Qalification assessment practices: new possibilities and constraints

Introduction. The transformation of the educational system and the labour market determines the need for objective procedures for independent assessment of qualifications that meet the needs of all stakeholders. The need to overcome the qualification gap is becoming more acute, and it is necessary to change the configuration of connections and relationships in the process of qualifications assessment, which determines the relevance of the current research.

Aim. The present publication is aimed to analyse social processes related to the development of practices for evaluating qualifications obtained in both formal and non-formal education in Russia.

Methodology and research methods. The methodological framework of the research is based on the principles of the activity approach and the concept of structuration, in which the practice of qualifications assessment is viewed as a combination of social relations between individual and collective actors in the space of social and labour relations. Data collection and analysis was carried out using a qualitative methodology of the sociological approach. A semi-formal interview was selected as the method of expert survey. Twenty-four experts from various sectors of the economy (Moscow, Ekaterinburg and Tyumen) took part in the interviews.

Results and scientific novelty. The possibilities and constraints of existing practices for qualifications assessment were identified: assessment centres, qualification assessment centres, internal certification, professional evaluation of working professions within the framework of the “WorldSkills” programme in Russia. The analysis of international experience is presented. Based on expert assessments, it was established that practices specific to the industrial model of the economy prevail in Russia. Thus, the infrastructure and regulatory field were established for the development of new practices of independent qualification assessment. However, the main participants of the process are not involved enough in mutual interaction. The primary sector of the economy hinders the development of the high-technology manufacturing industry and the employers who are interested in creating a competency framework. According to experts, the importance of non-formal education in the development of relevant competencies is increasing, and new mechanisms for qualifications assessment obtained in both formal and informal training are required. The authors presented the cases, which illustrate new configurations of participants’ relationships, when independent assessment of qualifications is integrated with the formal educational system at the stage of state final certification, ensuring the interrelated procedures. The article reveals the contradictions, which are manifested in the interaction between applicants/employees, employers and the state. It is concluded that such contradictions affect the institutional mechanisms for the formation of a national system of independent qualification assessment.

Practical significance. The analysis of alternative models for qualifications assessment revealed the interests of different stakeholders involved in this process, the possibility of using “hybrid” forms of qualifications assessment, as well as a number of contradictions related to regulatory, functional and institutional features. The results of the study can be useful for managers of educational institutions and employers to synchronise the processes for mutual assessment of qualifications. As a result, recommendations for the development of an independent qualification assessment system in Russia are proposed, and the prospects for further research are outlined.

1. Senashenko V. S., Struchkova E. P. The educational model is an important factor in influencing the system of higher education and the world of work. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2019; 28 (4): 9-20 (In Russ.)

2. Galkin V. V., Zuev D. S., Volkov A. E., Klimov A. A., Konanchuk D. S., Mrdulyash P. B. Modernizaciya rossijskogo obrazovaniya: vyzovy novogo desyatiletiya = Modernization of Russian education: Challenges of the new decade. Moscow: Publishing House Delo; 2010. 104 p. (In Russ.)

3. Toporkova O. V. On the content of higher technical education curricula abroad: Current trends (Review). Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2020; 29 (3):153-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-3-153-167 (In Russ.)

4. Barber M., Donnelly K., Rizvi S. On the eve of an avalanche. Higher education and the coming revolution. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2013; 3: 152-229. (In Russ.)

5. Prasetyo I., Suryono Y., Gupta S. The 21st century life skills-based education implementation at the non-forma! education institution. Journal of Nonformal Education. 2021; 7 (1): 1-7. DOI: 10.15294/jne.v7i1.26385

6. Kicherova M. N., Zyuban E. V., Muslimova E. O. Non-formal and informal learning: International recognition practices. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2020; 1: 126-158. (In Russ.)

7. Aksenova N. M. International trends in developing the national qualifications systems. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014; 5: 23-33. (In Russ.)

8. Allais S. Why the South African NQF failed: Lessons for countries wanting to introduce national qualifications frameworks. European Journal of Education. 2007; 42 (4): 523-547.

9. Allais S. M. Selling out education: National Qualifications Frameworks and the neglect of knowledge. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher; 2014. 304 p.

10. Allais S. Labour market outcomes of national qualifications frameworks in six countries. Journal of Education and Work. 2017; 30 (5): 457-470.

