Transformation of the discipline “Concepts of Modern Natural Science” for the development of critical thinking

   Introduction. Globally, there are integrated natural science disciplines in the training programmes for humanities students in many universities in order to overcome the gap between the humanitarian-artistic and natural-science cultures, to form a holistic view of the physical world and the basics of technology among university graduates, to equip them with the scientific method of cognition. In Russia, such a discipline is “Concepts of Modern Natural Science”. However, in its current form, it does not fully meet the abovementioned goals. Due to the lack of a practical line, students do not master the skills of applying the scientific method and do not get an idea about science as a tool for understanding nature and a way of thinking, but instead they become stronger in the perception of natural science as a storehouse of ready-made true knowledge. Nevertheless, the situation changes if the focus is shifted from the transfer of knowledge to the development of critical thinking, which in most countries of the world is recognised as the main goal of university education.

   Aim. The present research aims to identify the structure, content and types of training tasks of the course “Concepts of Modern Natural Science”, contributing to the development of critical thinking of students in the humanities, and the corresponding transformation of the course “Concepts of Modern Natural Science”.

   Methodology and research methods. The identification of the optimal structure, content and types of training tasks, as well as the evaluation of the results of the introduction of the transformed course “Concepts of Modern Natural Science” into the educational process were carried out on the basis of research conducted at two universities – RUDN University and Moscow State Pedagogical University. The tests were applied to assess the structure of motivation, natural science knowledge and critical thinking skills, tests of epistemological ideas. Also, the authors used the surveys showing students’ perception of the effectiveness of teaching methods and means, the usefulness of natural science knowledge and critical thinking for study, life, self-development and professional activities.

   Results. It is shown that students and teachers have a positive attitude towards the idea of making critical thinking the main goal of studying the course “Concepts of Modern Natural Science”. The change in goal-setting makes it possible to connect natural science and the humanities through critical thinking as a means of understanding nature and man, to introduce a practical line that includes tasks-simulators of critical thinking skills and the application of the scientific method and projects in the implementation of which these skills become tools of knowledge. After studying the transformed course “Concepts of Modern Natural Science”, the motivation of students to study natural science, their epistemological ideas, cognitive skills and assimilation of natural science material improved.

   Scientific novelty. A course structure was developed with two integration centres; additions were made to the course content that contribute to the development of students’ epistemological ideas and the conscious formation of cognitive skills; a practical line was introduced, consisting of tasks that require the use of certain cognitive skills in the study of problem situations in accordance with the stages of the scientific method; the procedural component of the course was complemented by methods for the development of thinking.

   Practical significance. The created case-practice is variable and can be applied in the practical line of
any integrated natural science discipline.

1. Snow C. P. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1959]. 107 p. Available from: http://intelligentagent.com/RISD/TheTwoCultures.pdf (date of access: 08. 03. 2023).

2. Голубева О. Н., Суханов А. Д. Новый подход к содержанию дисциплины «Концепции современного естествознания» // Физическое образование в ВУЗах. 1999. Т. 5, № 4. С. 23–29. Режим доступа: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9956493 (дата обращения: 05. 03. 2023).

3. Voronov V. K., Grechneva M. V., Gerashchenko L. A. The Program of Lecture Course “Concepts of Modern Natural Sciences” // American Journal of Educational Research. 2013. Vol. 1, № 8. Р. 344–349. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-8-12

4. Гинзбург В. Л. Разум и вера // Вестник РАН. 1999. Т. 69, № 6. С. 546–552. Режим доступа: http://lib.ru/HRISTIAN/ATH/ginzburg1.txt (дата обращения: 05. 03. 2023).

5. Tari D. K., Rosana D. Contextual Teaching and Learning to Develop Critical Thinking and Practical Skills // Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1233 Article number 012102. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2

6. Делёз Ж. Складка. Лейбниц и барокко / Посл. В. А. Подороги ; пер. Б. М. Скуратова. М.: Логос, 1997. 264 с.

7. Reed J. H. Effect of a model for critical thinking on student achievement in primary source document analysis and interpretation, argumentative reasoning, critical thinking dispositions, and history content in a community college history course: a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1998. Available from: www.criticalthinking.org/resources/JReed-Dissertation.pdf (date of access: 07. 03. 2023).

