NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS SYSTEM IN RUSSIA – AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

Introduction. The article offers an insight into an epistemological perspective of establishing the national qualifications system in Russia that is critical for creating a “market of qualifications in the country that would be adequate to the current context.
The aim of the research was to examine the context and factors underpinning the formation and evolution of the structure of knowledge relating to the national qualification system in Russia.
Methodology and research methods. The methods applied comprise a mixed-method approach that included: review and analysis of official documents, semi-structured background and individual interviews with key stakeholders (line ministries, experts from industry and qualifications awarding bodies etc.) and desk research.
Results and scientific novelty. The performed analysis of documents and of research data has revealed that the process of generating and enhancing knowledge about the national qualifications system semantically and methodologically is in broad terms contingent on the needs and objectives of social and economic development, and in narrower terms – on the development of occupational standards that underpin the standards of vocational and higher education, as well as on the enhanced institutionalisation of employers’ involvement in the training of personnel and in the search of effective mechanisms and instruments of independent assessment of qualifications.
It also offers an insight into current key paradigmatic gaps in the NQF-related epistemology in Russia that account for the specificity of the observed state of play and for the key conceptual epistemological contradiction that has been identified by the authors as the opposition of and conflict between occupational and education qualifications. The authors propose ways out of the situation based on international practices in this area starting from aligning the terminology and conceptual approaches with international ones. 

The performed epistemological research and the conclusions made by the authors contribute to the national qualifications system discourse. It is stressed that core principles underpinning the development of the national qualifications system should be adapted to the social and economic and local factors.
Practical significance. The material of the article can be used by policy-makers dealing with the NQS development and implementation of the NQS.

1. Burke G., et al. Mapping qualification frameworks across APEC economies [Internet]. Centre for Economics of Education. 2009 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 52 p. Available from: https://apec.org/-/media/APEC/Publications/2009/6/Mapping-Qualifications-Frameworks-across-APEC-Economies-June-2009/09_hrd_mappin_qualifn.pdf

2. Aksenova N. M. International trends in developing the national qualifications systems. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014; (5): 23–33. (In Russ.)

3. Analysis and overview of NQF developments in European countries. Annual report 2012 [Internet]. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Cedefop Working Paper. 2012 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 380 p. Available from: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/6117_en.pdf

4. Bjornеvol J., Grm Pevec S. The development of national qualifications frameworks in Europe. Working Paper. CEDEFOP. 2011; 12: 192.

5. Bohlinger S. Qualifications frameworks and learning outcomes: Challenges for Europe’s lifelong learning area. Journal of Education and Work. 2012; 25, 3: 279–297.

6. Changing qualifications. A review of qualifications policies and practices [Internet]. Cedefop Reference series; 84, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2010 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 263 p. Available from: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3059_en.pdf

7. Coles M. QFs in Europe: platforms for collaboration, integration and reform. In: Making the European Learning Area a Reality Conference [Internet]; 2007 June 3–5; Munich, Germany. 2007 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 41 p. Available from: https://studylib.net/doc/12371537/expertise-qualifications-frameworksin-europe-platforms-.../

8. Muravyeva A. A. Regulation of national qualifications systems. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014; 5: 82–93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2014–5-82–93 (In Russ.)

9. Oleynikova O. N., Muravyeva A. A., Aksenova N. M. National qualifications frameworks: Conceptual and methodological principles in the context of unresolved issues. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 20 (6): 70–89. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2018–6-70–89 (In Russ.)

10. Allais S. The implementation and impact of National Qualifications Frameworks: Report of a study in 16 countries [Internet]. ILO: Geneva; 2010 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 123 p. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—-ed_emp/—-ifp_skills/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_126589.pdf

11. Comparative Analysis of the European Qualifications Framework and the New Zealand Qualifications Framework: Joint Technical Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. 99 р.

12. Qualifications Systems: Bridges to Lifelong Learning. OECD; 2007. 237 p.

13. The Role of National Qualifications Systems in Promoting Lifelong Learning [Internet]. OECD; 2004 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 21 p. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/33977045.pdf

14. Tuck R. An introductory guide to national qualifications frameworks: Conceptual and practical issues for policy-makers [Internet]. ILO: Geneva; 2007 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 72 p. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_emp/@ifp_skills/documents/instructionalmaterial/wcms_103623.pdf

15. Méhaut P., Winch C. The European qualifications framework: Skills, competences or knowledge? European Educational Research Journal [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2018 Dec 10]; 11, 3: 369–381.Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/eerj. 2012.11.3.369

16. Auzinger M., Fellinger J., et al. Study on international sectoral qualifications frameworks and systems. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2016. 110 p.

17. Iglesias-Fernandez C., Llorente-Heras R. Sectoral structure, qualification characteristics and patterns of labour mobility. The Service Industries Journal. 2007; 27, 4: 411–434.

18. Agata K. How should we recognize the utility of vocational qualification in Japan? Japan Labor Review. 2010; 52 (1): 20–27.

19. Iwata K. Towards the early construction of Japanese Qualifications Framework – JQF is the key node for addressing many challenges of human resources development in Japan. Transactions of JASVET. 2014; 30 (1): 135–143.

20. Lester S. The UK qualifications and credit framework: A critique. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 2011: 63 (2): 205–216.

21. Strathdee R. The implementation and impact of the New Zealand national qualifications framework. Journal of Education and Work. 2011; 24, 3–4: 233–258.

22. Comparative analysis of the Australian Qualifications Framework and the European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning. Joint Technical Report [Internet]. 2016. European Union; 2016 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 75 p. Available from: https://internationaleducation.gov.au/news/latest-news/documents/ed16–0165%20-%20693040%20-%20joint%20technical%20report_acc.pdf

23. Global National Qualifications Framework Inventory. In: ASEM Education Ministers Conference [Internet]; 2013 May 13–14; Kuala Lumpur. European Training Foundation; 2013 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 56 p. Available from: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/2211_en.pdf

24. Making better vocational qualifications [Internet]. European Training Foundation; 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 10]. 81 p. Available from: https://www.etf.europa.eu/sites/default/files/m/3AE7DF5686200FCEC1257CA00047FD58_Making%20better%20vocational%20qualifications.pdf

25. Raffe D. The role of learning outcomes in national qualifications frameworks. Ed. by Bohlinger S., Münchhausen G. Validierung von Lernergebnisse. Bonn: BIBB; 2011. p. 87–104.

26. Oleynikova O., Muraveva A., Coles M. Principles and procedures of developing of the national qualifications framework. Centre for VET Studies. Moscow; 2006. 160 p. (In Russ.)

27. Oleynikova O., Muraveva A., Aksenova N. Occupational standards as a tool of regulating qualifications. Dopolnitelnoye professionalnoye obrazovanie v strane i mire = Additional Vocational Education in the Country and in the World. 2013; 4: 6–13. (In Russ.)