Preadaptation of students to innovation activity and formation of practices of futures scenario building
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-2-39-70
Abstract
Introduction. The approaches applied to reforms in the education systems in different countries assume notable importance of adapting students to changes in the environment and to its future conditions. In this case, the future is predicted as a continued present. This approach contradicts ongoing changes in reality, which are characterised by a high degree of unpredictability, and risks of unexpected future scenarios. Therefore, the search for new concepts of education development based on a set of theoretical provisions on preadaptation of students to changes in the environment and design of mechanisms for embedding in future models has emerged as an essential scientific problem.
The aim of the present research was to develop methodological basis and means (educational practices) of the preadaptation of students to innovation activity and formation of practices of futures scenario building.
Methodology and research methods. The research methodological framework is based on the historical-evolutionary approach and the methodology of futurology. The applied methodology enabled the authors to conduct the research based on the principles of combination of adaptation and preadaptation of students to innovative activities, the importance of developing practices for futures scenario building focused on the ideas of futurology. The research methods involve generalisation of scientific statements and logical deduction of new knowledge; analysis of practice using the case study method (more than 120 school cases were studied); experimental verification of authors’ materials (testing of practices for futures scenario building based on 25 schools in several regions of Russia).
Results and scientific novelty. The authors introduce the concept of the role and content of the process of preadaptation of students. Methodological basis for practices of futures scenario building was developed. The taxonomy of the practices of futures scenario building is described. The provisions on students’ preadaptation to innovative activity and formation of active position towards the future are developed. The proposed methodology of practices of futures scenario building determines the role of these practices, their content, implementation technology, grouping and use at three levels: personal development, communicative or social development, and active development of the student’s personality. The research results can be considered as the evolutionary development of the provisions of traditional adaptive theories.
Practical significance. Long-term experience of the authors in creating the methodology and educational practices of cooperation with the future enables to design educational activity in a new way and to succeed in the realisation of the concept of variative education and formation of metasubject competences, which assume inter alia competences of future thinking as well as self-positioning therein.
Keywords
About the Authors
P. D. RabinovichRussian Federation
Pavel D. Rabinovich – Cand. Sci. (Engineering), Associate Professor, Director of the
Center for Project and Digital Development of Education, Institute of Social Sciences
Researcher ID N-7024-2015
Moscow
L. V. Kremneva
Russian Federation
Lidiya V. Kremneva – Junior Researcher, Center for Project and Digital Development
of Education, Institute of Social Sciences
Moscow
K. E. Zavedenskiy
Russian Federation
Kirill E. Zavedenskiy – Deputy Director of the Center for Project and Digital Development of Education, Institute of Social Sciences
Moscow
E. D. Shekhter
Russian Federation
Evgenia D. Shekhter – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Senior Researcher, Department
of Psychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology
Researcher ID F-3874-2014
Moscow
S. N. Apenko
Russian Federation
Svetlana N. Apenko – Dr. Sci. (Economics), Department of Management and
Marketing
Researcher ID D-1661-2015
Omsk
References
1. Markov A. Rozhdenie slozhnosti. Jevoljucionnaja biologija segodnja: neozhidannye voprosy i novye voprosy = The birth of complexity. Evolutionary biology today: Unexpected questions and new questions. Moscow: Publishing House Astrel’: CORPUS; 2010. 528 p. (In Russ.)
2. Bateson G. Razum i priroda: Neizbezhnoe edinstvo = Mind and nature: The inevitable unity. Moscow: Publishing House Komkniga; 2007. 244 p. (In Russ.)
3. Altukhov Yu. P. Geneticheskie processy v populjacijah = Genetic processes in populations. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1983. 279 p. (In Russ.)
4. Lévi-Strauss K. Uznavat’ drugih. Antropologija i problemy sovremennosti = Recognise others. Anthropology and the problems of modernity. Moscow: Publishing House Tekst; 2016. 157 p. (In Russ.)
5. Waddington C. H. Osnovnye biologicheskie koncepcii = Na puti k teoreticheskoj biologii. Basic biological concepts. On the way to theoretical biology. Part I. Moscow: Publishing House Mir; 1970. 184 p. (In Russ.)
6. Bauer E. S. Teoreticheskaja biologija = Theoretical biology. Moscow – Leningrad: Publishing House VIJeM; 1935. 206 p. (In Russ.)
