Organisational factors influencing the integration model of interaction between a pedagogical university and a regional educational system

Introduction. At the current stage of development in the interaction between pedagogical universities and regional education systems (RESs), there is an opportunity to evaluate both the effectiveness of existing models of collaboration between the region and universities, as well as the influence of internal and external factors on the functioning of these models. Aim. The present research aimed to identify the most significant factors influencing the effectiveness of the integration model of interaction between a pedagogical university and RESs, as well as how these factors are perceived by the participants involved in this interaction. Methodology and research methods. In this study, the authors investigated the effectiveness of various factors influencing the integration model of interaction between pedagogical universities and RESs through the lens of systems and environmental approaches. In this context, interaction is viewed as both a process and an outcome of the dynamically evolving relationships between complex, integrated systems, aimed at maintaining balance and achieving objectives within the contemporary socio-cultural educational environment. A survey was employed as the assessment method, involving 2,335 employees from regional educational organisations, educational authorities, educational development institutes, and pedagogical universities. The participants ranged in age from 20 to 73 years, with an average age of 45.6 years (standard deviation: 12.3), and 89.8% of the respondents were women. Results. The study revealed a discrepancy between the perspectives of different parties regarding the nature of their interactions, particularly in how representatives from various organisations perceive the functioning of interaction models between pedagogical universities and RESs. University representatives view these interactions as more fruitful and intensive, while RES representatives tend to perceive their engagement with pedagogical universities primarily in terms of addressing the challenges of training future teachers and mitigating staff shortages within RESs. Furthermore, the research indicated that the territorial factor holds greater significance for RES representatives compared to university employees. It was also found that the selection of programme content and the educational outcomes associated with it reflect the actual deficits and needs of the interacting parties. Scientific novelty. For the first time, a large-scale survey conducted among representatives of RESs and pedagogical universities comprehensively examined the perceptions of the involved parties regarding the nature of their interaction. It also identified the factors influencing this interaction and revealed the expectations of the participants concerning the professional development programme. Practical significance. The research findings can serve as a foundation for designing interactions between pedagogical universities and RESs. This implementation is feasible during the development of professional competencies, motivations, and the significance of collaborative activities within a specially designed professional development programme for the participants involved in this interaction.

1. Tarasov S.V., Spasskaya E.B., Proekt Yu.L. Vzaimodejstvie pedagogicheskih vuzov i regional’nyh obra zovatel’nyh sistem: podhody, praktiki, reshenija = Interaction of Pedagogical Universities and Regional Educational Systems: Approaches, Practices, Solutions. Saint Petersburg: Herzen University; 2024. 247 p. (In Russ.) Accessed October 01, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=67906036

2. Arant W., Fornahl D., Grashof N., Hesse K., Söllner C. University-industry collaborations – the key to radical innovations? Review of Regional Research. 2019;39:119–141. doi:10.1007/s10037-019-00133-3

3. Boush G.D., Vertinova A.A., Soldatova L.S. The role of universities in innovative regional development. Ekonomika, predprinimatelstvo i pravo = Economics, Business and Law. 2024;14(4):1229–1238. (In Russ.) doi:10.18334/epp.14.4.120671

4. Pocol C.B., Stanca L., Dabija D.C., Pop I.D., Mișcoiu S. Knowledge co-creation and sustainable education in the labor market-driven university-business environment. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;10:781075. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2022.781075

5. Rådberg K.K., Löfsten H. The entrepreneurial university and development of large-scale research infrastructure: exploring the emerging university function of collaboration and leadership. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024;49(1):334–366. doi:10.1007/s10961-023-10033-x

6. Zinevich O.V., Balmasova T.A. On the way to modernization: mission of the university in the regional development. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional Education in the Modern World. 2018;8(3):2000–2010. (In Russ.) doi:10.15372/PEMW20180305

7. Vlasova I.N., Khudyakova M.A. Effective mechanisms of interaction of pedagogical universities with regional education systems in Russia. Upravlenie obrazovaniem: teorija i praktika = Education Management Review. 2023;13(10-2):218–227. (In Russ.) doi:10.25726/o7735-1720-1512-a

8. Yakovleva N.O., Bukhtiyar E.S., Shlyk M.F. Model of interaction of a modern pedagogical univer sity with the regional education system. Pedagogicheskaja perspektiva = Pedagogical Perspective. 2023;3:29–38. (In Russ.) Accessed October 03, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54321395

9. Korotkov A.M., Zemlyakov D.V., Karpushova O.A. Training methodology of teachers to the professional activities in the network format in the context of the integration of the pedagogical uni versity with the regional system of education. Izvestija Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University. 2022;8(171):4–11. (In Russ.) Accessed September 29, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49736313

