Physical Activity as a Factor to Improve the Quality of Student Life
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-5-150-168
Abstract
Introduction. Nowadays, the specialists note a steady decrease in the level of physical, somatic and mental health of modern student’s youth due to intensive computerisation of the educational space, high teaching loads, increased time for self-training, change of social environment and violations of the basic rules of a healthy lifestyle. In order to prevent the negative consequences of these processes in terms of health preservation and improvement of the situation, it is necessary to identify and follow the trends in young people’s quality of life concerning their physical activity, which is an important condition for harmonious development, especially during the period of youth ontogenesis.
The aims of the present research were the following: to study the indicators of well-being of senior students of technical specialties and to determine the vector of changes in graduates’ quality of life depending on the degree of their motor activity.
Material and research methods. When employing the Russian-language version of the Short Form (36) Health Survey, the students (n = 286) of Irkutsk National Research Technical University (Russia) were examined on a phased basis (7-year time gap). In the course of monitoring procedures, the method of questionnaire surveys was used. The comparison of the obtained data on the physical condition of students of different generations was carried out through comparative analysis. The validity of differences was determined by calculating the Student’s t-test.
Results and scientific novelty. The prolonged survey showed that physical activity of girls decreased by 15.2%, boys - by 15.7% in 2019 compared to 2012. The general state of students’ health condition deteriorated (by 22.5% in girls, by 21.3% in boys). The values of indicators such as “role functioning”, “pain intensity”, “mental health”, “emotional state”, “social and life activity” fell substantially. There was a decreased in the number of students, who observe the regulations, recommended by the World Health Organisation for weekly motor activity. Hypodynamia was diagnosed in undergraduates, who have completed an elective course in physical culture and sports. These facts result from the decrease in the number of students motivated to keep a healthy lifestyle and regularly do physical exercises, as confirmed by the students’ questionnaire answers. More than 21% of respondents surveyed that they felt healthy, and therefore they had no need to take care of their well-being; 37.4% of respondents lack the willpower to stay in shape, and 33.9% mentioned that there was no time for physical education. Although interviewees appreciated the importance of physical activity in people’s daily activities, only 30% visited sports sections and only 14% had a morning workout. It is highlighted that in order to preserve the physical and mental health of the nation, the valeological education of students should become a priority in higher educational institutions.
Practical significance. The current research findings can serve as the basis for the cooperation of pedagogical technologies of physical education in universities, for the provision of recommendations for the corresponding independent classes of students, and for the organisation of hypodynamia preventive actions. A combination of these measures will contribute to improving the health and quality of life of future professionals.
About the Authors
M. M. KolokoltsevRussian Federation
Mikhail M. Kolokoltsev - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Physical Culture.
Irkutsk
S. S. Iermakov
Poland
Sergii S. Iermakov - Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor.
Gdansk
N. V. Tretyakova
Russian Federation
Natalia V. Tretyakova - Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Culture.
EkaterinburgV. L. Kraynik
Russian Federation
Victor L. Kraynik - Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Sports Disciplines.
Barnaul
E. V. Romanova
Russian Federation
Elena V. Romanova - Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education.
Barnaul
References
1. Yang C. B., Dong M. K. A Study of the correlation between teachers’ teaching styles and students’ participation motivation in the physical education. Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2017; 16 (2): 199-206.
2. Olafsdottir A. S., Torfadottir J. E., Arngrimsson S. A. Health behavior and metabolic risk factors associated with normal weight obesity in adolescents. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 14]; 11 (8): 34-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161451
3. Hortiguela-Alcala D., Perez-Pueyo A., Moncada-Jimenez J. An analysis of the responsibility of physical education students depending on the teaching methodology received. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2015; 15 (2): 202-207. DOI: 10.7752/jpes.2015.02031
4. Abdullina L. B. The formation of a healthy lifestyle of students in a modern university: a practice-oriented aspect. Zdorov’esberegajushhee obrazovanie = Health Saving Education. 2014; 2: 78-82. (In Russ.)
5. Pop C. L. Body mass index and body image anxiety in a sample of undergraduate students. Physical Education of Students [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Jul 14]; 22 (2): 77-82. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2018.0204
6. Balsevich V. K. Health-forming function of education in the Russian Federation (materials for the development of a national project to improve the younger generation of Russia in the period 2006-2026). Zdorov’e dlia vsekh = Health for All. 2010; 1: 45-50. (In Russ.)
7. Tretyakov A. A., Drogomeretsky V. V., Agoshkov V. V. Analysis of the relationship of the level of somatic health of students with motor activity. Sovre-mennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 May 1]; 3. Available from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=13613 (In Russ.)
