The relationship between participation in decision-making and attitudes towards school inclusion policies

Introduction. One of the essential conditions for creating an inclusive educational environment in schools is the management of the process, which depends on balancing effectiveness and equity. Aim. The current research aims to analyse the relationship between school employees’ engagement in the decision-making process and their attitudes towards inclusive educational policies. Methodology and research methods. The survey was conducted using questionnaires and A/B testing (Saati’s method) in accordance with the authors’ methodology. A total of 104 employees from 34 different schools in Tyumen and the Tyumen Region participated in the study, divided into two groups: those who make decisions within the educational entity and those who execute those decisions. The A/B testing method enabled participants to adopt a reflective stance regarding inclusive processes. Results. Experts emphasise the significant deficits in professional training (47%) and psychological training (33%) for teachers in the field of inclusive education. A direct correlation has been identified between the education provided in inclusive settings and the level of student engagement in schools. Additionally, a relationship exists between the professional competence of educators in inclusive education and their psychological readiness to implement this approach. Experts also highlight the presence of latent resistance to inclusive policies and identify varying priorities in promoting the well-being of both unaffected students and children with disabilities. The psychological and physical protection of teachers is considered crucial for their subjective well-being. However, less emphasis is placed on involving parents and students in decision-making processes and ensuring a transparent and equitable mechanism for resource allocation. Ultimately, the prestige of the school is often prioritised over the subjective well-being of teachers. Scientific novelty. An authors’ toolkit based on the A/B testing method has been developed to examine the perspectives of school staff on inclusive policy priorities in education. Practical significance. The research findings can be valuable for school administrators as they reflect on management decisions regarding the prioritisation of progress amid inclusive transformation.

1. Alekhina S.V., Mel’nik Y.V., Samsonova E.V., Shemanov A.Yu. On the issue of assessing the inclusive process in an educational organization: a pilot study. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovanija = Psychological and Pedagogical Research. 2019;11(4):121–132. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/psyedu.2019110410

2. Ainscow M. Understanding the Development of Inclusive Schools. London: Falmer Press; 1999. 256 p. doi:10.4324/9780203016619

3. Khaleel N., Alhosani M., Duyar I. The role of school principals in promoting inclusive schools: a teachers’ perspective. Frontiers in Education. 2021;6:603241. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.603241

4. Vlachou A., Tsirantonaki S.S. The importance of school principals’ values towards the inclusive education of disabled students: associations between their values and knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and practices. Education Sciences. 2023;13(4):360. doi:10.3390/educsci13040360

5. Volosnikova L.M. Leadership in inclusive education: contemporary discourse. Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Nizhnevartovsk State University. 2023;62(2):17–25. (In Russ.) doi:10.36906/2311-4444/23-2/02

6. Cohen E. Principal leadership styles and teacher and principal attitudes, concerns and competencies regarding inclusion. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;186:758–764. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.105

7. Spillane J.P., Halverson R., Diamond J.B. Investigating school leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Educational Researcher. 2001;30(3):23–28. doi:10.3102/0013189x030003023

8. Hallinger P., Kovacevic J. Science mapping the knowledge base in educational leadership and management: a longitudinal bibliometric analysis, 1960 to 2018. Educational Management Administra tion & Leadership. 2021;49(1):5–30. doi:10.1177/1741143219859002

9. Lipsky D.A., Gartner A. Inclusion and School Reform: Transforming America’s Classrooms. P.H. Brookes Publishing Company; 1997. 414 p. doi:10.5860/choice.35-2249

10. Iswari M. Friendly inclusive environment toward learning in inclusive education. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Lifelong Learning and Education for Sustainability. 2019;405:86– 89. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.200217.018

11. Al-Azawei A., Serenelli F., Lundqvist K. Universal design for learning (UDL): a content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning. 2016;16(3):39–56. doi:10.14434/jootl.v16i3.19295

12. Almeqdad Q.I., Alodat A.M., Alquraan M.F., Mohaidat M.A., Al-Makhzoomy A.K. The effectiveness of universal design for learning: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education. 2023;10(1). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191

13. Avramidis E., Norwich B. Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: a review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2002;17(2):129–147. doi:10.1080/08856250210129056

14. Volosnikova L., Ignatjeva S., Fedina L., Bruk Z. Teacher in an inclusive class: relationship between attitudes towards inclusion and job satisfaction. Voprosy obrazovanija = Educational Studies Moscow. 2022;2:60–87. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2022-2-60-87

