Анализ успеваемости учащихся средней школы и вовлеченности родителей в обучение детей на дому

Введение. Вовлечение родителей в воспитание детей означает их участие в образовательной деятельности школьников. Существующие эмпирические исследования показывают, что вовлеченность родителей может влиять на успеваемость их детей двумя различными способами: участие родителей в воспитании детей дома (помощь в выполнении домашних заданий, обсуждении учебных дел и т. д.) и участие родителей в воспитании детей в школе (участие в школьных мероприятиях и собраниях и т. д.). Активное вовлечение родителей в воспитание детей может даже компенсировать неблагоприятные последствия низкого социально-экономического статуса и неблагополучных районов. Общий эффект участия родителей в воспитании детей как дома, так и в школе является достойным источником повышения успеваемости учеников путем обеспечения более высоких результатов в школе.
Цели исследования: 1) изучение влияния участия родителей в обучении детей на дому на успеваемость школьников; 2) выявление различий в следующих факторах влияния родителей: влияние на учащихся разного пола, уровень грамотности родителей, важность родителей для образования детей.
Методология и методы исследования. Перекрестный и многоступенчатый метод стратифицированной выборки был использован для отображения информации из выборки 448 студентов по шкале Лайкерта. Хи-квадрат Пирсона, тесты Тау-с Кендалла и анализ логистической регрессии использовались для определения уровня, направления и силы ассоциации между переменными.
Результаты. Результаты показали, что связь успеваемости детей была значительной и положительной, когда родители помогали детям в выполнении домашних заданий (P = 0,000, T = 0,231), обсуждали с детьми школьный прогресс (P = 0,002, T = 0,122) мотивировали детей больше работать, чем когда они получают плохую оценку (P = 0,015, T = 0,133). Кроме того, результаты показали различия в успеваемости детей в зависимости от их пола, уровня грамотности родителей, важности родителей для образования детей и участия родителей в воспитании детей дома. Был сделан вывод о том, что мальчики; дети грамотных родителей; дети, чьи родители придают большее значение образованию своих детей и чьи родители продолжают участвовать в их воспитательной деятельности в домашних условиях, получают более высокие оценки.
Научная новизна. Настоящее исследование отличается тем, что в нем рассматриваются различия в успеваемости детей в зависимости от пола учащихся, уровня грамотности родителей и важности родителей для их образования, а также рассматривается взаимосвязь между участием родителей в обучении их детей дома и успеваемостью.
Практическая значимость. Анализ результатов исследования приводит к ряду интересных результатов и предлагает полезные предложения для важных заинтересованных сторон. Основные рекомендации исследования, которые позволят родителям оперативно удовлетворять потребности своих детей в образовании и помогут детям получать более высокие оценки, включают в себя информационно-просветительские кампании для родителей, возможности получения дохода для неблагополучных семей и инициативы по ликвидации неграмотности среди взрослых.

1. Epstein J. L., Sanders G. M. Family, school, and community partnerships. In: M. Bornstein. (Ed.). Handbook of parenting. Practical issues in parenting. Vol. 5. New Jersey, London: LEA Mahwah; 2002. p. 407–439.

2. Maina M. J. Strategies employed by secondary school principals to improve academic performance in Embu West District [Internet]. Kenyatta University; 2010 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: http://irlibrary.ku.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/930/Mwaura%2C%20James%20Maina.pdf?sequence

3. Ahmed G., Muhammad A., Zia A. Q., Muhammad A. Effects of parent attitude on secondary school students academic performance in Pakistan. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2019; 12 (6). DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i6/140721

4. Hanes B. The exploration of socioeconomic status and student achievement at Beverly elementary school [unpublished thesis on the Internet]. Ohio: Marietta College; 2008 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=marietta1208259593

5. Kudari J. M. Survey on the factors influencing the student’s academic performance. International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology. 2016; 5 (6): 30–36.

6. Rothstein R. For public schools, segregation then, segregation since: Education and the unfinished march [Internet]. Economic Policy Institute; 2013 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: http://docshare04.docshare.tips/files/17180/171804363

7. Nicholas-Omoregbe O. S., Azeta A. A., Chiazor I. A., Omoregbe N. I. Predicting the adoption of e-learning management system: A case of selected private universities in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TODJE. 2017; 18 (2): 106–121.

8. Mccoy L. Effect of demographic and personal variables on achievement in eighthgrade algebra. The Journal of Educational Research. 2005; 98 (3): 131–135.

