The Idea of Education: Development or Service Delivery?

Introduction. In recent years, the debates over the education crisis, its essence and the role in the development of a person and culture in general have underlined the need to scientifically define the concept of modern education. The present article is debatable and theoretical; therefore, it explores the idea of education from the perspective of the current trend – the classification of education as a service sector.

The aim of the article is to scientifically justify irrelevance of the ideas of education as a “commercial service” through the discussion of consequences of such an interpretation.

Methodology and research methods. The research methodology is based on a meta-systemic approach, which allows us to consider education as the system in a number of other social institutes and structures and as an element of a larger system. The logical-semantic analysis, hermeneutic method and synthesis of the views among the representatives in the filed of the humanities were used to study the phenomenon of “educational services”. To determine own position, the authors of the present article used the procedure of separating “social construction paradigms” (as a set of principles of knowledge and transformation of social reality), which make it possible to give diverse definitions of society and to introduce the concepts of the essence and the role of education.

Results. The concept of “educational services” is analysed as a speech template, a way of thinking, a legal concept, a call to changing social practice and a probable project. The authors reveal a conceptual, semantic substitution, which negatively affects the result of the educational process: the meaning of profit has taken the place of the sense of personal development and social long-term viability and development of society. It is demonstrated that this semantic substitution is a natural consequence of the market laws, going beyond the social control, in particular, their semi-legitimate expansion into the sphere of education, which is a significant public good.

Scientific novelty. It is proved that an established expression “educational services” in modern discourse contributes to destructive transformations of the citizens’ mentality and social space. The concepts of “service” and “education” are characterised according to a set of the following criteria: a subject of activity, its nature, a recipient role, specificity of the methods of activity, its result (or its goal) and quality assessment. It is concluded that the sectors of service and education can be characterised as joint constructive human activities, but they are fundamentally different activities.

Practical significance. The obtained results could be applied to provide purposeful adjustment processes for conceptual management of the education sector.

education, problems of education, education crisis, education management, educational services, violation of the law of identity, semantic value processes, legal foundations of education, social practice, archetypes, state security

1. Zagvyazinsky V. I. Concerning the social importance and a demand of pedagogical research. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 06]; 8: 4–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17853/1994–5639–2015–8-4–19 (In Russ.)

2. Dulzon А. А. Higher education reforms and university community. Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye = Engineering Education. 2017; 21: 8–17. (In Russ.)

3. Bojsen E. Inventing the educational subject in the “information age”. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2016; 35 (3): 267–278.

4. Kristic P. Three naive questions: Addressed to the modern educational optimism. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2015; 35: 129. DOI:10.1007/s11217–015–9463–6

5. Tyson E. L. Rethinking the learning society: Giorgio Agamben on studying, stupidity, and impotence. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2015; 30 (6): 585–599. DOI: 10.1007/s11217–011–9255–6

6. O’Connell C. An examination of global university rankings as a new mechanism influencing mission differentiation: The UK context. Tertiary Education and Management. 2015; 21 (2): 111–126.

7. Dewey J. How we think. Carolona: BiblioBazaar; 2009. 234 p.

8. Dewey J. The quest for certainty: A study of the relation between knowledge and action. New York: Capricon; 1960. 318 p.

9. D’Agnese V. Undergoing, mystery, and half-knowledge: John Dewey’s disquieting side. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2016; 35: 195–214.

10. Dewey J. Experience and nature. Mineola: Dover Publications; 1958. 480 p.

11. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskakh smysla = Man in search of meaning. Moscow: Publishing House Progress; 1990. 368 p. (In Russ.)

12. Kuzminov Ya. I., Peskov D. N. What is the future of universities? Voprosy obrazovaniya = Issues of Education. 2017; 3: 202–233. DOI: 10.17323/18149545–2017–3-202–233 (In Russ.)

