CONCERING THE INTERRELATION OF E-LEARNING CONCEPTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2014-9-51-68
Abstract
The research objective is the classification and conventional interpretations of the concepts of «e-learning», «distance learning» and «blended learning»; its interconnection and correlation of the didactic system of modern education. The authors note that the deficiency of general data theories in pedagogical literature, - on the one hand, and active development of learning types essentially complicate framing and contents of modern education didactic system. Methods. The authors give the key feature of the generic difference between
the traditional and e-learning on the basis of the analysis and correlation made by various researchers’ viewpoints; the key feature - the information resources’ usage in educational process (i.e. devices for data processing, storage, transmission), and the information is presented in digital format. The authors single out that blended learning means implementation of traditional types and methods of specific educational tasks including the e-learning elements. Distance learning is proposed to be electronic itself; it’s supposed to be the final variation of e-learning.
Scientific novelty and practical significance. The presented approach based on the digital resources’ level application permits to determine all-existing higher education learning types; to establish connection and show differences between them. The authors draw the conclusion that recommended approach can be used
for further methodology development of modeling the specialists’ training variants in higher school. It is specially noted that this very training is considered as the collaboration of teachers and students focused on knowledge acquisition, work methods and communication features that correspond the future profession requirements. A mention should be made that it is necessary to use educational information material supplement and needed electronic devices or equipment.
About the Authors
B. E. StarichenkoRussian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Head of Information and Communication Educational Technologies Department, Ural State Pedagogical University, Yekaterinburg.
I. N. Semenova
Russian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Professor, Information and Communication Educational Technologies Department, Ural State Pedagogical University, Yekaterinburg.
A. V. Slepukhin
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Information and Communication Educational Technologies Department, Ural State Pedagogical University, Yekaterinburg.
References
1. Andreev A. A., Soldatkin V. I. Distancionnoe obuchenie: sushh-nost’, tehnologija, organizacija. [Distance learning: essence, technology, organization].
2. Moscow: MESI publishing house, 1999. 196 p. (In Russian)
3. Andreeva O. A. Smeshannoe obuchenie – kak odno iz konkurentnyh preimushhestv
4. vuzov. [Blended learning - as one of competitive advantages of higher education institutions]. [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://megaportnn. ru/content/articles/19161. (In Russian)
5. Artykbaeva E. V. Teorija i tehnologija jelektronnogo obuchenija v obshheobrazovatel’noj shkole. [The theory and technology of electronic training at
6. comprehensive school] Doct. Diss. Alma-Ata: 2010. 47 p. (In Russian)
7. Dubova H. A. E-Learning – obuchenie s pristavkoj «e» [E-Learning – training with a prefix "?"]. [Electronic resource]. Open systems. 2004. ? 11. Available at: http://www.cpk.mesi.ru/ materials/articles/other08/). (In Russian)
8. E-didactics kak teoreticheskij bazis jelektronnogo obuchenija. [Edidactics as theoretical basis of electronic training]. [Electronic resource]. Available et: method-lip.livejournal.com/363.html. (In Russian)
9. Il’ina T. A. Pedagogika [Pedagogics]. Moscow: Education, 1984. 496 p. (In Russian)
10. Kapustin Ju. I. Pedagogicheskie i organizacionnye uslovija jeffektivnogo
11. sochetanija ochnogo obuchenija i primenenija tehnologij distancionnogo obrazovanija. [Pedagogical and organizational effective combination conditions of resident studies and technologies’ application of distance education. Doct. Diss.].
12. Moscow: 2007, 40 p. (In Russian)
13. Kodzhaspirova G. M. Pedagogicheskij slovar’. [Pedagogical dictionary]. Moscow: Akademiya, 2000. 176 p. (In Russian)
14. L’vovskij M. B. O distancionnom obuchenii. [Concerning the distance learning] [Electronic resource]. Available as: http://onmcso.narod.ru/inf/do.htm (In Russian)
15. Sayed Baker A. O soderzhanii ponyatiya «E-learning – elektronnoe obuchenie» [Concerning the content of the concept "E-Learning-Electronic Training"].
16. [Electronic resource]. Available as: http://www.emissia.org/offline/2007/ 1178.htm. (In Russian)
17. Solovov A. V. Didakticheskij analiz problematiki jelek-tronnogo obuchenija.
18. [Didactic analysis of electronic training perspective]. IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. Kazan’: KGTU, 2002. P. 212–216. (In
19. Russian)
20. Solovov A. V. Jelektronnoe obuchenie: problematika, didak-tika, tehnologija
21. [Electronic training: problematics, didactics, technology]. Samara: New equipment, 2006. 464 p. (In Russian)
22. Fandej V. A. Teoretiko-pragmaticheskie osnovy ispol’zovanija formy smeshannogo obuchenija inostrannomu (anglijskomu) jazyku v jazykovom vuze [Theory-pragmatic usage bases of the mixed training form teaching foreign (English) Language in Higher Education Linguistic Institutions Cand.diss.]. Moscow: Moscow State University, 2012. 175 p. (In Russian)
23. Hutorskoj A. V. Sovremennaja didaktika: [Modern didactics]. St.-Petersburg:
24. Piter. 2001. 544 p. (In Russian)
25. Bersin J. The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies
26. and Lessons Learned. John Wiley
27. Clark D. Blended learning. CEO Epic Group plc, 52 Old Steine, Brighton BN1 1NH, 2003. 44 ?. (Translated from English)
28. Edelson P. J., Pitman V. V. E-Learning in the United States: New Directions
29. and Opportunities for University Continuning Education. Global E-Journal of Oped, Flexible
30. Garrison D. R. Three generations of technological innovations in distance
31. education. Distance Education. Vol. 6. ? 2. 1985. P. 235–241. (Translated from English)
32. Keegan D. The impact of new technologies on distance learning students. E-learning
33. archive/4/1422/. (Translated from English)
34. Khan Badrul. A framework for E-learning, 2003. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: www.bookstoread.com/framework/. (Translated from English)
35. Morrison D. E-Learning Strategies. How to get implementation and delivery right first time. Chichester: John Wiley
36. Picciano A., Dziuban C. Blended Learning: Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 2007. 312 p. (Translated from English)
37. Rosemberg M. J. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age [Electronic resource]. Access mode: http://marcrosenberg.com/. (Translated from English)
38. Starichenko B. Conceptual basics of computer education. Yelm WA USA: Science Publishing Book House, 2013. 184 p. (Translated from English)
39. Watwood B. Building from content to community: Rethinking the transition
40. to online teaching and learning: A CTE White Paper / B. Watwood, J. Nugent, William «Bud» Deihl. Virginia Commonwealth University: Center for teaching excellence, 2009. 22 p. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Starichenko B.E., Semenova I.N., Slepukhin A.V. CONCERING THE INTERRELATION OF E-LEARNING CONCEPTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION. The Education and science journal. 2014;(9):51-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2014-9-51-68