Category-terminological apparatus of modern social upbringing

Introduction. Social upbringing has taken shape in the branch of pedagogical knowledge – the pedagogy of social upbringing, and its categorical and terminological apparatus remains unformed and imperfect. This leads to the arbitrariness of the description of social and educational phenomena in the theory and practice of social upbringing; loss of categorisation, meaning of terms and their incompleteness that results in the inconsistency of social upbringing theory, etc.

Aim. The aim of the present article is a theoretical substantiation and description of the category-terminological apparatus of modern social upbringing based on the developed category classification, which acts as a means of systematising scientific knowledge.

Methodology and research methods. The methodological foundations of the study were categorical, systemic and holistic approaches. Theoretical methods were used as research methods: categorical analysis and synthesis, methods of classification, systematisation and generalisation, categorical methods of triadic decoding of categories and permutations.

Results. The study describes a two-level classification of categories developed by the author. Categories of the first order are allocated on the basis of purpose, include in their composition: base category, system and process categories. Categories of the second order are allocated on the basis of the use of mechanisms for the formation of categories, contain in their composition: a key category, synthesised, integrated and additional categories. The categorical system of social education is described. The categorical system of social upbringing is understood as a specially developed form of organisation of scientific knowledge, which makes it possible to holistically represent the objects of social education through given meaningful relationships between categories in the totality of their interaction.

Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of the study is the formation of a categorical system of social upbringing through a category-terminological apparatus, which provides the terminological unity of theory and practice, supplementing and concretising them and ensuring consistency and integrity. The developed categorical system of social upbringing does not change, but complements the specific scientific level of pedagogy methodology. By ensuring the completeness of the categorical apparatus, thecomplex of methods used in the analysis of the categories of social upbringing, enriches the technological level of pedagogy methodology with new methods of triadic decoding of categories and permutations. A new level of development of professional speech is being formed on the basis of its scientifically substantiated filling with a categorical system of social upbringing.

Practical significance. The practical significance of the study lies in the fact that the categorical system of social upbringing can be used in the development of basic educational programmes of the psychological and pedagogical direction, training courses, methodological materials, in terms of the formation of students’ professional competencies; in the implementation of scientific research in the field of social pedagogy and social upbringing; in the development of dictionary-encyclopedic literature on social pedagogy and social upbringing. The holistic development of the categorical system will contribute to the enrichment of the terminology of social upbringing and the effectiveness of professional communication.

1. Galaguzova M. A., Shtinova G. N. Evolyuciya ponyatijnogo apparata pedagogiki i obrazovaniya = Evolution of the conceptual apparatus of pedagogy and education [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House INFRA-M; 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 03]. 137 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36847842_31781442.pdf (In Russ.)

2. Serikov V. V. The category of consistency in didactics: Towards the development of L. Ya. Zorina’s ideas. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika = Domestic and Foreign Pedagogy. 2019; 5 (62-1): 16–24. DOI: 10.24411/2224-0772-2019-10026 (In Russ.)

3. Dautova O. B., Vershinina N. A., Ermolaeva M. G., et al. Sistematizaciya pedagogicheskogo znaniya: metodologiya issledovaniya terminologii = Systematisation of pedagogical knowledge: Methodology of terminology research [Internet]. Ed. by Dautova O. B. St. Petersburg: Publishing House Bukval’no; 2018 [cited 2021 Nov 07]. 215 p. Available from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01009970167 (In Russ.)

4. Tolkovyj slovar’ terminov ponyatijnogo apparata informatizacii obrazovaniya = Explanatory dictionary of terms of the conceptual apparatus of informatization of education [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House BINOM. Laboratorija znanij; 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 16]. 69 p. Available from: http://robert-school.ru/iio/pages/fonds/dict/Dictionary.pdf (In Russ.)

5. Zagvjazinskij V. I., Zakirova A. F. Pedagogicheskij slovar’ = Pedagogical dictionary [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House Akademija; 2008 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 343 p. Available from: https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01004171667 (In Russ.)

6. Azimov E. G., Shchukin A. N. Novyj slovar’ metodicheskih terminov i ponyatij (teoriya i praktika obucheniya yazykam) = New dictionary of methodological terms and concepts (theory and practice of teaching languages) [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House IKAR; 2009 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 448 p. Available from: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?tm=1669435379&tld=ru&lang=ru&name=azimov_e_g_shukin_a_n_novyy_slovar-21338.pdf&text=6 (In Russ.)

