The features of changes in orientations to employment among bachelor’s graduates

Introduction. Today, there is a whole range of problems related to youth employment. These problems are caused by social, economic, technological, migration reasons, rapid transformation of the labour market structure and all spheres of life of a modern man. The value-motivational attitudes of young people in solving the issue of their employment become different. The aim of the research is to identify the dynamics and qualitative changes in values, which determine the choice of the future workplace by university graduates, as well as the degree of compliance of the claims of young specialists with the requirements imposed by employers.

Methodology and research methods. The methodology of the present research is based on the theory of determination of human activity, which reveals the relationship of socio-economic, sociocultural factors, needs, goals, value orientations, personality attitudes in determining the content of the desired job and place of employment. The main research method was a questionnaire survey of bachelor’s students in their final year of studies, who receive technical, economic, humanitarian and pedagogical education in universities of Ekaterinburg – a large Russian industrial and cultural centre. The survey was conducted in 2016 and 2018 according to a single method. At the first stage (2016) the quota sample was 1905 people, at the second stage (2018) – 2420 people. The opinions of the heads of enterprises and organisations of the Ural region on the quality of young specialists’ training, their desire and ability to actively participate in innovation processes were revealed through the method of in-depth interviews.

Results and scientific novelty. The results of a comparative study showed the preservation of the graduates’ value orientations to high salaries and opportunities for rapid professional and career growth. At the same time, very significant changes in the direction and content of young people’s orientations to the forthcoming employment were revealed: perceptions of the importance of early search for the profession demanded in labour market and the work in the acquired specialty; values of social status of a specialist with higher education; self-realisation in activities corresponding to personal inclinations and potential. The share of students who do not have clear plans for employment by the time they graduate decreased by half, and the share of technical departments graduates without such plans decreased fourfold. The share of students seeking to raise their social status by receiving a higher education diploma doubled. The number of students focused on obtaining a specialty corresponding to their personal abilities decreased by a quarter. The variation was found in accordance with the specifics of the direction of training of bachelor’s degree students’ determination to continue further studies in master’s degree programmes and their value attitudes for work, including in related specialties. The representatives of enterprises, where students undergo practical training, began to actively help them in finding a job corresponding to their specialty. However, the heads of manufacturing sectors and management staff of various organisations note the inadequacy of ambitions of a large part of applicants for prestigious positions due to the low level of the formation of necessary universal, general professional and professional competencies. According to the employers, there are no noticeable positive changes in the level of readiness of young professionals to actively engage in self-education and continuous professional development, mastering technological innovations.

Practical significance. Since the success of graduate employment is an important indicator of university efficiency, the results of the present research can be applied by education management specialists dealing with the issues of the quality of education, career guidance, employment of population and youth policy. 

1. Bannikova L. N., Sholina I. I. Problems of formation of engineering elite in the industrial region. Socium i vlast = Society and Authorities. 2013; 5 (43): 86– 90. (In Russ.)

2. Kalininskaya A. A., Dzugaev A. K., Vorobyev V. M. Assessment of medical and demographic situation, medical and social factors and organization of medical aid to the popular of rural areas (based on the results of the sociological survey). Sotsialnye aspekty zdorovya naseleniya = Social Aspects of Public Health. 2011; 6 (22): 1–9. (In Russ.)

3. Grunt E., Merenkov A., Antonova N. Factors affecting the choice of future work by Russian universities’ graduates. 2017. In: 10th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. p. 3430–3435.

4. Bauman Z. Tekuchaja sovremennost’ = Current modernity. St. Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2008. 240 p. (In Russ.)

5. Zeer E. F. Psikhologiya professiy = Psychology of professions. 2nd ed. Moscow: Publishing House Akademicheskij proekt; 2003. 336 p. (In Russ.)

6. Klimov E. A. Psikhologiya professional’nogo samoopredeleniya = Psychology of professional self-determination. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija; 2004. 336 p. (In Russ.)

7. Pryazhnikov N. S. Psikhologiya truda y chelovecheskogo dostoinstva = Psychology of labour and human dignity. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija; 2005. 477 p. (In Russ.)

8. Chistyakova S. N. Pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie samoopredeleniya shkolnikov = Pedagogical support of school students self-determination. Moscow; 2005. 122 p. (In Russ.)

9. Dorozhkin E. M., Zeer E. F. Scientific and applied foundations of professional orientation – theory and practice. Sibirsky psikhologicheskyi zhurnal = Siberian Journal of Psychology. 2014; 52: 67–78. (In Russ.)