9. Grant K. B., Ray J. A. Home, school and community collaboration: Culturally responsive family involvement [Internet]. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2010 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.amazon.com/Home-School-Community-Collaboration-Culturally/dp/1483347540

10. Epstein J. School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools [Internet]. Boulder, Colo. Boulder: Westview Press; 2001 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/ERIC-ED467082/pdf/ERIC-ED467082.pdf

11. Brownlee L. Parental involvement in school benefits students and develops teacher-parent relationships. Journal of Initial Teacher Inquiry. 2015; 1: 54–56.

12. Dufur M. J., Parcel T. L., Troutman K. P. Does capital at home matter more than capital at school? Social capital effects on academic achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2013; 31: 1–21.

13. Ryan B. A., Adams G. R. How do families affect children’s success in school? Education Quarterly Review. 1999; 6: 30–43.

14. Dearing E., Kreider H., Simpkins S., Weiss H. B. Family involvement in school and low-income children’s literacy: Longitudinal associations between and within families. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006; 98: 653–664.

15. Hill N. E., Castellino D. R., Lansford J. E., Nowlin P., Dodge K. A., Bates J. E. Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence. Child Development. 2006; 75: 1491–1509.

16. Cheung C. S., Pomerantz E. M. Why does parents’ involvement enhance children’s achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. The Journal of Educational Psychology. 2012; 104 (3): 820–832.

17. Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence. 2012; 11 (1): 56–95.

18. Yun Mo., Kusum S. Parents’ relationships and involvement: Effects on students’ school engagement and performance. RMLE Online. 2008; 31 (10): 1–11. DOI: 10.1080/19404476.2008.11462053

19. Lee J. S., Bowen N. K. Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal. 2006; 43 (2): 193–218.

20. Silinskas G., Kiuru N., Aunola K., Lerkkanen M. K., Nurmi J. E. The developmental dynamics of children’s academic performance and mothers’ homework-related affect and practices. Developmental Psychology. 2015; 51 (4): 419–433. DOI: 10.1037/a0038908

21. Global partnership for education (GPE). Parents’ involvement in their children’s education: A key to success. Parents have a lasting impact on children’s learning [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.globalpartnership.org/blog/parents-involvement-their-childrens-education-key-success

22. Isaiah M. Parental involvement in the junior secondary schools and its effects on teachers’ job dissatisfaction. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities. 2013; 4 (2): 1–12.

23. Hill N. E., Tyson D. F., Bromell L. Parental involvement in middle school: Developmentally appropriate strategies across SES and ethnicity. In: Hill N. E., Chao R. K. (Eds.). Families, schools, and the adolescent: Connecting research, policy, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press; 2009. p. 53–72.

24. Benner A. D., Boyle A. E., Sadler S. Parental involvement and adolescents’ educational success: The roles of prior achievement and socioeconomic status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2016; 45. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-016-0431-4

25. Epstein J. L. Improving family and community involvement in secondary schools. Education Digest. 2008; 73 (6): 9–12.

26. Dearing E., Sibley E., Nguyen H. N. Achievement mediators of family engagement in children’s education: A family–school–community systems model. In: Sheridan S. M., Kim E. M. (Eds.). Processes and pathways of family-school partnerships across development. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 17–39. DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2016.1173037

27. Marcon R. Positive relationship between parent school involvement and public school inner-city preschoolers’ development and academic performance. School Psychology Review. 1999; 28: 395–412.

28. Senechal M., LaFevre J. Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development. 2002; 73 (2): 445–460.

29. Wong R. S. M., Wong W. H., Tung K. T. S., Chow C. B., Rao N. Parental involvement in primary school education: It’s relationship with children’s academic performance and psychosocial competence through engaging children with school. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2018; 27 (5): 1544–1555. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-017-1011-2

30. Bailey B., L., Silvern S., Brabham E., Ross M. The effects of interactive reading homework and parent involvement on children’s inference responses. Early Childhood Education Journal. 2004; 32: 173–178.

31. Kotaman H. Turk Ana Babalar on Cocuklar Ontim Retimlerine katm Düzeyleri. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education. 2008; 21 (1): 135–149. (In Turkish)

32. Aina F., Grace A., Jethro O. Roles of parent on the academic performance of pupils in elementary schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2012; 2 (1): 105–115.

33. Tang S., Dearing E., Weiss, H. B. Spanish-speaking Mexican-American families’ involvement in school-based activities and their children’s literacy: The implications of having teachers who speak Spanish and English. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2012; 27 (2): 177–187.

