Students’ struggles with EMI in Kazakhstani universities

Introduction. Fascination with English medium instruction (EMI) is fast growing in higher education institutions in non-native English-speaking countries, including Kazakhstan. The Kazakhstani government adopted a trilingual education policy in 2007 and the Bologna Process in 2010. Both these initiatives motivated universities to offer academic programmes in the English language. As a result, EMI programmes are offered in over 70 higher education institutions across Kazakhstan. In addition, there are four major Kazakhstani universities which offer academic programmes in English only. Despite the increase in the number of EMI programmes, there is a lack of empirical evidence about the difficulties and challenges faced by students in the EMI programmes.

Aim. The present study aimed to investigate the nature, forms, and levels of challenges graduate students face in academic reading and writing in English and the way they cope with these challenges. The study was conducted with graduate students and faculty in 10 selected Kazakhstani universities, which offer academic programmes in EMI.

Research methodology and methods. The study is based on a mixed-method design, involving an online survey and semi-structured interviews. The closed-ended questions have been analysed using SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). The grounded theory analysis was utilised to scrutinise open-ended questions and interview transcripts.

Results and scientific novelty. The study’s results indicated two major challenges faced by graduate students in academic reading and writing: the personal-psychological challenge and sociological challenge. The first challenge includes students’ previous academic backgrounds, exposure, and learning experiences. The second challenge is related to English academic culture and students’ worldviews, concepts, and values about English as a language and medium of instruction. As a result, graduate students experienced a lack of vocabulary, inadequate academic literacy skills, unfamiliarity with academic writing styles in English, and lack of skills to synthesise reading materials.

Practical significance. Hence, this study recommends systematising English language programmes across secondary and higher education institutions to help students acquire advanced English language proficiency. Also, the study results suggest that local faculty members should be trained according to international standards in terms of their English language skills and innovative teaching methods.

1. Nazarbayev N. Address to nation “New Kazakhstan in a New World” [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. Available from: http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/K070002007_#z0 (In Russ.)

2. Analytical Report. Realization of the Bologna process Principles in the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2019 [Internet]. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Centre for Bologna Process and Academic Mobility. Nur-Sultan; 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. p. 64. Available from: https://enic-kazakhstan.kz/en/analitika/otchety-1 (In Russ.)

3. Strategy “Kazakhstan-2050”. Address of the Leader of the Nation President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Nursultan Nazarbayev to nation [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.akorda.kz/ru/official_documents/strategies_and_programs (In Russ.)

4. Oralova G. Internationalization of higher education in Kazakhstan: Issues of instruction in foreign languages. Journal of Teaching and Education [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Apr 22]; 1 (2): 127–133. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259529213

5. MES, Ministry of Education of Science. Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2020–2024 [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. Available from: https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/edu/documents/5?lang=en (In Russ.)

6. Seitzhanova A., Plokhikh R., Baiburiev R., Tsaregorodtseva A. English as the medium of instruction: Modern tendency of education in Kazakhstan. Perspectives of Innovations, Economics and Business. 2015 May; 15 (3): 113–117. DOI:10.15208/pieb.2015.11

7. Macaro E., Curle S., Pun J., An J., Dearden J. A systematic review of English Medium Instruction in higher education. Language Teaching. 2018; 51 (1): 36–76. DOI:10.1017/S0261444817000350

8. Zhankalova Z. М., Baktybayeva А. Т. The state and prospects of the development of trilingual education in higher schools of Kazakhstan (on the example of KazNMU named after S. D. Asfendiyarov). KazNU Bulletin. Philology Series. 2016; 161 (3): 208–212. (In Russ.)

9. Frost D., Kambatyrova A. Researching internationalization and educational reform in Kazakhstan. In: Silova I., Niyozov S. (Eds.). Globalization on the margins: Education and post-socialist transformations in Central Asia. 2nd ed. NC: Information Age Publishing; 2020. p. 431–454.

