<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">edscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Образование и наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Education and science journal</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1994-5639</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2310-5828</issn><publisher><publisher-name>RSVPU</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17853/1994-5639-2018-6-183-194</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">edscience-987</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>КОНСУЛЬТАЦИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>CONSULTATIONS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКИЕ И ПРАКТИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ САМООЦЕНКИ ОБУЧАЮЩИХСЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF STUDENT SELF-ASSESSMENT</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Сарибейли</surname><given-names>Ф. Р.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Saribeyli</surname><given-names>F. R.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Сарибейли Фидан Рамиз – докторант </p><p>Баку</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Saribeyli Fidan Ramiz – PhD student </p><p>Baku</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">fsaribeyli@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Институт Образования Азербайджанской Республики<country>Азербайджан</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan<country>Azerbaijan</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2018</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2018</year></pub-date><volume>20</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>183</fpage><lpage>194</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Сарибейли Ф.Р., 2018</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2018</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Сарибейли Ф.Р.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Saribeyli F.R.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/987">https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/987</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Проблемы оценки достижений учащихся как показателя качества усвоенных ими знаний, умений и навыков постоянно находятся в зоне внимания педагогической сообщества и ученых, занимающихся развитием сферы образования. В настоящее время вопрос об объективном измерении результатов обучения особенно актуален в связи с тем, что приоритетной задачей образования становится развитие способностей ученика самостоятельно ставить учебные цели, проектировать пути их реализации, контролировать свои действия, рефлексировать собственные успехи и неудачи и исправлять ошибки – иначе говоря, формирование готовности самостоятельно учиться. Для решения данной задачи малопригодна традиционная балльная система оценок, ориентированная преимущественно на проверку репродуктивного уровня усвоения учебного материала и направленная исключительно на внешний контроль, а не на улучшение результатов учения. В новых условиях необходима новая система оценивания, включающая самоконтроль и самооценку обучающихся.</p></sec><sec><title> </title><p> </p></sec><sec><title>Методы</title><p>Методы. Основными методами исследования являются теоретический анализ, синтез, сравнение и обобщение содержания научной литературы соответствующей тематики.</p><p>Результаты и научная новизна. Рассмотрен новый формат оценивания результатов обучения, который основан на сборе из различных источников сведений о достижениях учащихся, регулярном мониторинге их поступательного продвижения по индивидуальной образовательной траектории. Такое пролонгированное оценивание более информативно, чем привычные отметки, выставляемые в баллах, поэтому оно позволяет педагогу оперативно регулировать учебный процесс и принимать своевременные верные решения о его коррекции. Кроме того, оно дает возможность ученику участвовать в процедурах оценки собственного уровня знаний и развивает у него навыки самооценки. Согласно исходным целевым установкам выделены суммирующий или формирующий виды самооценки. Показаны ее преимущества как механизма управления образовательным процессом: самооценка содействует совершенствованию метакогнитивных способностей и становлению критического (самокритичного) мышления учащихся; активизирует их самосознание; повышает интерес и мотивацию к обучению; поощряет быть независимыми субъектами своего образования, что крайне важно с точки зрения стратегии обучения на протяжении всей жизни.</p></sec><sec><title>Практическая значимость</title><p>Практическая значимость. Материалы статьи дают комплексное представление о феномене самооценки учащихся как обязательном элементе новой образовательной парадигмы, который пока только начал внедряться в повседневную педагогическую практику.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. The problems of assessment of student achievements as an indicator of the quality of knowledge and skills acquired by them are constantly in the focus of the pedagogical community and scientists involved in the development of education. Currently, the question of the objective measurement of learning outcomes is especially relevant because the priority task of education is the development of the student’s abilities to set independently learning goals, project ways of their implementation, monitor own actions, reflect own successes and failures and correct errors, in other words, the formation of the ability to learn independently. The traditional scoring system of grades is of little use to solve this problem since it is focused primarily on testing the reproductive level of mastering the training material and is aimed solely at external control, rather than improving the learning outcomes. In the new conditions, a new assessment system which includes self-control and self-assessment of students is required.</p><p>The aim of the publication is to discuss the existing approaches to the formation of self-evaluation of students and the effective use of this pedagogical tool for monitoring and increasing the motivation to learning in the educational process.</p><p>Methodology and research methods. The main research methods are theoretical analysis, synthesis, comparison and generalization of the content of scientific literature of the relevant subject matter.