Evaluación de CLOs, PLOs, ILOs, SLOs: Un programa académico de teatro educativo como modelo de aprendizaje
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-99-125
Resumen
Introducción. El teatro educativo combina varias formas de educación con el uso del arte teatral. Esto desarrolla en los estudiantes la habilidad de usar sus experiencias activas para absorber y desafiar la realidad social. El valor educativo del teatro y las artes escénicas es ampliamente reconocido, lo que ha llevado a la inclusión de las artes teatrales en los planes de estudios universitarios de todo el mundo. Los programas de teatro son supervisados por departamentos especializados y las universidades han creado instalaciones para la enseñanza y el ensayo.
Objetivo. El propósito de este estudio es evaluar los resultados educativos del programa académico de teatro educativo en la Facultad de Educación Especial de la Universidad de Mansoura en Egipto, para serciorarse de que los graduados estén preparados para las condiciones económicas cambiantes y las necesidades del mercado laboral. Todo ello, teniendo en cuenta que la adopción del teatro educativo como modelo no había sido evaluada en el país.
Metodología, métodos y procesos de investigación. El estudio actual define el papel de SLOs, CLOs, PLOs, ILOs como una medida para explorar el impacto del modelo de teatro educativo. Utilizando una metodología mixta con una encuesta a 50 estudiantes y entrevistas a 20 docentes del programa académico de teatro educativo, se determina la influencia del teatro educativo en los resultados de aprendizaje de los estudiantes.
Resultados. Los resultados obtenidos indican que los programas educativos académicos basados en las artes escénicas, la voz, la actuación y el movimiento activan el proceso de aprendizaje, hacen más efectivo el ambiente educativo y mejoran significativamente los procesos de aprendizaje y práctica. Los resultados también indican la importancia del papel de la institución educativa, especialmente de las universidades, en la adopción de programas académicos basados en la experiencia práctica, la formación, la activación y el uso de métodos de evaluación adecuados para ello.
Novedad científica. Dichos modelos educativos académicos ayudan a involucrar a los estudiantes en la creación de un estado emocional positivo, estimulando la curiosidad, luchando por la excelencia, construyendo el carácter nacional, centrándose en los problemas sociales y creyendo en sus propias habilidades.
Significado práctico. La acreditación de programas académicos basados en la práctica y el aprendizaje desarrolla a los estudiantes psicológica y mentalmente y aumenta el nivel de logro académico, desarrollo profesional y personal. Por lo tanto, se recomienda realizar cursos de formación teatral en Egipto para garantizar que los estudiantes estén preparados para adaptarse a los cambios en el mercado laboral.
Del autor
H. S. ZaghloulEgypt
Hisham Saad Zaghloul, Profesor Titular
Facultad de Educación Especial
Departamento de Medios Educativos
Mansourá
Referencias
1. Alverde V. Theatre in Education (TIE) in the context of educational drama [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2022 Sep 02]. Available from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/61902693.pdf
2. Bolton G. A history of drama education: A search for substance. In: Bresler L. (Ed.). International handbook of research in arts education. Dordrecht: Springer; 2007. P. 45–66.
3. Attel L. The utilization of Theater-in-Education for social development changes experiences and future tends, international and regional experiences with the implementation of children’s strategies and programs, and the role of local governments and NGOs [Internet]. Jordan: Amman; 2022 [cited 2022 Sep 02]. 14 p. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.111.1444&rep=rep1&type=pdf
4. Amira M. Higher education and development in Egypt. The African Symposium. 2017; 16 (1): 63–73.
5. Allah A. Z. The theory of theatre for Egyptian nationalists in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Quaderni di Studi Arabi. 2009; 193–204.
6. Zaghloul H. S. The theatre in the educational context: Elements of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Journal of History Culture and Art Research. 2020; 9 (2): 106–22.
7. Samy N. Specific programs for the faculty of specific education [Internet]. Mansoura University, Egypt; 2020 [cited 2022 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.mans.edu.eg/en/faculty-of-education-quality-en
8. Tombak A. Importance of drama in pre-school education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 143: 372–378.
9. Eskelinen M. Drama as a method of teaching EFL vocabulary: A material package for lower secondary school teachers [master’s thesis]. University of Jyväskylä; 2017. 115 p.
10. Kamal M. Campus theatre relationship on behaviour education. In: 7<sup>th</sup> International Conference for Asia-Pacific Art Studies. Yogyakarta, Indonesia; 2019. P. 288–299.
11. Crossley M. Landscapes: Nations, politics and theatre education. In: Contemporary theatre education and creative learning. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2021. P. 23–58.
12. Solís R. P. Theatre and education creative and innovative experience in vocational education & training. Journal of Education & Social Policy. 2018; 5 (3). DOI: 10.30845/jesp.v5n3p4
13. Thorkelsdóttir R. Understanding drama teaching in compulsory education in Iceland: A micro-ethnographic study of the practices of two drama teachers [doctoral thesis]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 2016. 287 p.
14. Holochwost S. J., Goldstein T. R., Wolf D. P. Delineating the benefits of arts education for children’s socioemotional development. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12: 624712.
15. Schonmann S. Key concepts in theatre/drama education. Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Boston: Sense Publishers; 2011. 366 p.
16. Idogho J. A. Drama/theatre in education and theatre as an academic discipline: A question of nomenclature, techniques, and effects. AFRREV IJAH: An International Journal of Arts and Humanities. 2013; 2 (3): 228–248.