13. Fresco J. The best that money can’t buy: Beyond politics, poverty and war. Global Cyber Visions; 2002. 166 p.

14. Nussbaum M. Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press; 2016. 192 p.

15. Duarte M. Educating citizens for humanism: Nussbaum. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2015; 35 (5): 463–476.

16. Nureev R. M. “Velikaya transformatsiya” Karla Polanyi: proshloye, nastoyashcheye, budushcheye = “The Great Transformation” by Karl Polanyi: Past, Present, Future. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2007. 321 p. (In Russ.)

17. Katasonov V. Yu. Kapitalizm: istoriya i ideologiya “denezhnoy tsivilizatsii” = Capitalism: The history and ideology of “monetary civilisation”. Moscow: Institute of Russian Civilisation; 2015. 1075 p. (In Russ.)

18. Ljovkin V. E. The current socio-economic system as the context of a psychological order. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke = Context and Reflection: Philosophy about the World and Man. 2015; 6: 114–138. (In Russ.)

19. Epstein G. Financialization, rentier interests, and central bank policy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts; 2002. 43 p.

20. Palley T. I. Financialization: The Economics of finance capital domination. Palgrave Macmillan; 2017. 248 p.

21. Vitali S., Glattfelder J. B., Battiston S. The network of global corporate control. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2019 Oct 06]; 6 (10): e25995. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025995

22. Jasinski I., Lewis T. The educational community as intentional community. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2015; 35: 371. DOI: 10.1007/s11217015–9480–5

23. Guilherme A. Reflexions on Buber’s ‘living-centre’: Conceiving of the teacher as ‘the builder’ and teaching as a ‘situational revelation’. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2014; 34: 245. DOI: 10.1007/s11217–014–9429–0

24. Grivennaya E. N. The concept and essence of educational services as a legal category. Obshchestvo i pravo = Society and Law. 2013; 4: 301–305. (In Russ.)

25. Kurov S. V. Obrazovatel’nye uslugi: Grazhdansko-pravovoj aspekt = Educational services: Civil law aspect [dissertation]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Public Service; 1999. 23 p. (In Russ.)

26. Gribovskiy M. V., Sorokin A. N. Academic freedom and bureaucratic bonds of the lecturers: Results of field research in British and French universities. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 06]; 23 (1–2): 60–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2019.01–2.004 (In Russ.)

27. Eagleton T. The slow death of the University. The Chronicle of Higher Education [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.chronicle.com/article/The-Slow-Death-of-the/228991

28. Fulford A. Education: expectation and the unexpected. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2015; 35: 415. DOI: 10.1007/s11217–015–9495-y

29. Munday I. Roots and rhizomes – Some reflections on contemporary pedagogy. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 2012; 46 (1): 42–59.

30. Peters R. S. Ethics and education. London: George Allen and Unwin; 1966. 333 p. DOI: 10.2307/2217533

31. Zagvyazinsky V. I. About barriers on the way of revival of the Russian education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016; 1 (8): 11–22. DOI: 10.17853/1994–5639–2016–8-11–22 (In Russ.)

32. Naot-Ofarim Y., Solomonic S. Educational polyphony. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2015; 35 (4): 385–397. DOI: 10.1007/s11217–015–9491–2

33. Vylegzhanina A. O. Upravleniye resursami sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya = Resource management of socio-economic development. Moscow: Publishing House Direkt-media; 2015. 372 p. (In Russ.)

34. Von Weizsaecker, E. U. Come on! Capitalism, short-termism, population and the destruction of the planet. New-York: Springer; 2017. 220 p.

35. Teslinov A. G. On two classes of trends in the formation of the digital age. In: Kachestvo otkrytogo distancionnogo obrazovanija koncepcii, problemy, reshenija (DEQ-2017). Molodezh’ i nauka: materialy XIX Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferencii i nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii studentov = Quality of Open Distance Education Concepts, Problems, Solutions (DEQ-2017). Materials of the XIX International Scientific-Practical Conference and Scientific-Practical Conference of Students; 2018 Dec 08–22; Zhukovsky. Zhukovsky: International Institute of Management LINK; 2018. p. 183–188. (In Russ.)