7. Ashby W. R. Konstrukcija mozga. Proishozhdenie adaptivnogo povedenija = Brain construction. The origin of adaptive behavior. Moscow: Publishing House Izdatel’stvo Inostrannoj literatury; 1962. 400 p. (In Russ.)
8. Wiener N. Kibernetika = Cybernetics. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1983. 344 p. (In Russ.)
9. Nazaretyan A. P. Civilizacionnye krizisy v kontekste universal’noj istorii. Sinergetika – psihologija – prognozirovanie = Civilizational crises in the context of universal history. Synergetics – psychology – forecasting. Moscow: Publishing House Mir; 2004. 368 p. (In Russ.)
10. Moren E. Obrazovanie v budushhem: sem’ neotlozhnyh zadach. Sinergetika. Antologija = Education in the future: Seven urgent tasks. Synergetics. Anthology. Scientific ed., comp., author of translations and introductory article by E. N. Knyazev. Moscow; St. Petersburg: Center for Humanitarian Initiatives; 2013. 416 p. (In Russ.)
11. Kondrat’ev N. D. Bolshie cikly ekonomicheskoj konyunktury. Izbrannye trudy = Large cycles of conjuncture and the theory of foreseeing. Selectas. Moscow: Publishing House Jekonomika; 2002. p. 341–400. (In Russ.)
12. Kovalevich D. A., Shchedrovitsky P. G. Konvejer innovacij = Conveyor of innovations. Agentstvo strategicheskih iniciativ po prodvizheniju novyh proektov = Agency for strategic initiatives to promote new projects [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 Dec 01]. Available from: https://kb.asi.ru/conveyor-of-innovations (In Russ.)
13. Rabinovich P. D., Zavedenskiy K. E. Education from the future. Federal State Educational Standard 4.0 – the first digital. Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy. 2020; 3 (83): 60–73. DOI: 10.22394/2078-838X-2020-3-60-73
14. Luksha P., Kubista D., Laszlo A., Popovich M. Education for a complex society. In: Sbornik tezisov foruma Global Education Leaders’ Partnership Moscow = Collection of Abstracts of the Global Education Leaders’ Partnership Moscow Forum [Internet]; 2018; Moscow. Moscow: Publishing House Rossijskij uchebnik; 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 01]; p. 62–84. Available from: https://futuref.org/educationfutures_ru (In Russ.)
15. Fadel Ch., Bialik M., Trilling B. Chetyrehmernoe obrazovanie = Four-dimensional education. Moscow: Publishing House Tochka; 2018. 235 p.
16. Iordansky N. N. Jevoljucija zhizni = Evolution of life. Moscow: Publishing Center Akademija; 2001. 425 p. (In Russ.)
17. Rautian A. S., Zherikhin V. V. Models of phylocenogenesis and lessons of ecological crises of the geological past. Zhurnal obshchey biologii = Journal of General Biology. 1997; 58 (4): 20–47. (In Russ.)
18. Grobstein K. Strategija zhizni = Strategy of life. Moscow: Publishing House Mir; 1968. 144 p. (In Russ.)
19. Asmolov A. G. Historical and evolutionary paradigm of constructing the diversity of worlds: Activity as existence. Voprosy psihologii = Psychology Issues. 2008; 5: 3–11. (In Russ.)
20. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Complexity as a symbol of human cognition: from postulate to subject of research. Voprosy psihologii = Psychology Issues. 2020; 1: 3–18. (In Russ.)
21. Asmolov A. G., Shekhter E. D., Chernorizov A. M. Preadaptacija k neopredelennosti: nepredskazuemye marshruty jevoljucii. = Preadaptation to uncertainty: Unpredictable routes of evolution. Moscow: Publishing House Acropolis; 2018. 210 p. (In Russ.)
22. Shmalgauzen I. I. Faktory jevoljucii: Teorija stabilizirujushhego otbora = Evolutionary Factors: Stabilising selection theory. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1969. 396 р. (In Russ.)
23. Altukhov Yu. P. Geneticheskie processy v populjacijah = Genetic processes in populations. Moscow: Publishing House Akademkniga; 2003. 431 p. (In Russ.)
24. Alekseev V. P. Chelovek: jevoljucija i taksonomija = Human: Evolution and taxonomy. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1985. 286 p. (In Russ.)