17. Cavallaro D. Educational theatre for women in post-World War II Italy: A stage of their own. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2016. 265 p.
18. Allen Savage S. Casting as a pedagogical practice in educational theatre spaces [master’s thesis on the Internet]. University of Central Florida; 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 02]. 130 p. Available from: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd2020/130
19. Vassileva R. E. Educational theatre – history and functioning within the school network in Bulgaria. SCIREA Journal of Education. 2019; 3 (4): 149–167.
20. Kindelan N. Artistic literacy: Theatre studies and a contemporary liberal education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. 215 p.
21. Basic G., Lokareva G. V., Stadnichenko N. V. Inclusive educational spaces and social pedagogical recognition: Interaction-and social-pedagogy-inspired analysis of space dynamics in compulsory, upper-secondary and post-secondary education. Education Sciences. 2021; 11 (11): 754.
22. Ebewo P. Transformation and the drama studies curriculum in South Africa: A survey of selected universities. In: Igweonu K. (Ed.). Trends in twenty-first century African theatre and performance. Amsterdam: Rodopi; 2011. P. 113–138.
23. Fakher R. M. Role of theatre in promoting identity and the development of the capacities of adolescents, Jurun experience (case study). Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction and Educational Technology. 2019; 5 (1): 45–78.
24. Al-Shammari Z. Assessment of student learning outcomes: Indicators of strengths and weaknesses. In: ICERI 2011 Proceedings. 2011. P. 4228–4230.
25. Kisida B., Goodwin L., Bowen D. H. Teaching history through theatre: The effects of arts integration on students’ knowledge and attitudes. AERA Open. 2020; 6 (1): 2332858420902712.
26. Nasrallah R. Learning outcomes’ role in higher education teaching. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues. 2014; 7 (4): 257–276.
27. Curcio A. A. A simple low-cost institutional learning-outcomes assessment process. Journal of Legal Education. 2018; 67 (2): 489–530.
28. Schoepp K. The state of course learning outcomes at leading universities. Studies in Higher Education. 2019; 44 (4): 615–627.
29. Waters S., Monks H., Ayres J., Thomson S. The use of Theatre in Education (TiE): A review of the evidence [Internet]. Child Health Promotion Research Centre, ECU; 2012 [cited 2022 Sep 02]. Available from: http://www.ntccorporate.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ECU_the_use_of_theatre_in_education_a_review_of_the_evidence.pdf. 2012
30. Dima A., Kaiafa E., Tsiaras A. Evaluation of the educational drama as an innovative method to be adopted by teachers in order to enhance critical thinking skills of students in primary school. Open Journal for Educational Research. 2020; 4 (2): 103–116.
31. Mavroudis N., Bournelli P. The contribution of drama in education to the development of skills improving the interpersonal relations of multicultural classroom students. Journal of Educational Issues. 2019; 5 (2): 42–57.
32. Isyar Ö. Ö., Akay C. The use of “drama in education” in primary schools from the viewpoint of the classroom teachers: A mixed method research. Online Submission. 2017; 8 (28): 201–216.
33. Ünalan P. C., Uzuner A., Çifçili S., Akman M., Hancıoğlu S., Thulesius H. O. Using theatre in education in a traditional lecture oriented medical curriculum. BMC Medical Education. 2009; 9 (1): 1–5.
34. Olaniyan M. E. The challenges and prospects of teaching and learning dramatic arts in tertiary institutions in Nigeria. African Research Review. 2015; 9 (3): 113–124.
35. Pañares A. A., Cabangon M. G. Drama-in-schools in the Philippines. Research in Drama Education. The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance. 2016; 21 (1): 13–16.
36. Cheadle A., Cahill C., Schwartz P. M., Edmiston J., Johnson S., Davis L., Robbins C. Engaging youth in learning about healthful eating and active living: An evaluation of educational theatre programs. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior. 2012; 44 (2): 160–165.
37. Palinkas L. A., Horwitz S. M., Green C. A., Wisdom J. P., Duan N., Hoagwood K. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2015; 42 (5): 533–544.
38. Acharya A. S., Prakash A. S., Nigam A. Sampling: Why and how of it? Indian Journal of Medical Specialties. 2013; 4 (2): 330–333.
39. Etikan I., Musa S. A., Alkassim R. S. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics. 2016; 5 (1): 1–4.
40. Allen M. The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods (volumes 1–4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2017. DOI: 10.4135/9781483381411
41. Percy W. H., Kostere K., Kostere S. Generic qualitative research in psychology. The Qualitative Report. 2015; 20 (2): 76–85.
42. Taber K. S. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education. 2018; 48 (6): 1273–1296.
43. Patel S., Bhavsar C. D. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data by Wilks’ Lambda (An important tool of MANOVA). International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention. 2013; 2 (1): 36–44.
44. Petkova P. T. Influence of theatrical art on children: Theatre schools. In: 3<sup>rd</sup> International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences; 2019. Belgrade: Center for Open Access in Science; 2019. P. 287–296.
Recensión
Para cita:
Zaghloul H.S. Evaluación de CLOs, PLOs, ILOs, SLOs: Un programa académico de teatro educativo como modelo de aprendizaje. EDUCACIÓN Y CIENCIA. 2023;25(6):99-125. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-99-125
For citation:
Zaghloul H.S. Assessment of CLOs, PLOs, ILOs, SLOs: An academic programme for educational theatre as a model. The Education and science journal. 2023;25(6):99-125. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2023-6-99-125