<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">edscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Education and science journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1994-5639</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2310-5828</issn><publisher><publisher-name>RSVPU</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-70-89</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">edscience-982</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНОЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>VOCATIONAL EDUCATION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>НАЦИОНАЛЬНАЯ СИСТЕМА КВАЛИФИКАЦИЙ: КОНЦЕПТУАЛЬНЫЕ И МЕТОДИЧЕСКИЕ ОСНОВЫ В КОНТЕКСТЕ НЕРЕШЕННЫХ ПРОБЛЕМ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORKS: CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN THE CONTEXT OF UNRESOLVED ISSUES</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Олейникова</surname><given-names>О. Н.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Oleynikova</surname><given-names>O N.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Олейникова Ольга Николаевна – профессор, доктор педагогических наук, генеральный директор </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Olga N. Oleynikova – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Center </p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">observatory@cvets.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Муравьева</surname><given-names>А. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Muravyeva</surname><given-names>A. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Муравьева Анна Александровна – кандидат филологических наук, ведущий эксперт </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Anna A. Muravyeva  – Candidate of Philological Sciences, Senior Expert </p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">observatory@cvets.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Аксенова</surname><given-names>Н. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Aksenova</surname><given-names>N. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Аксенова Наталья Михайловна – заместитель директора </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Natalia M. Aksenova – Deputy Director </p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">observatory@cvets.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Центр изучения проблем профессионального образования</institution></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Center for Vocational Education Training Studies</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>70</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Олейникова О.Н., Муравьева А.А., Аксенова Н.М., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Олейникова О.Н., Муравьева А.А., Аксенова Н.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Oleynikova O.N., Muravyeva A.A., Aksenova N.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/982">https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/982</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Ощущающийся во многих государствах дефицит высококвалифицированных специалистов, отвечающих требованиям современного рынка труда, стал причиной поиска новых, более эффективных механизмов регулирования профессиональной подготовки и аттестации кадров для постиндустриальной экономики знаний. Такими механизмами, как показывает мировая практика, могут стать национальные системы квалификации (НСК), национальные рамки квалификаций (НРК), сопоставимые с Европейской рамкой квалификаций, созданной для воплощения концепции обучения в течение всей жизни, и разрабатываемые синхронно с ними профессиональные стандарты (ПС).</p><p>Цель публикации – обсуждение на основе обобщения международного опыта сущностных вопросов использования НРК и ПС для изыскания возможностей адаптации к российским реалиям лучших образцов зарубежной практики в данной области.</p></sec><sec><title>Методология и методы</title><p>Методология и методы. В ходе изучения методологических и методических аспектов построения и функционирования НСК применялись методы сбора эмпирической информации, сравнительного и понятийно-терминологического анализа; обобщение, интерпретация и моделирование.</p></sec><sec><title>Практическая значимость</title><p>Практическая значимость. Материалы исследования и сформулированные его авторами рекомендации и предложения по совершенствованию механизмов сопряжения ФГОС, внедряемых ПС и системы независимой оценки квалификаций могут быть полезны для повышения квалификации экспертов и методистов, участвующих в проектировании и модернизации НРК, разработке профессиональных и образовательных стандартов, а также основных и дополнительных программ профессиональной подготовки.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. The deficiency of highly skilled professionals meeting the requirements of the modern labour market has become the reason for search of new, more effective regulation mechanisms of vocational training and personnel certification for post-industrial knowledge-based economy. As international practice demonstrates, such mechanisms could be the National Qualifications Systems (NQS), National Qualifications Framework (NQF) and Professional Standards (PS) that are comparable with the European Qualifications Framework (EQF), designed for lifelong education implementation.</p></sec><sec><title>Aim</title><p>Aim. Having analysed the international experience, the aims of the article are to discuss the issues of NQF and PS implementation and to consider the possibility of adaptation of the best models of foreign practice for the Russian realities.</p><p>Methodology and research methods. The methods of collecting empirical information, comparative and conceptual-terminological analysis were applied in the course of studying methodological and methodical aspects of construction and functioning of NQS; the methods of generalization, interpretation and modeling were applied.