10. Fernández-Costales A. Assessing students’ perceptions regarding English medium instruction in higher education. Didáctica: Lengua y Literatura. 2017; 29: 43. DOI:10.5209/DIDA.57129

11. Kim J., Choi J., Tatar B. English-medium instruction and intercultural sensitivity: A Korean case study. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2017 Nov; 21 (5):467–482. DOI:10.1177/1028315317720767

12. Singh M. K. Academic reading and writing challenges among international EFL Master’s students in a Malaysian university: The voice of lecturers. Journal of International Students. 2019 Nov 15; 9 (4): 972–992. DOI:10.32674/jis.v9i3.934

13. Al Fadda H. Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of King Saud university postgraduate students. English Language Teaching. 2012 Mar; 5 (3): 123–130. DOI:10.5539/elt.v5n3p123

14. Huang J., Klinger D. Chinese graduate students at North American universities: Learning challenges and coping strategies. Comparative and International Education. 2006 Dec 1; 35 (2). DOI:10.5206/cie-eci.v35i2.9080

15. Tai T. E., Tang C. W. The role of graduate students’ learning strategies in reducing their English medium instruction avoidance: The mediation effect of language anxiety. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2021 Apr 3; 41 (2): 368–384. DOI:10.1080/02188791.2020.1777937

16. Myrzakulova G. Graduate students’ perceptions of EMI [master’s thesis on the Internet]. Nur-Sultan: Nazarbayev University; 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. 118 p. Available from: https://nur.nu.edu.kz/bitstream/handle/123456789/4333/Gulfarida%20Myrzakulova%20Thesis%2BAuthor%20Agreement.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

17. Puspitasari D., Weng C., Hsieh Y. F. English Medium Instruction in Taiwan: From the perspective of international students as thesis writer. International Journal of Language Education. 2020; 4 (2): 194–208. DOI:10.26858/ijole.v4i2.12930

18. Karabay A. STEM and social sciences students’ language-oriented academic challenges in English medium of instruction (EMI) programs: The case of an international university in Kazakhstan [master’s thesis on the Internet]. Nur-Sultan: Nazarbayev University; 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. Available from: http://nur.nu.edu.kz/handle/123456789/2557

19. Baltabayev M. Faculty and students’ perceptions of EMI and its impact on academic content and language acquisition from the participants’ perspectives [master’s thesis on the Internet]. Nur-Sultan: Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Education; 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 22]. Available from: https://nur.nu.edu.kz/bitstream/handle/123456789/4871/Baltabayev%20Murat%20MA%20Thesis%202018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

20. Yessenbekova K. English as a medium of instruction in Kazakhstani higher education: A case study. Current Issues in Language Planning. 2022 Feb 19: 1–9. DOI:10.1080/14664208.2022.2043064

21. Bryman A. Why do researchers integrate/combine/mesh/blend/mix/merge/fuse quantitative and qualitative research. Advances in Mixed Methods Research. 2008 May 6; 21 (8): 87–100.

22. Creswell J. W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003. 246 p.

23. Fink A. How to analyse survey data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1995. 112 p.

24. Seale C. Generating grounded theory. In: C. Seale (Ed.). Researching society and culture. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2012. p. 393–404.

25. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications; 2014. 416 p.

26. Bolton K., Botha W., Bacon-Shone J. English-medium instruction in Singapore higher education: Policy, realities and challenges. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 2017 Nov 26; 38 (10): 913–930. DOI:10.1080/01434632.2017.1304396

27. Aizawa I., Rose H., Thompson G., Curle S. Beyond the threshold: Exploring English language proficiency, linguistic challenges, and academic language skills of Japanese students in an English medium instruction programme. Language Teaching Research. 2020 Oct 24: 1362168820965510. DOI:10.1177%2F1362168820965510

28. Kuo Y. H. Language challenges faced by international graduate students in the United States. Journal of International Students. 2011 Nov 11; 1 (2). DOI:10.32674/jis.v1i2.551

29. Kirkpatrick A., Liddicoat A. J. Language education policy and practice in East and Southeast Asia. Language Teaching. 2017 Apr; 50 (2): 155–188. DOI:10.1017/S0261444817000027