Psychological and pedagogical readiness of a guide to work with disabled people
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-10-167-188
Abstract
Introduction. Care for people with disabilities is one of the criteria for the civility of the state and the moral state of society. In recent years, the measures have been actively taken inRussia to afford people with disabilities to have access to educational, cultural and leisure environments, facilities and services, thereby increasing the number of people with disabilities participating in various excursions and educational activities. However, this tendency rises to the demand for pedagogical technologies and creation of pedagogical conditions for working with tourists, who need of additional attention and support.
The aims of the present article are the following: to consider the activities of guides from the point of view of its pedagogical component; to assess the degree of psychological and pedagogical readiness of employees of excursion and tourism industry to serve people with disabilities and to be ready for successful, productive communication with them.
Methodology and research methods. In the course of research, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis, statistical methods, methods of survey and participant observation were employed. Primary data obtained during the survey, as well as secondary data from open sources and databases were used. The survey results and secondary data from open sources and information bases were investigated.
Results and scientific novelty. The generalisation of existing approaches to the interpretation of the concept of “specialist readiness” made it possible to clarify the essence of professional readiness. The author gives the definition of psychological and pedagogical readiness of the guide to work with people with disabilities. Psychological and pedagogical readiness is considered as a qualitative characteristic of a professional, reflecting the relationship between his or her internal, personal attitudes for activities of this kind and the ability to have an effective educational and development impact, using the means and potential of the excursion as a form of continuous training. The specifics of excursion and cognitive tourism for disabled persons and persons with special educational needs are described. The analysis of the results of empirical research allowed the authors to establish that most guides do not have necessary professional skills and skills of goal-setting concerning interaction with various categories of clients with disabilities. The pedagogical aspects of such activities are not presented in the theory and practice of vocational training/retraining of personnel for the tourism sphere. The conclusion was reached that the methods of education in higher education institutions and the system of advanced training for specialists-guides need to be further developed and improved in order to maximise the implementation of pedagogical function of culture-oriented sightseeing tourism. The authors give the recommendations on the inclusion of pedagogical component in the content of educational material and in the curricula of the corresponding specialties in order to promote professional development of future and current guides.
Practical significance. According to the authors, the materials and conclusions of the research will be useful to solve theoretical and applied problems in the field of pedagogy of excursion activities, as well as to train social workers of other profiles.
Keywords
About the Authors
O. V. ZaslavskayaRussian Federation
Olga V. Zaslavskaya – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Honored Teacher of the School of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Education
Tula
A. S. Malafiy
Russian Federation
Aleksandra S. Malafiy – Associate Professor, Department of Tourism and Hospitality Industry
Tula
References
1. Ozogul G., Baran G. G. Accessible tourism: The golden key in the future for the specialized travel agencies. Journal of Tourism Futures. 2016; 2 (1): 79–87.
2. Rabontu C. I. The accessibility of persons with disabilities in Romanian tourism. Revista de Turism-Studii si Cercetari in Turism. 2018; 25: 32–37.
3. Gassiot Melian A., Prats L., Coromina L. The perceived value of accessibility in religious sites – Do disabled and non-disabled travellers behave differently? Tourism Review. 2016; 71 (2): 105–117.
4. Portner M. Ernstnehmen, Zutrauen, Verstehen. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 1996. p. 36–38.
5. Portner M. Brucken bauen. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta; 2018. 249 p.
6. Malafiy A. S. Problems of personnel training for the tourism industry. In: Razvitiye turizma v kontekste innovatsionnykh protsessov sovremennoy ekonomiki: sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Tourism Development in the Context of Innovative Processes of the Modern Economy. A collection of Materials of the International Scientific-Practical Conference; 2018 Oct 3–4; Yelets. Yelets: Yelets State University named after I. A. Bunin; 2018. P. 433–437. (In Russ.)
7. Gillovic B., McIntosh A. Stakeholder perspectives of the future of accessible tourism in New Zealand. Journal of Tourism Futures. 2015; (3): 223–239.
8. Kastenholz E., Eusebio C., Figueiredo E. Contributions of tourism to social inclusion of persons with disability. Disability & Society. 2015; 30(8): 1259–1281.
9. Mesquita S., Carneiro M. J. Accessibility of European museums to visitors with visual impairments. Disability & Society. 2016; 31(3): 373–378.
10. Tomej K. Accessible and equitable tourism services for travelers with disabilities: From a charitable to a commercial footing. In: Corporate sustainability and responsibility in tourism. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 65–78.
11. McKercher B., Darcy S. Re-conceptualizing barriers to travel by people with disabilities. Tourism Management Perspectives. 2018; 26: 59–66.
12. Baltusite R., Katane I. The structural model of the pedagogy students’ readiness for professional activities in the educational environment. Rural Environment. Education. Personality. 2014; 7: 29–41.
