Corpus software in EFL teaching: Examination of language exposure

Introduction. High-quality language education in technical universities requires its interdisciplinary relation to the content of highly specialised subjects corresponding to the training programmes aimed at instructing the future specialists. Educational materials in a foreign language are highly productive if they emphasise the terminology and professional vocabulary authentic to the current state of the scientific field.

The aim of the study presented in the article was to assess the validity of the lexical material delivered in the course “English for Business Communication”, to determine the selection criteria for this vocabulary as well as the methods for its assimilation and practical application.

Methodology and research methods. The applied corpus software enabled to obtain quantitative indicators of the distribution of foreign-language business vocabulary in the given training course. The lexical material being currently offered to students and the professional thesaurus identified via linguistic databases was compared with the use of comparative analysis and synthesis.

Results and scientific novelty. The lexical units (terms, set expressions), which are the most active in the business sphere, were identified on the basis of its frequency. The authors established the correlation between them and educational vocabulary, both from the perspective of its integration into the course without block concentration throughout the course of university training, and from the perspective of the variety of methods used to practice this vocabulary. It is concluded that the applied educational material needs to be substantially adjusted. The vocabulary does not completely reflect the realities of the business communication sphere and the distribution of active vocational vocabulary regulated by methodological guidelines does not entirely contribute to its strong assimilation. According to the authors, the necessary changes to the approaches and methods for selecting and compiling lexical material and to the methodology for designing a foreign language course should be made on the basis of integrating pedagogical and linguistic knowledge, in particular, the methodology of teaching foreign languages and the corpus linguistics.

Practical significance. The ways of integrating corpus programs in the process of developing the content of language disciplines, which are part of the main educational program of technical universities, are demonstrated as one of the methods to increase the effectiveness of teaching foreign languages to students of non-linguistic specialties.

1. Zahar R., Cobb T. & Spada N. Acquiring vocabulary through reading: Effects of frequency and contextual richness. Canadian Modern Language Review. 2011; 57 (4): 541–572.

2. Matsuoka W., Hirsh D. Vocabulary learning through reading: Does an ELT course book provide good opportunities? Reading in a Foreign Language. 2010; 22: 56–70.

3. Vidal K. Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics. 2003; 24 (1): 56–89.

4. Bisson M-J., Van Heuven W. J. B., Conklin K, et al. Incidental Acquisition of Foreign Language Vocabulary through Brief Multi-Modal Exposure. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8 (4): 1–7.

5. Yudintseva A. Game-Enhanced Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition Strategies: A Systematic Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2015; 3 (10): 101–109.

6. Shahraki S. H., Kassaian Z. Effects of learner interaction, receptive and productive learning tasks on vocabulary acquisition: An Iranian case. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2001; 15: 2165–2171.

7. Krashen S. The case for narrow reading. Language Magazine. 2004; 3 (5): 17–19.

8. Joe A. The quality and frequency of encounters with vocabulary in an English for Academic Purposes programme. Reading in a Foreign Language. 2010; 22 (1): 117–138.

9. Coady J., Huckin T. Second language vocabulary acquisition. Cambridge University Press; 1997. 297 p.

10. Harley B. Vocabulary learning and teaching in a second language. Canadian Modern Language Review. 1996; 53: 3–12.

11. Mondria J. A., Wit-de Boer M. The effects of contextual richness on the guess ability and the retention of words in a foreign Language1. Applied linguistics. 1991; 12 (3): 249–267.

12. Horst M., Cobb T., Meara P. Beyond A Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language. 1998; 11 (2): 207–223.

13. Cobb T. Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordance? System. 1997; 25 (3): 301–315.

14. Chen C., Truscott J. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics. 2010; 31: 693–713.

15. Eckerth J., Tavakoli P. The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research. 2012; 16 (2): 227–252.

16. Laufer B., Rozovski-Roitblat B. Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research. 2011; 15: 391–411.

17. Rott S. The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 1999; 21: 589–619.

18. Waring R., Takaki M. At what rate do learners learn and retain new vocabulary from a graded reader. Reading in a Foreign Language. 2003; 15: 130–163.

19. Webb S. The effects of repetition on vocabulary knowledge. Applied Linguistics. 2007; 28: 46–65.

20. Saragi T., Nation P. & Meister G. Vocabulary learning and reading. System. 1978; 6: 72–80.

21. Herman P. A., Anderson R. C., Pearson P. D., et al. Incidental acquisition of word meaning from expositions with varied text features. Reading Research Quarterly. 1987; 22 (3): 263–284.

22. Rozanova Ya. V., Kudryashova A. V., Zamyatina O. M. Computer-aided research of ESP class materials: vocabulary potential and learning opportunities. Language and Culture [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Apr 6]; 42. Available from: http://journals.tsu.ru//language/en/&journal_page=archive&id=1744

23. Nation P., Wang M. Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language. 1999; 12: 355–390.