Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Hardiness and psychological safety of a teacher in an educational environment

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-9-143-173

Abstract

Introduction. In the conditions of emerging psychological threats and risks of the educational environment, the development and formation of the hardiness of a teacher as one of the participants in educational relations becomes relevant. The study of professional hardiness in the system of psychological safety of a teacher and the justification of the means of its support are of particular relevance.
Aim. The aim of the study was to identify the characteristics of the hardiness and psychological safety of teachers in the educational environment of the school.
Methodology and research methods. The provisions on the social environment as a source of development, the provisions of resource and risk-resource approaches in psychology, theoretical and empirical approaches to the psychological safety of the educational environment were used as subject-scientific guidelines. Psychodiagnostic methods were used: “Psychological Safety of the Educational Environment of the School” (I. A. Baeva), “Hardiness Test” (by S. Maddi, Russian-language adaptation of D. A. Leontiev, E. I. Rasskazova), “The Index of Well-Being” (WHO-5) (Well-Being Index, WHO). The data obtained were processed using descriptive statistics, factor analysis (principal component method, Varimax rotation), correlation and regression analysis.
Results and scientific novelty. The conducted research allowed authors to identify four factors of subjectively significant psychological threats to the teacher in the educational environment (social nature, intensity of work, interpersonal relations and digitalisation of education). The authors revealed direct interrelations of the teacher’s satisfaction with the significant characteristics of the educational environment, its reference significance, psychological security with well-being and hardiness; inverse relationships between threats of a public nature and the teacher’s well-being, resilience, psychological safety and reference significance. It was established that the main predictors of the teacher’s hardiness in the educational environment were its reference and subjectively significant threats of a public nature for the teacher.
Practical significance. The identified factors of the threats, psychological predictors of hardiness allow us to outline approaches to the development and implementation of psychological and pedagogical programmes to support the hardiness of a teacher, as well as to the introduction into teacher training programmes of methods for teaching interpersonal communication skills, stress management and burnout prevention, contributing to teacher hardiness.

About the Authors

E. A. Shmeleva
Ivanovo State University; Russian State Social University; Ivanovo Fire and Rescue Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations of Russia
Russian Federation

Elena A. Shmeleva – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Psychology and Social Pedagogy; Professor of the Department of Physical Culture; Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages and Professional Communications

ResearcherID H-7821-2016

Scopus Author ID 56375922700 

Shuya

Moscow

Ivanovo



P. A. Kislyakov
Russian State Social University
Russian Federation

Pavel A. Kislyakov – Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of the Psychology; Chief Scientific Officer of the Research Institute of the Federal Penitentiary Service

ResearcherID E-4701-2016

Scopus Author ID 56348736600 

Moscow



N. I. Kolchugina
University of Continuing Education and Innovation
Russian Federation

Natalia I. Kolchugina – Senior Lecturer

Ivanovo



T. K. Phan
Hanoi Metropolitan University
Viet Nam

Trung K. Phan – PhD (Education), Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Vocational Education and the Faculty of Social and Human Sciences 

Hanoi



References

1. Baeva I. A., Bordovskaia N. V. The psychological safety of the educational environment and the psychological well-being of Russian secondary school pupils and teachers. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art. 2015; 8 (1): 86–99. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2015.0108

2. Janik M., Rothmann S. Engagement of secondary school teachers in Namibia: Relational context effects. Journal of Psychology in Africa. 2016; 26 (4): 316–325. DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2016.1208921

3. Smyk Yu. V., Kachimskaya A. Yu. The potential of psychological safety of a teacher as a condition of psychological safety of a student. Science for Education Today. 2021; 11 (1): 42–58. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.2101.03 (In Russ.)

4. Kulikova T. I., Maliy D. V. Professional and personal qualities of the teacher in the context of the psychological safety of educational environment. European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2017; 6 (4): 715–722. DOI: 10.13187/ejced.2017.4.715

5. Shahid S., Din M. Fostering psychological safety in teachers: The role of school leadership, team effectiveness & organizational culture. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management. 2021; 9 (2): 122–149. DOI: 10.17583/ijelm.2021.6317

6. Johnson S., Cooper C., Cartwright S., Donald I., Taylor P., Millet C. The experience of work related stress across occupations. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2005; 20 (2): 178–187.

7. Smith A., Brice C., Collins A., Matthews V., McNamara R. The scale of occupational stress: A further analysis of the impact of demographic factors and type of job. Contract Research Report No. 311/200. London: HSE Books; 2000. 61 p.

