Challenges for first-year undergraduates with a non-EMI background in an EMI classroom: A case study
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-8-189-201
Abstract
Introduction. English has been the official language as well as medium of instruction (MOI) in higher education of Pakistan for over 70 years despite decolonisation in Asia in 1950s. However, the majority of undergraduates come from non-EMI (English as a medium of instruction) background because MOI in private or public primary and secondary schools is either regional or local language. Therefore, first year undergraduates face challenges in EMI classrooms at university.
Aim. This study aimed to investigate the challenges first year undergraduates with nonEMI background face in an EMI classroom in a public sector university in Sukkur, Pakistan.
Methodology and research methods. Using the case study approach, six purposively selected participants were interviewed using semi-structured interviews as the data collection tool.
Results and scientific novelty. The findings reveal that the learners face issues such as ineffective presentation, incoherent answers in writing, difficult grammatical structures, lack of vocabulary and partial comprehension of content. One of the key findings of the study is the psychological pressure students experience in an EMI classroom. The research is novel in the sense it brings to light language-related issues faced by students such as lack of vocabulary, improper organisation of ideas, and the role of varied language level of books and teachers. Since these challenges have not been explored at undergraduate level, and that too for students from non-EMI background, the study bears great significance for all stakeholders to develop effective strategies for future.
Practical significance. The study will have implications for both policymakers and practitioners in higher education of Pakistan.
About the Author
K. A. Siddiqui
Sukkur IBA University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kamran Akhtar Siddiqui – Lecturer in English, Faculty of Math and Social Sciences
Sukkur
References
1. Soruç A. Griffiths C. English as a medium of instruction: Students’ strategies. ELT Journal. 2017; 72 (1): 38–48.
2. Dearden J., Macaro E. Higher education teachers’ attitudes towards English medium instruction: A three-country comparison. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. 2016; 6 (3): 455–486.
3. Phuong Y. H., Nguyen T. T. Students’ perceptions towards the benefits and drawbacks of EMI classes. English Language Teaching. 2019; 12 (5): 88–100.
4. Rassool N., Heugh K., Mansoor S. Global issues in language, education and development: Perspectives from postcolonial countries. Clevedon: Multilingual matters; 2007. 304 p.
5. Mahboob A. English medium instruction in higher education in Pakistan: Policies, perceptions, problems, and possibilities. In: Fenton-Smith B., Humphreys P., Walkinshaw I. (eds.). English Medium Instruction in Higher Education in Asia-Pacific. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 71–91.
6. Khan H. I. An investigation of two universities’ postgraduate students and their teachers’ perceptions of policy and practice of English medium of instruction (EMI) in Pakistani universities. University of Glasgow; 2013. 313 p.
7. Lewis M. P., Simons G. F., Fennig C. D. Ethnologue: Languages of Asia. SIL International; 2014. 603 p.
8. Mansoor S. Punjabi, Urdu, English in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic study. Lahore: Vanguard; 1993. 240 p.
9. Mahboob A. No English, no future! Language policy in Pakistan. In: Obeng S., Hartford B. (eds.). Political independence with linguistic servitude: The politics about languages in the developing world. UK: Nova Science Pub Inc; 2002. p. 15–39.
10. Mansoor S. Language planning in higher education: A case study of Pakistan. Karachi, Pakistan: Oxford University Press; 2005. 474 p.
11. Marsh D. English as medium of instruction in the new global linguistic order: Global characteristics, local consequences. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing Abu Dhabi: METSMaC; 2006; Citeseer. p. 30–31.
12. Cankaya P. Challenges in English medium of instruction from the teachers and students’ eyes. Online Submission. 2017; 5 (4): 830–839.
13. Yeh C.-C. Taiwanese students’ experiences and attitudes towards English-medium courses in tertiary education. RELC Journal. 2014; 45 (3): 305–319.
14. Macaro E., Akincioglu M. Turkish university students’ perceptions about English medium instruction: Exploring year group, gender and university type as variables. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 2018; 39 (3): 256–270.
15. Belhiah H., Elhami M. English as a medium of instruction in the Gulf: When students and teachers speak. Language Policy. 2015; 14 (1): 3–23.
16. Dafouz E., Camacho-Miñano M. M. Exploring the impact of English-medium instruction on university student academic achievement: The case of accounting. English for Specific Purposes. 2016; 44: 57–67.
17. Al Zumor A. Q. Challenges of using EMI in Teaching and learning of university scientific disciplines: Student voice. International Journal of Language Education. 2019; 1 (1): 74–90.
18. Meneghetti M. English as a medium of instruction at the University of Padova: Interaction in the classroom [master’s thesis on the Internet]. Università degli Studi di Padova; 2016 [cited 2020 Feb 01]. 142 p. Available from: http://tesi.cab.unipd.it/53362/1/ MICHELA_MENEGHETTI_2016.pdf
19. Evans S., Morrison B. Meeting the challenges of English-medium higher education: The first-year experience in Hong Kong. English for Specific Purposes. 2011; 30 (3): 198–208.
20. Yildiz M., Soruc A., Griffiths C. Challenges and needs of students in the EMI (English as a medium of instruction) classroom. Konin Language Studies. 2017; 5 (4): 387–402.
21. Denscombe M. The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014. 376 p.
22. Etikan I., Musa S. A., Alkassim R. S. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 2016; 5 (1): 1–4.
23. Kallio H., Pietilä A. M., Johnson M., Kangasniemi M. Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2016; 72 (12): 2954–2965.
24. Creswell J. W. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. NJ: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River; 2002. 673 p.
25. Lee H., Sung K. WTC in EMI: Correlational factors and college learners’ perceptions. 외국어교육. 2014; 21 (2): 75–106.
26. Kırkgöz Y. Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of foreign language instruction in an English-medium university in Turkey. Teaching in Higher Education. 2009; 14 (1): 81–93.
Review
For citations:
Siddiqui K.A. Challenges for first-year undergraduates with a non-EMI background in an EMI classroom: A case study. The Education and science journal. 2021;23(8):189-201. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-8-189-201
Views:
821
Email this article 