11. Mandal S. Emerging National Qualification Framework in India: A journey of dilemmas. Social Change. 2018; 48 (4): 589-600. DOI: 10.1177/0049085718801471

12. Mehaut P., Winch C. The European Qualification Framework: Skills, competences or knowledge? European Educational Research Journal. 2012; 11 (3): 369-381. DOI: 10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.369

13. Brown A. Problems with national qualifications frameworks in practice. Magazin Erwachsenenbildung. 2011; 14: 4-13.

14. Skinner C., Goldhill R. Changes in probation training in England and Wales: The Probation Qualification Framework (PQF) three years on. European Journal of Probation. 2013; 5 (3): 41-55. DOI: 10.1177/206622031300500304

15. Gossling B. All new and all outcome-based? The German qualifications framework and the persistence of national governance approaches. Journal of Education and Work. 2016; 29 (5): 540-561.

16. Williams E., Norman J., Rowe M. The police education qualification framework: A professional agenda or building professionals? Police Practice and Research. 2019; 20: 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/15614263.2019.1598070

17. Tamronglak A. Impacts of the Thailand qualification framework - Public administration on public administration education in Thailand. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 2020; 26 (3): 276-290. DOI: 10.1080/15236803.2020.1771991

18. Yusri R., Muspardi M., Kemal E., Rahmat W. Effectiveness of national Qualification framework Indonesia based curriculum and higher education national standard behaviour assessment rubric. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1157: 042129. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042129

19. Primastuty I., Noor I., Mindarti L. The implementation of Indonesian National Qualification Framework curriculum in higher education institution. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2020; 68 (8): 125-130. DOI: 10.18551/ijoas.2017-08.15

20. Schleicher A. Skills matter: Additional results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Skills Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2019. 127 p. DOI: 10.1787/1f029d8f-en

21. Andreyanova I. V., Shubnikov Yu. B. The system of independent assessment of qualifications in the labor market: Legal regulation in Russia at the present stage. Leningradskij yuridicheskij zhurnal = Leningrad Journal of Law. 2018; 2 (52): 167-186. (In Russ.)

22. Leskina E. I. Problems of an independent assessment of qualifications. Gosudarstvennaya vlast’ i mestnoe samoupravlenie = State and Local Government. 2019; 5: 10-14. (In Russ.)

23. Svirin Yu. A., Titor S. E. Professional standards and an independent assessment of qualifications: Problems of theory and practice. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern Law. 2016; 11: 38-42. (In Russ.)

24. Arkhipova N. I., Nazaikinsky S. V., Sedova O. L. Sovremennye problemy upravleniya personalom = Modern problems of personnel management. Moscow: Publishing House Prospekt; 2018. 160 p. (In Russ.)

25. Terekhova T. A., Mikhailova L. L. Assessment-centr kak metod ocenki kompetentnosti rukovoditelya = Assessment center as a method of assessing the competence of a manager. Irkutsk: Baykalsky State University of Economics and Law; 2011. 206 p. (In Russ.)

26. Dimotakis N., Mitchell D., Maurer T. Positive and negative assessment center feedback in relation to development self-efficacy, feedback seeking, and promotion. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2017; 102 (11): 1514-1527.

27. Shtompka P. Sociologiya social’nyh izmenenij = Sociology of social change. Moscow: Publishing House Aspekt-Press; 1996. 416 p. (In Russ.)

28. Egoshina L. A. Independent assessment of the qualifications of workers and job seekers: Problems of legal regulation. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2019; 12: 158-167. (In Russ.)

29. Dudyrev F., Frumin I., Maltseva V. Novye vozmozhnosti WorldSkills dlja sopostavimoj ocenki rezul’tatov v professional’nom obrazovanii = New opportunities of WorldSkills for a comparable assessment of results in professional education. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics; 2019. 47 p. (In Russ.)

30. Chankseliani M., James Relly S. Three-capital approach to the study of young people who excel in vocational occupations: A case of WorldSkills competitors and entrepreneurship. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training. 2016; 3 (1): 4665. DOI: 10.13152/IJRVET.3.1.4

31. Pylvas, L., Nokelainen P. Finnish WorldSkills achievers’ vocational talent development and school-to-work pathways. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training. 2017; 4 (2): 95-116. DOI: 10.13152/IJRVET.4.2.1

32. Kaybiyaynen A. A., Matveeva S. E., Pavlova I. V. WorldSkills Competition as an Efficient Engineer Training Technology. In: Auer M. E., Ruutmann T. (eds.). Educating Engineers for Future Industrial Revolutions. ICL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 1329. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 727-733. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-68201-9_71

33. Travkina N. N., Chernyshev Yu. V. Pilot project to introduce mechanisms for independent assessment of qualifications in the Kursk region: First results. Nauchno-metodicheskij zhurnal Pedagogicheskijpoisk = Scientific and Methodological Journal Pedagogical Search. 2018; 6-7: 39-42. (In Russ.)

34. Oleynikova O. N. Prerequisites for developing and implementing the national qualifications system. Оbrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014; 5: 4-14. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2014-5-4-14 (In Russ.)