8. Singh T. S. Problems of teaching science at higher secondary level // Global Journal of Applied Engineering in Computer Science and Mathematics (GJAECSMA) – Special Edition 1. 2022. P. 82–84. Available from: https://stjosephuniv.edu.in/gjaecsma/articles/Apr_2022/GJSE020.pdf (date of access: 06. 03. 2023).

9. Полонников А. А. О миссии гуманитарного обучения в высшей технической школе // Высшее образование в России. 2022. Т. 31, № 4. С. 79–91. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-4-79-91

10. Солодихина М. В. Критическое мышление в высшем естественнонаучном образовании: определение и содержание понятия: монография. М.: МПГУ, 2022. 164 с. DOI: 10.31862/9785426310650

11. Свиридов В. В., Кочукова М. В. Структурирование предметной области на основе системного подхода // Известия Воронежского государственного педагогического университета. 2017. № 1 (274). С. 92–97. Режим доступа: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28912536 (дата обращения: 02. 03. 2023).

12. Одинцова Н. И. Естественнонаучная картина мира как новая дисциплина в системе высшего образования // Современные направления развития вузовского образования: коллективная монография. Ульяновск: ИП Кеньшенская Виктория Валерьевна (издательство «Зебра»), 2019. С. 236–245. Режим доступа: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38309757 (дата обращения: 03. 03. 2023).

13. Leighton J. P., Cui Y., Cutumisu M. Key information processes for thinking critically in data-rich environments // Frontiers in Education. 2021. № 6. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.561847

14. Эйнштейн А. Собрание научных трудов / Под ред. И. Е. Тамм, Я. А. Смородинского, Б. Г. Кузнецова. М.: Наука, 1967. Т. 4. Режим доступа: https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/klassiki_nauki/ehjnshtejn_a_sobranie_nauchnykh_trudov_v_chetyrekh_tomakh_1965_1967/52-1-0-975 (дата обращения: 08. 03. 2023).

15. Ennis R. H. Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research // Educational Researcher. 1989. № 18 (3). P. 4–10. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X018003004

16. Al-Ghadouni A. M. Instructional Approaches to Critical Thinking: An Overview of Reviews // Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica. 2021. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 240–246. URL: https://www.revistaclinicapsicologica.com/data-cms/articles/20210531120120pmSSCI-479.pdf

17. Alberts B. Why science education is more important than most scientists think // FEBS Letters. 2022. № 596. P. 149–159. DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.14272

18. Adams D. Critical Thinking, the Scientific Method, and Page 25 of Gilbert. 1998. Available from: https://www.sdbonline.org/sites/archive/sdbeduca/dany_adams/critical_thinking.html (date of access: 28. 02. 2023).

19. Agustinasari A., Susilawati E., Yulianci S., Fiqry R. et al. The implementation of inquiry by using local potential to improve critical thinking skills in Bima // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. Vol. 1933, № 1. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012078

20. Yulianci S., Asriyadin, Nurjumiati, Kaniawati I. et al. Preliminary analysis of module development by setting arguments through the application of scientific inquiry models to improve students’ scientific attitudes // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. Vol. 1806, № 1. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012021

21. Blatti J. L., Garcia J., Cave D., Monge F. et al. Systems thinking in science education and outreach toward a sustainable future // Journal of Chemical Education. 2019. Vol. 96, № 12. P. 2852–2862. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00318

22. Dong Y., Yin H., Du S., Wang A. The effects of flipped classroom characterized by situational and collaborative learning in a community nursing course: A quasi-experimental design // Nurse Education Today. 2021. Vol. 105. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105037

23. Скрипко З. А. Использование практических методов при изучении предмета «Естественно-научная картина мира» студентами-гуманитариями // Научно-педагогическое обозрение. 2020. № 3 (31). С. 144–150. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-3-144-150

24. Смирнов Г. В. Менделеев [Электрон. ресурс] // Жизнь замечательных людей. Вып 12 (544). М.: Молодая гвардия, 1974. 336 с. Режим доступа: https://prussia.online/books/mendeleev (дата обращения: 05. 03. 2023).

25. Baxter Magolda M. B. Knowing and Reasoning in College Students; gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1992. 446 p. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?id=0CqdAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y (date of access: 1. 03. 2023).

26. Hofer B. K., Pintrich P. R. Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. DOI: 10.4324/9781410604316

27. Jiménez L. G. El desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y de una conciencia social crítica: metodología y prácticas pedagógicas de un curso de nivel intermedio B1 de ELE // Revista Internacional de Lenguas Extranjeras. 2017. Vol. 6. Р. 9–30. Available from: https://raco.cat/index.php/RILE/article/view/328547 (date of access: 01. 03. 2023).

