Development of the Programme of Applied Research as a Tool for the Formation of Research Competency of Future Political Scientists (on the Example of the Theme “Spatial Development of Russia as a Factor in Nation-Building and National Idea Formation”)

Introduction. Nowadays, the modern higher education involves not only advanced theoretical training, but also the formation of practical skills and universal professional skills, which contribute to the development of skills of future specialists and their successful careers. The participation of students in the research work is considered as a special direction of improvement of professional competency and an essential factor of general cultural development of the student’s personality. The research work creates prerequisites for qualitative change of the whole working practice through the acquisition of abilities to act reasonably in working situations, to solve tasks and problems independently and effectively, to assess the results of own work adequately. However, the active inclusion of students in research activities was characterised by the lack of guidelines, which could be used to fill the gaps in research methodology and research procedures. This fully applies to the students of political science specialties and updates the interpretation of research and political science practices.

The aim of the article is to reveal the peculiarities of organisational and technological procedures of complex socio-political applied research, using a specific example of a training model.

Methodology and research methods. The authors used general scientific and special methods and approaches: formalisation, abstraction, comparative analysis, system-based and conceptual approaches, etc. An interview was conducted as the main applied method to diagnose the degree of students’ (bachelor’s and master’s degree students training in the discipline “Political Science” at Ogarev Mordovia State University) interest in research work and their understanding of the importance of practice-oriented learning.

Results and scientific novelty. On the basis of the studentsэ questionnaire responses, the factors characterising the problem situation “Quality of Student Research Work”, are worked out in detail. The survey questionnaire revealed that the research work is perceived by students as a qualification component for obtaining master’s / bachelor’s degrees, but not as an important element of professional development. A good level of theoretical knowledge of the subject area is frequently negated by the low development of practical skills, including due to the unwillingness or lack of opportunity to participate in practice-oriented research. However, the majority of respondents (77.7%) stated that they lack available information sources on the methodology of specific scientific papers with examples in order to indeppendently choose the research strategy and to develop their own professional skills. In this regard, on the example of the topic “Spatial Development of Russia as a Factor of Nation-Building and Formation of National Idea”, a universal programme of political applied research was developed. The programme can be used as a basis for long-term analysis and as a template for other thematic studies. The proposed scheme includes the selection of analysis methods and techniques to maximise the scope of the study area.

Practical significance. The described research methodology can be used in educational practice, when teaching the following disciplines: “Methods and Technologies of Political Science”, “Information and Analytical Work”, “Political Analysis and Forecasting”, etc.

1. Vishnevskiy Yu. R., Narkhov D. Yu., Didkovskaya Ya. V. Trends in higher vocational education: Professionalisation or deprofessionalisation? Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 1 (20): 152–170. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2018–1-9–170 (In Russ.)

2. Antyukhova E. A. Education as a soft power in modern foreign and Russian politological research. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4, Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Science Journal of Volgograd State University. History. Area Studies. International Relations. 2018; 4: 197–209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.4.17 (In Russ.)

3. Gutorov V. A. Education in modern political theory discourse (bibliographic review). Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Policy Studies. 2019; 3: 107– 126. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.03.0 (In Russ.)

4. Lantsova I. V., Kornilova G. I. On status of political education in national research university. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2013; 7 (78): 285–289. (In Russ.)

5. Hu Z. J., Li J. Innovative methods for ideological and political education of college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2018; 5: 2069–2078. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2018.5.106 (In Russ.)

6. Demchenkova O. A. Potential of competency-based approach in the educational paradigm. Vestnik Rossijskogo fonda fundamental’nyh issledovanij. Gumanitarnye i obshchestvennye nauki = Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2018; 4 (93): 116–124. DOI: 10.22204/2587–8956–2018–093–04–116–124 (In Russ.)

7. Kayumov O. R. About goals and ideals of education applying the “competence approach”. Idei i ideally = Ideas and Ideals. 2017; 4 (34): 95–104. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17212/2075–0862–2017–4.1–95–104

8. Tarkhanova I. Yu., Kharisova I. G. Educational technologies in forming university students’ universal competences. Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik = Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin. 2018; 5: 136–145. DOI: 10.24411/1813–145X2018–10165 (In Russ.)

