Institutional Traps in the Scientific and Educational Sphere: Nature and Mechanism of Elimination

Introduction. One of the consequences of the crisis associated with the coronavirus pandemic will be increased global competition for human capital. Russia’s ability to create barriers to “brain drain” will determine how quickly to overcome the crisis and enter the sixth technological order. Improving the efficiency of the educational system (primarily higher education) as a “basis” for training scientists, who can provide “breakthrough” scientific results, actualises the research aimed at eliminating ineffective standards, which set false benchmarks for the innovative development of higher education and science.
The aim of the present research is to identify the nature of institutional traps in the scientific and educational sphere and to suggest the ways to eliminate them.
Methodology and research methods. The current research was carried out on the basis of a systematic approach. The following general scientific methods were employed: analytical review of scientific literature and the content of normative documents, generalisation, comparison, synthesis.
Results and scientific novelty. The author’s hypothesis that the backbone of the institutional trap in the scientific and educational sphere is the trap of strategic planning in the formal documents, which should set strategic guidelines of development of higher education and science, the real content of these documents does not represent: a) the structure of trained personnel (the proportion of graduates, who studied under secondary professional and higher education programmes); b) the planned number of future specialists in specialties and areas of training, which are critical for a breakthrough in the sixth technological order; с) the necessary and sufficient number of researchers, who can provide “breakthrough” scientific results; d) the necessary and sufficient number of higher school teachers, who can provide high-quality transfer of “compressed” human experience. In the scientific sphere, the phenomenon of “implicit knowledge deficit” is recorded: against the background of an increase in the proportion of young researchers (up to 39 years of age), the number and proportion in the cohort of middle-aged researchers (40-59 years) decreases. In higher education, there is a “surplus of implicit knowledge”: a decrease in the share of young teachers with a fairly stable share of middle-aged teachers creates a situation, where there is no one to transmit implicit knowledge to. Cumulatively, this can prevent real scientific results from being obtained and promoted in the real economy and commercialisation, as well as lead to imitation of scientific research and the absence of “breakthrough” scientific results. The analysis of approaches used by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation to assess the effectiveness of universities and research organisations suggests the existence of a “performance evaluation trap”, when the proposed methods do not allow making an objective conclusion about the essence of the measured.
The trap of strategic planning in the scientific and educational sphere predefined the paradoxes of strategic planning in the Russian Federation when the development of strategies and programmes for the promotion of crucial sectors of the national economy is not based on forecasting long-term socio-economic development of Russia. Based on the generalisation of the results of the analysis, the proposals are formulated, which should be kept in a reference framework for a national-oriented strategy for the development of the scientific and educational sphere.
Practical significance. The research results can be used to adjust the strategy for the development of scientific and educational sphere.

1. Egorov V. K. Specific features of human potential development of a new generation in Russia. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2017; 10 (3): 100–113. DOI: 10.15838/esc/2017.3.51.5 (In Russ.)

2. Romanov E. V. What capitalism does Russia need?: Methodological guidelines of the “new industrialisation”. Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny: fakty, tendencii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2017; 10 (2): 90-108. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2017.2.50.5 (In Russ.)

3. Medvedev D. A. New reality: Russia and global challenges. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2015; 10: 5–29. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2015-10-5-29 (In Russ.)

4. Polterovich V. M. Institutional traps and economic reforms. Ekonomika i matematicheskiye metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods.1999; 35 (2): 3–20. (In Russ.)

5. Arthur W. B. Self–reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In: Anderson P. W., Arrow K. J., Pines D. (eds.). The economy as an evolving complex system. Addison–Wesley Publishing Company; 1998: 9–28.

6. North D. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 159 p.

7. North D. Instituty, institucional’nye izmeneniya i funkcionirovanie ekonomiki = Institutions, institutional changes and the functioning of the economy. Moscow: Fond ekonomicheskoj knigi “Nachala” = Fund of the Economic Book “Nachala”; 1997. 180 p. (In Russ.)

8. Polterovich V. М. Transplantation of economic institutions. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economic Science of Modern Russia. 2001; 3; 24-50. (In Russ.)

9. Senashenko V. S. On the reforming of national higher education system. Vyssheye obrazovaniye v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2017; 213 (6); 5–15. (In Russ.)

10. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. From educational failure to social success. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019: 28 (11): 34–46. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-11-34-46 (In Russ).

11. Zhuk А. А., Fursa Е. V. Narrative analysis of institutional traps of education and science in Russia. Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij = Journal of Institutional Studies. 2019; 11 (1): 176–193. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.1.176-193 (In Russ.)

12. Volchik V. V., Maslyukova E. V. Reforms, tacit knowledge, and institutional traps in education and science. Terra Economicus. 2019; 17 (2): 146–162. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-2-146-162 (In Russ.)

13. Tambovtsev V. L., Rozhdestvenskaya I. A. Higher education reform in Russia: international experience and economic theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki. 2014; 5: 97–108. DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2014-5-97-108 (In Russ.)

14. Tarasevich Yu. Yu., Shinyaeva T. S. Criteria for assessment of current condition and development of research studies based on scientometric data analysis. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies. 2015; 2: 221–234. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2015-2-221-234 (In Russ.)

15. Volchik V. V., Oganesyan A. A. Reformy v obrazovanii: bremya adaptacii = Reforming Education: The burden of adaptation. Terra Economicus. 2017; 15 (4): 136–148. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2017-15-4-136-148 (In Russ.)

