The Impact of Quality Content Educational Resources on Students’ Academic Achievement: Survey Research (on the Example of Northern Border University, Arar)

Introduction. Academic achievement is reflected in marks (points) achieved in the disciplines studied and it assumes that the student has acquired the required set of skills and knowledge, which he or she can use while performing educational and professional tasks after learning a particular discipline or a group of disciplines. This means that the concept of “academic achievement” represents measuring the student’s ability to comprehend academic programmes in the class or independently.

The aims of the present research were the following: to determine the ability of students to be active users of educational databases and their elements, which are considered to be effective especially in this type of educational activity; to identify the opportunities to improve academic achievement and the quality of academic curriculum implementation (in accordance with the necessary content) through digital educational content.

Methodology and research methods. The present research is based on the field survey methodology. Empirical data were collected through questionnaires and face-to-face interviews. The validity of the collected material was verified through the method of mathematical statistics.

Results and scientific novelty. It is known that information technology today is one of the most important factors, which can have a powerful impact on the quality of the education system in universities. The research conducted at the Northern Border University (Arar, Saudi Arabia) investigated the following questions: how the databases available at the Saudi Digital Library assist students of various specialties (faculties) in their studies; what the real contribution of the databases to the training of future professionals is; how learners define their goals and needs by using these databases. The processed questionnaire and interview results demonstrated that for most students e-learning content is not a tool to improve academic performance. The students’ satisfaction with the offered e-learning content was very low. Meanwhile, the students noted that they needed accessible and quality digitised educational information. However, they lack the information competency to find, store and apply information in its various forms. This competency is not limited only to the skills to work with the computer (all young people possess this skill today) - it includes the skills to systematise and structure the received information; critical attitudes towards it; ability to summarise and draw conclusions. It is also important to have easy and user-friendly database tools. Thus, it is necessary to provide further guidance for learners on effective work with digital databases; to develop students’ research skills; to carry out specialised workshops in order to motivate students to use digital educational resources.

Practical significance. The present research materials can be useful for specialists developing university digital databases based on curricula mastered by students.

1. Wang S., Wang H. Teaching tip: a teaching module of database-centric online analytical process for MBA business analytics programs. Journal of Information Systems Education. 2019; 30 (1): 19-26.

2. Soria K., Fransen J., Nackerud S. Beyond books: The extended academic benefits of library use for first-year college students. College & Research Libraries. 2017; 78 (1): 8-22.

3. Sebastian J., Moon J., Cunningham M. The relationship of school-based parental involvement with student achievement: A comparison of principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. Educational Studies. 2017; 43 (2): 123-146.

4. Mason R. A. Database practicum for teaching database administration and software development at Regis University. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice. 2013; 12: 159-168.

5. Saudi digital library [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 10]. Available from: https://portal.sdl.edu.sa/english/

6. Shamandi S. Patterns of benefiting faculty members and their assistants from information systems and technology development projects (ICTP) at Sohag University [dissertation]. Sohag University, Faculty of Arts, Department of Libraries, Documents and Information Technology; 2014.

7. Wheeler J. Extraction of a relational database diagram from the database [dissertation]. University of North Florida; 2017.

8. Hussain I., Suleman Q. Effects of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on students’ academic achievement and retention in Chemistry at secondary level. Journal of Education and Educational Development. 2017; 4.

9. Hsiung C., Zheng X. MTF database: A repository of students’ academic performance measurements for the development of techniques for evaluating team functioning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2015; 46 (5): 942-946.

10. Rollo S. The effects of classroom-based dynamic seating interventions on academic outcomes in youth: A systematic review. Learning Environments Research. 2019; 22 (2): 153-171.

11. Sakibayev S., Sakibayev R., Sakibayeva B. The educational impact of using mobile technology in a database course in college. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. 2019; 16 (4): 363-380.

12. Kanadli S. A meta-analysis on the effect of instructional designs based on the learning styles models on academic achievement, attitude and retention. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2016; 16 (6): 2057-2086.

13. Martinez A. Data-mining techniques in detecting factors linked to academic achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 2017; 28 (1): 39-55.

14. Simsek O., Sarsar F. Investigation of the self-efficacy of the teachers in technological pedagogical content knowledge and their use of information and communication technologies. World Journal of Education. 2019; 9 (1): 196-208.

15. Sebastian J., Moon J., Cunningham M. The relationship of school-based parental involvement with student achievement: a comparison of principal and parent survey reports from PISA 2012. Educational Studies. 2017; 43 (2): 123-146.

16. Du Toit J., Verhoef A. Embodied digital technology and transformation in higher education. Transformation in Higher Education. 2018; 3, Article 52.

17. Gezgin D. The effect of mobile learning approach on university students’ academic success for database management systems course. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies. 2019; 17 (1), Article 2: 15-30.

18. Trucano M. Innovative educational technology programs in low- and middle-income countries. Childhood Education. 2017; 93 (5): 364-367.

19. Baguant N. Integration of information and communication technologies in teaching by female academic teaching staff in the higher education sector in Mauritius. International Journal of Higher Education. 2019; 8 (5): 56-70.

20. Shelton C. An ecological model for university faculty members’ thinking about technology. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2018; 30 (2): 279-297.

21. Caskey M. Supplemental nutrition assistance program education evaluation and database system. Journal of Extension. 2019; 57 (4), Article 4TOT6.

22. Chavez-Gibson S. The Comprehensive, Powerful, Academic Database (CPAD): An evaluative study of a predictive tool designed for elementary school personnel in identifying at-risk students through progress, curriculum, and performance monitoring [dissertation]. The University of Texas at El Paso; 2013.

23. Lloyd-Strovas J., Arsuffi T. Environmental education organizations and programs in Texas: Identifying patterns through a database and survey approach for establishing frameworks for assessment and progress. World Journal of Education. 2016; 6 (6): 1-17.

24. Di Felice P. Teaching geographical databases at the engineering master level: Learner-centred approach vs teacher-centred approach. European Journal of Engineering Education. 2018; 43 (5): 757-770.