Modelling a High Quality Education for International Students

Introduction. The strive for high quality of Russian higher education, puts an emphasis on seeking the ways to improve it in the line with the topical Global educational agenda. In the context of this study provision of high quality education is defined as managing students experience in and out of the classroom as an integrative whole which is indispensable for maximising educational outcomes. Though Russian universities have a steady intake of international students on mobility programmes, there are not enough studies modelling the application of these dimensions in Russian academic setting. The current study seeks for the pathways to overcome this gap.

Aim. The article is targeted to rethink the strategy of managing high quality education for international students and to work out and test an integrated model for the educational quality enhancement regarding two critical dimensions of their university training in curricular-related and co-curricular areas.

Methodology and research methods. Mixed research methods were utilised. Individual interviews and a survey with close-ended and open-ended items were used to find out challenging issues impeding the development of high quality education offered in curricular and co-curricular related dimensions. Classroom observation, peer experts opinions and content analysis of the courses taught and their outcomes evaluation were applied at the University of Tyumen, being 5-100 project participant, to indicate the components, pedagogical toolkit and competencies for high educational quality of international students.

Results and scientific novelty. The developed integrated model for high educational quality provision included the main interrelated curricular and co-curricular components of quality enhancement. They involved the designed up-to-date academic Russian course; teacher-student interactive support, socio-cultural and intellectual engagement such as “buddy” scheme studentto-student support, discussion workshops on intercultural awareness of students and teaching staff. Teaching methods of reflection, critical analysis, confirmatory feedback, communities, project-based and action oriented learning, group discussions, language tandems were proposed. Major competencies for international students’ curricular-based and co-curricular educational quality were suggested: critical reading and reflection, academic writing, negotiating, argumentation, logical cohesion, intercultural and cross-cultural awareness, conflict avoidance, tolerance to ambiguity.

Practical significance. The integrated model can be applied for road-mapping the action plan of international policy at any university in Russia to provide high quality education for international students.

1. Al-Naqshbandi Ahmed F. M. Adaptatsiya inostrannykh studentov k uchebno-professional’noy deyatel’nosti kak psikhologo-pedagogicheskaya problema = Adaptation of international students to educational and professional activities as a psychological and pedagogical problem. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya = Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education. 2019; 1: 120–124. (In Russ.)

2. Klyushnikova E. V. Adaptation problems of foreign students in Russia. Vestnik TvGU. Seriya “Pedagogika i psikhologiya” = Bulletin of Tver State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”. 2018; 1: 133–140. (In Russ.)

3. Olivas M., Li C. Understanding stressors of international students in higher education: What college counselors and personnel need to know. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2006; 33(3): 217–222.

4. Poyrazli S., Grahame K. Barriers to adjustment: Needs of international students within a semi-urban campus community. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2007; 34 (1): 28–45.

5. Vatolkina N. Sh., Fedotkina O. P. Students academic mobility in the context of education internationalisation. Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2015; 2 (96): 17–26. (In Russ.)

6. Jackson J. Interculturality in international education. New York: Routledge; 2018. 238.

7. Martin J. N., Nakayama T. K. Intercultural communication in contexts. 2 nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 1999. 364 р.

8. Gudykunst W. B., Kim Y. Y. Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication. 2 nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2002. 44 р.

9. Gereboff B. Taking control: Defining academic excellence. Hayidion the Prizmah Journal. 2015; 6: 12–15.

10. Bekker I. L., Ivanchin S. A. Problems of foreign students’ adaptation to the educational process at a Russian university (by the example of Penza State University). Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Povolzhskiy region. Gumanitarnyye nauki = News of Higher Educational Institutions. Volga Region. Humanitarian Sciences. 2015; 4 (36): 247–257. (In Russ.)

11. Campbell T. A. A phenomenological study on international doctoral students’ acculturation experiences at a U.S. university. Journal of International Students. 2015; 5 (3): 285–299.

12. Peelo M. Learning reality: Inner and outer journeys. Changes. 2000; 18 (2): 118–127.

13. Bastien G., Seifen-Adkins T., Johnson L. R. Striving for success: Academic adjustment of international students in the U.S. Journal of International Students. 2018; 8 (2): 1198–1219.

14. Crockett L. J., Iturbide M. I., Torres Stone R. A., McGinley M., Raffaelli M., Carlo G. Acculturative stress, social support, and coping: Relations to psychological adjustment among Mexican American college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. 2007; 13 (4): 347–355.

15. Sun W., Chen G. M. Dimensions of difficulties mainland Chinese students encounter in the United States. Intercultural Communication Studies. 1999; 9: 19–30.

16. Trice A. Faculty perspectives regarding graduate international students’ isolation from host national students. International Education Journal [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2019 Oct 18]; 8 (1): 108–117. Available from: http://iej.com.au

17. Tseng W., Newton F. International students’ strategies for well-being. College Student Journal. 2002; 36(4): 591–598.

18. Park E. Issues of international students’ academic adaptation in the ESL writing class: A mixed-methods study. Journal of International Students. 2016; 6 (4): 887–904.

19. Gebhard J.G. International students’ adjustment problems and behaviors. Journal of International Students. 2012; 2: 184–193.

20. Borland H., Pearce A. Identifying key dimensions of language and cultural disadvantage at university. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 2002; 25 (2): 101–127.

21. Peelo M., Luxon T. Designing embedded courses to support international students’ cultural and academic adjustment in the UK. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2007; 31 (1): 65–76.

22. Nadler A. Determinants of help seeking behaviour: The effects of helper’s similarity, task centrality and recipient’s self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology. 1987; 17 (1): 57–67.

23. Young T. J., Schartner A. The effects of cross-cultural communication education on international students’ adjustment and adaptation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 2014; 35 (6): 547–562.

24. Levina M. M. Tekhnologii professional’nogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya = Technologies of professional pedagogical education. Moscow. Publishing House Akademiya; 2001. 272 р. (In Russ.)

25. Praxmarer P. Intercultural (communication) competence. Script & Study Materials. Switzerland. Lugano, USI; 2009. 41 p.

26. Qing G., Schweisfurth M. Who adapts? Beyond cultural models of ‘the’ Chinese learner. Language, Culture and Curriculum. 2006; 19 (1): 74–89.

27. Houghton S. Intercultural citizenship in the (foreign) language classroom. Language Teaching Research [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2019 Oct 18]; 22 (5): 484–498. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817718580

28. Cottrell S. Critical thinking skills. Developing effective analysis and argument. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. 282 p.

29. Fujioka M. L2 student–U.S. professor interactions through disciplinary writing assignments: An activity theory perspective. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2014; 25: 40–58.

30. Başarir F. Examining the perceptions of English instructors regarding the incorporation of global citizenship education into ELT. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 2017; 5 (4): 409–425

31. Calle-Díaz L. Citizenship education and the EFL standards: A critical reflection. Profile Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 18]; 19 (1): 155. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n1.55676

32. Caruana V. Re-thinking global citizenship in higher education: From cosmopolitanism and international mobility to cosmopolitanisation, resilience and resilient thinking. Higher Education Quarterly. 2014; 68 (1): 85–104.

33. Byram M., Gribkova B., Starkey H. Developing the intercultural dimension in language teaching: A Practical introduction for teachers [Internet]. Strasbourg: The Council of Europe; 2002 [cited 2019 Oct 18]. 40 p. Available from: http//lrc.cornell.edu/directorintercultural.pdf