Dynamics of educational activity of students under the influence of digitalisation

Introduction. The relevance of the study is due to the aggravation of the complex of student problems caused by the sharp acceleration of digitalisation and the destruction of the established complex of social interactions under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic, both within the student community, and between the student body and other educational communities. The fixation of qualitative changes in educational activity in non-standard conditions, along with the development of a theoretical basis for the digital educational community of students, is necessary for making qualified managerial decisions.

The aim of the present research was to identify the factors and dynamics of students as a digital educational community in the context of self-isolation and online learning.

Methodology and research methods. This study is based on the use of specific approaches to industry-specific sociological knowledge (youth and education): community, system, structural-functional, institutional, temporal, thesaurus, network, panoramic (pedagogical science). The current research employs the results of a mass survey conducted among students (N = 1825, 19 universities of the Sverdlovsk region) according to the authors’ method. A mixed survey was carried out through a representative quota-target sample using traditional and electronic forms, implemented on the CAWI (Computer Assisted Web Interview) platform. Data processing was implemented using the VORTEX application package. Data verification was carried out using materials from the secondary data analysis of the VII stage of the regional student survey in 2016.

Results. In the course of the study, the general forming characteristics of traditional, virtual and digital educational communities of students were clarified. The transition from traditional to digital community has been fixed. The key terms of the educational community of students in the digital age were defined. The indicators of educational activity were identified and investigated: effect of self-isolation regime on educational activity, features of online education, dynamics of the educational time budget, self-assessment of knowledge gained online, etc. The factors that determine educational activity were examined: motivation, sources of information, material and technical support, and organisational and technological consulting. On the basis of empirical materials, qualitative changes in the importance of digital information and digital material and technological support for successful studying were revealed. Insufficient digital competence of students is shown. Positive and negative aspects of online education were revealed, including under the influence of physical and psychological changes associated with the regime of complete self-isolation. The main reason for the desire of students to continue their education in a traditional or mixed form is substantiated – a decrease in the quality of education due to the exacerbation of the contradiction between the classical university and “everyday digital” educational culture.

Scientific novelty lies in the development of the concept of the digital educational community of students, concretisation of its general-forming characteristics, clarification of the terminological range of the digital community and the educational activity of students; obtaining and systematising new empirical information about the state of students in the Sverdlovsk region as a major scientific and educational region of the country.

Practical significance. The materials obtained provide grounds for clarifying the process and results of digitalisation of the educational space, assessing the state of the student community in extraordinary conditions of self-isolation and learning experience in a full online learning mode. Developed tools can be applied for further monitoring student learning. The obtained quantitative data can be used for the advancement of teaching and learning in digital and mixed formats, as well as for scientific substantiation of management decisions.

1. Bell D. Sotsial’nyye ramki informatsionnogo obshchestva = Social framework of the information society. In: Novaya tekhnokraticheskaya volna na Zapade = New technocratic wave in the West. Moscow: Publishing House Progress; 1986. p. 330–342. (In Russ.)

2. Castells M. Galaktika Internet: Razmyshleniya ob Internete, biznese i obshchestve = Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business and society. Translated from English by A. Matveev. Ed. by V. Kharitonov. Ekaterinburg: Publishing House U-Faktorija (with the participation of the Liberal Arts University); 2004. 328 p. (In Russ.)

3. Inglegart R. Modernizatsiya i postmodernizatsiya = Modernisation and postmodernisation. In: V. L. Inozemtsev (ed.). Novaya industrial’naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya = New industrial wave in the West. Anthology. Moscow: Publishing House Academia; 1999. p. 261–291. (In Russ.)

4. Belyakov S. A. Modernizatsiya obrazovaniya v Rossii: sovershenstvovaniye upravleniya = Modernisation of education in Russia: Management improvement [Internet] Moscow: Publishing House MAKS Press; 2009 [cited 2021 Apr 30]. 440 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20098814 (In Russ.)

5. Shtompka P. Sotsiologiya. Analiz sovremennogo obshchestva = Sociology. Analysis of modern society. Translated from Polish by C. M. Chervonnaya. Moscow: Publishing House Logos; 2008. 664 p. (In Russ.)