25. Dobzhansky Th. Evolution, genetics and man. New York: Wiley; 1955. 398 р.
26. Eldredge N., Gould S.J. Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. Models in Paleobiology. Ed. by T. J. M. Schopf. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper and Company; 1972. p. 82−115
27. Asmolov A. G. Optika prosveshhenija: sociokul’turnye perspektivy = Optics of enlightenment: Sociocultural perspectives. Moscow: Publishing House Prosveshchenie; 2012. 447 p. (In Russ.)
28. Fidler D. “Future skills”. Update and literature review. Prepared for ACT Foundation and the Joyce Foundation. Institute for the Future [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 09]. p. 4–33. Available from: https://www.iftf.org/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/wfi/ACTF_IFTF_FutureSkills-report.pdf
29. Ehlers U.-D. Future skills: Lernen der zukunfthochschule der zukunft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2020. 316 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-29297-3
30. Slaughter R. A. Road testing a new model at the Australian Foresight Institute. Futures. 2004; 36 (8): 837–852.
31. Fien J. Teaching and learning for a sustainable future. Paris: UNESCO; 2002. 86 р.
32. Pouru L., Wilenius M. Еducating for the future: How to integrate futures literacy skills into secondary education. In: Session Futures Proficiency for Society. 6th International Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA). Future in the Making; 2018; Brussels. Brussels; 2018. p. 6–8.
33. Utemov V. V. Innovations in pedagogical practice of the system of general and professional education of the future. Koncept = Concept [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 01]; 1. Available from: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/76004.htm
34. Heinonen S., Ruotsalainen J. Futures Clinique – method for promoting futures learning and provoking radical futures. European Journal of Futures Research. 2013; 1 (1): 5–8.
35. Miller R. From trends to futures literacy. Centre for Strategic Education. Seminar Series Paper. Melbourn; 2006. 20 p.
36. Nuttin J., Lens W. Future time perspective and motivation: Theory and research method. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Hillsdale; 1985. 236 p.
37. Husman J., Lens W. The role of the future in student motivation. Educational Psychologist. 1999: 113–125. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep3402_4
38. Herrera Paredes D. I. Future time perspective and its motivational relevance in different educational contexts. Propósitos y Representaciones. 2019; 7: 17–23 DOI: 10.20511/pyr2019.v7nSPE.348
39. Andre L. van Vianen A. E. M., Peetsma T. T. D., Oort F. J. Motivational power of future time perspective: Meta-analyses in education, work, and health. European Journal of Psychology of Education [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 09]; 20: 209–225. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190492
40. De Voider M. L., Lens W. Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivational concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982; 42 (3): 566–571.
41. Darling M., Guber H., Smith J., Stiles J. Emergent learning: A framework for whole-system strategy, learning, and adaptation. The Foundation Review. 2016; 8 (1): 59–73. DOI: 10.9707/1944-5660.1284
42. Mueller S., Toutain O. The outward looking school and its ecosystem. Entrepreneurship 360. Thematic paper, OECD. 2015. p. 7–22.
43. Prince С. Innovating toward a vibrant learning ecosystem: Ten pathways for transforming learning. In: Knowledge Works Forecast 3.0. [Internet]. 2014 Oct 21 [cited 2020 Dec 04]. p. 2–6. Ava ilab le from: https://knowledgeworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/innovation-pathways-transforming-learning.pdf
44. Valerie H., Louise T., Ward S., Beresford T. Local learning ecosystems: Emerging models. WISE report series in Partnership with Innovation Unit [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 09]. p. 10–21. Available from: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5b4ce0ef25bf02418c85ea24/t/5d0bc1bc48dc590001c42591/1561051602478/WISE_ecosystems_PRINT.pdf
45. Inayatullah S. Futures studies: Theories and methods. There’s a Future: Visions for a Better World [Internet]. 2013 Jan [cited 2020 Dec 04]: 36–66. Ava ilab le from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281595208_Futures_Studies_Theories_and_Methods
46. Rabinovich P. D., Zavedenskiy K. E., Samojlov N. E. School of project technologies. Informatika i obrazovanie = Informatics and Education. 2020; 9: 6–19. (In Russ.)
47. Zavedenskiy K. E., Rabinovich P. D. Project and digital technologies in school: Motivation, cognition, competence. Informatika i obrazovanie = Informatics and Education. 2020; 7: 6–16. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Rabinovich P.D., Kremneva L.V., Zavedenskiy K.E., Shekhter E.D., Apenko S.N. Preadaptation of students to innovation activity and formation of practices of futures scenario building. The Education and science journal. 2021;23(2):39-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-2-39-70