Development of educational robotics: Problems and prospects

Introduction. The inclusion of schoolchildren in the development of robotics can serve as an effective method of popularising technical education and a means of vocational guidance work. Educational robotics can be viewed as a means of integrating science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the context of school education, as a tool for developing flexible skills in students. The problem of the lack and/or incompetence of teaching staff in this area is a limiting factor in the development of children’s technical creativity.

Aim. Based on the analysis of the development of educational robotics (a popular and promising direction of children’s technical creativity), the current research aimed to compare the trends of its implementation in different countries, identify problems arising on the way of integrating educational robotics into school and additional education, and outline ways to overcome these problems.

Methodology and research methods. The methodological basis of the study was the theory of professional development of future teachers and the concept of forecasting the prospects in the field of education.

The identification of problems and prospects for the integration of robotics into the education of schoolchildren was carried out by the method of thematic content-analysis of publications with a search depth of 10 years, placed in the Web of Science, Google Academy and eLibrary databases.

The identification of the need for teachers in robotics in school and additional education was carried out on the basis of generalising the results obtained in the course of questioning the heads and teachers of children technical creativity centres. 275 respondents from 11 regions of Russia took part in the online survey based on Google forms.

Diagnostics of teachers’ interests and readiness to receive additional education in educational robotics was carried out on the basis of a questionnaire survey of students in pedagogical areas of training. The study involved 185 students – future teachers from 6 universities in Russia. The equipment of the system of school and additional education in Russia and the availability of appropriate equipment for schoolchildren were studied on the example of one of the Russian regions. The authors obtained empirical data from the annual reports of educational institutions.

The assessment of the availability and quality of methodological support for robotics classes was carried out by processing data from an online survey of teachers, in which 98 respondents took part.

Results. Research papers on the development of educational robotics have been divided into three main groups: robotics as a means of STEM integration; robotics as a means of forming Soft Skills; robotics as a means of forming professional competencies among teachers. The most significant problems of integrating educational robotics into school and additional education are highlighted: weak material base for organising classes; absence or low qualification of existing teachers; lack of a clear systemic plan for the implementation of robotics in the education of schoolchildren; lack of educational and methodological support. As strategies for the provision of education with teachers in educational robotics, the following are proposed: introduction into the practice of professional training of teachers in the higher education system of the profile “Educational Robotics”; implementation of professional retraining under the “Educational Robotics” programme for teachers of computer science, mathematics, technology, physics and primary education; attracting students –future teachers to receive additional education at the stage of study at the university in the framework of professional training “Pedagogy of Additional Education: Robotics”.

Scientific novelty. The problems of successful integration of robotics into school and additional education are identified and described, among which the leading one is the absence or low qualifications of existing teachers in educational robotics. The ways of overcoming the identified difficulties based on mutually beneficial cooperation of universities, schools and centres of additional education are outlined; the system-forming role of pedagogical universities in this process is outlined.

The practical significance of the study consists in the possibility of using its results to determine the prospects for the development of educational robotics, as well as to select the optimal ways of professional training and/or retraining of teaching staff for the implementation of this type of activity.

1. Fillipov S., Ten N., Shirokolobov I., Fradkov A. Teaching robotics in secondary school. IFAC-PapersOnLine [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 02]; 50-1: 12155–12160. Available from: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896317328124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2143

2. Nazarov V. L., Zherdev D. V., Averbukh N. V. Shock digitalisation of education: The perception of participants of the educational process. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2021; 23 (1): 156–201. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-1-156-201 (In Russ.)

3. Zinchenko Yu. P., Dorozhkin E. M., Zeer E. F. Psychological and pedagogical bases for determining the future of vocational education: Vectors of development Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2020; 3 (22): 11–35. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-311-35 (In Russ.)

