International academic mobility through the prism of soft power theory

Introduction. In the era of globalisation and digitalisation of society, the phenomenon of mobility is of particular relevance in the humanitarian discourse. Technological, socio-political and economic changes, penetrating into the sectors of education and science, contribute to internationalisation, intensification, as well as the inclusive growth of these priority areas of society. The study of academic mobility in the context of the theory of soft power will make it possible quantitatively measure and qualitatively evaluate the information and educational infrastructure as a separate educational and scientific organisation, and the country as a whole. The aim of the present research is to comprehensively consider the international academic mobility of students as a component and recourse of the country’s soft power in post-industrial realities.

Methodology and research methods. The methodological framework of the research involves discursive and conceptual approaches. The following general scientific methods were used: comparative and system-structural analysis, synthesis, generalisation and comparative method. Statistical reports and data from global rating systems were analysed and processed through the method of secondary data analysis. The coefficient of rank correlation of the relationship between the number of foreign students in the countries (included in the Top 30 of soft power) and indicators of the rating of the world universities was calculated according to Spirman’s rank correlation test.

Results and scientific novelty. The theories of soft power and academic mobility are synthesised on the basis of an analytical review of scientific publications by European, American, Russian and Chinese scientists. The hypothesis of the close interdependence of these concepts is confirmed. Academic mobility, including the virtual one, is shown to be an important tool for achieving geopolitical and economic goals both in the long-term and short-term perspectives. It is established that academic mobility, on the one hand, is determined from the standpoint of economic and political expediency; on the other hand, as a consequence of the globalisation, transforming the higher education system. While Western researchers emphasise the positive aspects of international law by students and scientists, the Russian scientific discourse is largely focused on the negative trends of this process. Two directions of soft power formation in the field of education are identified: training of future leaders (elite) and education of ordinary citizens. The authors revealed the vectors of the discussed type of mobility – Western-centric (Anglo-American) and the new one Asian (Eurasian), in whichChinaand the Chinese language take a special place. It was initiated to establish the SCO University Network among the representatives of member states in order to balance educational flows. The obstacles to its effectiveness are identified.

Practical significance. The research findings and conclusions extend the knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of the academic mobility realisation to increase university competitiveness.

1. Marginson S., Van der Wende M. Globalisation and higher education. OECD Education Working Papers. 2007; 8: 1–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/173831738240

2. Chen Q. Globalization and transnational academic mobility. The experiences of chinese academic returnees. Singapore: Springer Science+Business Media Singapore and Higher Education Press; 2017. 122 p.

3. Pan S.-Y. Education abroad, human capital development, and national competitiveness: China’s brain gain. Frontiers of Education in China. 2011; 6 (1): 106–138.

4. Zweig D. Learning to compete: China’s efforts to encourage a reverse brain drain. International Labour Review. 2006; 145 (1–2): 65–89.

5. Van der Wende M. International academic mobility: Towards a concentration of the minds in Europe. European Review. Cambridge University Press. 2015; 23 (1): 70–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798714000799

6. Lee C. S. Global linguistic capital, global cultural capital: International student migrants in China’s two-track international education market. International Journal of Educational Development. 2019; 67: 94–102.

7. Teichler U. Academic mobility and migration: What we know and what we do not know. European Review. 2015; 23 (1): 6–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798714000787

8. Geuna A. Global mobility of research scientists, the economics of who goes where and why. Ed. by Geuna A. Amsterdam: Elsevier BV; 2015. 310 p.

9. Pherali T. J. Academic mobility, language, and cultural capital: The experience of transnational academics in British higher education institutions. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2012; 16 (4): 313–333.

10. Otto D. Using virtual mobility and digital storytelling in blended learning: Analysing students’ experiences. Turkish Internet Journal of Distance Education. 2018; 19 (4): 90–103. DOI: 10.17718/tojde.471657

11. Nikulina T. V., Starichenko E. B. Informatization and digitalization of education: Concepts, technologies, management. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Teacher Education in Russia. 2018; 8: 107–113. (In Russ.)