28. Günther S. L., Fleige J., Upmeier zu Belzen A., Krüger D. Using the Case Method to Foster Preservice Biology Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge Related to Models and Modeling // Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2019. Vol. 30, № 4. P. 321–343. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1560208

29. Minniti L. F. S., Melo J. S. M., Oliveira R. D., Salles J. A. A. The Use of Case Studies as a Teaching Method in Brazil // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2017. Vol. 237. P. 373–377. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.024

30. Solodikhina М. V. Solodikhina A. A. Natural-Scientific Cases As A Tool For The Development Of Critical Thinking // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. 2021. Vol. 116. P. 1532–1545. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.171

31. Barnett R. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?id=1a_pAAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y (date of access: 08. 03. 2023).

32. Hidayati N., Zubaidah S., Suarsini E., Praherdhiono H. The Relationship between Critical Thinking and Knowledge Acquisition: The Role of Digital Mind Maps-PBL Strategies // International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2020. № 10. P. 140–145. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1353

33. Hasni A., Bousadra F., Belletête V., Benabdallah A. et al. Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: a systematic review // Studies in Science Education. 2016. Vol. 52. P. 199–231. DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

34. Cortázar C., Nussbaum M., Harcha J., Alvares D., López F., Goñi J., Cabezas V. Promoting critical thinking in an online, project-based course // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. Vol. 119. Article number 106705. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106705

35. Almulla M. A. The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning // SAGE Open. 2020. Vol 10 (3). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020938702

36. Корешникова Ю. Н. Развитие критического мышления в современном российском обществе: что дает университет? // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2019. № 6. С. 91–110. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.6.06

37. Солодихина М. В. Сборник кейс-задач по интегрированным естественнонаучным курсам (Серия «Современное естествознание»). М.: Прометей, 2020. 156 с.

38. Wade S., Kidd C. The role of prior knowledge and curiosity in learning // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2019. Vol. 26. P. 1377–1387 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01598-6

39. Oyamaa Y., Manalob E., Nakatanic Y. The Hemingway effect: How failing to finish a task can have a positive effect on motivation // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2018. Vol. 30. P. 7–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.001

40. Solodikhina M. V., Odintsova N. I., Odintsova E. E. Natural-scientific cases as an instrument for assessment of logical thinking // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. Vol. 1691. Article number 012218. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012218

41. Желеева А. B. Диагностика мотивации школьников к изучению физики // Наука и школа. 2015. № 4. С. 155–161. Режим доступа: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diagnostika-motivatsii-shkolnikov-k-izucheniyu-fiziki (дата обращения: 03. 03. 2023).

42. Федоров А. А. Русскоязычная версия шкалы конструктивистских эпистемологических убеждений: психометрический анализ // Reflexio. 2020. Т. 13, № 1. С. 49–59. URL: https://reflexio.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/51

43. Перенести в английский вариант

44. Snow C. P. The Two Cultures. London: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1959]. 107 p. Available from: http://intelligentagent.com/RISD/TheTwoCultures.pdf (date of access: 08. 03. 2023).

45. Golubeva O. N., Sukhanov A. D. A new approach to the content of the discipline “Concepts of modern natural science”. Fizicheskoe obrazovanie v VUZakh = Physical Education in Universities [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2023 Mar 05]; 5 (4): 23–29. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9956493 (In Russ.)

46. Voronov V. K., Grechneva M. V., Gerashchenko L. A. The Program of Lecture Course “Concepts of Modern Natural Sciences” // American Journal of Educational Research. 2013. Vol. 1, № 8. Р. 344–349. DOI: 10.12691/education-1-8-12

47. Ginzburg V. L. Reason and faith. Vestnik RAN = Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Internet]. 1999 [cited 2023 Mar 05]; 69 (6): 546–552. Available from: http://lib.ru/HRISTIAN/ATH/ginzburg1.txt (In Russ.)

48. Tari D. K., Rosana D. Contextual Teaching and Learning to Develop Critical Thinking and Practical Skills // Journal of Physics Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1233 Article number 012102. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12835-1_2

49. Deleuze Z. Skladka. Lejbnic i barokko = The Fold. Leibniz and the Baroque. Moscow: Publishing House Logos; 1997. 264 p. (In Russ.)

