The Types of Religious Identity of Chechen Students

Introduction. In connection with the growth of religious consciousness of young people in Russia, the study of their religious identity is being updated. Scientists pay special attention to Islamic denominations, as both in Western countries and in the Russian Federation, the number of Muslims is increasing. However, scientific publications cover mainly sociological aspects of the problem, and its psychological component remains insufficiently investigated, which largely determines the social behaviour of a person and affects the process of his or her socialisation. In view of the interest shown by the scientific community in Arab-Muslim culture, appropriate psychological research should be carried out in Muslim-dominated regions. The Chechen Republic is one of such territories in the Russian Federation.

The aim is to identify the characteristics and types of religious identity of Chechen students.

Methodology and research methods. The study was performed in the framework of socio-psychological approach using the following questionnaires: “Scale of Religious Orientation” by G. Allport, D. Ross; “Structure of Individual Religiosity” by Y. V. Shcherbatykh; questionnaires developed by A. N. Tatarko and N. M. Lebedeva for the study of certainty and valence of ethnic identity and readiness for interethnic interaction; “Types of Ethnic Identity” by G. U. Soldatova and S. V. Ryzhova.

Results and scientific novelty. It is revealed that the majority of Chechen students are characterised by consistently internal religious orientation, in which religion is the main value and primary motive of activity. Almost a quarter of respondents demonstrated consistently external religious orientation, characterised by instrumental or external significance. A small group of respondents can be classified as inconsistently religious, whose external religiosity prevails over the internal, and their motivation for behaviour is poorly connected with religion. On the basis of the factor analysis, the types of religious identity of Chechen students are revealed: ethno-cultural, true Muslim, formal, pro-social, non-adaptive, nonreligious, ethnocentric and positive ethnic. The present study evidences that the structure of social identity of students is dominated by ethno-cultural religious identity.

Practical significance. The research results extend the knowledge about the content of the concept of “religious identity”, its place in the structure of social identity of the individual, as well as about the relationship of religious orientations with ethnic identity.

1. Fukuyama F. Identity. Farrar, Straus and Giroux [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Sep 8]. Available from: http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=64s744&from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%2F%3Bweb%3B%3B&text=&etext=5277

2. Waage P. N. Islam und die moderne Welt. Versuch eines Dialogs. Oslo: Futurum; 2004. 141 p.

3. Kudryashova I. V. Muslim political identity in the modern era: Sacred text and social experience. Vestnik RUDN. Serija Politologija = Vestnik RUDN. Series Political Science [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Dec 8]; 4: 349–365. Available from: http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=k2s3&from=yandex.ru (In Russ.)

4. Nunuev S. M. Risks of politicization of Islamic identity in modern Russia (based on the materials of the North Caucasus). Istoricheskaja i social’no-obrazovatel’naja mysl’ = Historical and Socio-Educational Thought. 2015; 7 (2): 63–69. (In Russ.)

5. Zhdanov N. B. Islamskaja koncepcija miroporjadka = Islamic concept of world order. Moscow: Publishing House Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija; 2003. 216 p. (In Russ.)

6. Drobizheva L. M. Russian, ethnic and regional identity: confrontation or compatibility. Rossija reformirujushhajasja = Reforming Russia. 2002; 2: 213–244. Moscow: Federal Research Sociological Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)

7. Moscovici S. Social representations theory: A new theory for media research. Nordicom Review [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Sep 8]; 32 (2): 3–16. Available from: http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=47ul3e&from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%2F%3Bweb%3B%3B&text=&etext=5277.0pQXZvh0d

8. Krylov A. N. Religioznaja identichnost’. Individual’noe i kollektivnoe samosoznanie v postindustrial’nom prostranstve = Religious identity. Individual and collective self-consciousness in the post-industrial space. 3rd ed. Moscow: Publishing House IKAR; 2014. 356 p. (In Russ.)

9. Tajfel H., Turner J. C. The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. Psychology of intergroup relations. Ed. by S. Worchel, W. G. Austin. Chicago; 1986. p. 15–47.

10. Brewer Marilynn B. Intergroup relations. Advanced social psychology: The State of the science. Ed. by Roy F. Baumeister, Eli J. Finkel. Oxford University Press; 2010. p. 535–571.

11. Lenski G. The religious factor. New York; 1961. p. 3–6.

12. Lenski G. The religious factor, a sociological study of religion’s impact on politics, economics, and family life. Connecticut; 1963. 414 p.

13. De Fina A. Group identity, narrative and self-representations. Ed. by De Fina A., Schiffrin D., Bamberg M. Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 351–375.

14. McAdams D. P. Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry. 1996; 7 (4): 295–321.

15. Elсia M., Sener I., Alpkan L. The impact of morality and religiosity of employees on their hardworking behavior. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Sep 8]; 24: 1367–1377. Available from: http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=77up3x&from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%2F%3Bweb%3B%3B&text=&etext=5277.X4I

16. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity self and society in late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991. 150 p.

17. Glock Ch. On the study of religious commitment. Religious Education. 1962; 57 (4): 98–110.

18. Babich I. L. “Soft Islamic revolution” in modern Adygea. Rossija i musul’manskij mir = Russia and the Muslim World [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 29]; 4: 31–37. Available from: https://rucont.ru/efd/475345 (In Russ.)