6. Zborovsky G. E. Modernisation of education through the prism of social policy. Zhurnal issledovaniy sotsial’noy politiki = Journal of Social Policy Research [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 May 03]; 8 (1): 87–104. Available from: https://www.library.ru/item.asp?id=13216410 (In Russ.)

7. Konstantinovsky D. L., Abramova M. A., Voznesenskaya E. D., Goncharova G. S., Kostyuk V. G., Popova E. S., Cherednichenko G. A. Novyye smysly v obrazovatel’nykh strategiyakh molodezhi: 50 let issledovaniya = New meanings in educational strategies of youth: 50 years of research [Internet]. Moscow: Center for Social Forecast and Marketing Publishing House; 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 12]. 232 p. Available from: https://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=3311 (In Russ.)

8. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A., Katashinskikh V. S., et al. Formirovaniye nelineynoy sistemy vysshego obrazovaniya v makroregione = Formation of a nonlinear system of higher education in a macroregion [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University; 2018 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. 251 p. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/65469 (In Russ.)

9. Boulianne S., Theocharis Y. Young people, digital media, and engagement: A Meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review. 2020; 38 (2): 111–127. DOI: 10.1177/0894439318814190

10. Albert M., Hurrelmann K., Leven I., et al. Der Nutzen des Begriffs Generation in Soziologie und Jugendforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie Sozialpsychologie. 2019; 71: 457–469. DOI: 10.1007/s11577-019-00635-5 (In German)

11. Ben A. L. Violence and youth studies in the 21st century. In: Youth and Violent Performativities. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 35–53. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-155542-8

12. Woodman D., Threadgold S. The future of the sociology of youth: Institutional, theoretical and methodological challenges. Youth Studies Australia [Internet]. 2011 (Sep) [cited 2021 June 03]; 30 (3): 8–12. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256464643_The_Future_of_Youth_Sociology_Institutional_Theoretical_and_ Methodological_Challenges

13. Teterskiy S. V., Rostovskaya T. K., Fomina S. N. Teoriya i praktika ustoychivogo tsennostno-pozitivnogo razvitiya molodozhi = Theory and practice of sustainable value-positive development of youth [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House Perspektiva; 2016 [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 280 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26635039 (In Russ.)

14. Zubok Yu. A., Chuprov V. I. Modern sociology of youth: Changing reality and new theoretical approaches. Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya: ezhegodnik = Reforming Russia. Yearbook [Internet]. Ed. by M. K. Gorshkov. Moscow: Publishing House Novyj Hronograf; 2017 [cited 2021 Feb 08]; (15): 12–48. Available from: https://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=5060 (In Russ.)

15. Bannikova L. N., Belova O. R., Boronina L. N., et al. STUDENT 1995–2016 gg.: dinamika sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiya studenchestva Srednego Urala = STUDENT 1995– 2016: Dynamics of socio-cultural development of students in the Middle Urals [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University; 2017 [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 904 p. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/54225 (In Russ.)

16. Zborovsky G.E., Ambarova P. A. Sotsiologiya vysshego obrazovaniya = Sociology of higher education [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University; 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 08]. 539 p. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/78152 (In Russ.)

17. Beyond Dead Reckoning: Research Priorities for Redirecting American Higher Education. Report of National Center for Postsecondary Improvement (Oсtober 2002) [Internet]. 2002 [cited 2021 June 03]. 28 p. Available from: http://web.stanford.edu/group/ncpi/documents/pdfs/beyond_dead_reckoning.pdf

18. Routledge Handbook of the Sociology of Higher Education. Ed. by J. E. Cote, A. Furlong. London; New York: Taylor and Francis Group; 2016. 414 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315772233

19. Clark B. Development of the sociology of higher education. In: Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and their Context. Ed. by P. J. Gumport. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007. p. 147–183.