10. Reprintseva Yu.S. Development of a model of regional scientific and pedagogical cluster educational systems of the Amur region. Vestnik Amurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija: Gumanitarnye nauki = Bulletin of Amur State University. Series: Humanities. 2023;102:82–84. (In Russ.) doi:10.22250/20730284_2023_102_82

11. Kadakin V.V., Shukshina T.I., Zamkin P.V. The role of pedagogical higher education establishment in the system of children additional education development of the region. Gumanitarnye nauki i obrazovanie = Humanities and Education. 2017;31(3):56–64. (In Russ.) Accessed October 02, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30016677

12. Sityaeva S.M., Yaremtchuk S.V., Bakina A.V., Gotnoga A.V. The dynamic cluster model of scientific interaction between pedagogical universities and educational development institutes. Obshhestvo: sociologija, psihologija, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2021;12(92):263–271. (In Russ.) doi:10.24158/spp.2021.12.40

13. Emelyanova I.N., Volosnikova L.M. Functions of modern universities: comparative analysis of missions of international and national institutions. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i ana liz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2018;22(1):83–92. (In Russ.) doi:10.15826/umpa.2018.01.008

14. Jian X., Du D., Liang D. Scale or effectiveness? The nonlinear impact of talent agglomeration on high-quality economic development in China. Heliyon. 2024;10(9):e30121. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30121

15. McCowan T. Higher Education for and beyond the Sustainable Development Goals. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2019. 365 p. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19597-7

16. Popov A.A., Glukhov P.P. The role of universities in the competitiveness of cities and urban agglomerations. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2020;29(11):75–87. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-75-87

17. Kefelegn H. Theoretical analysis on economic impacts of universities on regional economies. Energy and Environment. 2020;5(5):69–73. doi:10.11648/j.ijeee.20200505.11

18. Pugh R., Soetanto D., Jack S. L., Hamilton E. Developing local entrepreneurial ecosystems through integrated learning initiatives. The Lancaster Case. Small Business Economics. 2019;56(2):2. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00271-5

19. Burke M.K., Pugh R., Soetanto D., Owusu-Kwarteng A., Jack S.L. The engaged university delivering social innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024;49(6):2056–2079. doi:10.1007/s10961-024-10091-9

20. Schütz F., Heidingsfelder M.L., Schraudner M. Co-shaping the future in Quadruple Helix innovation systems: uncovering public preferences toward participatory research and innovation. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation. 2019;5(2):128–146. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.002

21. Belitski M., Sikorski J. Three steps for universities to become entrepreneurial: a case study of entrepreneurial process and dynamic capabilities. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2024;49(6):2035– 2055. doi:10.1007/s10961-024-10099-1

22. Galan-Muros V., Davey T. The UBC ecosystem: putting together a comprehensive framework for university-business cooperation. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019;44:1311–1346. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9562-3

23. Korotkov A.M., Nikolaeva M.V. Scientific and methodological support of the interaction of the pedagogical university and the regional educational system. Sovremennoe dopolnitel’noe professional’noe pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie = Modern Additional Professional Pedagogical Education. 2023;4(23):58– 69. (In Russ.) Accessed October 01, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=59994455

24. Paputkova G.A., Golovina I.V., Medvedeva T.Yu., Khaladov Kh.-A.S., Leonova O.I., Vikhristyuk O.V. Interaction of scientific and methodological centers for supporting teaching staff with subjects of a single educational space. Vestnik Mininskogo universiteta = Vestnik of Minin University. 2024;12(2):1. (In Russ.) doi:10.26795/2307-1281-2024-12-2-1

25. Tarasov S.V., Gogoberidze A.G., Kondrakova I.E., Spasskaya E.B. “Universitet, otkrytyj regionam”. Proekt postroenija obrazovatel’noj sociokul’turnoj universitetskoj sredy podgotovki uchitelja budushhego pokolenija Rossii = “University Open to the Regions”. Project of Building an Educational Socio-Cultural University Environment of Training a Teacher of the Future Generation of Russia. Saint Petersburg: Herzen University; 2023. 68 p. (In Russ.) Accessed September 26, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=63506771

26. Kashaev A.A., Petrenko A.A. Metodologija i tehnologija razvitija edinogo obrazovatel’nogo prostranstva sovremennoj shkoly = Methodology and Technology of Development of a Unified Educational Space of a Modern School. Moscow: Publishing House “KNORUS”; 2024. 528 p. (In Russ.) Accessed October 11, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=54394546

27. Vertinova A.A. Classification of factors influencing on the university: the mutual influence of the university and the region. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: jekonomika i upravlenie = Azimuth of Scien tific Research: Economics and Management. 2019;2(27):95–98. (In Russ.) doi:10.26140/anie-2019-0802-0022

