BUILDING RESEARCH COMPETENCE OF PHD STUDENTS: AN ANALYSIS OF EXPERIENCE OF A PHD SCHOOL

Introduction. Postgraduate education of the Russian higher school is traditionally considered as a strategic reserve, which provides the continuity of academic and teaching personnel and the efficiency of education of future experts. However, the total number of this key resource of the higher education system, which guarantees its stable functioning and further forward development, has been reduced in recent years. Postgraduate admission has decreased, in particular, pedagogical training programmes. What is most important, the PhD student quality has substantially dropped.

The aim of the present publication was to identify the level of research skills of PhD students of pedagogical specialisation and present the most productive ways for the formation of skills to carry out research activities.

Methodology and research methods. The study was based on the ideas of systemic-activity approach, competency-based approach and major provisions of the theory of action. Scientific publications on research projects of PhD students and the concept of “new” post graduate school in the Russian education were analysed. Online survey and questionnaire survey of PhD students, their supervisors and members of dissertation boards were conducted. The assessment of results of research conducted by PhD students, synthesis and description of productive teaching practices and positive pedagogical experience gained at Tyumen State University (TSU) were applied.

Results and scientific novelty. Based on the classical interpretation of nature and contents of human activity, a definition of research activity is formulated. It constitutes as the grounds for development of the contents and procedure for the list of research tasks for PhD students to master in order to successfully complete their PhD studies (as yet, the similar register has been compiled and scientifically based only for a bachelor degree). Insufficient competence of many PhD students to organise and conduct an independent scientific and pedagogical search is proved. Unstable components of their research competence are revealed: inability to use the most important elements of the methodology corpus and problems in writing scientific texts. Practically verified methods and means to develop the research competence of PhD students, doctoral candidates, applicants on academic degrees and their research supervisors are described: methodological seminars of the education department, a group analysis of scientific texts for publication, group visits and discussion of open lectures and seminars for teachers of the education department and PhD students, role mini-plays, public preliminary dissertation defense, participation in the events held by the department, etc.

Practical significance. Knowledge of the gaps in research competence of PhD students will allow their supervisors to selectively improve the students’ skills, which are necessary for writing and defending the dissertation. Creative application and systematically scientific-pedagogical work will help achieve a significant improvement in building PhD student competence for scientific and teaching activities.

1. Osipov G. V., Savinkov V. I. Dinamika aspirantury i perspektivy do 2030 goda: Statisticheskiy i sotsiologicheskiy analiz = Dynamics of a postgraduate education and perspective till 2030: Statistical and sociological analysis. Moscow: Center for Social Forecast and Marketing; 2014. 152 p. (In Russ.)

2. Bednyy B. I. On the issue of the goal of postgraduate training (dissertation vs qualification). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 3 (199): 44–52. (In Russ.)

3. Bednyy B. I. A new postgraduate school model: Pro et contra. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 4 (211): 5–16. (In Russ.)

4. Popova N. G., Biricheva Ye. V. Training young researchers at the postgraduate level: In search of a goal. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 1 (208): 5–14. (In Russ.)

5. Raychuk D. Yu., Minina N. V. About positioning postgraduate school in a three-tier system of higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 4 (200): 33–41. (In Russ.)

6. Senashenko V. S. Problems of postgraduate training organisation on the basis of the Federal State Educational Standards of the third level of higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 3 (199): 33–043. (In Russ.)

7. Spiridonova Ye. A. About some ambiguous tendencies in russian higher school. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 1 (208): 25–34. (In Russ.)

8. Shestak V. P., Shestak N. V. Postgraduate studies at the third level of higher education: discursive field. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2015; 12: 22–34. (In Russ.)

9. Bednyy B. I., Kuzenkov O. A. Integrated “Academic Master’s – PhD” educational programs. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; № 5 (201): 21–32. (In Russ.)

10. Nechayev V. D. Modernisation of the Russian doctoral programs in education: The search of models in an international context. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 6 (202): 16–33. (In Russ.)

11. Senashenko V. S. On some problems of preparation specialists of higher qualification. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2013; 4: 54–59. (In Russ.)

12. Bochkova Ye. V., Avdeyeva Ye. A., Nazarenko V. A. Postgraduate studies in the higher education system of Russia: New rules and new problems. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2016; 6 (51): 17–23. (In Russ.)

13. Reznik S. D., Chemezov I. S. PhD Institute of the Russian University: Condition, problems and prospects of development. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Tomsk State University Herald. 2018; 430: 159–168.(In Russ.)

14. Shadrikov V. D., Rozov N. Kh., Borovskikh A. V. Methods of improvement of pedagogical thesis. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 3 (199): 53–60. (In Russ.)

15. Sannikova L. V. Research activity as the main type of activity of a postgraduate student. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija: Juridicheskie nauki = Bulletin of Perm University. Series “Juridical Sciences”. 2014; 4 (26): 271–275. (In Russ.)

16. Shestak V. P., Shestak N. V. Formation of research competence and “academic writing”. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2011; 12: 115–120. (In Russ.)

17. Zimnyaya I. A. Issledovatel'skaja dejatel’nost’ studentov v vuze kak ob’ekt proekti-rovanija v kompetentnostno-orientirovannoj OOP VPO. Dlja programmy povyshenija kvalifikacii prepodavatelej vuzov v oblasti proektirovanija OOP, realizujushhih FGOS VPO = Research activity of students in higher education institution as a subject to design in the competency-based general educational programme of higher vocational education. For the programme of increase in qualification of teachers of higher education institutions in the field of design of general educational programme implementing Federal State Educational Standards of higher vocational education. Moscow: Research Center for Problems of Quality of Expert Training; 2010. 40 p. (In Russ.)

18. Strokova T. A. Criteria and diagnostic tools for monitoring quality assessment of pre-service teachers’ training for practice-oriented research activity. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016; 3 (132): 29–43. (In Russ.)

19. Boziyev R. S., Dontsov A. I. Domestic pedagogics and education: Between the past and the future. Pedagogika = Pedagogics. 2016; 1: 3–11. (In Russ.)