Current status of interaction between vet institutions and enterprises

Introduction. The implementation of work-based learning in the process of joint vocational instruction by enterprises and VET (vocational education and training) institutions is the most important focus of the educational policy in developed countries. In the Russian Federation, over the past decade, such kind of partnership has been developing both through spontaneous self-organisation and purposefully in the form of several government projects. VET education policy was focused mainly on implementing the World Skills championship movement in the domestic field. As a result, no fundamental changes in institutional and economic structure were implemented to make apprenticeship training compelling for enterprises. Nevertheless, no full-fledged accumulation of information on the dynamics of the development of various forms of work-based learning was carried out to prevent the decent assessment of the current state of apprenticeship training in the Russian Federation and to conduct a comparative international analysis.

The present article aims to determine the current status of interaction between enterprises and VET institutions, fulfil the lack of quantitative information on the topic, and test the hypothesis that under the current institutional conditions the interaction frequency and intensity between enterprises and VET institutions in the Russian Federation lag behind similar international indicators.

Methodology and research methods. In the course of the research, the methods of socio-historical analysis, the instruments of theoretical and methodological analysis, hypothesis building, assessment and generalisation methods were applied. The empirical part of the present research was formed by the methods of secondary analysis of the Russian and foreign studies on the development of the VET and its interaction with the labour market. In addition, the method of comparative and retrospective analysis of statistical data from Russian and international studies was employed. Finally, the method of questionnaire survey and the method of content analysis of websites of educational institutions and enterprises were used. The study involved 603 VET institutions from 29 constituent entities of the Russian Federation.

Results and scientific novelty. One of the most significant research findings is a systemic description of the current status of the partnership between VET institutions and enterprises in the Russian Federation. Main directions and forms of interaction between VET institutions and enterprises in Russia at the end of the second decade of the XXI century were outlined (curricula development, internship for students, and participation in education results assessment). The prospects for the development of partnership between VET institutions and enterprises and the influencing factors (economic and institutional) were determined. The particular Russian characteristics of the interaction between the VET system and the labour market were identified and described as an inharmonious partnership with the employer’s active articulation of a request for a high-quality human resource without proportionate participation in its instruction. The quantitative assessment of current interaction between enterprises and VET institutions in Russia allowed comparative analysis with the indicators of foreign countries to be conducted. In our country, the authors revealed a lower level of enterprises investments (especially financial ones) in the students’ human capital development.

Practical significance. The sociological toolkit and schemes of dynamic and comparative analysis developed in the course of the research can be used in further research on the education system and on the related issues. The research findings can be applied while planning and implementing educational policy measures.

1. Kuczera M. Incentives for apprenticeship. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 152 [Internet]. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 05]. 50 p. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/incentives-for-apprenticeship_55bb556d-en

2. Comyn P. Does work-based learning facilitates transitions to decent work? Employment working paper No. 242 [Internet]. Geneva: International Labour Ogranization; 2018 [cited2021 Apr 05]. 44 p. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/employment/Whatwedo/Publications/working-papers/WCMS_635797/lang--en/index.htm

3. Becker G. S. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education [Internet]. 2nd ed. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1975 [cited 2021 Apr 05]. Part 2. p. 13-44. Available from: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c3733

4. Vishnevskaya N. Т. Models of primary professional training in modern economies. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2010; 4: 5-29. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2010-4-5-29 (In Russ.)

5. Satdykov A. I. Comparative analysis of enterprise’s participation in the process of labor training in USA, Great Britain and Russia. Contemporary Problems of Social Work. 2019; 2: 21-29. DOI: 10.17922/2412-5466-2019-2-21-29

6. Hannelore D., Esenina E. Y. “Old woman in very modern international dress” (German dual system of VET in Germany and in the world). Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2015; 8: 34-49. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2015-8-34-49 (In Russ.)

7. Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica, New Series [Internet]. 1937 Nov [cited 2021 Apr 06]; 16 (4): 386-405. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2626876?seq=1

8. Lafontaine F., Slade M. Vertical integration and firm boundaries: The evidence. Journal of Economic Literature [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 Apr 06]; 3 (45): 629-685. Available from: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.45.3.629

9. Eggertsson T. Ekonomicheskoe povedenie i instituty = Economic behavior and institutions. Moscow: Publishing House Delo; 2001. 408 p. (In Russ.)