4. Rubinacci F., Ponticorvo M., Passariello R., Miglino O. Robotics for soft skills training. REM – Research on Education and Media [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 02]; 10 (2): 20–25. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327036615_Robotics_for_soft_skills_training DOI: 10.1515/rem-2017-0010

5. Geykhman L. K., Titova M. V. Educational robotics in working with children of preschool and primary school age. Vestnik PNIPU. Problemy yazykoznaniya i pedagogiki = PNRPU Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Apr 02]; 4 (14). Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovatelnaya-robototehnika-v-rabote-s-detmi-doshkolnogo-i-mladshego-shkolnogo-vozrasta (In Russ.)

6. Benitti F. V. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education. 2012; 58 (3): 978–988.

7. Eguchi A. Bringing robotics in classrooms. In: Khine M. (ed.) Robotics in STEM Education. Cham: Springer; 2017. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_1

8. Eguchi A. Educational robotics for promoting 21st century skills. Journal of Automation, Mobile Robotics & Intelligent Systems [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Apr 06]; 8 (1): 5–11. Available from: https://www.infona.pl/resource/bwmeta1.element.baztech-2480a09b-edb8- 46e3-a1d1-71caf5703c37

9. Tocháčeka D., Lapeš J., Fuglíka V. Developing technological knowledge and programming skills of secondary schools students through the educational robotics projects. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 08]; 217: 377–381. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042816001324 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.107

10. Barak M., Zadok Y. Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving. International Journal of Technology and Design Education [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2021 Apr 05]; 19: 289–307. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-007-9043-3

11. Alimsis D. Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science & Technology Education [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 05]; 6 (1): 63–71. Available from: http://earthlab.uoi.gr/theste/index.php/theste/article/view/119

12. Blikstein P. Digital fabrication and ‘making’ in education: The democratization of invention. In: Walter-Herrmann J., Boching C. (eds.). FabLabs: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 05]. p. 1–21. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281495128_Digital_Fabrication_and_%27Making%27_in_Education_The_The_Democratization_of_Invention

13. Coşkunserçe O. Implementing teacher-centered robotics activities in science lessons: The effect on motivation, satisfaction and science skills. Journal of Pedagogical Research. 2021; 5 (1): 50–64. DOI:10.33902/jpr.2021067231

14. Sullivan A., Bers M. Robotics in the early childhood classroom: Learning outcomes from an 8-week robotics curriculum in pre-kindergarten through second grade. International Journal of Technology and Design Education [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 04]; 26: 3–20. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10798-015-93045?sa_campaign=email/event/articleAuthor/onlineFirst&error=cookies_not_supported&code=73287c8a-d499-448d-aeea-f89efdeb68e6

15. Tolstova N. A., Bondarenko D. A., Ganshin K. Yu. Educational robotics as a component of engineering education. Nauka. Innovatsii. Tekhnologii = Science. Innovations. Technologies [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 04]; 3. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazovatelnaya-robototehnika-kak-sostavlyayuschaya-inzhenerno-tehnicheskogo-obrazovaniya (In Russ.)

16. Altin H., Pedaste M. Learning approaches to applying robotics in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 09]; 12 (3): 365–377. Available from: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol12/365-377.Altin_JBSE_Vol.12.3.pdf

17. Galino J. R., Tanaka H. Initiatives and development of secondary school robotics education in Camarin High School. Journal of Robotics, Networking and Artificial Life [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 09]; 8. Available from: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?pid=10.2991%2Fjrnal.k.210521.014 DOI: 10.2991/jrnal.k.210521.014

18. Gerald A., Pauline M., Lauren S. Using robotics to promote collaborative and mathematics learning in a middle school classroom. Middle Grades Research Journal [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Apr 02]; 9 (3): 73–88. Available from: http://blogs.ubc.ca/roboted/files/2015/07/using-roboticcs-to-promote-collaboration-and-learning-in-middle-school.pdf

