INSTITUTIONAL MODELLING OF THE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR REGIONAL PARTICIPANTS OF DUAL EDUCATION

Introduction. The need for increasing the investment attractiveness of Russian regions and meeting the needs of territories for qualified personnel updates the search for infrastructure and coordination mechanisms and tools of the solution of these problems. At the same time, the diversity of interests of participants in dual education and their various structural positions do not allow to solve this task by directive methods, both on the part of state structures and corporate sectors. One of the solutions might be to form an effective management system for dual education, which assumes the organisation of practical vocational training according to inquiries of employers, who are involved in implementation of educational process in order to promote labour market with in-demand experts. 
The aim of the present research was the scientific substantiation of the choice of the institutional model for management of dual education system at the regional level, taking into account the interests of all its members: enterprises, government agencies, students and educational institutions.
Methodology and research methods. The research was based on the systematic approach. The methods of modelling and comparative analysis were employed. The provisions and principles of utility theory served as the methodological basis of institutional model formation.
Results and scientific novelty. The main target reference points of regional participants of dual education were identified and formalised in the form of certain indicators. Two types of models of management of these subjects were considered: models with and without the usage of institutional superstructures. As a key criterion for model selection, maximization of a complex indicator of its utility for interested parties was offered. In particular, it was demonstrated that supervision of graduates by a certain employer is caused by parameters of employment attractiveness, such as a wide range of horizontal and vertical career cards and a possibility of continuing vocational education. The conducted quantitative research on utility indicators allowed the authors to design the institutional model for management of regional participants within the system of dual education and to recommend it for further implementation.
Practical significance. The institutional model presented in the publication is directed to the solution of tasks faced by partner companies and educational establishments within the system of dual education. When applying this model, it is possible to forecast personnel requirements – job availability in the future of jobs, resulting to a considerable simplification of vocational guidance  work, which can be carried out in the course of applicants’ preparation.

1. Romantcev G. M., Fedorov V. A., Mokronosov A. G. Vocational education in the provision of modernised economics of upgraded personnel. Universitetskoe obrazovanie: praktika i analiz = University Education: Practice and Analysis. 2012; 6 (44): 108–114. (In Russ.)

2. Kokovikhin A., Ogorodnikova E. S., Williams D., Plakhin E. A. Institutional Factors in the evaluation of the entrepreneur in the investment climate of the municipal formation. Jekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2017; 13, 1: 80–92. DOI 10.17059/2017–1-8 (In Russ.)

3. Kokovikhin A., Ogorodnikova E. S., Williams D., Plakhin E. A. The assessment of competitive environment in regional markets. Jekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2018; 14, 1: 79–94. DOI 10.17059/2018–1-7 (In Russ.)

4. Frants O. B., Arzhakova O. N. Problems of interaction between state and business in development of the secondary education. Jekonomika regiona = Economy of Region [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2018 Dec 15]; S2: 58–64. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp? id=11736988 (In Russ.)

5. Vasenin E. I. Dual education as a mechanism of cluster interaction of professional educational organisations and business. Srednee professional’noe obrazovanie = Secondary Vocational Education. 2017; 9: 30–33. (In Russ.)

6. Kazanbaev I. A. Modern forms of training in secondary vocational education on the example of implementation of dual education. Nauka i obrazovanie: novoe vremja = Science and Education: New Time. 2016; 2 (13): 411–415. (In Russ.)

7. Petrina O. V., Mezentseva T. V. The concept of collaboration between the University and enterprises in the organisation of the dual training. Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyj universitet upravlenija) = Bulletin of University (State University of Management). 2017; 3: 239–242. (In Russ.)

8. Remington Th. F. Gosudarstvenno-chastnye partnerstva v sfere SPO: adaptacija ne-meckoj modeli dual'nogo obrazovanija = Public-private partnerships in the field of Secondary Vocational Education: Adaptation of the German model of education [Internet]. Preprint WP1/2017/03. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2017. (Series WP1 “Institutional problems of Russian economy”). 30 p. Preprint. (In Russ.)

9. Pogatsnik M. Dual education: The win-win model of collaboration between universities and industry. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. 2018; 8, 3: 145–152. DOI: 10.3991/ijep.v8i3.8111

10. Marhuenda-Fluixa F., Chisvert-Tarazona M. Jose, Palomares-Montero D. D as in dual: Research on the implementation of dual training in the Spanish vocational education system. EDUCAR. 2013; 53, Iss. 2: 285–307. DOI: 10.5565

11. Baethge M., Wolter A. the German skill formation model in transition: From the dual system of VET to higher education? Journal for Labor Market Research. 2015; 48, 2: 97–112. DOI: 10.1007/s12651–015–0181-x

12. Danilov R. V. The role of municipal administration in the implementation of social projects in the field of vocational education. Municipal’naja akademija = Municipal Academy. 2012; 2: 51–53. (In Russ.)

13. Remington T. Business-government cooperation in VET: A Russian expert with dual education. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2017; 33, 4: 313–333. DOI: 10.1080/1060586.2017.1296730

14. Petrina O. A., Mezentseva T. V. The Concept of collaboration between the university and enterprises in the organisation of the dual training. Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyj universitet upravlenija) = Bulletin of University (State University of Management). 2017; 3: 239–242. (In Russ.)

15. Fomin R. L. Complex model of evaluation and forecasting of efficiency of planned organisational and technical measures. Aktual’nye voprosy jekonomicheskih nauk = Topical Issues of Economic Sciences. 2010; 12–2: 260–266. (In Russ.)

16. Kolga V. V., Shuvalova M. A. Training of modern specialists in the system of dual education. Vestnik Krasnojarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva = Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafiev. 2014; 3 (29): 66–69. (In Russ.)

17. Busemeyer M. R., Trampusch Ch. The comparative political economy of collective skill formation the political economy of collective skill formation. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.

18. Kuklin A. A., Tyrsin A. N., Pecherkina M. S., Nikulina N. L. Risks to well-being in the regions: Diagnosis and management (on the example of the Ural Federal district). Prostranstvennaja jekonomika = Spatial Economy. 2018; 2: 36–51. DOI: 10.14530 Ise.2018.2.036–051. (In Russ.)

19. Tereshchenkova E. V., Bernhard M. The Dual education system as an innovative format for the system of higher professional education. Vestnik Moskovskogo gumanitarno-jekonomicheskogo institute = Bulletin of the Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute. 2014; 1 (2): 33–37. (In Russ.)

20. Helmer M., Conway M. Workforce communications and the apprenticeship system: lessons and connections from the construction industry people to work: Workforce communications and sector strategies. M. Conway, R. P. Giloth (eds). New York: Aspen Institute; 2014. p. 325.