20. Rabossi M., Guaglianone A. Las políticas de internacionalización universitaria en la Argentina: movilidad estudiantil y producción científica. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação. 2020; Special Issue (15): 2556–2576. DOI: 10.21723/riaee.v15iesp4.14504 (In Spanish)

21. Traianou A. The Erosion of academic freedom in UK higher education. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 2015; 15 (1): 39–47. DOI: 10.3354/esep00157

22. Bourdieu P. Homo academicus [Internet]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 1988 [cited 2021 Mar 03]. 367 p. Available from: https://monoskop.org/images/4/4f/Pierre_Bourdieu_Homo_Academicus_1988.pdf

23. Vallet L.-A., Ichou M. Academic achievement, tracking decisions, and their relative contribution to educational inequalities: Change over four decades in France. In: M. Jackson (ed.). Determined to succeed? Performance versus choice in educational attainment. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 2013. p. 116–148. DOI: 10.11126/stanford/9780804783026.003.0005

24. Gorshkov M. K., Sheregi F. E. Young people in Russia and their life plans: Present and future [Internet]. In: Handbook of the sociology of youth in BRICS countries. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd.; 2018 [cited 2020 Oct 12]. p. 861–880. Available from: https://www.isras.ru/publ.html?id=5408

25. Zborovsky G. E., Ambarova P. A., Katashinskikh V. S., et al. Nelineynaya model’ rossiyskogo vysshego obrazovaniya v makroregione: teoreticheskaya kontseptsiya i prakticheskiye vozmozhnosti = Nonlinear model of Russian higher education in the macroregion: Theoretical concept and practical possibilities [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University; 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 18]. 336 p. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/43856 (In Russ.)

26. Stegny V. N., Kurbatova L. N. Sotsial’nyy portret studenchestva v usloviyakh transformatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva = Social portrait of students in the conditions of transformation of Russian society [Internet]. 2nd ed. Perm: Perm National Research Polytechnic University; 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 23]. 384 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19669004 (In Russ.)

27. Zborovsky G. E., Shuklina E. A. Interaction between educational communities of the Russian metropolis: Management problems. Voprosy upravleniya = Management Issues [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 17]; 3 (46): 44–52. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32751807 (In Russ.)

28. Schemeleva I. I. Social activity of student youth: Factor and cluster analysis. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2019; 4: 133–141. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250004594-6 (In Russ.)

29. Vishnevsky Yu. R., Narkhov D. Yu., Didkovskaya Ya. V. Trends in higher vocational education: Professionalization or deprofessionalization? Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018; 20 (1): 152–170. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2018-1-152-170 (In Russ.)

30. Zborovsky G. E., Melnichenko S. V. The concept of human capital of educational communities in a university. In: Strategii razvitiya sotsial’nykh obshchnostey, institutov i territoriy = Strategies for the Development of Social Communities, Institutions and Territories. Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference [Internet]; 2017 Apr 21–22; Ekaterinburg. Vol. 1. Ekaterinburg: Ural University; 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 12]; p. 215–219. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/55507 (In Russ.)

31. Vishnevsky Yu. R., Narkhov D. Yu. Paradoxes of modernization of higher education (results of 20-year monitoring of students in the Sverdlovsk region). Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Sotsiologiya = RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2019; 2: 289–301. DOI: 10.22363/23132272-2019-19-2-289-301 (In Russ.)

32. Noritsugu U. Society 5.0: The view of Mitsubishi Electric. Ekonomicheskiye strategii = Economic Strategies [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Mar 03]; 4: 122–131. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29679937 (In Russ.)

33. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. Part 1. On the Horizon. 2001; 9 (5): 1–6. DOI: 10.1108/10748120110424816

34. Stegniy V. N., Ermakov M. A. Sociological analysis of students’ perception of the information society. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskiye nauki = Bulletin of the Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Socio-Economic Sciences [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 18]; 1: 8–16. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25664012 (In Russ.)

35. Zborovsky G. E. Teoriya sotsial’noy obshchnosti = Theory of social community [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: Liberal Arts University; 2009 [cited 2020 Nov 21]. 304 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19667671 (In Russ.)

36. Zagranichnyy A. I. Features of manifestation of social activity of youth in virtual and real environments. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2019; 4 (60): 95–98. DOI: 10.24158/spp.2019.4.16 (In Russ.)