15. Kantor V.Z., Proekt Yu.L., Antropov A.P., Kondrakova I.E. Pedagogical education as an area to form teacher inclusive dispositions. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2023;25(10):12–44. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2023-10-12-44

16. Astrauskaitė M., Vytautas R., Perminas A. Job satisfaction survey: a confirmatory factor analysis based on secondary school teachers’ sample. International Journal of Business and Management. 2011;6(5):41–50. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v6n5p41

17. Ho S.K., Ip F., Wong M.W.-Y. Self-efficacy, work engagement, and job satisfaction among teaching assistants in Hong Kong’s inclusive education. SAGE Open. 2020;10(3):2158244020941008. doi:10.1177/2158244020941008

18. Saloviita T. Attitudes of teachers towards inclusive education in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2020;64(2). doi:10.1 080/00313831.2018.1541819

19. Smet M. Professional development and teacher job satisfaction: evidence from a multilevel model. Mathematics. 2022;10(51). doi:10.3390/math10010051

20. Wilson C., Woolfson M., Durkin K. School environment and mastery experience as predictors of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs towards inclusive teaching. International Journal of Inclusive Educa tion. 2020;24(2):218–234. doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1455901

21. Klassen R.M., Tze V.M., Betts S.M., Gordon K.A. Teacher efficacy research 1998–2009: signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychological Review. 2011;23:21–43. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8

22. Miesera S., Gebhardt M. Inclusive vocational schools in Canada and Germany. A comparison of vocational pre-service teachers’ attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences towards inclusive educa tion. European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2018;33(5):707–722. doi:10.1080/08856257.2 017.1421599

23. Perrin A.L., Jury M., Desombre C. Are teachers’ personal values related to their attitudes toward inclusive education? A correlational study. Social Psychology of Education. 2021;24(5):1085–1104. doi:10.1007/s11218-021-09646-74

24. Riehl C.J. The principal’s role in creating inclusive schools for diverse students: a review of normative, empirical, and critical literature on the practice of educational administration. Review of Educational Research. 2000;70(1):55–81. doi:10.3102/00346543070001055

25. Khaleel N., Alhosani M., Duyar I. The role of school principals in promoting inclusive schools: a teachers’ perspective. Frontiers in Education. 2021;6:603241. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.603241

26. Hayes S.D., Angelle P.S. Relational mentoring for supporting school principals in social justice leadership. In: Mullen C.A., ed. Handbook of Social Justice Interventions in Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Cham: Springer; 2021:283–302. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35858-7_98

27. Nguluma H., Bayrakçı M., Titrek O. School administrators’ attitudes toward inclusion of children with disabilities in the general education classrooms. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership. 2017;3(2):1–12. Accessed August 25, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321484224

28. Maccormack J., Side S., Maich K., Specht J. Self-determination and inclusion: the role of Canadian principals in catalysing inclusive-positive practices. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership. 2021;17. doi:10.22230/ijepl.2021v17n2a969

29. Salisbury C. Principals’ perspectives on inclusive elementary schools. Research & Practice for Per sons with Severe Disabilities. 2006;31(1):70–82. doi:10.2511/rpsd.31.1.70

30. Boyle M.J., Hernandez C.M. An investigation of the attitudes of catholic school principals to wards the inclusive of students with disabilities. Journal of Catholic Education. 2006;20(1):190–219. doi:10.15365/joce.2001092016

31. Mthethwa G.S. Principals’ Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Inclusive Education: Implications for Curriculum and Assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Zululand; 2008. Accessed August 25, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46150553_Principals’_knowledge_and_attitudes_regarding_inclusive_education_implications_for_curriculum_and_assessment

32. Fedina L., Volosnikova L., Ignatjeva S., Bruk Z. Parents’ attitudes towards inclusive education: the Siberian school case. Zhurnal issledovanij social’noj politiki = The Journal of Social Policy Studies. 2023;21(4):723–734. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/727-0634-2023-21-4-723-734

33. Kukuev E.A. Resources and risks of inclusive transformation of the school: the position of parents. Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovanija. = Problems of Modern Teacher Education. 2023;81–1:42–46. (In Russ.) Accessed August 25, 2024. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/resursy-i-riski-inklyuzivnoy-transformatsii-shkoly-pozitsiya-roditeley/viewer

34.