19. Lopez-Caudana E., Ramirez-Montoya M. S., Martínez-Pérez S., Rodríguez-Abitia G. Using robotics to enhance active learning in mathematics: A multi-scenario study. Mathematics [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 02]. Available from: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?pid=10.3390%2Fmath8122163 DOI: 10.3390/math8122163

20. Arís N., Orcos L. Educational robotics in the stage of secondary education: Empirical study on motivation and STEM skills. Education Sciences [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 04]; 9 (2): 73. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/9/2/73

21. D’Amico A., Guastella D., Chella A. A playful experiential learning system with educational robotics. Frontiers in Robotics and AI [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 01]; 7. Available from: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?pid=10.3389%2Ffrobt.2020.00033 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2020.00033

22. Kubilinskiene S., Zilinskiene I., Dagiene V., Sinkevicus V. Applying robotics in school education: A systematic review. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 04]; 1 (5): 50–69. Available from: https://epubl.ktu.edu/object/elaba:23026500/

23. Piedade J. Pre-service and in-service teachers’ interest, knowledge, and self-confidence in using educational robotics in learning activities. Educação Formação [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 04]; 6. Available from: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?pid=10.25053%2Fredufor.v6i1.3345 DOI:10.25053/redufor.v6i1.3345

24. Leonard J., Mitchell M., Barnes-Johnson J., Unertl A., Outka-Hill J., Robinson R., Hester-Croff C. Preparing teachers to engage rural students in computational thinking through robotics, game design, and culturally responsive teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 2017; 69: 386–407. DOI: 10.1177/0022487117732317

25. Cahyono A. N., Asikin M., Zahid M. Z., Laksmiwati P. A., Miftahudin M. The RoboSTE[M] project: Using robotics learning in a STEM education model to help prospective mathematics teachers promote students’ 21st-centuryskills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 2021; 20: 85–99. DOI: 10.26803/ijlter.20.7.5

26. Anwar S., Bascou N. A., Menekse M., Kardgar A. A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 10]; 9 (2): 2. Available from: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1223&context=jpeer

27. Khodakova N. P., Davoyan I. L. Robotics in school as an extracurricular activity of students. In: Trudy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Informatizacija obrazovanija-2018” = Proceedings of Scientific-Practical Conference “Informatization of Education-2018” [Internet]; 2018; Moscow. Vol. 4. Moscow: Social and Humanitarian University; 2018 [cited 2021 Apr 10]; p. 201–207. Available from: https://portalsga.ru/data/3397.pdf#page=201 (In Russ.)

28. Echmaeva G. A. Training of teaching staff in the field of educational robotics. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 10]; 2: 7. Available from: https://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=9099 (In Russ.)

29. Vlasova O. S. The content component of preparing a primary school teacher for the introduction of educational robotics. Vestnik YUUrGGPU = Bulletin of the South Ural State Pedagogical University [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Apr 08]; 11. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/soderzhatelnyy-komponent-podgotovki-uchitelya-nachalnyh-klassov-k-vnedreniyu-obrazovatelnoy-robototehniki (In Russ.)

30. El-Hamamsy L., Chessel-Lazzarotto F., Bruno B., Roy D., Cahlikova T., Chevalier M., et al. A computer science and robotics integration model for primary school: Evaluation of a large-scale in-service K-4 teacher-training program. HAL CCSD [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 10]. Available from: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?pid=10.100 7%2Fs10639-020-10355-5 DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10355-5

31. Baťko J. Methodical support for teachers of robotics in the Czech educational system. Centre for Higher Education Studies [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Oct 10]. Available from: https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=od______8936:0f57be8f3c83bfdae552654ffba2cd2d/

32. Schina D., Esteve-González V. Usart M. An overview of teacher training programs in educational robotics: Characteristics, best practices and recommendations. Education and Information Technologies. 2020; 26: 2831–2852. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10377-z

33. Zaitseva S. A., Kiselev V. S. University training of a multidisciplinary teacher. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 10]; 1. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44831354 (In Russ.)