</p><p>The results and scientific novelty. The complex of the systemic problems which restrict the process of NQS formation launched in Russia is noted. The revealed reasons are explained by the developed psychological, organizational and methodical stereotypes; the ways of overcoming the current problems are outlined. According to the authors, the key problem is the dichotomy between professional and educational qualifications which does not exist in the international discourse, but is deeply rooted in consciousness of the Russians. Such a distinction involves irrational duplication of procedures for the qualifications assessment and generates a number of other difficulties interfering effective development of NQS and obtaining the maximum benefits from its use. In order to resolve the revealed contradictions and shortcomings, the authors analysed the experience of other countries where national systems of qualifications are implemented. Based on the international practice invariant systemically important parameters and variable characteristics of NQS and NQF are singled out and described. The typology of the qualifications framework and the principles of their design are proved.</p></sec><sec><title>Practical significance</title><p>Practical significance. The research materials and findings, recommendations and suggestions for integrated improvement of mechanisms of Federal State Educational Standards, introduced PS and the system of independent assessment of qualifications can be useful for professional development of the experts and methodologists participating in design and modernization of NQF, development of professional and educational standards along with the main and additional programs of vocational training.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>квалификация</kwd><kwd>национальная рамка квалификаций</kwd><kwd>национальная система квалификаций (НСК)</kwd><kwd>инфраструктура НСК</kwd><kwd>профессиональные стандарты</kwd><kwd>образовательные стандарты</kwd><kwd>результаты обучения</kwd><kwd>компетенции</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>qualification</kwd><kwd>National Qualifications Framework (NQF)</kwd><kwd>National Qualifications System (NQS)</kwd><kwd>infrastructure of the National Qualifications System</kwd><kwd>Professional Standards</kwd><kwd>Education Standards</kwd><kwd>learning outcomes</kwd><kwd>competences</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аксенова Н. М. Международный опыт разработки национальных систем квалификаций // Образование и наука. 2014. № 5 (114). С. 23–33 [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2014–5-23–33 (дата обращения: 20.01.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aksenova N. M. International trends in developing the national qualifications systems. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 20]; 5: 23–33. Available from: https://doi.org/ 10.17853/1994–5639–2014–5-23–33 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Караваева Е. В. Квалификации высшего образования и профессиональные квалификации: сопряжение с напряжением // Высшее образование в России. 2017. № 12. С. 5–12.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Karavaeva E. V. Higher Education Qualifications and professional qualifications: Conjugation with stress. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 12: 5–12. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Муравьева А. А., Аксенова Н. М. Зачем нужна рамка квалификаций? // Учительская газета. 2013. № 44 (10489). С. 17–18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muravyeva A. A., Aksenova N. M. Why do we need a qualifications framework? Uchitel’skaja gazeta = Teacher’s Newspaper. 2013; 44 (10489): 17–18. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Муравьева А. А. Управление системой квалификаций // Образование и наука. 2014. № 5 (114). С. 82–93 [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2014–5-82–93 (дата обращения: 20.01.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muravyeva A. A. Regulation of national qualifications systems. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Jan 20]; 5 (114): 82–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2014–5-82–93 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Олейникова О. Н., Муравьева А. А., Аксенова Н. М. Профстандарты как средство управления квалификациями // Дополнительное профессиональное образование в стране и мире. 2013. № 4. С. 6–13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oleynikova O. N., Muravyeva A. A., Aksenova N. M. Professional standards as a means of qualification management. Dopolnitel’noe professional’noe obrazovanie v strane i mire = Additional Professional Education in the Country and the World. 2013; 4: 6–13. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bjornеvol J., Grm, Pevec S. The development of national qualifications frameworks in Europe // Working paper. CEDEFOP. 2011. № 12. 192 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bjornеvol J., Grm Pevec S. The development of national qualifications frameworks in Europe. Working Paper. CEDEFOP. 2011; 12: 192.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Méhaut P., Winch C. The European qualifications framework: skills, competences or knowledge? // European educational research journal, Vol. 11, № 3. [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.369 (дата обращения: 20.01.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Méhaut P., Winch C. The European qualifications framework: Skills, competences or knowledge? European Educational Research Journal [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 Jan 20]; 11 (3). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.369</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raffe D. What is evidence for the impact of National Qualifications frameworks? Comparative education. 2012. Vol. 49 (2). Р. 143–162. [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03050068.2012.686260 (дата обращения: 20.01.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raffe D. What is evidence for the impact of National Qualifications frameworks? Comparative Education [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2018 Jan 20]; 49 (2): 143–162. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03050068.2012.686260</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bateman A., Keating J., Gillis S., Dyson C., Burke G. &amp; Coles M. Concept paper East Asia summit vocational education and training quality assurance framework. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2012.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bateman A., Keating J., Gillis S., Dyson C., Burke G., Coles M. Concept paper East Asia summit vocational education and training quality assurance framework. Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2012.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raffe D. The role of learning outcomes in national qualifications frameworks // Bohlinger S., Münchhausen G. (ed.). Validierung von Lernergebnisse [Recognition and validation of learning outcomes]. Bonn: BIBB, 2011. Р. 87–104.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raffe D. The role of learning outcomes in national qualifications frameworks. In: Bohlinger, S.; Münchhausen, G. (eds). Validierung von Lernergebnisse [Recognition and validation of learning outcomes]. Bonn: BIBB; 2011. p. 87–104.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burke G., McKenzie P., Shah Ch., Keating J., Vickers A., Fearnside R. &amp; Bateman A. Mapping Qualifications Frameworks across APEC Economies. 2009. [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: https://research.acer.edu.au/ceet/8 (дата обращения: 20.01.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burke G., McKenzie P., Shah Ch., Keating J., Vickers A., Fearnside R., Bateman A. Mapping Qualifications Frameworks across APEC Economies [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2018 Jan 20]. Available from: https://research.acer.edu.au/ceet/8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bateman A., Keating J., Burke G., Coles M. &amp; Vickers A. Concept Design: ASEAN Regional Qualifications Framework, Education and Training Governance: Capacity Building for National Qualifications Frameworks (AANZ-0007). Vol. II. 2012. 23 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bateman A., Keating J., Burke G., Coles M., Vickers A. Concept Design: ASEAN Regional Qualifications Framework, Education and Training Governance: Capacity Building for National Qualifications Frameworks (AANZ-0007). 2012; Vol. II. 23 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bateman A. &amp; Coles M. Asean Regional Qualifications Framework: Issues and options for discussion, Taskforce Meeting and Workshop, Education and Training Governance: Capacity Building for National Qualifications Frameworks (AANZ-0007). 2012. 35 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bateman A., Coles M. ASEAN Regional Qualifications Framework: Issues and options for discussion, Taskforce Meeting and Workshop, Education and Training Governance: Capacity Building for National Qualifications Frameworks (AANZ-0007). 2012. 35 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Education &amp; business cooperation: new skills for new jobs in a globalised world, Conference conclusions, 3–4 December 2009, ETF. Turin, 2010.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Education &amp; business cooperation: New skills for new jobs in a globalised world. Conference conclusions; 2009 Dec 3–4. ETF. Turin; 2010.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carroll G. &amp; Boutall T. Guide to Developing National Occupational Standards // International Accounting Standards Board. Revised, June, 2011.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carroll G., Boutall T. Guide to Developing National Occupational Standards. International Accounting Standards Board. Revised 2011 June.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bateman A., Dunn F. &amp; Vickers A. Use of volume of learning in qualification design. VRQA, Victoria, 2010. 76 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bateman A., Dunn F., Vickers A. Use of volume of learning in qualification design. VRQA. Victoria; 2010. 76 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bohlinger S. Qualifications frameworks and learning outcomes: challenges for Europe’s lifelong learning area // Journal of education and work. 2012. Vol. 25, № 3. Р. 279–297.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bohlinger S. Qualifications frameworks and learning outcomes: challenges for Europe’s lifelong learning area. Journal of Education and Work. 2012; Vol. 25, 3: 279–297.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lester S. The UK qualifications and credit framework: a critique // Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 2011. № 63 (2). Р. 205–216.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lester S. The UK qualifications and credit framework: a critique. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 2011; 63 (2): 205–216.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Allais S. The impact and implementation of national qualifications frameworks: a comparison of 16 countries // Journal of education and work. 2011. Vol. 24, № 3–4. Р. 233–255.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Allais S. The impact and implementation of national qualifications frameworks: A comparison of 16 countries. Journal of Education and Work. 2011: Vol. 24, 3–4: 233–255.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