12. Karpenko M. Features of the use of methods of forming soft power in the world of electronic learning tools. Chelovecheskij kapital = Human Capital. 2016; 88 (4): 17–19. (In Russ.)

13. Rusakova O., Kovba D., Gribovod E., Popova N. Cultural diplomacy as the intellectual capital of soft power exercised by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation member states. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning ICICKM 2018 Hosted by University of the Western Cape South Africa; 29–30 Nov 2018; Cape Town, South Africa. p. 277–284.

14. Bondarenko V. V., Zaugarov V. V., Seleznyov P. S., Yudina V. A. The concept of improving university education for foreign students in the Russian Federation within the framework of the policy of soft power. Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta = Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University. 2018; 8 (5): 6–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26794/2226–7867–2018–8-5–6-18 (In Russ.)

15. Sergeev S. Academic mobility as an instrument of soft power of science. Gumanitarnye, social’no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanitarian, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences. 2015; 6: 191–194. (In Russ.)

16. Torkunov A. V. Education as soft power instrument in Russian foreign policy. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta = MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2012; 4: 85–93. (In Russ.)

17. Lomer S. Soft power as a policy rationale for international education in the UK: A critical analysis. Higher Education. 2017; 74 (4): 581–598. DOI: 10.1007/s10734–016–0060–6.

18. Li J. Conceptualizing soft power of higher education, perspectives on rethinking and reforming education. Singapore: Springer; 2018. 251 p.

19. Bhuian S. N. Sustainability of Western branch campuses in the Gulf Region: Students’ perspectives of service quality. International Journal of Educational Development. 2016; 49: 314–323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.001

20. Wojciuk A. Higher education as a soft power in international relations. Chapter 8. Ed. by Y. Watanabe. Handbook of cultural security. Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar; 2018. p. 343–347.

21. Bilecen В., Van Mol С. Introduction: International academic mobility and inequalities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2017; 43 (8): 1241– 1255. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1300225

22. Urry J. Mobil’nosti = Mobility. Moscow: Publishing House Praksis; 2012. 576 p. (In Russ.)

23. Gribovod E. G. Mediation of politics in the framework of mobility theory. In: Mobil’nost’ kak izmereniye myagkoy sily: teoriya, praktika, diskurs: sb. nauch. tr. po itogam Pervoy Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy molodezhnoy konferentsii = Mobility as a Soft Power Dimension: Theory, Practice, Discourse. Proceedings of the First AllRussian Scientific and Practical Youth Conference; 2018 Oct 17; Ekaterinburg. Ekaterinburg: Publishing House Diskurs-Pi; 2019. p. 56–68. (In Russ.)

24. Rusakova O. Mobility discourse in modern communications. Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya Gumanitarnaya nauka = Scientific Gazette. Humanities Series. 2014; 13: 245–252. (In Russ.)

25. Ryazantsev S. V., Rostovskaya T. K., Skorobgatova V. I., Bezverbny V. A. International academic mobility in Russia: Trends, types, state stimulation. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2019; 15 (2): 420–435. (In Russ.)

26. Macek A., Ritonija N. Virtual mobility in higher Education – the case of DOBA Faculty. Studies from Education and Society [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Feb 14]. Available from: http://irisro.org/edusoc2016nov/26MacekAnita.pdf

27. Kovba D. Academic mobility in higher education in the context of the theory of soft power. Nauchnyj zhurnal “Diskurs-Pi” = Scientific Journal DiscourseP. 2016; 3–4: 181–185. (In Russ.)

28. Kovba D. Chinese civil society in the context of soft power theory. Teorii i problemy politicheskih issledovanij = Theories and Problems of Political Studies. 2017; 4: 197–205. (In Russ.)

29. Nye J. The future of power. New York: Public Affairs; 2010. 320 p.

30. Lebedeva M. M. Soft power: Concept and approaches. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta = MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2017; 3: 212–223. (In Russ.)

31. Petrova L. E., Kuz’min K. V. Virtual academic mobility of students through the MEPC: Methodological solutions of a university teacher. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2015; 12: 177–182. (In Russ.)