37. Andreev A. L. Face to face with the modern world. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies. 2019; 2: 3–8. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003995-7

38. Wangbei Ye. Students’ citizenship competence learning in China’s Yangzhong City. British Journal of Educational Studies. 2018; 67 (4): 513–539. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2018.1453045

39. Newcomb M., Burton J., Edwards N. Student constructions of resilience: Understanding the role of childhood adversity. Australian Social Work. 2019; 72 (2): 166– 178. DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2018.1550521

40. Makransky G., Terkildsen T. S., Mayer R. E. Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction. 2019; 60: 225–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007

41. Herrero R., Mira A., Cormo G., et al. An Internet based intervention for improving resilience and coping strategies in university students: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions. 2019; 16 (Apr): 43–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.005

42. Sobol-Kwapinska M., Przepiorka A., Zimbardo F., Philip P. The structure of time perspective: Age-related differences in Poland. Time & Society. 2019; 28 (1): 5–32. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X16656851

43. Hardika E.-N. A., Raharjo K. M., Soraya D. U. Transformation the meaning of learning for millennial generation on digital era. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2020; 14 (12): 69–81. DOI: 10.3991/ijim.v14i12.15579

44. Zhang Zuocheng, Tan S., Wignell P., O’Halloran K. Addressing international students on Australian and Chinese university webpages: A comparative study. Discourse, Context & Media [Internet]. 2020 Aug [cited 2021 June 23]; 36: 10403. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211695820300362 DOI: 10.1016/j.dcm.2020.100403

45. Novikov P. Impact of COVID-19 emergency transition to on-line learning on international students’ perceptions of educational process at Russian university. Journal of Social Studies Education Research [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 17]; 11 (3): 270–302. Available from: https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/2602

46. Zborovsky G. E. Teoreticheskiye osnovaniya izucheniya sotsial’noy obshchnosti = Theoretical foundations of the study of social community. Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya = Sociological Studies [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 Dec 25]; 4: 3–12. Available from: https://www.isras.ru/socis_2010_04.html (In Russ.)

47. Narkhov D. Yu., Narkhova E. N., Vishnevsky Yu. R. Resource potential of the community of faculty members in the modernization of the Russian higher education. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’18); 2018 June 20-22; Valencia, Spain. p. 707–715. DOI: 10.4995/HEAd18.2018.8067

48. Knyazeva E. I. Network theory in modern sociology. Sotsiologiya = Sociology [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2020 Mar 03]; 2: 3–10. Available from: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/11256 (In Russ.)

49. Zagvyazinsky V. I. panorama of pedagogical research: Staging stage. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2014; 8 (117): 4–18. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2014-8-4-18 (In Russ.)

50. Narkhova E. N., Radchenko T. E. Methods of forming self-identification of student youth. Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 1. Problemy obrazovanija, nauki i kul’tury = Bulletin of the Ural Federal University. Series 1. Problems of Education, Science and Culture [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Feb 13]; 3 (104): 69–76. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/21082 (In Russ.)

51. Fihel Yu. O. Role of practical professional activity in the educational process of students of legal specialities. Law and Safety [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 June 10]; 2010 (4): 122–126. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lwsfkhv2010&div=204

52. Luis M. I., de la Torre T., Huelmo J., et al. Active methodologies and teaching performance: A necessary relationship in the field of education. In: 4th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’18); 2018 June 20–22; Valencia, Spain. p. 995–1001. DOI: 10.4995/HEAd18.2018.8134

53. Sanina E., Tan Nham Ngoc, Savadova A., Aleksanyan G., Batayeva Ya. Management of self-educational activity of students in the information educational environment of the university. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientifi Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM. 2018; Vol. 5: 473–478. DOI: 10.5593/sgemsocial2018/3.4

54. Serafimovich I. V., Кonkova O. M. Promotion of professionalization through forming the scientific-educational environment at the university. Otkrytoe Obrazovanie = Open Education. 2017; (2): 29–39. DOI: 10.21686/1818-4243-2017-2-29-39

55. Trostinskaya I. R., Evseeva L. I., Pozdeeva E. G., Tanova A. G. Sociological assessment of student activity potential as a subject of the educational process. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 940, International Scientifi Conference “Digital Transformation on Manufacturing, Infrastructure and Service”; 2019 Nov 21–22; Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation. DOI: 10.1088/1757899X/940/1/012141

56. Zborovskiy G. E., Shuklina E. A., Ambarova P. A., et al. Upravleniye strategiyami povedeniya gorodskikh obshchnostey: problemy i vozmozhnosti = Management of strategies of behavior of urban communities: Problems and opportunities [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: Ural University; 2014 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. 200 p. Available from: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/28072 (In Russ.)