8. Freudenberger H. J. Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues. 1974; 30 (1): 159–165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x

9. Maslach C., Schaufeli W. B., Leiter M. P. Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001; 52: 397–422.

10. Bakker A. B., Schaufeli W. B., Sixma H. J., Bosveld W. Burnout contagion among general practitioners. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2002; 20 (1): 82–98. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.20.1.82.22251

11. Maslach C., Jackson S. E. The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Occupational Behaviour. 1981; 2 (2): 99–113.

12. Maslach C., Jackson S. E. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1986. p. 191–218.

13. Byrne B. M. Burnout: Investigating the impact of background variables for elementary, intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1991; 7 (2): 97–209.

14. Abel M. H., Sewell J. Stress and burnout in rural and urban secondary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Research. 1999; 92 (5): 287–289.

15. Byrne B. M. The Maslach Burnout Inventory: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across elementary, intermediate and secondary teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 1993; 66: 197–212.

16. Skaalvik E. M, Skaalvik S. Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2009; 25 (3): 518–524.

17. Shackleton N., Bonell C., Jamal F., Allen E., Mathiot A., Elbourne D., Viner R. M. Teacher burnout and contextual and compositional elements of school environment. The Journal of School Health. 2019; 89 (12): 977–993. DOI: 10.1111/josh.12839

18. Gallant A., Riley P. Early career teacher attrition: New thoughts on an intractable problem. Teacher Development. 2014; 18: 562–580. DOI: 10.1080/13664530.2014.945129

19. Kelly N., Sim C., Ireland M. Slipping through the cracks: teachers who miss out on early career support. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 2018; 46: 292–316. DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2018.1441366

20. Baeva I. A., Laktionova E. B., Gayazova L. A., Kondakova I. V. Determinants of psychological security of a teacher in an educational environment. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2020. 197: 18–30. DOI: 10.33910/1992-6464-2020-197-18-30 (In Russ.)

21. Leontiev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test zhiznestojkosti = Test of resilience. Moscow: Publishing House Smysl; 2006. 63 p. (In Russ.)

22. Maddi S. R. The story of hardiness: Twenty years of theorizing, research, and practice. Consulting Psychology Journal. 2002; 54 (3): 173–185.

23. Maddi S. R. Hardiness: The courage to grow from stresses. Journal of Positive Psychology. 2006; 1 (3): 160–168.

24. Li M., Yang Y. A cross-cultural study on a resilience-stress path model for college students. Journal of Counseling & Development. 2016; 94: 319–332. DOI: 10.1002/jcad.12088

25. Mansfield C. F., Beltman S., Broadley T., Weatherby-Fell N. Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016; 54: 77–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016

26. Brunetti G. J. Resilience under fire: Perspectives on the work of experienced, inner city high school teachers in the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2006; 22: 812–825. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.027

27. Doney P. A. Fostering resilience: A necessary skill for teacher retention. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2013; 24: 645–664. DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9324-x

28. Richards K. A. R., Levesque-Bristol C., Templin T. J., Graber K. C. The impact of resilience on role stressors and burnout in elementary and secondary teachers. Social Psychology of Education. 2016; 19: 511–536.

29. Wang Y. Building teachers’ resilience: Practical applications for teacher education of China. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 738606. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738606

30. Masten A. S., Best K., Garmezy N. Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology. 1990; 2: 425–444.

31. Gu Q., Li Q. Sustaining resilience in times of change: Stories from Chinese teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. 2013; 41 (3): 288–303. DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2013.809056

32. Beltman S. Teacher professional resilience: Thriving not just surviving. In: N. Weatherby-Fell (Ed.). Learning to teach in the secondary school. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2015. p. 20–38.

33. Beltman S. Understanding and examining teacher resilience from multiple perspectives. In: C. F. Mansfield (Ed.) Cultivating teacher resilience. Springer, Singapore; 2021. p. 11–28. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-5963-1_2

34. Holt P., Fine M. J., Tollefson N. Mediating stress: Survival of the hardy. Psychology in the Schools. 1987; 24 (1): 51–58. DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(198701)24:13.0.CO;2-8

35. Pierce C. M. B., Molloy G. N. Psychological and biographical differences between secondary school teachers experiencing high and low levels of burnout. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 1990; 60 (1): 37–51. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00920.x

36. Corso-de-Zúñiga S., Moreno-Jiménez B., Garrosa E., et al. Personal resources and personal vulnerability factors at work: An application of the Job Demands-Resources model among teachers at private schools in Peru. Current Psychology. 2020; 39: 325–336. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-017-9766-6

37. Zhang L.-F. Hardiness and the Big Five personality traits among Chinese university students. Learning and Individual Differences. 2011; 21 (1): 109–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.006

38. Kobasa S. C. Stressful life events, personality, and health: An inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979; 37 (1): 1–11. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.1

39. Bernard L. C., Hutchison S., Lavin A. Ego-strength, hardiness, self-esteem, self-efficacy, optimism, and maladjustment: Health-related personality constructs and the “Big Five” model of personality. Assessment. 1996; 3 (2): 115–131.