10. Stevens M. An investment model for the supply of training by employers. The Economic Journal [Internet]. 1994 May [cited 2021 Apr 06]; 424 (104): 556-570. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2234631

11. Wolter S. C., Muehlemann S., Schweri J. Why some firms train apprentices and many others do not. German Economic Review [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2021 Apr 6]; 7 (3): 249­-264. Available from: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/20152

12. Muehlemann S., Schweri J., Winkelmann R., Wolter S. C. An empirical analysis of the decision to train apprentices. Labour Economics and Industrial Relations [Internet]. 2007b [cited 2021 Apr 06]; 21 (3): 419-441. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4775597_An_Empirical_Analysis_of_the_Decision_to_Train_Apprentices

13. Mohrenweiser J., Zwick T. Why do firms train apprentices? The net cost puzzle reconsidered. Labour Economics [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2021 Apr 06]; 16 (5): 631-637. Available from: http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/12124/Mohrenweiser_Zwick_2008.pdf?sequence=1

14. Dionisius R., Muehlemann S., Pfeifer H., Walden G., Wenzelmann F., Wolter S. C. Cost and benefit of apprenticeship training: A comparison of Germany and Switzerland. IZA Discussion Papers [Internet]. 2008 Apr [cited 2021 Apr 06]; № 3465. Available from: http://ftp.iza.org/dp3465.pdf

15. Muehlemann S., Wolter S. C. Return on investment of apprenticeship systems for enterprises: Evidence from cost-benefit analysis. IZA Journal of Labor Policy [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Apr 06]. 3 (25). Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2193-9004-3-25

16. Wilson B., Mehta S. Work-based learning policy: 50-states scan. National Skills Coalition [Internet]. 2017 Apr [cited 2021 Apr 06]. 32 p. Available from: https://www.nationalskillscoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/WBL-Learning-Policy-50-State-Scan.pd

17. Seliverstova I. V. Employment of secondary vocational education graduates: what are the specifics? Nauchen vektor na Balkanite = Scientific Vector of the Balkans. 2020; 4 (10): 24-31. DOI: 10.34671/SCH.SVB.2020.0404.0004 (In Russ.)

18. Dudyrev F., Romanova O., Travkin P. Employment of vocational graduates: Still a slough or already a ford? Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2019: 1: 109-136. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-109-136 (In Russ.)

19. Klyachko Т. L., Semionova Е. А. Youth employment. First job. Ekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii = Russian Economic Development. 2019; 12 (26): 48-56. (In Russ.)

20. Agranovich M. L., Dreneva A. A., Ermachkova Yu. V., Livenec M. A., Seliverstova I. V. Rossijskoe obrazovanie v kontekste mezhdunarodnyh indikatorov, 2020. Analiticheskij doklad = Russian education in the context of international indicators, 2020. Analytical report. Moscow: Research Center of Educational Statistics and Monitoring FIRO PANEPA; 2020. 52 p. (In Russ.)

21. Agranovich M. L., Ermachkova Yu. V., Seliverstova I. V. Rossijskoe obrazovanie v kontekste mezhdunarodnyh indikatorov, 2019. Analiticheskij doklad = Russian education in the context of international indicators, 2019. Analytical report [Internet]. Moscow: Research Center of Educational Statistics and Monitoring FIRO PANEPA; 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 09]. 96 p. Available from: https://firo.ranepa.ru/files/docs/ros_obr_v_kontekste_mejdunar_indikatorov/doclad_ros_obr_v_kontekste_mi.pdf (In Russ.)

22. Baert S., Nyet B., Omey E., Verhaest D. Student work, educational achievement, and later employment: A dynamic approach. IZA Discussion Papers [Internet]. 2017 Nov [cited 2021 Apr 09]; № 11127. Available from: http://ftp.iza.org/dp11127.pdf

23. Agranovich M. L., Seliverstova I. V., Sizov V. V., Fateeva A. V. Metodicheskie voprosy sravnitel’nogo analiza mezhdunarodnyh i rossijskih pokazatelej statistiki obrazovaniya = Methodological issues of comparative analysis of international and Russian indicators of education statistics. Tomsk: Tomsk State Pedagogical University; 2012. 155 p. (In Russ.)

24. Satdykov A. I. Problems of cooperation between vocational educational organizations and industrial enterprises. Trud i social’nye otnosheniya = Labour and Social Relations. 2016; 5: 127-139. (In Russ.)

25. Bondarenko N. V. Practice-oriented approach to instructing: Implementation opportunities in vocational organizations. Monitoring of Education Markets and Organisations [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 09]; 8 (93). Available from: https://memo.hse.ru/data/2019/04/25/1181817929/iam_8_2019(93).pdf (In Russ.)

26. Bondarenko N. V. The analysis of the interaction between the system of VET and enterprises of high-tech sectors of the economy. Monitoring of Education Markets and Organisations [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Apr 9]: 2 (122). Available from: https://memo.hse.ru/data/2018/02/28/1165005722/2018_inbul_122(2).pdf (In Russ.)