8. Yunatskaya T. A., Turchaninova M. S., Kozubenko O. V., Turchani-nov D. V. The psychological component of the quality of life associated with health, adolescents and students of the Omsk region. Fundamental’nye issledovanija = Fundamental Research. 2014; 7: 170-173. (In Russ.)
9. Ware J. E., Snow K. K., Kosinski M., Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and interpretation guide. The Health institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, Mass.; 1993: 21-28.
10. Bull F. C., Maslin T. S., Armstrong T. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): Nine country reliability and validity study. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2009; 6: 790-804.
11. Safonova V. R., Shalamova E. Yu. The relationship of performance indicators and scales of the SF-36 questionnaire in people with different physical fitness living in the Middle Ob region. Fundamental’nye issledovanija = Fundamental Research [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2019 Jul 29]; 2-3: 487-491. Available from: http://www.fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=36839 (In Russ.)
12. Billinger S. A., Arena R., Bernhardt J., Eng J. J., Franklin B. A., et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 8: 2532-2553. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022
13. Balsevich V. K. Ontokineziologija cheloveka = Human ontokinesiology. Moscow: Publishng House Teorija i praktika fizicheskoj kul’tury; 2000. 275 p. (In Russ.)
14. Basset D., Fitzhugh E., Heaz G., Erwin P., Frederick G., Wolff D., et al. Estimated energy expenditures for school-based policies and active living. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013; 44 (2): 108-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.amep-re.2012.10.01.017
15. Moy B., Renshaw I., Davids K. The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Sept 14]; 21 (5): 517-538. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2015.1072506
16. Banes C. J. Firefighters' cardiovascular risk behaviors. Workplace Health Saf. 2014; 62: 27-34.
17. Goldaeva P. R., Pavlenko O. A. The incidence of obesity among students of Tomsk. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Apr 14]; 6. Available from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25920 (In Russ.)
18. Talovic M., Mahmutovic I., Jeleskovic E., Sedic D., Haris Alic, Lako-ta R., et al. Quantitative changes of specific motor abilities of students under the influence of regular and additional activities in sport and physical education. Port Science International Scientific Journal of Kinesiology. 2015; 8 (2): 34-37.
19. Kozlov A. V., Pasko G. V. Optimal motor mode as a mandatory factor in a healthy lifestyle of students. In: Fizkurturno-sportivnqja i vospitatel’nQ-patrioticheskqja dejatel’nost’ v vuzah innovacii v reshenii aktual’nyh problem.: materialy IV Mezhduna-rodnoj nquchnQ-prakticheskQj konferencii = Physical-Sports and Educqtionql-PqtriQtic Activities in Universities: Innovations in Solving Pressing Problem. Materials of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference; 2018; Tyumen. Ed. by S. I. Khromina. Tyumen: Tyumen Industrial University; 2018. p. 111-113. (In Russ.)
20. Grzhibovsky A. M. Data types, distribution verification, and descriptive statistics. Jekologja chelovekq= Human Ecology. 2008; 1: 52-58. (In Russ.)
21. Sidorov D. G. Problems of forming a health-oriented education process in a university. In: Problemy i perspektivy razvitija fizicheskoj kultury v Rossii i stranah blizhnego zarubezhja: sbornik nauchnyh statej = Problems and Prospects for the Development of Physical Education in Russia and Neighboring Countries. A Collection of Scientific Articles; 2010; Barnaul. Ed. by V. L. Kraynik, P. G. Vorontsov. Barnaul: Altai State Pedagogical University; 2010. p. 225-230. (In Russ.)
22. Kolokoltsev M. M., Ambartsumyan R. A. The characteristic of the value-ological attitude in young men of the Baikal region. Problemy sovremennogo peda-gogicheskogo obrazovanija = Problems of Modern Teacher Education. Yalta: Humanities and Education Science Academy. 2018; 62-4: 96-98. (In Russ.)
23. Jamali A., Tofangchiha S., Jamali R., Nedjat S., Jan D., Narimani A., et al. Medical students’ health-related quality of life: Roles of social and behavioural factors. Medical Education. 2013; 47 (10): 1001-1012. DOI: 10.1111/medu.12247
24. Voltmer E., Rosta J., Aasland O. G., Spahn C. Study related health and behavior patterns of medical students: A longitudinal study. Medical Teacher. 2010; 32 (10): e422-e428.
25. Amirjanova V. N., Goryachev D. V., Korshunov N. I., et al. Population indicators of quality of life according to the questionnaire SF-36 (results of a multicenter study of quality of life “MIRAGE”). Nauchno-prakticheskaja revmatologija = Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. 2008; 1: 36-48. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kolokoltsev M.M., Iermakov S.S., Tretyakova N.V., Kraynik V.L., Romanova E.V. Physical Activity as a Factor to Improve the Quality of Student Life. The Education and science journal. 2020;22(5):150-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-5-150-168