Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Workload and salary as determinants of pedagogical graduates’ employment by occupation

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-10-100-128

Abstract

Introduction. The problem of the effectiveness of the pedagogical education system remains one of the most discussed topics in modern professional discourse. A large proportion of leaders of the educational industry and representatives of the expert community are convinced that graduates of pedagogical universities and colleges are not sufficiently prepared for independent professional activity and deflect from work in their field. The refusal of graduates to be employed by occupation is associated mainly with the poor quality of students’ practical training in universities. Criticising the low attendance rates of young professionals in schools, analysts often ignore the conditions of employment in educational institutions. Meanwhile, the appearance of a new form of statistical observation of OO-1 and OO-2 on open access makes it possible not only to track the results of employment of graduates of the vocational education system in schools across the country, but also to compare them with the conditions for hiring: the current workload on staff and the level of teachers’ salaries.
The aim of the present research was to find the dependence of the results of pedagogical graduates’ employment by occupation on the conditions of employment in schools: the level of teachers’ salaries and workload in the regions of Russia.
Methodology and research methods. The research methodological framework is a structural approach based on applied research procedures (observation, description, comparison, counting, measurement, modelling, etc.), according to which general scientific (comparative, retrospective analysis, systematisation, generalisation) and statistical research methods (statistical and correlation analysis, etc.) were employed. The analysis of official documents of educational authorities of different levels and educational institutions, scientific publications and forms of federal statistical observation of OO-1 and OO-2 was conducted. The processing of regional educational statistics was carried out using the Online Analytical Processing technology, which makes it possible to obtain OLAP cubes and form analytical slices in accordance with emerging research tasks. The slices were studied in detail using the Analysis ToolPak addin procedures and the statistical functions of the Excel library. In the course of the analysis, the authors performed the calculation of measures of the statistical relationship between the studied variables and their graphic visualisation.
Results. This study established a high level of pedagogical labour market segmentation by territorial and qualification-age criteria of employees. The effects of influence on the part of state and public institutions and practices, leading to systematic discrimination of certain groups of educators, were revealed. Regional data provide the examples of discrimination against young teachers in remuneration, both in the process of employment due to the lack of qualification grades, and in the process of work, as a consequence of the inaccessibility to payments from the incentive part of the salary fund of schools. It is shown that the improvement of the results of pedagogical graduates’ employment by occupation is related to the improvement of the wage system, increasing the base rates and reducing the intra-industry differentiation of earnings among workers of different ages.
Practical significance. The authors are convinced that this article will clarify the approaches for adjusting the mechanism for distributing the wages fund of schools, develop measures to attract young people to teaching and ensure the elimination of the shortage of personnel in the education system.

About the Authors

L. M. Nurieva
Omsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Liutsiya M. Nurieva – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics and Methods of Mathematics Teaching

Scopus Author ID 57207467838

Omsk



S. G. Kiselev
Omsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Sergey G. Kiselev – Sociologist, Center for the Adaptation and Employment of Students and Graduates

Scopus Author ID 57207457781

Omsk



References

1. [Internet]. OECD Publishing; 2013 [cited 2020 Aug 15]. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518775.pdf

2. Sutcher L., Darling-Hammond L., Carver-Thomas D. Understanding teacher shortages: An analysis of teacher supply and demand in the United States. Education Policy Analysis Archives [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 May 05]; 27 (35). Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1213618.pdf

3. Nurieva L. M., Kiselev S. G. Employment of graduates of pedagogical universities: Statistics vs mythology. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2020; 22 (9): 37–66. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-9-37-66

4. Piore M., Doeringer P. Internal labor markets and manpower adjustment [Internet]. New York: D. C. Heath and Company; 1971 [cited 2021 May 11]. Available from: https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED048457

5. Mincer J. Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. Journal of Political Economy [Internet]. 1958 [cited 2021 May 12]; 66 (4): 281–302. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20190126221201/https://karollgomez.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/mincer1958.pdf

6. Schultz T. Investing in people. The economics of population quality [Internet]. University of California Press. Berkeley Los Angeles, London; 1981 [cited 2021 May 10]. 173 p. Available from: https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_2ixF0UF45acC

7. Becker G. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy. 1962; 70 (5): 9–49. DOI: 10.1086/258724

8. Spence M. Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics [Internet]. 1973 [cited 2021 May 11]; 87 (3): 355–374. Available from: https://www.scirp.org

9. Durkheim E. Sotsiologiya. Yeyo predmet, metod, prednaznacheniye = Sociology. Its subject, method, purpose. Moscow: Publishing House Kanon; 1995. 352 p. (In Russ.)

10. Simmel G. Izbrannoye. T. 2: Sozertsaniye zhizni = Selectas. Vol. 2: Contemplation of life. Moscow: Publishing House Jurist; 1996. 607 p. (In Russ.)

