The analysis of the notions of Russian school principals about digital transformation

Introduction. The challenge of the pandemic forced educational organisations in Russia to resort to massive transition to distance learning and accelerated digital transformation of schools. It has become more obvious than ever that the digital transformation of a school is not limited to a simple technical update of its information resources but implies a fundamental rethinking of the school activities based on the capabilities of digital technologies.
The aim of the study was to investigate the experience of digital transformation and the Russian school principals’ notions about it as a systemic process. The subject of the study is the notion about the systemic impact of digital transformation processes on schools; the experience of complexity in the introduction of information technologies in the educational process and school management, the assessment of the progress of digitalisation; the notions about the factors of successful digital transformation, which require a critical understanding of the experience of implementing information technologies in the school, highlighting key success factors.
Methodology and research methods. The authors analysed 7189 questionnaires using computer methods for processing the natural language. The questionnaires were completed in general education organisations of 66 regions from all federal districts of Russia. The respondents’ answers were categorised in accordance with the European Framework for Technologically Competent Educational Organisations (DigCompOrg).
Results. The research findings demonstrated the significant imbalance in the frequency of responses: the most frequent answers belong to the “Infrastructure” category, while the least frequent ones belong to the categories of pedagogical aspects of digital transformation affecting changes in the educational content and methods for assessing educational outcomes. It is concluded that the respondents’ replies reflect the institutional position of school principals in the current educational system: a head of a government-funded school positions herself/himself as an administrative executor and a representative of the founder, rather than a leader of the teaching team. Consequently, the provision of educational achievements and students’ personal development are largely not perceived by principles of Russian schools as a priority management task.
Scientific novelty of the present research lies in the attempt to answer the question of how systematically the digital transformation of the principle is perceived, to apply DigCompOrg to the assessment of these categories by the European Framework of technologically competent educational organisations, as well as to use natural language processing methods to process text answers to open-ended questions of the questionnaire, which made it possible to obtain results on a large sample with wide geographical coverage.
Practical significance. The research findings can be used in the development and implementation of advanced training programmes for school and college administrations in accordance with the ongoing digitalisation of Russian educational system.

1. Uvarov A. Yu., Geibl E., Dvoretskaya I. V., Zaslavskii I. M., Karlov I. A., Mertsalova T. A., Sergomanov P. A., Frumin I. D. Trudnosti i perspektivy cifrovoĭ transformacii obrazovanija = Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education [Internet]. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2019 [cited 2021 July 18]. 344 p. Available from: https://ioe.hse.ru/data/2019/07/01/1492988034/Cifra_text.pdf (In Russ.)

2. Uvarov A. Na puti k cifrovoj transformacii shkoly = Toward a digital transformation of school. Moscow: Publishing House Obrazovanie i informatika; 2018. 120 p. (In Russ.)

3. Rabinovich P. D., Zavedensky K. E., Kushnir M. E., Khramov Yu. E., Melik-Parsadanov A. R. Digital transformation of education: From changing means to developing activities. Informatika i obrrazovanie = Informatics and Education. 2020; 5: 4–14. DOI: 10.32517 / 0234- 0453-2020-35-5-4-14 (11/5) (In Russ.)

4. Vavilova A. A., Zinkovsky K. V., Surkova N. E. Teachers in search of balance. Consequences of the transition of schools to distance learning. Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy. 2020; 3 (83): 38–45. DOI: 10.22394/2078−838Х−2020−3−38-45 (In Russ.)

5. Glukhov P. P., Popov A. A. Adaptacija organizacij dopolnitel’nogo obrazovanija k uslovijam pandemii v ramkah realizacii celevoj modeli razvitija regional’nyh sistem dopolnitel’nogo obrazovanija detej = Adaptation of additional education organisations to the conditions of the pandemic as part of the implementation of the target model for the development of regional systems of additional education for children [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 July 18]. Available from: https://clck.ru/SwyQz (In Russ.)