36. Kuzminov Ya. I., Karnoi M. Online learning: How it changes the structure of education and the economy of the university. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Issues. 2015; 3: 8–43. DOI: 10.17323/1814–9545–2015–3-8–43 (In Russ.)

37. Walker J. Time as the fourth dimension in the globalization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education. 2009; 80 (5): 483–509.

38. Knox J. Posthumanism and the MOOC: Opening the subject of digital education. Studies in Philosophy and Education. 2016; 35: 305. DOI:10.1007/s11217–016–9516–5

39. Mikhalkov N. S. Slomaet li Google shpil’ MGU? = Will Google break MSU spire? BesogonTV = ExorcismTV [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Oct 06]. Available from: https://youtu.be/TmMhv2PikdA (11:35–12:07) (In Russ.)

40. Manea N. P., Iatagan M. Perceptions of PhD Students Regarding the Quality of Educational Services of Romania. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 191: 1735–1739.

41. Korka M. Educaţie de calitate pentru piaţa muncii. Bucureşti: Editura Universitară; 2009. 278 p.

42. Bektaş Ş., Tayaunova G. A Model Suggestion for improving the efficiency of higher education: University-industry cooperation. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 116: 2270–2274.

43. Schedrovitsky P. G. Human capital [Internet]. 2018 Apr 26 [cited 2019 June 12]. EduNet-Obrazovaniye budushchego = EduNet-Future Education. Available from: https://youtu.be/EqXZJTHSJXU (In Russ.)

44. Vylegzhanina A. O., Ljovkin V. E. The fundamental reasons for the difficulties of innovative development of a modern organization. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2019 Oct 06]; 6 Available from: www.science-education.ru/120–16026 (In Russ.)

45. Gromyko Yu. V., Davyvodov V. V. Education as a means of formation and cultivation of social and regional development. Nauchno-analiticheskiy zhurnal “Obrazovatel’naya politika” = Scientific-analytical journal “Educational Policy”. 2011; 2 (52): 24–38. (In Russ.)

46. Subetto A. I. Kapitalokratiya = Capitalocracy. St. Petersburg. Kostroma: Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov; 2000. 216 p. (In Russ.)

47. Subetto A. I. Kapitalokratija i global’nyj imperializm = Capitalocracy and global imperialism. St. Petersburg. Kostroma: Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov; 2009. 598 p. (In Russ.)

48. Subetto A. I. Epokha krakha rynka, kapitalizma i liberalizma: noosferno-sotsialisticheskiy proryv ili ekologicheskaya gibel’ chelovechestva? = The epoch of the collapse of the market, capitalism and liberalism: A noospheric-socialist breakthrough or the ecological death of humanity? St. Petersburg. Kostroma: Kostroma State University named after N. A. Nekrasov; 2010. 43 p. (in Russ.)

49. Dulzon A. A. Paradoks ustoychivogo razvitiya = The paradox of sustainable development. Moscow: Publishing House Triumf; 2018. 264 p. (In Russ.)

50. Martin G.-P., Schumann H. Zapadnya globalizatsii. Ataka na protsvetaniye i demokratiyu = The Trap of globalisation. Attack on prosperity and democracy. Moscow: Publishing House Alpina; 2001. 335 p. (In Russ.)

51. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti = Anatomy of human destructiveness. Moscow: Publishing House AST; 2004. 635 p. (In Russ.)

52. Fromm E. Zdorovoye obshchestvo = Healthy society. Moscow: Publishing House AST; 2015. 448 p. (In Russ.)

53. Fromm E. Psikhoanaliz i etika = Psychoanalysis and ethics. Moscow: Publishing House Respublika; 1993. 414 p. (In Russ.)