28. Urban B., Seely D. Academic spin-offs in an African emerging market context. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation. 2023. doi:10.1177/14657503231213308

29. Zinevich O.V., Melekhina E.A. Higher education for global and local sustainable development. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2023;32(3):84–102. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-3-84-102

30. Elochov A.M., Arbuzova T.A. Strategicheskoe upravlenie portfelem proektov = Strategic Project Portfolio Management. Perm: Perm State National Research University; 2023. 168 p. (In Russ.) Accessed October 05, 2024. http://www.psu.ru/files/docs/science/books/mono/Elohov-Arbuzova-Strategicheskoe-upravlenie-portfelem-proektov.pdf

31. Kovalenko V.I., Kurganskiy S.I., Sokolova O.A. Factors of development of the educational system of the university. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovanija = Modern Problems of Science and Education. 2017;6:12–19. (In Russ.) Accessed October 02, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32390540

32. Drejer I., Østergaard C.R. Exploring determinants of firms’ collaboration with specific universities: employee-driven relations and geographical proximity. Regional Studies. 2017;51(8):1192–1205. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1281389

33. Sannikova O.V., Zhuikov A.A. Opportunities for risk management of a professional in sociological research. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sociologija. Politologija. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija = Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations. 2020;4(2):156–163. (In Russ.) doi:10.35634/2587-9030-2020-4-2-156-163

34. Knight J. Higher education cooperation at the regional level. Journal of International Cooperation in Education. 2024;26(1):101–115. doi:10.1108/JICE-09-2023-0021

35. Jones S.E., Clarke D. Sustainable school-university partnerships: motivators for engagement, enablers, and constraints. In: Green C.A., Eady M.J., eds. Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships. Singapore: Springer; 2024:279–297. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9_15

36. Clifton J., Jordan K. The role of the school leader in professional experience school–university partnership models. In: Green C.A., Eady M.J., eds. Creating, Sustaining, and Enhancing Purposeful School-University Partnerships. Singapore: Springer; 2024:413–431. doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8838-9_22

37. Clifford-Swan J., Hudson K., Littlefair D. What makes school-university partnerships effective? An investigation into the relationship between a teacher training school and a university in England. School-University Partnerships. 2022;15(1):1–9. Accessed October 02, 2024. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1346069

38. Littlefair D., Clifford Swan J., Hudson K. Kinship and collegiality: an exploration of the underpinning characteristics of external partnerships at a university education department. Qualitative Research Journal. 2019;19(4):371–379. doi:10.1108/QRJ-02-2019-0018

39. Rubinshtein S.L. Osnovy obshhej psihologii = Fundamentals of General Psychology. Saint Petersburg: Publishing House Piter; 2002. 720 p. (In Russ.) Accessed September 22, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42490373

40. Charles D.R. Universities and engagement with cities, regions and local communities. rebalancing the social and economic. In: Duke C., Osborne M., Wilson B., eds. Learning, Partnership and Place. Leicester: NIACE; 2005:148–150. Accessed September 15, 2024. https://pascalobservatory.org/sites/default/files/david_r_charles_universities_and_engagement_with_cities_regions_and_local_communities_-_dec_2007_0.pdf

41. Tarasov S.V., Proekt Yu.L. Interaction practices between pedagogical universities and regional educational systems: Indicators of scientific and educational effectiveness. Science for Education Today. 2023;13(6):121–144. (In Russ.) doi:10.15293/2658-6762.2306.06

42. Rahman A., Saodi S., Irfan M., Nasrah N. Education partnerships between local education authori ties and universities: A promising strategy but undeveloped. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research. 2022;3(2):122–131. doi:10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.85

43. Adams P. Initial teacher education partnership: bureaucracy, policy, and professional agency. In: Prøitz T.S., Aasen P., Wermke W., eds. From Education Policy to Education Practice: Unpacking the Nexus. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023:151–171. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36970-4_2

44. Akkerman S., Bruining T. Multilevel boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 2016;25(2):240–284. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1147448

45. Golovina I.V. Practice of organization of interaction between pedagogical universities in the formation of a unified educational space. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija = Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education. 2024;82-3:108–111. (In Russ.) Accessed September 29, 2024. https://gpa.cfuv.ru/attachments/article/6071/%D0%92%D1%8B%D0%B-F%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BA%2082%20%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%203,%202024%20%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4.pdf

46. Laman T.T., Flint A.S., Jett P.M., Davis T.R. “Together, I don’t feel so alone”: collaborative teaching as third space in university/school sites. The Teacher Educator. 2024;59(3):326–344. doi:10.1080/08878730.2023.2289880

47.