPSS Statistics 17,0.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The research unit which is stated in the publication has comparative character and includes three stages. The difference of managers’ positions in Russia and Slovenia concerning self-checking of managerial activities was studied at the first stage. When researching the Russian managerial activity, listeners and graduates of the Presidential program of preparation of a managerial personnel provided by the Business School of the Ural State Federal University named after B. N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg) were engaged. The research has showed that both groups of measurable and weakly-measurable parameters are equally presented in the structure of subjective control criteria among managers. The significant differences are revealed between average values of the measured criteria of all types (natural, binary, criteria of a ratio and fitting) in the Russian (56,11) and Slovenian (60,39) samples. Scientific novelty. Activities control is a capability of a person to influence on the process and result of own work that is an extremely important aspect of professional competence of leading experts and managers. This aspect should be considered in programs of managerial professional training; unfortunately, it is poorly considered when training the Russian managers. The research confirmed and expanded theoretical theses on national cultural differences in managerial processes of work evaluation efficiency.</p></sec><sec><title>Practical significance</title><p>Practical significance. The proposed diagnostic model which has confirmed its practical consistency, and the questionnaire developed on its basis can be considered as working tools for monitoring of the content of activity and measurement of indicators of its control among managers of various organizations. The results of diagnostics can serve as the material for correction of educational programs for training of managers in higher educational institutions, and the academic content of further vocational training courses.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>контроль деятельности</kwd><kwd>измеримые и слабоизмеримые субъективные критерии контроля</kwd><kwd>эффективность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>activities control</kwd><kwd>measurable and weakly-measurable subjective criteria of control</kwd><kwd>efficiency</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Друкер Питер Ф. Эффективный руководитель. Москва: И. Д. Вильямс. 2011. 105 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Druker Piter F. Jeffektivnyj rukovoditel’. [Effective leader]. Moscow: Publishing House OOO «I. D. Vil’jams». 2011. 105 p. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Исмагилова Ф. С., Миролюбова Г. С. Психологическое исследование проблемы критериального обеспечения профессиональной деятельности руководителей // Известия Уральского государственного университета. 2012. № 2 (103). С. 100–108.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ismagilova F. S., Miroljubova G. S. Psychological research of a problem of criteria ensuring professional activity of managers. Izvestija Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. [Ural State University Journal]. 2012. № 2 (103). P. 100–108. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Климов Е. А. Введение в психологию труда. Москва: Культура и спорт; ЮНИТИ, 1998.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Klimov E. A. Vvedenie v psihologiju truda. [Introduction into work psychology]. Moscow: Publishing House Kul’tura i sport. [Culture and Sport]: JuNITI, 1998. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малышева Л. А. Контроллинг организационных изменений: как не утонуть в море популярных концепций: учебное пособие. Екатеринбург: УГТУ – УПИ, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malysheva L. A. Kontrolling organizacionnyh izmenenij: kak ne utonut’ v more populjarnyh koncepcij. [Controlling of organizational changes: How not to drown in the sea of popular concepts]. Ekaterinburg: Ural’skij gosudarstvennyj tehnicheskij universitet. [Ural State Technical University]. 2010. (In Russian)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Benjamin A. J., Riggio R. E., Mayes B. T. Reliability and factor structure of Budner’s Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale // Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1996. V. 11. № 3. Р. 625–632.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Benjamin A. J., Riggio R. E., Mayes B. T. Reliability and factor structure of Budner’s Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 1996. V. 11, № 3. Р. 625–632. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cameron Kim S. and Whetten, David A. Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. N. Y.: Academic Press. 1983. 451 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cameron Kim S. and Whetten, David A. Organizational effectiveness: a comparison of multiple models. N. Y.: Academic Press. 1983. 451 p. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">England G. W., Dhingra О. P., Agarwal N. С. The Manager and the Man: A Cross-Cultural Study of Personal Values. Kent, OH: Kent University Press, 1974. 234 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">England G. W., Dhingra О. P., Agarwal N. С. The Manager and the man: a cross-cultural study of personal values. Kent, OH: Kent University Press, 1974. 234 р. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gallie D. Production Regimes, Employee Job Control and Skill Development. Duncan Gallie LLAKES Research Paper 31. 2011. Available at: http://www.llakes.org.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gallie D. Production regimes, employee job control and skill development. Duncan Gallie LLAKES Research Paper 31. 2011. Available at: http://www.llakes.org. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ismagilova F., Mirolyubova G. Russian Manager’s Criteria of Effectiveness: Managerial Work Experience and Its Consequences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013. № 86. P. 441–447. Available at: http://www.psy.msu.ru/science/psyrussia/volumes_en.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ismagilova, F., Mirolyubova, G. Russian Manager’s Criteria of Effectiveness: Managerial Work Experience and Its Consequences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013. № 86. P. 441–447. Available at: http://www.psy.msu.ru/ science/psyrussia/volumes_en.html (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Herman J. L. et al. The tolerance for ambiguity scale: Towards a more refined measure for international management research // International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2010. V. 34. № 1. Р. 58–65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Herman J. L. et al. The tolerance for ambiguity scale: Towards a more refined measure for international management research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 2010. V. 34. № 1. Р. 58–65. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980. 453 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hofstede G. Culture’s Consequences. International Differences in Work Related Values. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1980. 453 р. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ismagilova F., Mirolyubova G., Malysheva L., Mugatabarova E. How to apply the model of managerial system of subjective criteria of efficiency during managers’ life-long learning. EDULEARN14 Proceedings. 2014. P. 7335–7341. Spain. Available at: http://library.iated.org/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ismagilova F., Mirolyubova G., Malysheva L., Mugatabarova E. How to apply the model of managerial system of subjective criteria of efficiency during managers’ life-long learning. EDULEARN14 Proceedings. 2014. P. 7335–7341. Spain. Available at: http://library.iated.org/. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ismagilova F. S. &amp; Miroliubova G. S. Subjective Preferences of CriterionOriented Support of Professional Activities of Managers. Moscow: State of the Art, 2012. Р. 359–368.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ismagilova F. S. &amp; Miroliubova G. S. Subjective Preferences of CriterionOriented Support of Professional Activities of Managers. Moscow: State of the Art, 2012. Р. 359–368. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ismagilova F. S. &amp; Mirolyubova G. S. What do Russian managers want to add to life-long learning of their aged subordinates? ICERI2015 Proceedings, 2015. Р. 8421–8429. Available at: http://library.iated.org/view/ISMAGILOVA2015WHA.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ismagilova F. S. &amp; Mirolyubova G. S. What do Russian managers want to add to life-long learning of their aged subordinates? ICERI2015 Proceedings. 2015. Р. 8421–8429. Available at: http://library.iated.org/view/ISMAGILOVA2015WHA. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Matthews J. R. Evaluation and measurement of library services. Libraries Unlimited, 2007.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matthews J. R. Evaluation and measurement of library services. Libraries Unlimited, 2007. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ronen S. Comparative and Multinational Management. N. Y., 1986. 385 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ronen S. Comparative and Multinational Management. N. Y., 1986. 385 р. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zeer E. F., Streltsov A. V. Technological Platform for Realization of Students’ Individual Educational Trajectories in a Vocational School // IEJME – mathematics education. 2016. Vol. 11. № 7. Р. 2639–2650.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeer E. F., Streltsov A. V. Technological Platform for Realization of Students’ Individual Educational Trajectories in a Vocational School. IEJME – Mathematics Education. 2016. Vol. 11. № 7. Р. 2639–2650. (Translated from English)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