40. Alexander D. A., Klein S. Ambulance personnel and critical incidents: Impact of accident and emergency work on mental health and emotional well-being. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2001; 178: 76–81. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.178.1.76

41. Murray R. A. Interpersonal guilt and self-defeating behavior of foster youth. Dissertation Abstracts International (Section B): The Sciences and Engineering. 2005; 65 (10B): 5415.

42. Polyakova O. B. The specifics of the resilience of psychologists and teachers with professional deformations (burnout). Izvestiya Ural’skogo federal’nogo universiteta. Ser. 3, Obshchestvennye nauki. Social’naya filosofiya i sociologiya = Izvestiya Ural Federal University Journal. Ser. 3. Social Sciences. Social Philosophy and Sociology. 2016; Vol. 11, 4 (158): 82–91. (In Russ.)

43. Volodina T. V. Interrelation of resilience and emotional burnout among teachers of secondary schools. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2011; 6: 259. (In Russ.)

44. Torkachenko Yu. V. Teacher’s resilience as an intrapersonal resource of professional development. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena = Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2021; 201: 178–186. DOI: 10.33910/1992-6464-2021-201-178-186 (In Russ.)

45. Kislyakov P. A., Shmeleva E. A., Tolstov S. N. Ensuring socio-psychological safety of subjects of education. Voprosy psihologii = Questions of Psychology. 2015; 5: 46–55. (In Russ.)

46. Baeva I. A. Psihologicheskaja bezopasnost’ v obrazovanii = Psychological safety in education. St. Petersburg: Publishing House “SOJuZ”; 2002. 271 p. (In Russ.)

47. Baeva I. A., Volkova E. N., Laktionova E. B. Psychological safety of the educational environment: personality development. St. Petersburg: Publishing House Nestor-Istorija; 2011. 271 p. (In Russ.)

48. Krasnov V. N. Depression as a social and clinical problem of modern medicine. Rossijskij psihiatricheskij zhurnal = Russian Psychiatric Journal. 2011; 6: 8–10. (In Russ.)

49. Chernenko Yu. A., Saprykina D. I. The phenomenon of bullying in Russian schools: Teachers – victims. Kommunikacii. Media. Dizajn = Communications. Media. Design. 2018; 3 (2): 136–150. (In Russ.)

50. Khusnutdinova M. R. The social status of the teacher’s profession: Self-determination of Russian teachers. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2017; 22 (4): 38–48. DOI: 10.17759/pse.201722040 (In Russ.)

51. Zeer E. F., Yugova E. A., Karpova N. P., Trubetskaya O. V. Psychological predictors of human hardiness formation. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education. 2016; 11 (14): 7035–7044.

52. Edmondson A. C., Higgins M., Singer S., Weiner J. Understanding psychological safety in health care and education organizations: A comparative perspective. Research in Human Development. 2016; 13 (1): 65–83. DOI: 10.1080/15427609.2016.1141280

53. Chan D. W. Hardiness and its role in the stress-burnout relationship among prospective Chinese teachers in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2003; 19 (4): 381– 395. DOI: 10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00023-4

54. Makhnach A. V., Laktionova A. I., Postylyakova Yu. V. Resilience of student youth in Russia under uncertainty. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2022; 24 (5): 90–121. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-5-90-121 (In Russ.)

55. Kislyakov P. A., Meyerson I. S., Shmeleva E. A., Aleksandrovich M. O. Personal resilience to socio-cultural threats in the context of digital transformation of society. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2021; 23 (9): 142–168. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-9-142-168 (In Russ.)


Review

For citations:


Shmeleva E.A., Kislyakov P.A., Kolchugina N.I., Phan T.K. Hardiness and psychological safety of a teacher in an educational environment. The Education and science journal. 2022;24(9):143-173. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-9-143-173

Views: 1656


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)