9. Fortygina S. N., Chepurenko A. A., Andreeva E. V., Sterligova E. A. The concept of the competency-based approach in the system of higher education. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2017; 57 (7): 238–245. (In Russ.)

10. Verbitsky A. A., Kurylov A. S., Iliazova M. D. The invariant structure of the contextual-competence curriculum. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = The Highest Education in Russia. 2011; (6): 66–71. (In Russ.)

11. Mikidenko N. L., Aminova Y. R., Pivovarova E. S., Storozheva S. P. Experience in the assessment of students’ satisfaction with organisation and content of independent study in the conditions of implementation of competency building approach. Vestnik NGUEU = Vestnik NSUEM. 2018; 3: 255–266. (In Russ.)

12. Fedorova N. М., Churkina N. I. Organising master’s students research activity in a network. Vestnik Sibirskogo instituta biznesa i informacionnyh tekhnologij = Bulletin of the Siberian Institute of Business and Information Technology. 2016; 4 (20): 161–166. (In Russ.)

13. Apanasenok A. V., Shulgina N. P., Bozhenkova R. K. Research work of students in a contemporary University: The topical challenges. Izvestiya Yugo-Zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Lingvistika i pedagogika = News of Southwest State University. Series: Linguistics and Pedagogy. 2016; 2 (19): 123– 130. (In Russ.)

14. Zamkin P. V., Parshina L. G., Miroshkin V. V. Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the development of research activities of students in the process of practice-oriented training at high school. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie = Humanities and Education. 2018; 9 (4): 31–40. (In Russ.)

15. Shulgina T. A., Ketova N. A., Kholodova K. A., Severinov D. A. Motivating students to participate in professionally oriented events management. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 1 (20): 96–115. DOI: 10.17853/19945639–2018–1-96–115 (In Russ.)

16. Hines A. Getting ready for a PostWork future. Forsajt = Foresight and STI Governance. 2019; 1: 19–30. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2019.1.19.30 (In Russ.)

17. Andreev V. V., Gibadulin R. Ya., Prodanov G., Zhdanov R. I. Russian Institute for Advanced Study as a new form of training of highly trained teaching staff. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2017; 21 (4): 623–636. DOI: 10.15507/1991–9468.089.021.201704.623–636 (In Russ.)

18. Kuzminov Ya., Sorokin P., Froumin I. Generic and specific skills as components of human capital: New challenges for education theory and practice. Forsajt = Foresight and STI Governance. 2019; 2: 19–41. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2019.2.19.41 (In Russ.)

19. Ustinova K. A., Chekmareva Y. A. Influence of the level of the development of skills on labour potential, its implementation and choice of work position. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2016; 3: 726–740. DOI: 10.17059/2016–3-10 (In Russ.)

20. Unger M., Polt W. The knowledge triangle between research, education and innovation – a conceptual discussion. Forsajt = Foresight and STI Governance. 2017; 2: 10–26. DOI: 10.17323/2500–2597.2017.2.10.26 (In Russ.)

21. Carayannis E., Grigoroudis E. Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: Knowledge production and national competitiveness. Forsajt = Foresight and STI Governance. 2016; 1: 31–42. DOI: 10.17323/1995–459x.2016.1.31.42 (In Russ.)

22. Gapontsev V. L., Fedorov V. A., Gapontseva M. G. Symmetry principle as a basis for integration in science and its value for education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 4 (21): 9–35. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–20194–9-35 (In Russ.)

23. Easton D. An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics. 1957; 9 (3): 383–400. DOI: 10.2307/2008920

24. Bartop V. I. Comparison as a means of cognition. Minsk: Belarusian State University; 1978. 128 p. (In Russ.)

25. Mannheim D. B., Richie K. R. Political science: Research methods. Moscow: Publishing House Ves’ Mir; 1997. 544 p. (In Russ.)

26. Gritsenko A. A. Ethnocultural gradient and regional identity along the RussianUkrainian-Belarusian borderlands. Regional Research of Russia. 2011; 1 (4): 351–362. DOI: 10.1134/S2079970511040058

27. Drobizheva L. M. The potential of interethnic consent: Understanding of concepts and social practices in Moscow. Sociologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Research. 2015; 11: 80–90. (In Russ.)