11. Moreno J. Sotsiometriya: Eksperimental’nyy metod i nauka ob obshchestve = Sociometry: An experimental method and the science of society. Moscow: Publishing House Akademicheskij proekt; 2001. 383 p. (In Russ.)

12. Winters M. New Jersey teacher salaries are comparable to professional pay in private sector. Issue Brief [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 May 13]; 5. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED512246.pdf

13. Allegretto S., Mishel L. Teacher pay penalty dips but persists in 2019: Public school teachers earn about 20 % less in weekly wages than nonteacher college graduates. Economic Policy Institute [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 May 13]. Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED611063

14. Adamson F., Darling-Hammond L. Funding Disparities and the inequitable distribution of teachers: Evaluating sources and solutions. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2012; 20: 37. DOI: 10.14507/epaa.v20n37.2012

15. Winters J. What you make depends on where you live: College earnings across states and metropolitan areas [Internet]. Thomas B. Fordham Institute; 2020 [cited 2021 May 13]. 172 p. Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED605988

16. Sinitsa A. L. Interregional differences in wages: Pedagogical workers in municipal schools. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Jekonomika = St. Petersburg University Journal of Economic Studies [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 May 17]; 35 (1): 26–49. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mezhregionalnye-razlichiya-v-oplate-trudapedagogicheskie-rabotniki-v-munitsipalnyh-shkolah (In Russ.)

17. Rodina N. V. Inter-regional differences in teachers’ wage before and after issuing decrees on teachers’ pay raise. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2014; 1: 64–79. DOI 10.17323/1814-9545-2014-1-64-79 (In Russ.)

18. Zaychenko N. A. Teacher salary: Inequality for equal work. Publichnaya politika = Public Policy [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 May 17]; 2: 113–128. Available from: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/247772551.pdf (In Russ.)

19. Bueno C., Sass T. The Effects of differential pay on teacher recruitment and retention. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 May 16]; 5. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED595205.pdf

20. Ladd H. Teacher labor markets in developed countries. Future of Children. 2007; 17 (1): 201–217. DOI: 10.1353/foc.2007.0006

21. Davidovitch N., Byalsky M., Soen D., Sinuani-Stern Z. The cost of more accessible higher education: What is the monetary value of the various academic degrees? A case study. Contemporary Issues in Education Research [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 May 16]; 6 (1): 37–58. Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1073228

22. Barber M., Mourshed M. Consistently high performance: Lessons from the world’s top performing school systems. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2020 Aug 17]; 3: 7–60. Available from: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2010/12/31/1208181144/1.pdf (In Russ.)

23. Klyachko T. L., Semionova E. A., Tokareva G. S. Personnel situation at school: The opinion of teachers. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2020; 4: 232–249. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2020-4-232-249 (In Russ.)

24. Klyachko T. L., Tokareva G. S. Salaries of teachers: Expectations and results achieved. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2017; 4: 199–216. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2017-4-199-216 (In Russ.)

25. Klyachko T. L., Avraamova E. M., Loginov D. M. Dependence of effective activity on material incentives. Ekonomika obrazovaniya = Economics of Education [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Aug 17]; 2: 63–73. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zavisimosteffektivnoy-deyatelnosti-ot-materialnyh-stimulov (In Russ.)

26. Avraamova E. M., Loginov D. M. New trends in the development of school education. According to the annual monitoring research of the Center for the Economics of Continuing Education, RANEPA. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2016; 4: 163–185. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2016-4-163-185 (In Russ.)

27. Pimenov A. Ju. How to “make” the stimulating part of the new system of remuneration work to improve the professionalism of the teacher? Ekonomika obrazovaniya = Economics of Education [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Aug 17]; 2: 80–84. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kak-zastavit-stimuliruyuschuyu-chast-novoy-sistemy-oplatytruda-rabotat-na-povyshenie-professionalizma-uchitelya-1 (In Russ.)

28. Ermakov D. N. Actual aspects of improving the remuneration system for employees of state and municipal educational institutions. In: Aktual’nye problemy upravleniya ekonomikoy i finansami transportnykh kompaniy: sbornik trudov Natsional’noy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii = Actual Problems of Economic and Financial Management of Transport Companies. Collection of Works of the National Scientific and Practical Conference [Internet]; 2016 Moscow. Moscow: Art-Business Center; 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 17]. p. 38–47. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26571211_55158975.pdf (In Russ.)

29. Kalashnikov K. N., Sharov V. V. New system of teachers’ remuneration: Is the incentive mechanism working? Problemy razvitiya territorii = Problems of Territory’s Development [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 17]; 5: 136–147. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/novaya-sistema-oplaty-truda-uchiteley-rabotaet-li-mehanizm-stimulirovaniya (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Nurieva L.M., Kiselev S.G. Workload and salary as determinants of pedagogical graduates’ employment by occupation. The Education and science journal. 2021;23(10):100-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2021-10-100-128

Views: 693


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)