The Study of School Educational Environment in the Context of Ensuring Equal Access to Quality Education

Introduction. Today, official international and State Russian documents require ensuring equal access to quality education for all citizens regardless of place of residence and social status. In this regard, it becomes relevant to determine the quality of school environment and its potential in terms of compliance with the requirements of delivery of quality education services for all representatives of the oncoming generation.

The aim of the present research is to study the educational environment of Moscow schools in the context of ensuring equal access to quality education.

Methodology and research methods. An international assessment tool – the SACERS scale – was chosen as the main method of the research. The SACERS scale was modified by the employees of Laboratory of Educational Infrastructures of the Institute of System Projects of Moscow City University (MCU). The data were processed using descriptive statistics methods, dispersion and regression analysis, T-student’s criterion in the modification of Welch.

Results and scientific novelty. On the basis of random sample (22 educational complexes), the peculiarities of educational conditions in different Moscow schools were diagnosed; the quality index of their educational environment and its structural components were determined (n = 58). The study sample revealed the “heterogeneity” of secondary educational establishments in the organisation of the subject-spatial environment of schools, extracurricular activities and additional education, as well as availability of educational infrastructure for students with special educational needs. Sufficiently equal indicators of educational conditions were identified: “Attendance”, “Space for Gross Motor Activities”, “Discipline”, “Peer Interactions”, “Interactions between Staff and Parents”, “Opportunities for Professional Growth”. Six “homogeneous” and ten “inhomogeneous” complexes were revealed in the studied sample. In “homogeneous” complexes, there are educational conditions, which provide relatively equal access to quality education, as compared with “heterogeneous” complexes. This fact is confirmed by the range of values of the quality index of the educational environment and the values of standard deviation.

Practical significance. The present research allowed the authors to obtain a differentiated understanding of the existing educational conditions of Moscow schools, which formed the basis to solve the management problem in the development of education system, which guarantees quality education for all students.

1. Frumin I. D. the Main approaches to the problem of equity in education. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2006; 2: 7–36. (In Russ.)

2. Bourdieu P., Passeron J. C. La reproduction éléments pour une théorie du système d ' enseignement. Paris: Editions de Minuit; 1970. 284 p.

3. Breen R., Jonsson J. O. Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology. 2005; 31: 223–243.

4. Legewie J., DiPrete T. A. School context and the gender gap in educational achievement. American Sociological Review. 2012; 77 (3): 463–485. DOI: 10.1177/0003122412440802

5. Jackson M. Determined to succeed? Performance vs choice in educational attention. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2013. DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804783026.001.0001

6. Shmis T., Parandekar S. Education equity in the Russian Federation: Summary report [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Feb 20]. Available from: documents.vsemirnyjbank.org

7. Agranovich M. L. Indicators in education management: What do they show and where do they lead to? Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2008; 1: 120–145. (In Russ.)

8. Konstantinovsky D. L., Vakhstein V. S., Kurakin D. Real’nost’ obrazovaniya. Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: ot metafory k interpretatsii = Reality of education. Sociological research: From metaphor to interpretation. Moscow: Centre of Social Forecasting and Marketing; 2013. 224 p. (In Russ.)

9. Roshchina Ya. M. Family capital as a factor of educational opportunities of Russian schoolchildren. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2012; 1: 257–271. (In Russ.)

10. Yastrebov G. A., Pinsky M. A., Kosaretsky S. G. The use of context information in the system of education quality assessment: The development and testing of instruments. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2014; 4: 58–95. (In Russ.)

11. Derbyshire N.. Pinsky M. A. Management strategy of directors of effective schools. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2016; 3: 123–124. DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2016–3-110–129 (In Russ.)

12. Bessudnov A., Malik V. M. Socio-economic and gender inequality in the choice of educational trajectory after the end of the 9th grade of secondary school. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2016; 1: 135–161. DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2016–1-135–167 (In Russ.)

13. Pinsky M. A., Khavenson I. E., Kosaretsky S. G., Zvyagintsev, R. S., Mikhailova A. M., Chirkin T. A. Over barriers: Exploring resiliently school. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Questions of Education. 2018; 2: 198–227. DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2018–2-198–227 (In Russ.)

14. O’ Dougherty Wright M., Masten A. S., Narayan A. J. Resistance processes in development: Four waves of research on positive adaptation in the context of adversity. Ed. by S. Goldstein, R. B. Brooks. Handbook of resilience in children. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 15–38.

15. Henderson N. Havens of resilience. Resistance and Learning. 2013; 71 (1).

16. Harms T., Jacobs. E., White D. School age care environment rating scale. New York, NY: Teachers College press; 1996.

17. Halle T., Vick Whittaker J. E., Anderson R. Quality in early childhood care and education settings: A compendium of measures, second edition. Washington, DC: Child Trends. Prepared by Child Trends for the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2010.

18. Ivanova E. V., Vinogradova I. A. Scales SACERS: Results of the study of the educational environment of Moscow schools. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2018; 7 (3): 498–510. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2018.3.498

19. Ivanova E. V., Vinogradova I. A. Evaluation of conditions for the implementation of the basic educational program of primary and basic general education using the international scale SACERS. Vestnik Moskovskogo gorodskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika i psikhologiya = Bulletin of Moscow City University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2017; 4 (42): 66–79. (In Russ.)

20. Yasvin V. Organisational and psychological risks of unification of school organisations. In: Rebenok v sovremennom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve megapolisa: Materialy IV Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Child in the Modern Educational Space of the Metropolis. Proceedings of the IV All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference; 2017; Moscow. Moscow: Publishing House Pero; 2017. p. 7–12. (In Russ.)