34. Orozco G. L. Understanding the culture of low-income immigrant Latino parents: Key to involvement. The School Community Journal. 2008; 18 (1): 21–37.

35. Wiseman A. Family involvement in four voices: Administrator, teacher, students, and community member. Perspectives on Urban Education. 2010; 7 (1): 115–124.

36. Lindsay B., Harvey B. The impact of school buildings on student health and performance [Internet]. New York: McGraw-Hill Research Foundation; 2012 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://centerforgreenschools.org/sites/default/files/resource-files/McGrawHill_ImpactOnHealth.pdf

37. Jeynes W. H. The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education. 2007; 42 (1): 82–110.

38. McNeal R. B. Parental involvement as social capital: Differential electiveness’ on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces. 1999; 78 (1): 117–144.

39. Hill N. E., Craft, S. A. Parent-school involvement and school performance: Mediated pathways among socioeconomically comparable African American and Euro-American families. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2003; 95 (1): 74–83.

40. Shumow L., Lyutykh E., Schmidt J. A. Predictors and outcomes of parental involvement with high school students in science. The School Community Journal. 2004; 21 (2): 81–98.

41. Latif M., Rahmany R., Hassani M. T. The effects of teacher-parent relationships on Iranian EFL learners’ language proficiency. The International Journal of Language Learning Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW). 2013; 4 (3): 293–302.

42. Cansler M. L. E. Parent attitudes about involvement with foreign language programs for elementary students [doctoral dissertation on the Internet]. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; 2008 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: file:///C:/Users/Nayab%20Ali/Downloads/Parent_attitudes_about_and_involvement_with_foreign_language_programs_for_elementary_students.pdf

43. Chaudhry S. M. Introduction to statistical theory [Internet]. 8th edition. Lahore, Pakistan: Ilmi Kitab Khana Publisher; 2009 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://educations4u.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Introduction-to-statistical-theory-BSc-Part-1-By-Prof-Sher-Muhammad-Choudhry-and-Prof.-Dr.-Shahid-Kamal.pdf

44. Bowley A. L. Measurements of precision attained in sampling. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute. 1926; 22: 1–62.

45. Kingsley N. Parental involvement: A sine qua non in adolescents’ educational achievement [dissertation]. Ghana: Universität München; 2007. 235 p.

46. Nachmias D., Chava N. Research method in the social sciences. 3rd ed. New York, USA: St. Martin’s Press. Inc.; 1992. 576 p.

47. Eamon E. M. Social-demographic, school, neighborhood, and parenting influences on the academic achievement of Latino young adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2005; 34 (2): 163–174.

48. Halle T. G., Kurtz-Costes B., Mahoney J. L. Family influences on school achievement in low-income, African American children. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1997; 89: 527–537.

49. Williams J. H. Globalization, international education policy and local policy formation, policy implications of research in education. Vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4165-2_2

50. Steinberg L. We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2001; 111: 1–19.

51. Boonk L. M., Gijselaers H. J., Ritzen H., Brand-Gruwel S. Student perceived parental involvement as a predictor for academic motivation in vocational education and training (VET). Journal of Vocational Education & Training. 2020; 12 (1): 1–23.

52. Loneza G., Marshal L. B., Imelda A. Parents’ role in enhancing the academic performance of students in the study of mathematics in Tabuk city, Philippines. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences. 2013; 2 (8): 303.

53. Dornbusch S. M., Ritter P. L., Leiderman P. H., Roberts D. F., Fraleigh J. J. The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development. 1987; 58: 1244–1257.

54. Leung K., Lau S., Lam W. L. Parenting styles and achievement: A cross-cultural study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 1998; 44: 157–172.

55. Davies S. School choice by default? Understanding the demand for private tutoring in Canada. American Journal of Education. 2004; 110 (3): 233–255.

56. Steinberg L., Lamborn S. D., Dornbusch S. M., Darling N. Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: Authoritative parenting, school involvement an encouragement to succeed. Child Development. 1992; 63: 1266–1281.

57. Zellman G. L., Waterman J. M. Understanding the impact of parent school involvement on children’s educational outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research. 1998; 91 (6): 370–380.

58. Todd E. S., Higgins S. Powerless in professional and parent partnerships. British Journal of Sociology of Education. 1998; 19 (2): 227–236.

59. Wang M., Fredricks J. The reciprocal links between school engagement, youth problem behaviors, and school dropout during adolescence. Child Development. 2014; 85 (2): 722– 737. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12138

60. Stevenson D. L., Baker D. P. The family-school relation and the child’s school performance. Child Development. 1987; 58: 1348–1357.