7. Sovremennyj slovar’ po pedagogike = Modern dictionary of pedagogy [Internet]. Minsk: Publishing House “Sovremennoe slovo”; 2001 [cited 2021 Nov 24]. 925 p. Available from: https://spblib.ru/en/catalog/-/books/11238642-sovremennyy-slovar-po-pedagogike (In Russ.)

8. Voronin A. S. Slovar’ terminov po obshchej i social’noj pedagogike = Glossary of terms for general and social pedagogy [Internet]. Ekaterinburg: GOU VPO USTU-UPI; 2006 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 135 p. Available from: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?tm=1669435928&tld=ru&lang=ru&name=Voronin_v.pdf&text=8 (In Russ.)

9. Polonsky V. M. Slovar’ po obrazovaniyu i pedagogike = Dictionary of education and pedagogy [Internet]. Moscow: Higher school; 2004 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 512 p. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20153663 (In Russ.)

10. Polonsky V. M. Why do we need a dictionary? Nauka i shkola = Science and School [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 16]; 1: 214–226. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37263488_88072640.pdf (In Russ.)

11. Belkov S. A., Goldstein S. L., Tkachenko T. Ya. Hypertext thesaurus of system knowledge. Nauchno-tehnicheskaja informacija = Scientific and Technical Information [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2021 Nov 12]; 3: 1–10. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25085214_46357552.pdf (In Russ.)

12. Abyzova E. V. Pedagogical design: Concept, subject, main categories. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Vyatka State University Bulletin. [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 3. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pedagogicheskiy-dizayn-ponyatie-predmet-osnovnye-kategorii (In Russ.)

13. Gartliv A. V. On the question of the concept of “upbringing education”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Bulletin of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2021 Nov 15]; 4 (32): 387–392. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-ponyatii-vospityvayuschego-obucheniya (In Russ.)

14. Kraevsky V. V. Yazyk pedagogiki v kontekste sovremennogo nauchnogo znaniya = Language of pedagogy in the context of modern scientific knowledge. In: Materialy vserossijskoj metodologicheskoj konferencii- seminara = Materials of the All-Russian Methodological Conference-Seminar [Internet]. Volgograd; Krasnodar; Moscow; 2008 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. p. 38–47. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20066618 (In Russ.)

15. Orlov A. A. Specificity of modern pedagogical knowledge. Pedagogika = Pedagogy [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 8: 3–14. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=20879324 (In Russ.)

16. Veidt V. P. Problems of modern pedagogical terminology. Kaliningradskij vestnik obrazovaniya = Kaliningrad Bulletin of Education [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 4 (8): 4–14. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44435156_73978555.pdf (In Russ.)

17. Savotina N. A. Educational technologies in modern education: Problems of the development of the conceptual apparatus and approaches to its unification. SOTIS – social’nye tekhnologii, issledovaniya = SOTIS – Social Technologies, Research [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 16]; 4 (72): 93–98. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24248141 (In Russ.)

18. Altenthan S., Betscher-Ott S., Gotthardt W., et al. Pädagogik [Internet]. Köln: Bildungsverlag Eins GmbH; 2016 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 504 p. Available from: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?tm=1669436333&tld=ru&lang=de&name=978-3-427-05030-8_06.pdf&text=Altenthan%20S.%2C%20Betsche (In German)

19. Sobe N. W., Kovalczyk J. A. Exploding the cube: Revisiting “context” in the field of comparative education in comparative and international education: The making of a field and a vision for the future. Current Issues in Comparative Education [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 16 (1): 80–98. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264001877_Exploding_the_Cube_Revisioning_Context_in_the_Field_of_Comparative_Education

20. Larsen M. A. New editorial introduction. In: Larsen A. M. (Ed.). New thinking in comparative education. Honoring Robert Cowen. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2010. p. 1–14. DOI: 10.1163/9789460913051

21. Creswell J. W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches [Internet]. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2003 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. p. 342. Available from: https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf

22. Bray M., Adamson B., Mason M. Comparative education research approaches and methods. Pacific Affairs. 2007; 80 (4): 660–661. DOI: 10.2307/40377441

23. Blum L. Multicultural education as values education. Harvard Projects on Schooling and Students [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 4: 1–34. Available from: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?tm=1669434837&tld=ru&name=BlumMEVE.pdf&text=Blum