50. Reed J. H. Effect of a model for critical thinking on student achievement in primary source document analysis and interpretation, argumentative reasoning, critical thinking dispositions, and history content in a community college history course: a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 1998. Available from: www.criticalthinking.org/resources/JReed-Dissertation.pdf (date of access: 07. 03. 2023).

51. Singh T. S. Problems of teaching science at higher secondary level // Global Journal of Applied Engineering in Computer Science and Mathematics (GJAECSMA) – Special Edition 1. 2022. P. 82–84. Available from: https://stjosephuniv.edu.in/gjaecsma/articles/Apr_2022/GJSE020.pdf (date of access: 06. 03. 2023).

52. Polonnikov A. A. About the mission of liberal education in higher technical school. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2022; 31 (4): 79–91. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-4-79-91 (In Russ.)

53. Solodikhina M. V. Kriticheskoe myshlenie v vysshem estestvennonauchnom obrazovanii: opredelenie i soderzhanie ponyatiya = Critical thinking in higher natural science education: Definition and content of the concept. Moscow: MPGU; 2022. 164 p. DOI: 10.31862/9785426310650 (In Russ.)

54. Sviridov V. V., Kochukova M. V. Structuring the subject area based on a systematic approach. Izvestiya Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of the Voronezh State Pedagogical University [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2023 Mar 02]; 1 (274): 92–97. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28912536 (In Russ.)

55. Odintsova N. I. Estestvennonauchnaya kartina mira kak novaya disciplina v sisteme vysshego obrazovaniya = Natural science picture of the world as a new discipline in the system of higher education. In: Nagornova A. Yu., Mikheev T. B. (Eds.). Sovremennye napravlenija razvitija vuzovskogo obrazovanija = Modern trends in the development of higher education [Internet]. Ulyanovsk: Publishing House Zebra; 2019 [cited 2023 Mar 03]. p. 236–245. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38309757 (In Russ.)

56. Leighton J. P., Cui Y., Cutumisu M. Key information processes for thinking critically in data-rich environments // Frontiers in Education. 2021. № 6. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2021.561847

57. Einshtein A. Sobranie nauchnyh trudov = Collection of scientific papers [Internet]. Ed. by Tamm I. E., Smorodinskij Ya. A., Kuznetsov B. G. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1967 [cited 2023 Mar 08]. Vol. 4. Available from: https://platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/klassiki_nauki/ehjnshtejn_a_sobranie_nauchnykh_trudov_v_chetyrekh_tomakh_1965_1967/52-1-0-975 (In Russ.)

58. Ennis R. H. Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research // Educational Researcher. 1989. № 18 (3). P. 4–10. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X018003004

59. Al-Ghadouni A. M. Instructional Approaches to Critical Thinking: An Overview of Reviews // Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica. 2021. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 240–246. URL: https://www.revistaclinicapsicologica.com/data-cms/articles/20210531120120pmSSCI-479.pdf

60. Alberts B. Why science education is more important than most scientists think // FEBS Letters. 2022. № 596. P. 149–159. DOI: 10.1002/1873-3468.14272

61. Adams D. Critical Thinking, the Scientific Method, and Page 25 of Gilbert. 1998. Available from: https://www.sdbonline.org/sites/archive/sdbeduca/dany_adams/critical_thinking.html (date of access: 28. 02. 2023).

62. Agustinasari A., Susilawati E., Yulianci S., Fiqry R. et al. The implementation of inquiry by using local potential to improve critical thinking skills in Bima // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. Vol. 1933, № 1. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012078

63. Yulianci S., Asriyadin, Nurjumiati, Kaniawati I. et al. Preliminary analysis of module development by setting arguments through the application of scientific inquiry models to improve students’ scientific attitudes // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021. Vol. 1806, № 1. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012021

64. Blatti J. L., Garcia J., Cave D., Monge F. et al. Systems thinking in science education and outreach toward a sustainable future // Journal of Chemical Education. 2019. Vol. 96, № 12. P. 2852–2862. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00318

65. Dong Y., Yin H., Du S., Wang A. The effects of flipped classroom characterized by situational and collaborative learning in a community nursing course: A quasi-experimental design // Nurse Education Today. 2021. Vol. 105. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105037

66. Skripko Z. A. The use of practical methods in the study of the subject “natural science picture of the world” by humanities students. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie = Pedagogical Review. 2020; 3 (31): 144–150. DOI: 10.23951/2307-6127-2020-3-144-150 (In Russ.)