10. Antonova N. L. Higher education in the context of multiple modernity. Teoriya I praktika obshestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2018; 6 (124): 11–14. DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2018.6.1 (In Russ.)

11. Bannikova L. N., Boronina L. N., Vishnevsky Y. R. Implementation of new models for training engineers-researchers: Sociological analysis. Vyshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2016; 11: 88–96. (In Russ.)

12. Ryabov M. V. Establishment and development of Russian professional education. Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universita = Bulletin of Bryansk State Technical University. 2006; 1 (9): 10–18. (In Russ.)

13. Artamonov A. D., Lovetsky G. I. Tekhnicheskie universitety v informatsionnom obshestve = Technical universities in digital society. Moscow: Bauman Moscow State Technical University; 2004. 288 p. (In Russ.)

14. Rebrin O. I., Sholina I. I. New models of engineering education. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2016; 2: 61–71. (In Russ.)

15. Saprykin D. L. Engineering education in Russia: history, concepts, prospects. Vyshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2012; 1: 125–137. (In Russ.)

16. Chubik P. S., Chubik M. P. Industrialisation as the main driver for engineering education transformation. Engineering education – focus on the new industrialisation. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie = Engineering Education. 2012; 10: 65– 76. (In Russ.)

17. Rudskoy A. I., et al. Strategiya razvitiya inzhenernogo obrazovaniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii do 2020 goda. Proekt = Strategy of development of engineering education in the Russian Federation by 2020. Project. St. Petersburg: Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnical University; 2017. 55 p. (In Russ.)

18. Crawley E. F. Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2015. 497 p. (In Russ.)

19. Basham J. D. Understanding STEM education and supporting students through universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children. 2013; 45 (4): 9–10.

20. Rodger W. What is STEM education? Science, New Series. 2010; 329 (5995): 991–998.

21. Sorum C. E. The problem of mission: A brief survey of the changing mission of the liberal arts. Liberal arts colleges in American higher education: Challenges and opportunities. ACLS Occasional Paper [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2019 Feb 05]; 59: 57–59. Student services & Advising. College of Liberal Arts. University of Minnesota. Available from: https://www.mtholyoke.edu/sites/default/files/iplanning/docs/59liberalartscolleges.pdf

22. Merenkov A., Dronishinets N., Antonova N. Social factors in the work attitudes to nuclear industry of Russian high school graduates. 2017. In: 2nd SSR International Conference on Social Sciences and Information (SSR-SSI 2017). p. 57– 62. DOI: 10.26602/asbs.2017.17.57

23. Gokuladas V. K. Technical and non-technical education and the employability of engineering graduates: an Indian case study. International Journal of Training and Development. 2010; 14. iss. 2: 131.

24. Hasanefendic S., Heitor M., Horta H. Training students for new jobs: The role of technical and vocational higher education and implications for science policy in Portugal. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2016; 113: 328– 333.

25. Kogan I. Tertiary education landscape and labour market chances of the highly educated in central and Eastern Europe. European Sociological Review. 2012; 28 (6): 701–703.

26. Fuchs W. The new global responsibilities of engineers create challenges for engineering education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development. 2012; 6 (1): 111–113.

27. Agarkov G. A., Sandler D. G., Sushenko A. D. Financial and social success of university graduates in the Ural region: Problems and ways of solution. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of the Region. 2018; 14 (4): 1312–1326. (In Russ.)

28. Maslow A. Motivacija i lichnost’ = Motivation and personality. St. Petersburg: Publishing House Evrazija; 1999. 478 p. (In Russ.)

29. Sorokin P. Sotsialnaya mobilnost’ = Social mobility. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija LVS; 2005. p. 365–370. (In Russ.)

30. Didkovskaya Ya.V., Bannikova L. N., Boronina L. N., Vishnevsky Yu. R., et al. Molodezh’ industrial’nyh regionov Rossii: obraz social’nogo budushhego i innovacionnyj potencial = Youth of the industrial regions of Russia: The image of the social future and innovative potential. Ekaterinburg: Ural State University; 2018. 215 p. (In Russ.)

31. Fedotova V. A. Values of Russians in the context of age differences. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofija. Psihologija. Sociologija = Bulletin of Perm University. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology. 2017; 1: 78–86. (In Russ.)

32. Bannikov L. N., et al. Student 1995–2016 gg.: dinamika sociokul’turnogo razvitija studenchestva Srednego Urala = Student 1995–2016: Dynamics of the sociocultural development of students in the Middle Urals. Ed. by Yu. R. Vishnevsky. Ekaterinburg; 2017. 904 p. (In Russ.)