INCLUSIVE HIGHER EDUCATION: SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING OF STUDENTS

Introduction. Nowadays, substantial intensification of inclusive processes in educational system (especially in higher education) identifies the need for thorough research of psycho-pedagogical foundations for the development of inclusive education culture.
The aim of this research was to identify and compare the levels and factors of social-psychological well-being of healthy students, students with disabilities and students of inclusive groups.
Methodology and research methods. At the methodological level, the research was based on the proposition that inclusive education assumes the formation and support of such an integrative socio-psychological space, in which neither students with disabilities nor healthy students feel anxiety in the course of interaction in the classroom or out-of-class situation. As the main methodological tool,
a specially designed questionnaire was used for fixing the socio-emographic characteristics of the respondents, as well as for clarifying the problematic experiences of students and their attitudes to using social support resources, for identifying the characteristics of students’ assessments of the conditions of higher education, their satisfaction and involvement in student life and attitudes towards inclusive education. The received results of monitoring were processed by means of the following qualitative and quantitative methods of the analysis: the content analysis; the analysis of percentage with the use of the Pearson’s chi-squared test (χ2); comparative analysis with the use of Student’s t-test; the median test and one-factorial dispersive analysis; correlation and factorial types of the analysis. The statistical software packages Statistica 7.0 were employed for the calculation of the results.
Results and scientific novelty. The authors clarified the patterns of formation of the barrier-free socio-psychological environment of the university, which implements the concept of inclusive education. It was established that there are no global differences in the parameters of socio-psychological well-being between students with disabilities and students without disabilities. This determines the favourable social and psychological prerequisites for development of inclusive higher education. Belonging to the same socio-typological and age group and the same leading activity cause the similar experience (e.g. similar problems and difficulties) of both groups of students. The type of disabling health condition, i.e. a disabled student with the defined particular nosological group determines only the specifics of the difficulties, which might be faced in higher school. The conclusion was drawn that successful inclusion of students with disabilities in educational process and social space of university contributes to positive students’ perception 
of the high school environment.
Practical significance. The research outcomes might be used to define the content, directions and forms of work to support students in the conditions of inclusive education. Thus, it is recommended to further develop the system of inclusive education through the following actions: to optimise social conditions of disabled students; to hold rehabilitational and psychological training sessions focused on communication; to organise educational work in order to raise students’ awareness of special technical means of inclusive education; to involve inner circle of people (parents, friends, fellow students) close to disabled students in the process of socio-psychological support. 

1. Waterfield J., West B. Inclusive assessment in higher education: A resource for change. Plymouth: University of Plymouth; 2006.

2. Kantor V. Z., Puzan V. V. Otnoshenie studencheskoj molodezhi k invalidam kak determinanta ih vkljuchenija v integrativnoe reabilitacionno-obrazovatel'noe prostranstvo vuza = Attitude of students to disabled people as a determinant of their inclusion in the integrative rehabilitation and educational space of the university. Inkljuzivnoe obrazovanie lic s narushenijami v razvitii: vzgljad iz Evropy i Rossii: sbornik nauchnyh trudov = Inclusive education of persons with impaired development: A view from Europe and Russia. Collection of scientific papers. St.-Petersburg; 2010. P. 151–163. (In Russ.)

3. Grachev S. P. Specifika formirovanija social’nogo statusa nezrjachego studenta v uchebnoj gruppe (problema identifikacii) = Specificity of the formation of the social status of a blind student in an educational group (identification problem). Problemy social’no-psihologicheskoj adaptacii studentov i aspirantov s narushennym zreniem v sovremennom vuze = Problems of social and psychologicaladaptation of undergraduate and postgraduate students in a modern university. St.-Petersburg; 2000. P. 46–49. (In Russ.)

4. Mikhailova N. F., Kantor V. Z., Fattakhova M. E., Mironova M. A. Selfidentification as a factor of successful social and mental adaptation of deaf and hearing impaired students. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2016; 52/2: 295–304. (In Russ.)