67. Smirnov G. V. Mendeleev. Zhizn’ zamechatel’nykh lyudei = Mendeleev. The lives of wonderful people [Internet]. 1974. Vol. 12 (544). Moscow: Publishing House Molodaya gvardiya; 1974 [cited 2023 Mar 05]. 336 р. Available from: https://prussia.online/books/mendeleev (In Russ.)

68. Baxter Magolda M. B. Knowing and Reasoning in College Students; gender-related patterns in students’ intellectual development. San-Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1992. 446 p. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?id=0CqdAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y (date of access: 1. 03. 2023).

69. Hofer B. K., Pintrich P. R. Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. DOI: 10.4324/9781410604316

70. Jiménez L. G. El desarrollo del pensamiento crítico y de una conciencia social crítica: metodología y prácticas pedagógicas de un curso de nivel intermedio B1 de ELE // Revista Internacional de Lenguas Extranjeras. 2017. Vol. 6. Р. 9–30. Available from: https://raco.cat/index.php/RILE/article/view/328547 (date of access: 01. 03. 2023).

71. Günther S. L., Fleige J., Upmeier zu Belzen A., Krüger D. Using the Case Method to Foster Preservice Biology Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge Related to Models and Modeling // Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2019. Vol. 30, № 4. P. 321–343. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1560208

72. Minniti L. F. S., Melo J. S. M., Oliveira R. D., Salles J. A. A. The Use of Case Studies as a Teaching Method in Brazil // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2017. Vol. 237. P. 373–377. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.024

73. Solodikhina М. V. Solodikhina A. A. Natural-Scientific Cases As A Tool For The Development Of Critical Thinking // European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS. 2021. Vol. 116. P. 1532–1545. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2021.09.02.171

74. Barnett R. Higher Education: A Critical Business. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997. Available from: https://books.google.ru/books?id=1a_pAAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y (date of access: 08. 03. 2023).

75. Hidayati N., Zubaidah S., Suarsini E., Praherdhiono H. The Relationship between Critical Thinking and Knowledge Acquisition: The Role of Digital Mind Maps-PBL Strategies // International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2020. № 10. P. 140–145. DOI: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.2.1353

76. Hasni A., Bousadra F., Belletête V., Benabdallah A. et al. Trends in research on project-based science and technology teaching and learning at K–12 levels: a systematic review // Studies in Science Education. 2016. Vol. 52. P. 199–231. DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2016.1226573

77. Cortázar C., Nussbaum M., Harcha J., Alvares D., López F., Goñi J., Cabezas V. Promoting critical thinking in an online, project-based course // Computers in Human Behavior. 2021. Vol. 119. Article number 106705. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106705

78. Almulla M. A. The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning // SAGE Open. 2020. Vol 10 (3). DOI: 10.1177/2158244020938702

79. Koreshnikova Y. N. Critical thinking in modern society: What do universities provide? Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: Ekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny = Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes. 2019; 6: 91–110. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2019.6.06 (In Russ.)

80. Solodikhina M. V. Sbornik kejs-zadach po integrirovannym estestvennonauchnym kursam (Serija “Sovremennoe estestvoznanie”) = Collection of case studies on integrated natural science courses (Series “Modern Natural Science”). Moscow: Publishing House Prometej; 2020. 156 p. (In Russ.)

81. Wade S., Kidd C. The role of prior knowledge and curiosity in learning // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2019. Vol. 26. P. 1377–1387 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-019-01598-6

82. Oyamaa Y., Manalob E., Nakatanic Y. The Hemingway effect: How failing to finish a task can have a positive effect on motivation // Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2018. Vol. 30. P. 7–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.01.001

83. Solodikhina M. V., Odintsova N. I., Odintsova E. E. Natural-scientific cases as an instrument for assessment of logical thinking // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2020. Vol. 1691. Article number 012218. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1691/1/012218

84. Zheleeva A. V. The diagnostics of school students’ motivation towards learning physics Nauka i shkola = Science and School [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 03]; 4: 155–161. Available from: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diagnostika-motivatsii-shkolnikov-k-izucheniyu-fiziki (In Russ.)

85. Fedorov A. A. Russian version of the Constructivist Epistemological Beliefs scale: Psychometric analysis. Reflexio. 2020; 13 (1): 49–59. URL: https://reflexio.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/51 (In Russ.)