28. Herrera Y. M., Butkovich Kraus N. M. Pride versus prejudice: ethnicity, national identity, and xenophobia in Russia. Comparative Politics. 2016; 48 (3): 293–315. DOI: 10.5129/001041516818254365 (In Russ.)

29. Gorshkov M. K., Tyurina I. O. Synthesis of ethnic and civil as the basis for the Russian identity. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sociologiya = Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology. 2018; 18 (1): 44–57. DOI: 10.22363/2313–2272–2018–18–1-44–57 (In Russ.)

30. Latov Yy. V. The paradoxes of the perception of the modern Russians of Russia of L. I. Brezhnev, B. N. Yeltsin and V. V. Putin. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Policy Studies. 2018; 5: 116–133. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.05.10 (In Russ.)

31. Fabrykant M., Magun V. Dynamics of national pride attitudes in postsoviet Russia, 1996–2015. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity. 2019; 47 (1): 20–37. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2018.18

32. Pushkaryova G. V. Ideas and values as a method of constructing symbolic space of the national identity. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Policy Studies. 2017; 5: 156–173. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.11 (In Russ.)

33. Tikhonova N. Ye. Balance of state interests and human rights in perception of Russians: Empirical analysis. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Policy Studies. 2018; 5: 134–149. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.05.11 (In Russ.)

34. Mersiyanova I. V. Indicators of civil society development in Russia: Results of 10 years of observations. Informacionno-analiticheskij byulleten’ o razvitii grazhdanskogo obshchestva i nekommercheskogo sektora v RF = Information and Analytical Bulletin on the Development of Civil Society and the Non-Profit Sector in Russia. 2017; 1: 6–11. (In Russ.)

35. Miroshnichenko I. V., Morozova E. V. Networking mechanisms of identity formation. Cultura. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology. 2017; 14 (2): 107–120. (In Russ.)

36. Kol’ba A. I., Khasaeva Е. Y. Monitoring of interethnic relations as an instrument of political control of urban conflicts. Srednerusskij vestnik obshchestvennyh nauk = Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. 2017; 12 (6): 141–149. DOI: 10.22394/2071–2367–2017–12–6-141–149 (In Russ.)

37. Bakhlova O. V. Integration policy of Russia in the region of the commonwealth of independent states: opportunities, estimates, prospects. RЕGIONOLOGIYA REGIONOLOGY = Regionology. Russian Journal of Regional Studies. 2017; 4: 482–511. (In Russ.)

38. Shentyakova A. V. The Electoral preferences of citizens and inhabitants of rural area before the elections to the State Duma of convening VII (on KHMAO example). Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Politologija. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija = Vestnik of St. Petersburg University. Political Science. International Relations. 2017; 10 (1): 30–38. DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu06.2017.104 (In Russ.)

39. Shirmanov Е. V. Symbolic system of state and regional identity of Mordovia and Ulyanovsk region inhabitants (based on focus groups records). Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya = Bulletin of Volga Region Institute of Management. 2015; 4: 77–83. (In Russ.)

40. Arnold R., Markowitz L. P. The evolution of violence within far-right mobilization: Evidence from Russia. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 2017; 41 (1): P. 1–16. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1332377

41. Akhremenko A. S., Petrov A., Yureskul E. Barriers to institutional development in Europe. Social Sciences. 2017; 48 (4): 91–110. DOI: 10.21557/SSC.50041063

42. Kangas A. Governmentality, the global and Russia. Journal of International Relations and Development. 2014; 18 (4): 482–504. DOI: 10.1057/jird.2014.7

43. Kangas A. Market civilisation meets economic nationalism: the discourse of nation in Russia's modernization. Nations and Nationalism. 2013; 19 (3): 572–591. DOI: 10.1111/nana.12023

44. Turovsky R., Korneeva E. The Institutional impact on voter turnout: The case of Russia and its regions (2011–2016). Russian Politics and Law. 2018; 3 (3): 372–395. DOI: 10.1163/2451–8921–00303004

45. Shestopal Ye. B. Quarter-century-long project: Study of the images of authorities and leaders in post-soviet Russia (1993–2018). Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya = Polis. Policy Studies. 2019; 1: 9–20. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.01.02 (In Russ.)