24. Gordon M. Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins [Internet]. 1964 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 287 p. Available from: https://archive.org/details/assimilationinam0000gord

25. Amor A. M., Hagiwara M., Shogren K. A., Thompson J. R., Verdugo M. Á., Burke K. M., Aguayo V. International perspectives and trends in research on inclusive education: A systematic review. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2019; 23: 1277–1295. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2018.1445304

26. Florian L. On the necessary co-existence of special and inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2019; 23: 691–704. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2019.1622801

27. Kemple K. M. Let’s be friends. Peer competence and social inclusion in early childhood programs [Internet]. New York: Teacher College Press; 2004 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. 180 p. Available from: https://archive.org/details/letsbefriendspee0000kemp

28. Molbaek M. Inclusive teaching strategies – dimensions and agendas. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2018; 22: 1048–1061. DOI: 10.1080/13603116.2017.1414578

29. Reindal S. M. Discussing inclusive education: An inquiry into different interpretations and a search for ethical aspects of inclusion using the capabilities approach. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2015; 31: 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/08856257.2015.1087123

30. Sergeev N. K., Serikov V. V. Thesis on pedagogy: The problem of science and morality. Pedagogika = Pedagogy [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 4: 80–81. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22830073 (In Russ.)

31. Zakirova A. F. Conceptual base of modern pedagogy. Pedagogika = Pedagogy [Internet]. 2001 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 7: 7–12. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33844493&selid=20227866 (In Russ.)

32. Zakirova A. F., Zheglova O. A. Methods of forming pedagogical concepts in the professional training of a teacher. Specifika pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya v Rossii = Specificity of Pedagogical Education in Russia [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 13]; 1: 40–41. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25594813_18968636.pdf (In Russ.)

33. Polonsky V. M. Dinamika razvitiya i sootnoshenie osnovnyh ponyatij pedagogiki = Dynamics of development and the ratio of the basic concepts of pedagogy. In: Ponjatijnyj apparat pedagogiki i obrazovanija = Conceptual apparatus of pedagogy and education [Internet]. Ekaterinburg; 2019 [cited 2021 Nov 13]. p. 94–103. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_42879583_24567544.pdf (In Russ.)

34. Serikov V. V. Search for pedagogical knowledge: to overcome the methodological crisis in pedagogy. Grani poznaniya = Borders of Knowledge [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Nov 16]; 7 (41): 9–18. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25413230_54241616.pd (In Russ.)

35. Khudyakov V. N., Kostenok P. I. On the problem of terminological work on concepts. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Nov 16]; 19 (273): 125–128. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_18801857_86498849.pdf (In Russ.)

36. Mamardashvili M. K. Kak ya ponimayu filosofiyu = As I understand philosophy [Internet]. Moscow: Publishing House Progress; 1990 [cited 2021 Nov 21]. 414 p. Available from: https://docs.yandex.ru/docs/view?tm=1669433701&tld=ru&lang=ru&name=mamardashvili_kak_ya_ponimayu_filosofiyu_1992__ocr.pdf&text=36 (In Russ.)

37. Polonsky V. M. Attention: Terminology! Novoe v psihologo-pedagogicheskih issledovaniyah = New in Psychological and Pedagogical Research [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 Nov 19]; 4 (24): 44–51. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_17891787_56264474.pdf (In Russ.)

38. Zheglova O. A. Development of humanitarian culture in the process of forming scientific concepts among students of pedagogical specialties. Vestnik Tyumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye issledovaniya. Humanitates = Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Humanities Research. Humanitates. 2016; 1 (2): 253–269. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2016-2-1-253-269 (In Russ.)

39. Popov M. Kh., Shiryalkin A. F. On the issue of the quality of systematized technical terminology. Vestnik Ul’yanovskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Ulyanovsk State Technical University [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Dec 01]; 3 (67): 67–73. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22296383_99790933.pdf (In Russ.)

40. Guzeev M. S. On the issue of explication of pedagogical concepts: Man-individual-personality. Voprosy pedagogiki = Questions of Pedagogy [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 03]; 8-2: 45–48. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_43858930_81807687.pdf (In Russ.)

41. Aksyutina Z. A. Methodological and theoretical analysis of the concept of “social education”. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Omsk University [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Dec 08]; 2 (72): 146–151. Available from: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21594954_36302316.pdf (In Russ.)