13. Baltusite R. Readiness for pedagogical activity indicators and methodology. In: International Scientific Conference, ATEE Spring University, 20 Years for Sustainable Development: Learning from Each Other; 2012 May 3–5; Vilnuis. Vilnuis: Lithuanian University of Educational Sciences; 2012. p. 205–210.
14. Kovalev A. G. Psikhologiya lichnosti = Psychology of personality. Moscow: Publishing House Prosveshhenie; 1970. 311 p. (In Russ.)
15. Platonov K. K. Struktura i razvitiye lichnosti = Structure and development of personality. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1986. 254 p. (In Russ.)
16. Slastenin V. A., Podymova L. S. The teacher’s readiness for innovation. Sibirskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal = Siberian Pedagogical Journal. 2007; 1: 42–49. (In Russ.)
17. Dyachenko M. I., Kandybovich L. A., Ponomarenko V. A. Gotovnost’ k deyatel’nosti v napryazhennykh situatsiyakh. Psikhologicheskiy aspekt = Willingness to work in stressful situations. Psychological aspect. Minsk: Publishing House “Universitetskoe”; 1985. 208 p. (In Russ.)
18. Dyachenko M. I., Kandybovich L. A. Psikhologicheskiye problemy gotovnosti k deyatel’nosti = Psychological problems of readiness for activity. Minsk: Publishing House “Universitetskoe”; 1976. 176 p. (In Russ.)
19. Gilmeeva R. H. Professional’noye razvitiye uchitelya v sovremennykh usloviyakh = Teachers’ professional development in modern conditions. Kazan: Institute of Advanced Training and Retraining of Education Workers of the Republic of Tatarstan; 1996. 103 p. (In Russ.)
20. Derkach A. A., Vodop’yanov D. A. Theoretical foundations of psychological readiness of students – future psychologists to professional activities. Akmeologiya = Acmeology. 2017; 2: 7–13. (In Russ.)
21. Kirilova S. А. Psychological readiness as the basis of a teacher’s professional competency. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2017. 57 (12): 138–144. (In Russ.)
22. Emelyanov B. V. Ekskursovedeniye = Tour Guide. Moscow: Publishing House Sovetskij sport; 2007. 216 p. (In Russ.) 2
23. Bogdanova A. D. Model of professional retraining of guides for work with foreign tourists in English. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2019 Mar 10]; № 3. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/model-professionalnoy-perepodgotovki-ekskursovodov-dlya-raboty-sinostrannymi-turistami-na-angliyskom-yazyke (In Russ.)
24. Zharkova U. A. Self-identification of a professional guide: Motives and means. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2019 Mar 15]; № 37 (328). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/samoidentifikatsiya-professionalnogoekskursovoda-motivy-i-sredstva (In Russ.)
25. Kalugina T. V. Formation of a strong language personality of the guide (on the material of the Republic of Crimea). Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 10]; № 1 (423). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-silnoy-yazykovoy-lichnosti-ekskursovoda-na-materiale-respubliki-krym (In Russ.)
26. Mulkova Ye. S. Pedagogical aspect of excursion activity. Tsarskosel’skiye chteniya = Tsarskoye Selo Readings. 2011; 15: 206–209. (In Russ.)
27. Simonova M. M. Humanitarian problems in the organisation of excursion activities. Nauchnoe obozrenie: gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Scientific Review: Humanitarian Studies. 2016; 12: 45–49. (In Russ.)
28. Ponomareva I. Yu., Malafiy A. S., Petrovichev V. M. Turizm kak sredstvo sotsial’noy adaptatsii lyudey s ogranichennymi fizicheskimi vozmozhnostyami = Tourism as a means of social adaptation of people with disabilities. Tula: Tula State University; 2013. 62 p. (In Russ.)
29. Malafiy A. S., Tankieva T. A. Improving the legal policy in the field of tourism for people with disabilities. Izvestija Tul’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tula State University. 2012; 3: 248–256. (In Russ.)
30. Vanshin S. N. Sotsiokul’turnaya reabilitatsiya invalidov muzeynymi sredstvami = Socio-cultural rehabilitation of disabled people with museum tools. Moscow: Publishing House GDM; 2013. 100 p. (In Russ.)
31. Zaslavskaya O. V. Professional personality of a teacher: A subject of a standard or a citizen of a profession? In: Sistemnyy podkhod v vospitanii: razvitiye vo vremeni i prostranstve: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika RAO Lyudmily Ivanovny Novikovoy = System Approach in Education: Development in Time and Space. Materials of the International Scientific-Practical Conference Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of the Academician of the Russian Academy of Education Lyudmila Ivanovna Novikova; 2018 Oct 18–19; Moscow. Moscow: Publishing House Pedagogicheskij poisk; 2018. p. 456–461. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Zaslavskaya O.V., Malafiy A.S. Psychological and pedagogical readiness of a guide to work with disabled people. The Education and science journal. 2019;21(10):167-188. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2019-10-167-188