Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Modelling Methodology as the Basis for Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Approach in the Training of Students of Pedagogical Specialties

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-6-9-30

Abstract

Introduction. Nowadays, according to the tendencies of education modernisation, an interdisciplinary approach is taking a leading role, based on deepening the links between education and science, which is the most acute problem in the conditions of large amounts of scientific information. The implementation of the interdisciplinary approach is based on the methodology of modelling using information technologies, as a methodology of a new post-industrial stage of scientific culture of research in the digital age, which is of fundamental importance in modern teacher training.

The aim of the present article is to investigate the aspects of modelling methodology using information technologies in the implementation of an interdisciplinary approach in the training of students of pedagogical specialties.

Methodology and research methods. In the course of the research, a modelling methodology, a systematic approach, the analysis and generalisation of the results of academic works on the implementation of interdisciplinary, cultural, and meta-subject approaches in education were employed.

Results and scientific novelty. The authors conducted the analysis of interdisciplinary approach (interdisciplinary integration) as a leading trend in post-industrial education. It is justified that interdisciplinary training, implemented on the basis of modelling methodology, is of fundamental importance in the formation of general-cultural scientific ideas among students and in their awareness of science as the ideal scientific knowledge. Various aspects of modernisation of teacher training based of modelling methodology are investigated. The main peculiarities of implementation of cultural and meta-subject approaches in the selection of the content of profile training of future teachers are identified. It is revealed that interdisciplinary courses play an important role in the implementation of the interdisciplinary approach. The didactic and methodological principles for the development of model-theoretical interdisciplinary courses for future teachers are established. It is demonstrated that in accordance with the modelling methodology, the main didactic goal of such courses is to teach the implementation of stages for investigating solutions of research problems (objects of processes or phenomena) using information technologies.

Practical significance. The materials of the article contribute to the implementation of the interdisciplinary approach in the content of training of students of pedagogical specialties. Also, the research findings might be useful for both theorists of education and for teachers, who are engaged in professional training of students of pedagogical specialties, and all those who are interested in the further development of educational system.

About the Authors

E. A. Perminov
Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Evgeniy A. Perminov – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematical and Natural-Science Disciplines

Ekaterinburg



V. A. Testov
Vologda State University
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Testov – Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Mathematics

Researcher ID A-5900–2016, Scopus ID 57203921177

Vologda



References

1. Zeer E. F. Concept of human professional development in the system of continuing education. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii = Pedagogical Education in Russia. 2012; 5: 122–127. (In Russ.)

2. Perkin G. The third revolution: Professional society in international perspective. London: Routledge; 1996. 272 p.

3. Zeer E. F., Zinnatova M. V., Bukovei T. D. Transprofessionalism of the subjects of professional activity: Prolegomena, platform, formation. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2017; V. 12 (Special Issue 11): 9137–9143.

4. Stepin V. S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika, kriterii razlicheniya = Classics, non-classics, post non-classics, criteria of distinction. Saint–Petersburg: Publishing House Mir; 2009. 671 p. (In Russ.)

5. Apostel Léo, Berger Guy, Briggs Asa, Michaud Guy (ed.). L’interdisciplinarité - Problèmes d’enseignement et de recherché. Paris: Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement, Organisation de Coopération et de développement économique; 1972. p. 38.

6. Jantsch Erich. Vers l’interdisciplinarité et la transdisciplinarité dans l’enseignement et l’innovation. Paris: Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies (CLEA); 1972. p. 108.

7. Testov V. A. Obnovleniye soderzhaniya obucheniya matematike: istoricheskiye i metodologicheskiye aspekty = Updating the content of training in mathematics: historical and methodological aspects. Vologda: Vologda State Pedagogical University; 2012. 176 p. (In Russ.)

8. Krasovskiy N. N. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie v shkole = Mathematical modelling at school. Izvestija UrGU = Bulletin of Ural State University. 1995; 4: 12–24. (In Russ.)

9. Borisenkov V. P. Quality of education and problems of teacher training. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2015; 3 (122): 4–18. (In Russ.)