61. Pong S. L., Lingxin H., Erica G. The roles of parenting styles and social capital in the school performance of immigrant Asian and Hispanic adolescents. Social Science Quarterly. 2005; 86 (4): 928–950.

62. Dojillo J. L., Balandra J., Lebuna M. R., Lopez N. E. The relationship of moral and financial support of parents to the academic performance of the BSHRM students. In: 2017 CEBU International Conference on Studies in Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities (SASSH-17); 2017 Jan 26–27; Cebu, Philippines. Iloilo City, Philippines: St. Therese-MTC Colleges; 2017. DOI: 10.17758/URUAE.UH0117434

63. Connell J. P., Wellborn J. G. Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In: Gunnar M., Sroufe L. A. (Eds.). Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology: Self processes and development. Vol. 23. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991. p. 43–77.

64. Adelman H. S., Taylor L. Intrinsic motivation and school misbehavior: Some intervention implications. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 1990; 21: 541–550.

65. Amabile T. M., Gitomer J. Children’s artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1984; 10: 209–215.

66. Spaulding C. L. Motivation in the classroom [Internet]. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc; 1992 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.worldcat.org/title/motivation-in-the-classroom/oclc/24319740?referer=di&ht=edition

67. Cotton K., Wikelund K. Parent involvement in education [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/3/cu6ht

68. Beebe F. M., Bocian K., Grasham F., Lane K., MacMillan D. Students with or at risk for problem behavior: Betwixt and between teacher and parent expectations. Preventing School Failure. 2005; 49 (2): 10–17.

69. Mante F. A., Awereh E. O., Opare A. Effects of parental involvement on academic performance of pupils: A Case Study at Adukrom Methodist Primary School. Basic Research Journal of Education Research and Review. 2015; 4 (1): 1–7.

70. Gutman M. L., McLoyd V. C. Parents’ management of their children’s education within the home, at school, and in the community: An examination of African-American families living in poverty. The Urban Review. 2000; 32 (1): 1–5

71. Charles B. F., Helene R. W., Kevin P. H., Robert D. A., Richard F. C. Educational paths and substance use from adolescence into early adulthood. Drug Issues. 2012; 42 (2). DOI: 10.1177/0022042612446590

72. McNeal R. B. Parent involvement and student performance: The influence of school context. Educational Research for Policy and Practice. 2015; 14 (2): 153–167.

73. Moon U. J., Hofferth S. L. Parental involvement, child effort, and the development of immigrant boys’ and girls’ reading and mathematics skills: A latent difference score growth model. Learning and Individual Differences. 2016; 47: 136–144.

74. Jung E., Zhang Y. Parental involvement, children’s aspirations, and achievement in new immigrant families. The Journal of Educational Research. 2016; 109 (4): 333–350.

75. Galindo C., Sheldon S. B. School and home connections and children’s kindergarten achievement gains: The mediating role of family involvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2012; 27 (1): 90–103.

76. Toren N. K. Multiple dimensions of parental involvement and its links to young adolescent self-achievement and academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools. 2013; 50 (6): 634–649.

77. Pena D. C. Parent involvement: Influencing factors and implications’. The Journal of Educational Research. 2000; 94 (1): 42–54.

78. Yamamoto Y. Unequal beginnings: Socioeconomic differences in Japanese mothers’ support of their children’s early schooling. Dissertation Abstract International, 2007; 68 (3): 172.

79. Meador D. Effective strategies to increase parental involvement in education [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://www.thoughtco.com/increase-parental-involvement-in-education-3194407

80. Sanders M. G., Sheldon S. B. Principal’s matter: A guide to school, family, and community partnerships [Internet]. Corwin: A SAGE Company; 2009 [cited 2022 Jan 25]. Available from: https://books.google.com.pk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=5I0J7Bb2KCsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&ots=1_BSvoH-uv&sig=boof2kYVlUHsjXdjenZTzzcvyU4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

81. Davis-Kean P. E. The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology. 2005; 19: 294–304.

82. Pearce R. R. Effects of cultural and social structural factors on the achievement of white and Chinese American students at school transition points. American Educational Research Journal. 2006; 43 (1): 75–101.

83. Fantuzzo J., MacWayne C., Perry M. A. Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School Psychology Review. 2004; 33 (4): 467–480.

84. McWayne C., Hampton V., Fantuzzo J., Cohen H. L. Sekino Y. A multivariate examination of parent involvement and the social and academic competencies of urban kindergarten children. Psychology in the Schools. 2004; 41 (3): 363–377.