6. Isaeva N. V., Kasprzhak A. G., Kobtseva A. A., Tsatryan M. A. School barometer. COVID-19: the situation with teaching and learning in Russian schools. Analiticheskij bjulleten’ NIU VShJe ob jekonomicheskih i social’nyh posledstvijah koronavirusa v Rossii i v mire = HSE Analytical Bulletin on the Economic and Social Consequences of Coronavirus in Russia and in the World [Internet]. 2020 June 19 [cited 2020 Dec 23]: 6. Available from: https://www.hse.ru/data/2020/06/19/1607522628/HSE_Covid_06_2020_4_3.pdf (In Russ.)

7. Iivari N., Sharma S., Ventä-Olkkonen L. Digital transformation of everyday life – How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care? International Journal of Information Management. 2020 Dec; Vol. 55, Article number 102183. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183

8. Portillo J., Garay U., Tejada E., Bilbao N. Self-perception of the digital competence of educators during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-analysis of different educational stages. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020 Dec; 12 (23), Article number 10128: 1–13. DOI: 10.3390/su122310128

9. Hodges C., Moore S., Lockee B., Trust T., Bond A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 15]. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

10. Navaridas-Nalda F., Clavel-San Emeterio M., Fernández-Ortiz R., Arias-Oliva M. The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020; 112. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481

11. Siddiq F., Scherer R., Tondeur J. Teachers’ emphasis on developing students’ digital information and communication skills (TEDDICS): A new construct in 21st century education. Computers & Education. 2016; 92–93: 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006

12. Boies K., Fiset J. I do as I think: Exploring the alignment of principal cognitions and behaviors and its effects on teacher outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2019; 55 (2): 225–252. DOI: 10.1177/0013161X18785869

13. Leithwood K. A., Patten S., Jantzi D. Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly. 2010; 46: 671–706. DOI: 10.1177/0013161X10377347

14. Elkordy A., Iovinelli J. Competencies, culture, and change: A model for digital transformation in K-12 educational contexts. In: Ifenthaler D., Hofhues S., Egloffstein M., Helbig C. (eds.). Digital Transformation of Learning Organizations. Cham: Springer; 2021. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55878-9_12

15. Khramov Yu. E., Rabinovich P. D., Kushnir M. E., Zavedensky K. E., Melik-Parsadanov A. R. School readiness for digital transformation. Informatika i obrazovanie = Informatics and Education. 2019; 10: 13–20. DOI: 10.32517 / 0234-0453–2019-34-10-13-20 (7/3) (In Russ.)

16. Kampylis P., Punie Y., Devine J. Promoting effective digital-age learning: A European Framework for digitally-competent educational organisations, EUR 27599 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. DOI: 10.2791/54070

17. Dvoretskaya I. V., Uvarov A. Yu., Vikhrev V. V. Modeli obnovleniaya obzhego obrazovaniya v zifrovoy srede: Annotirovannaya bibliografiya = Models of renewal of general education in the evolving digital environment: Annotated bibliography. Moscow: Publishing House Torus Press; 2020. p. 18. (In Russ.)

18. Redecker C. European Framework for the digital competence of educators: Dig- CompEdu. Ed. by Punie Y. EUR 28775 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017. DOI: 10.2760/159770, JRC107466

19. Kasprzhak A. G., Kobtseva A. A., Tsatryan M. A. School directors in megacities. How do they manage the educational process? Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy. 2020; 2: 72–87. DOI: 10.22394/2078−838Х−2020−2−70−85 (In Russ.)

20. Volkov V. N. The problem of determining management tasks for directors of the schools in foreign educational systems. Izvestiya RPGU imeni Herzena = IZVESTIA: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2017; 185: 62–75. (In Russ.)

21. Bennett N. Distributed leadership and IT. In: Voogt J., Knezek G. (eds.). International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education. Springer International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. Vol. 20. Boston, MA: Springer; 2008. p. 597–613. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_35

22. Hartley D. The emergence of distributed leadership in education: Why now? British Journal of Educational Studies. 2007; 55 (2): 202–214. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00371.x