19. Galieva G. I. the Potential of youth in the preservation of ethno-confessional traditions: the experience of focus group research. In: Akademicheskoe issledovanie i konceptualizacija religii v XXI veke: tradicii i novye vyzovy: sb. materialov Tret’ego kongressa rossijskih issledovatelej religii (7‒9 oktjabrja 2016 g. Vladimir, VlGU): v 6 t. T. 3 = Academic Research and Conceptualisation of Religion in the XXI Century: Traditions and New Challenges. Collection of Materials of the Third Congress of Russian Researchers of Religion; 2016 Oct 7–9; Vladimir. In 6 volumes. Vol. 3. Vladimir: Arkaim; 2016. p. 228–237. (In Russ.)

20. Dvoinin A. M. Psychology of religion in Russia: problems and prospects. In: Akademicheskoe issledovanie i konceptualizacija religii v XXI veke: tradicii i novye vyzovy: sb. materialov Tret’ego kongressa rossijskih issledovatelej religii (7‒9 oktjabrja 2016 g. Vladimir, VlGU): v 6 t. T. 3 = Academic Research and Conceptualisation of Religion in the XXI Century: Traditions and New Challenges. Collection of Materials of the Third Congress of Russian Researchers of Religion; 2016 Oct 7–9; Vladimir. In 6 volumes. Vol. 3. Vladimir: Arkaim; 2016. p. 104–107. (In Russ.)

21. Drobizheva L. M. Tatarstan. The process of re-Islamisation and modern trends in the development of Muslim identity. Rossija i musul’manskij mir = Russia and the Muslim World [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2017 Sept 15]; 4: 24–31. Available from: https://rucont.ru/efd/475344 (In Russ.)

22. Malashenko A. Islamskoe vozrozhdenie v sovremennoj Rossii = The Islamic revival in modern Russia. Moscow: Moscow Carnegie Centre; 1998. 222 p. (In Russ.)

23. Mikhaleva A. V. Regional dimension of Islamic identity in Russia (on the example of the Perm region). Rossija i musul’manskij mir = Russia and the Muslim World [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2017 May 23]; 10: 20–25. Available from: https://rucont.ru/efd/474677 (In Russ.)

24. Mchedlova M. M. Religija i obshhestvo v sovremennoj Rossii: poisk edinstva = Religion and society in modern Russia: The search for unity. Rossijskoe obshhestvo i vyzovy vremeni = Russian Society and the Challenges of Time. 5th book. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov, V. V. Petukhov. Moscow: Publishing House Ves’ Mir; 2017. p. 287–307. (In Russ.)

25. Rakhmatullin R. Y. The problem of Muslim identity. Vestnik vostochno jekonomiko-juridicheskoj gumanitarnoj akademii = Bulletin of the East Economic and Legal Humanitarian Academy. 2018; 2 (94): 72–82. Ufa: Publishing House of the Eastern Economics and Law Humanitarian Academy. (In Russ.)

26. Sinelina Y. Y. Izmenenie religioznosti naselenija Rossii: pravoslavnye i musul’mane. Suevernoe povedenie rossijan = Change of religiosity of the population of Russia: Orthodox and Muslims. Superstitious behaviour of Russians. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 2006. 110 р. (In Russ.)

27. Lyausheva S. A., Zhade Z. A. Religious identity: some approaches to the understanding of the phenomenon. Nauchnye trudy Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta = Scientific works of the Kuban State Technological University. 2018; 10: 146–154. (In Russ.)

28. Pavlova O. S. Psychology of religion in the Islamic paradigm: state and prospects of development. Islam v sovremennom mire = Islam in the Modern World. 2015; 11(4): 207–222. (In Russ.)

29. Marcia J. E. Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1966; 3: 551–558.

30. Whitehouse H. Modes of religiosity: A cognitive theory of religious transmission. Walnut Creek; 2004. 208 p.

31. Pavlova O. S., Minasov V. M., Khukhlaev O. E. Religious identity of Muslim students (based on the study of young people living in the Chechen Republic). Kul’turno-istoricheskaja psihologija = Cultural-Historical Psychology. 2016; 12 (4): 90–99. (In Russ.)

32. Leach C. W., van Zomeren M., Zebel S., Vliek M. L. W., Pennekamp S. F., Doosje B., et al. Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008; 95(1): 144–165.

33. Van Camp D. Religious identity: individual or social? Exploring the components and consequences of religious identity [Internet]. Washington: Howard University; 2010 [cited 2016 May 13]. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/pqdtft/docview/743822279/13E4AA3864B650ABE7C/1?accountid=35419

34. Allport G. W., Ross J. M. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967; 5 (4): 432–443.

35. Myagkov I. F., Shcherbatykh Yu. V., Kravtsova M. S. Psychological analysis of the level of individual religiosity. Psihologicheskij zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 1996; 17 (6): 119–122. (In Russ.)

36. Tatarko A. N., Lebedeva N. M. Metody jetnicheskoj i krosskul’turnoj psihologii = Methods of ethnic and cross-cultural psychology. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2011. p. 15–17. (In Russ.)

37. Emelyanova E. Praktikum po jetnicheskoj psihologii = Practical course on ethnic psychology. Irkutsk: Irkutsk State University; 2015. 158 p. (In Russ.)

38. Nasledov A. D. Matematicheskie metody psihologicheskogo issledovanija. Analiz i interpretacija dannyh = Mathematical methods of psychological research. Data analysis and interpretation [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2018 Dec 21]. Available from: http://yandex.ru/clck/jsredir?bu=gmvc&from=yandex.ru%3Bsearch%2F%3Bweb%3B%3B&text=&etext=2140.U0orgECxl0K_nLKWNylhX9lHLyltFTQXpNTlDTCJUmE (In Russ.)

39. Stefanenko T. G. Jetnopsihologija = Ethnopsychology. Moscow: Publishing House Aspekt Press; 2009. 368 р. (In Russ.)