5. Polataiko S. V. Problema marginal’nosti v reshenii zadachi social’no-psihologicheskoj integracii slabovidjashhih studentovn = The problem of marginality in solving the problem of social and psychological integration of visually impaired students. Problemy social’no-psihologicheskoj adaptacii studentov i aspirantov s narushennym zreniem v sovremennom vuze = Problems of social and psychological adaptation of undergraduate and graduate students in modern high school. St.-Petersburg; 2000. (In Russ.)

6. Boyle C., Sharma U. Inclusive education – Worldly views? Support Learn. 2015; 30: 2–3.

7. Zorina E. E. Eradicating the barriers to inclusive higher education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 5 (20): 165–184. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2018–5-165–184 (In Russ.)

8. Lukyanova N. A., Shchukina N. I., Fell E. V. Russian universities’ corporate culture and inclusive education: What needs to change. Vestnik nauki Sibiri = Siberian Journal of Science. 2016; 1, 20: 101–110. (In Russ.).

9. Ortiz Colón A. M., Agreda Montoro M., Colmenero Ruiz M. J. Toward inclusive higher education in a global context. Sustainability [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Dec 27]; 10 (8): 2670. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071–1050/10/8/2670

10. Liasidou A. Inclusive education and critical pedagogy at the intersection of disability, race, gender and class. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies. 2012; Vol. 10. № 1: 168–184.

11. Molina V. M., Rodriguez H. P., Aguilar N. M., Fernández A. C., Moriňa A. The role of lecturers and inclusive education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2016; Vol. 16 (s1): 1046–1049.

12. Strnadová I., Hájková V., Květoňová L. Voices of university students with disabilities: Inclusive education on the tertiary level – a reality or a distant dream? International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2015; 19 (10): 1080–1095.

13. Yssel N., Pak N., Beilke J. A Door Must Be Opened: Perceptions of Students with Disabilities in Higher Education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2016; 63 (3): 384–394, DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2015.1123232

14. Vickerman Ph., Blundell M. Hearing the voices of disabled students in higher education. Disability & Society. 2010; 25 (1): 21–32, DOI: 10.1080/09687590903363290

15. Shevlin M., Kenny M., Mcneela E. Participation in higher education for students with disabilities: An Irish perspective. Disability and Society. 2004; 19: 15–30.

16. Claiborne L., Cornforth S., Gibson A., Smith A. Supporting students with impairments in higher education: Social inclusion or cold comfort? International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2010; 15 (5): 513–527.

17. Fuller M., Bradley A., Healey M. Incorporating disabled students within an inclusive higher education environment. Disability and Society. 2004; 19 (5): 455–468.

18. Doughty H., Allan J. Social Capital and the Evaluation of inclusiveness in Scottish further education colleges. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2008; 32 (3): 275–284.

19. Prowse S. Institutional Construction of Disabled Students. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2009; 31: 89–96.

20. Tienda M. Diversity ≠ inclusion: Promoting integration in higher education. Educational Researcher. 2013; 42, 9: 467–475.

21. Ryff C. D. Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989; 57: 1069–1081.

22. Ryff C. D., Keyes C. L. M. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995; 69: 719–727.

23. Bonivell I. Kljuchi k blagopoluchiju: Chto mozhet pozitivnaja psihologija = The keys to well-being: What positive psychology can do. Translated from English by M. Babicheva. Moscow: Publishing House Vremja; 2009. 192 p. (In Russ.)

24. Deci E., Rayan R. Self determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology. 2008; 49, 3: 182–185.

25. Leontiev D. A. Approach through positive personality traits: From psychological well-being to virtues and strengths of character = Podhod cherez pozitivnye cherty lichnosti: ot psihologicheskogo blagopoluchija k dobrodeteljam i silam haraktera. Lichnostnyj potencial: struktura i diagnostika. Personal potential: Structure and diagnostics. Ed. by D. A. Leontiev Moscow: Publishing House Smysl; 2011. P. 76–92. (In Russ.)

26. Maddi S. R., Khoshaba D. M. Hardiness and mental health. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1994; 63, 2: 265–274.

27. Seligman M. V poiskah schast’ja. Kak poluchat’ udovol’stvie ot zhizni kazhdyj den’ = In search of happiness. How to enjoy day-to-day life. Moscow: Publishing House Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2010. 320 p. (In Russ.)