16. Kurbatova M. V., Donova I. V. Effective contract in higher education: Some results of project implementation. Zhurnal institucional’nyh issledovanij = Journal of Institutional Studies. 2019; 11 (2): 122–145. DOI: 10.17835/2076-6297.2019.11.2.122-145 (In Russ.)

17. Romanov Е. V. Threats to the personnel potential of regional universities. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2018; 14 (1): 95–108. DOI: 10.17059/2018-1-8 (In Russ.)

18. Romanov Е. V. The phenomenon of tacit knowledge loss in high school: Causes and consequences. Part I. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2019; 21 (4): 60–91. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-4-60-91. (In Russ.)

19. Volkov A., Livanov D., Fursenko A. The higher education: agenda of 2008-2016. Innovacionnoe obrazovanie i ekonomika = Innovative Education and Economy. 2007; 1 (12): 8–12. (In Russ.)

20. Woelert P. The “economy of memory”: Publications, citations, and the paradox of effective research governance. Minerva. 2013; 51 (3): 341–362.

21. Woelert P. Governing knowledge: The formalization dilemma in the governance of the public sciences. Minerva. 2015; 53 (1): 1–19.

22. Hattie J., Marsh H. The relationship between research and teaching: A metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research. 1996; 66 (4): 507–542.

23. Cadez S., Dimovski V., Zaman Groff M. Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: The salience of quality. Studies in Higher Education. 2017; 42 (8): 1455–1473.

24. Centra J. A. Research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education. 1983; 18 (4): 379–389.

25. Figlio D. N., Schapiro M. O., Soter K. B. Are tenure track professors better teachers? NBER Working Paper [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Feb 25]; 19406. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544502

26. Bonaccorsi A., Daraio C. The organization of science. Size, agglomeration and age effects in scientific productivity. In: Paper submitted to the SPRU Conference “Rethinking Science Policy” [Internet]; 2002 Mar 21–23; 2002 [cited 2020 Feb 25]; p. 1–34. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrea_Bonaccorsi2/publication/228846571_The_organization_of_science_Size_agglomeration_and_age_effects_in_scientific_productivity/links/548837700cf289302e2fb3b6.pdf

27. Bonaccorsi A., Daraio С. Exploring size and agglomeration effects on public research productivity. Scientometries. 2005; 63 (1): 87–120.

28. Kyvik S. Are big university departments better than small ones? Higher Education. 1995; 30 (3): 295–304.

29. Athanassopoulos A., Shale E. Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education institutions in the UK by the means of Data Envelopment Analysis. Education Economics. 1997; 5 (5): 117–134.

30. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A. Universities and cities in provincial Russia. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019; 28 (5); 37–51. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-5-37-51

31. Bolgova M. A., Podlegayev A. V. Strategies for the activities of higher education institutions in the context of the modernization of higher education in the Russian Federation. Socio–economic analysis. Vestnik Magnitogorskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnicheskogo universiteta im. G. I. Nosova = Vestnik of Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University. 2015; 52 (4): 117–122. (In Russ.)

32. Lenchuk E. B., Filatov V. I. Strategic planning – the way toward sustainable development of the Russian economy. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsialnyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2018; 11 (4): 35–47. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2018.4.58.2 (In Russ.)

33. Frenkel A. A., Tikhomirov B. I., Sergiyenko Ya. V., Surkov A. A. Russian Economy in 2017–2019: The prerequisites for a breakthrough have not been created yet. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2018; 13 (5): 24–49. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-5-24-49 (In Russ.)

34. Klepach A. N. Turning to strategic planning: Thorns and prospects. Voprosy politicheskoj ekonomi i= Issues of Political Economy. 2016; 1: 44–63. (In Russ.)

35. Klimanov V. V., Safina A. I. Variability in the strategic planning documents in the country. Menedzhment i biznes-administrirovaniye = Management and Business Administration. 2017; 1: 46–65. (In Russ.)

36. Shvetsov A. N. Strategicheskoye planirovaniye po–rossiyski: torzhestvo tsentralizovannogo byurokraticheskogo vybora = Strategic planning in the Russian way: The triumph of the centralized bureaucratic choice. EKO = ECO Journal. 2017; 518 (8): 114–127. (In Russ.)

37. Konstantinovskiy D. L, Popova E. S. Vocational vs higher education. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 2020; 29 (2): 6–26. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2020-29-2-6-26 (In Russ.)

38. Romanov E. V. Higher education: Current state and development prospects. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2018; 13 (3): 182–205. DOI: 10.18288/1994-5124-2018-3-08 (In Russ.)

39. Berestov A. V., Guseva A. I., Kalashnik V. M., Kaminsky V. I., Kireev S. V., Sadchikov S. M. Project “National Research University” – Driver of Russian Higher Education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2020; 29 (6): 22–34. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-6-22-34 (In Russ.)

40. Kuznetsova N. V. Professional training of management personnel in the digital economy. Ekonomika i politika = Economy and Politics. 2019; 13 (1): 25–29. (In Russ.)

41. Zborovsky G. E, Ambarova P. A. The Dream of quality education: Contradictions in the development of educational communities in Russian universities. Mir Rossii = Universe of Russia. 28 (2): 98–124. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2019-28-2-98-124 (In Russ.)

42. Balackij E. V. Functional properties of institutional traps. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody = Economics and Mathematical Methods. 2002; 38 (3): 54–72. (In Russ.)