10. Fedorov, V.A. Vocational and pedagogical education in changing socio-economic conditions: Scientific support of development. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2008; (57): 127–134. (In Russ.)

11. Neuymin Ya. G. Modeli v nauke i tekhnike = Models in science and technology. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; Leningrad Office; 1984. 189 p. (In Russ.)

12. Pisarev D. I. Sochineniya: v 4 tomah = Writings: in 4 volumes. Moscow: Publishing House GIHL; 1955. V. 2. 431 p. (In Russ.)

13. Shestakova L.A. Theoretical foundations of interdisciplinary integration in the educational space of universities. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta imeni S. Yu. Vitte. Seriya 3: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Obrazovatelnyye resursy i tekhnologii = Moscow Witte University Bulletin. Series 3: Pedagogy. Psychology. Educational Resources and Technologies. 2013; 1 (2): 47–51. (In Russ.)

14. Sadovnichiy V. A. Traditions and modernity. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2003; 1: 11–18. (In Russ.)

15. Gromyko, N. V. Metapredmetnyj podhod v obrazovanii: kak scenirovat’ i provodit’ uchebnoe “metapredmetnoe” zanyatie, realizuya novye obrazovatel’nye standarty = Metasubject approach in education: How to conduct a “metasubject” lesson, implementing new educational standards. Moscow: Pushkin Institute; 2010–2011. p. 114–119. (In Russ.)

16. Khutorsky A.V. Meta-subject content of human education. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2012. 1 (1): 15–29.

17. Testov V. A. Some types of metasubject results when teaching mathematics. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2016; 1: 4–21. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2016-1-4-20 (In Russ.)

18. Testov V. A. Content of modern education: Choice of the path. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2017; 8 (19): 29–46. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-29-46 (In Russ.)

19. Perminov E. A., Anakhov S. V., Grishin A. S., Savitskiy E. S. On the research of the methodology of mathematization of pedagogical science. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 2016; Vol. 11. № 16: 9339–9347.

20. Danilyuk A. Ya. Principle of culture genesis in education. Pedagogika = Pedagogy. 2008; 10: 3–9. (In Russ.)

21. Testov V. A. Integration of discreteness and continuity in the formation of a mathematical picture of the world of students. Integratsiya obrazovaniya = Integration of Education. 2018; 22 (3): 480–492. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.092.022.201803.480-492. (In Russ.)

22. Sarantsev G. I. Formation of modern methodological thinking of students of pedagogical university. Pedagogika =Pedagogy. 2011; 10: 38–46. (In Russ.)

23. Yegorchenko I. V. Fundamentalisation of mathematical education: Aspects of peculiarities of interpretations of the direction of implementation. In: Gumanitarizatsiya srednego i vysshego matematicheskogo obrazovaniya: sostoyaniye, perspektivy: materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konferentsii = Humanisation of Secondary and Higher Mathematical Education: State, Prospects. Materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference; 2005; Saransk. Saransk: Mordovia State Pedagogical University; 2005. p. 7–10. (In Russ.)

24. Perminov E. A. Metodicheskaya sistema obucheniya diskretnoy matematike studentov pedagogicheskikh napravleniy = The methodical system of training in discrete mathematics of students of the pedagogical directions. Ekaterinburg: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University; 2015. 256 p. (In Russ.)

25. Samarskiy A. A., Mikhaylov A. P. Matematicheskoye modelirovaniye: Idei. Metody. Primery = Mathematical modeling: Ideas. Methods. Examples. 2 nd ed. Moscow: Publishing House FIZMATLIT; 2002. 320 p. (In Russ.)

26. Myshkis A. D. Elementy teorii matematicheskikh modeley = Elements of mathematical model theory. 3 rd ed. Moscow: Publishing House KomKniga; 2007. 192 p. (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Perminov E.A., Testov V.A. Modelling Methodology as the Basis for Implementation of an Interdisciplinary Approach in the Training of Students of Pedagogical Specialties. The Education and science journal. 2020;22(6):9-30. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2020-6-9-30

Views: 1220


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)