</p></sec><sec><title>Practical significance</title><p>Practical significance. The materials of the article provide a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon of students’ self-assessment as an obligatory element of the new educational paradigm, which has just begun to be introduced into everyday pedagogical practice.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>самооценка</kwd><kwd>учитель</kwd><kwd>ученик</kwd><kwd>обучение</kwd><kwd>размышление</kwd><kwd>оценка</kwd><kwd>достижение</kwd><kwd>класс</kwd><kwd>информация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>self-assessment</kwd><kwd>teacher</kwd><kwd>student</kwd><kwd>training</kwd><kwd>reflection</kwd><kwd>grade</kwd><kwd>achievement</kwd><kwd>class</kwd><kwd>information</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">James H. McMillan and Jessica Hearn. Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons. 2008. V. 87, 1. Р. 40–49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">James H. McMillan and Jessica Hearn. Student Self-Assessment: The Key to Stronger Student Motivation and Higher Achievement. Educational Horizons. 2008; V. 87; 1: 40–49.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ширапова Д. Д. Психологические факторы развития профессиональной самооценки студентов. С.-Петербург, 2005. 165 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shirapova D. D. Psikhologicheskiye faktory razvitiya professional’noy samootsenki studentov = Psychological factors of development of a professional self-assessment of students. St.-Petersburg; 2005. 165 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chris J. Lorraine Spiller and Juliet Twist. Self-assessment: What Teachers Think. Wellington: New Zealand Council For Educational Research, 2009.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chris J. Lorraine Spiller and Juliet Twist. Self-assessment: What teachers think. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research; 2009.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schunk D. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice / Hall. 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schunk D. Learning theories: An educational perspective. Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice / Hall; 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bruce L. B. Student Self-Assessment: Making Standards Come Alive // Classroom Leadership. 2001. V. 1 (5). Р. 1–6.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bruce L. B. Student self-assessment: Making standards come alive. Classroom Leadership. 2001; 1 (5): 1–6.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sadler D. R. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice / Hall, 2004.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sadler D. R. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill Prentice / Hall; 2004.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown S. &amp; Glasner A. In: Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham. The Society for Research into Higher Education &amp; Open University Press, 2003.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown S., Glasner A. In: Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches. Buckingham. The Society for Research into Higher Education &amp; Open University Press; 2003.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brown S., Rust C. &amp; Gibbs G. Strategies for Diversifying Assessment in Higher Education / The Oxford Centre for Staff Development. Oxford: Oxonion Rewley Press, 1994.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brown S., Rust C., Gibbs G. Strategies for diversifying assessment in higher education. The Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford: Oxonion Rewley Press; 1994.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Black P. &amp; Wiliam D. Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. 2001. Available from: http://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Black P., Wiliam D. Inside the Black Box: Raising standards through classroom assessment [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: http://weaeducation.typepad.co.uk/files/blackbox-1.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boud D. &amp; Falchikov N. Aligning assessment with long-term learning // Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006. № 31 (4). Р. 399–413.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boud D. &amp; Falchikov N. Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006; 31 (4): 399–413.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Boud D. Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page, 1995.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Boud D. Enhancing learning through self-assessment. London: Kogan Page; 1995.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Andrade H. &amp; Du Y. Student responses to criteria-referenced self-Assessment // Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2007. № 32 (2). Р. 159–181.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Andrade H., Du Y. Student responses to criteria-referenced self-Assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2007; 32 (2): 159–181.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dorothy S. Assessment Matters: Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment. Teaching Development. The University of Waikato; 2012. Available from: https://kennslumidstod.hi.is/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/assessment-matters-self-assessment-and-peer-assessment.pdf (дата обращения: 14.05.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dorothy S. Assessment matters: Self-assessment and peer assessment. Teaching development [Internet]. The University of Waikato; 2012 [cited 2018 May 14]. Available from: https://kennslumidstod.hi.is/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ assessment-matters-self-assessment-and-peer-assessment.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Удальцова М. О. Связь социально-психологического типа родительской позиции отца с самооценкой дошкольников. Ярославль, 2010 [Электрон. ресурс]. Режим доступа: lib.uniyar.ac.ru/edocs/diss/umo_1_a.pdf (дата обращения: 20.04.2018).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Udal’tsova M. O. Svyaz’ sotsial’no-psikhologicheskogo tipa roditel’skoy pozitsii ottsa s samootsenkoy doshkol’nikov = Communication of social and psychological type of a parental position of the father with a self-assessment of preschool children [Internet]. Yaroslavl; 2010 [cited 2018 Apr 20]. Available from: lib.uniyar.ac.ru/edocs/diss/umo_1_a.pdf (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
