Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Features of bullying manifestation among university students

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-4-122-148

Abstract

Introduction. The issue of bullying within educational institutions is increasingly acknowledged by both the global community and the Russian public. Bullying among students exhibits a more complex structure and differs from that in primary and secondary schools in terms of its focus and awareness. This complexity necessitates the development of intervention programmes that consider the specific causes and dynamics of bullying in higher education.

Aim. The aim of this research is to study the characteristics of bullying behaviour among students.

Methodology and research methods. The theoretical foundation of this research is based on a humanistic approach to education. To achieve the research aim, the following methodological tools were employed: E.G. Norkina’s methodology for identifying the bullying structure; the Buss – Durkee emotion test for assessing emotional reactions; the psychological diagnostic method for coping with stressful and personally challenging situations, known as “Strategies of Coping Behaviour”; and a methodology for determining students’ comfort levels. The study involved 124 students from Novosibirsk State Technical University.

Results. The primary psychological roles and positions in bullying situations among students have been identified as defenders and observers. Among humanitarian and technical students, no significant differences were found in the indicators of bullying behaviour. The emotional reactions most commonly observed in bullying situations were irritation and resentment. At the same time, no forms of aggression were observed in the study sample. No significant differences were found between the two groups examined. Various coping strategies were identified, all of which were moderately common; the most prominent strategy was distancing. A notable difference was observed in the level of comfort within the educational organisation between the two groups: technical students reported a slightly higher level of comfort compared to their peers in the humanities. Scientific novelty. This study examines the characteristics of bullying behaviour among students. It identifies and analyses the specific manifestations of bullying among students in technical and humanities disciplines.

Practical significance. The results obtained from the study can be utilised, with minimal adaptation, to assess the prevalence of bullying within the student body. Additionally, these findings can inform the development of preventive and corrective programmes designed to address and respond promptly to this phenomenon when it is identified.

About the Author

E. G. Ogoltsova
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

Elena G. Ogoltsova – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Pedagogy.

Novosibirsk, Scopus Author ID 56786388100



References

1. Olweus D. School bullying: development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2013;9:751–780. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185516

2. Fomina A.V., Molchanova L.N. Modern ideas about school bullying in Russia and abroad. Kollektsiya gumanitarnykh issledovaniy = Collection of Humanitarian Studies. 2020;3(23):6–12. (In Russ.) doi:10.21626/j-chr/2020-2(23)/1

3. Krivtsova S.V., Shapkina A.N. Features of school bullying that create problems in identifying it. Voprosy psikhologii = Questions of Psychology. 2022;68(2):26–39. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. http://www.voppsy.ru/

4. Gruzdeva A.I. Theoretical analysis of the concept of bullying and its types. Psikhologiya i pedagogika v Krymu: puti razvitiya = Psychology and Pedagogy in Crimea: Ways of Development. 2023;6:60–66. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. http://psikhologiya-v-krimu-puti-razvitiya.online

5. Foody M., Samara M., O’Higgins Norman J. Bullying by siblings and peers: poly-setting victimization and the association with problem behaviours and depression. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2020;90:138–157. doi:10.1111/bjep.12311

6. Pokrovskaya S.E., Chekanovskaya I.A. Features of bullying in adolescence and youth. Aktual’nye problemy gumanitarnykh i sotsial’no-ekonomicheskikh nauk = Current Problems of the Humanities and Socio-Economic Sciences. 2022;3(86):73–77. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. https://elib. bspu.by/handle/doc/57698

7. Shalaginova K.S., Kulikova T.I., Zalygaeva S.A. Gender characteristics of bullying in adolescence. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2019;24(4):62–71. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/pse.2019240405

8. Hellstrom L., Beckman L. Adolescents’ perception of gender differences in bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2020;61:90–96. doi:10.1111/sjop.12523

9. Abacioglu C.S., Epskamp S., Fischer A.H., Volman M. Effects of multicultural education on student engagement in lowand high-concentration classrooms: the mediating role of student relationships. Learning Environments Research. 2023;26:951–975. doi:10.1007/s10984-023-09462-0

10. Molchanova L.N., Kuznetsova A.A., Fomina A.V., Prokofieva A.A. Features of the status-role structure of the risk of school bullying among adolescents. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Perspectives of Science and Education. 2022;4(58):440–456. (In Russ.) doi:10.32744/pse.2022.4.26

11. Al Qudah M.F., Al-Barashdi H.S., Hassan E.M.A.H., Albursan I.S., Heilat M.Q., Bakhiet S.F.A., Al-Khadher M.A. Psychological security, psychological loneliness, and age as the predictors of cyber-bullying among university students. Community Mental Health Journal. 2020;56:393–403. doi:10.1007/s10597-019-00455-z

12. Pichel R., Foody M., Norman J., Feijóo S., Varela J., Rial A. Bullying, cyberbullying and the overlap: what does age have to do with it? Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(15). doi:10.3390/su13158527

13. Nazarov V.L., Averbukh N.V., Buinacheva A.V. Bullying and cyberbullying in modern school. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science. 2022;24(2):69–205. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-56392022-2-169-205

14. Muresan L.M. Bullying аnd cyberbullying proximal and specific differences in middle schools in Romania. European Proceedings of Conference: Education, Reflection, Development. 2020:536–544. doi:10.15405/epsbs.2020.06.53

15. Tay E.M.K. Revisiting the definition of bullying in the context of higher education. International Journal of Bullying Prevention. 2023. doi:10.1007/s42380-023-00199-1

16. Tight M. Bullying in higher education: an endemic problem? Tertiary Education and Management. 2023;29:123–137. doi:10.1007/s11233-023-09124-z

17. Petrosyants V.R., Gridyaeva L.N., Arpentieva M.R. Bullying and problems of psychological safety in education. Psikhopedagogika v pravookhranitelnykh organakh = Psychopedagogy in Law Enforcement. 2022;27(1):40–49. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/1999-6241-2022-188-40-49

18. Ye B., Fan N., Im H., Liu M., Wang X., Yang Q. Relation between child psychological maltreatment profiles and problematic online behaviors among Chinese college students. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2023. doi:10.1007/s10826-023-02631-y

19. Bochaver A.A. School experience of bullying and current well-being among students. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education. 2021;26(2):17–27. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/pse.2021260202

20. Segovia-González M.M., Ramírez-Hurtado J. M., Contreras I. Analyzing the risk of being a victim of school bullying. The Relevance of Students’ Self-Perceptions. Child Indicators Research. 2023;16:2141– 2163. doi:10.1007/s12187-023-10045-x

21. Sharif-Nia H., Marôco J., Rahmatpour P., Allen K.A., Kaveh O., Hoseinzadeh E. Bullying behaviors and intention to drop-out among nursing students: the mediation roles of sense of belonging and major satisfaction. Sharif-Nia et al. BMC Nursing. 2023;22:417. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01584-3

22. Murphy D., Leonard S.J., Taylor L.K., Santos F.H. Educational achievement and bullying: the mediating role of psychological difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2022;92:1487– 1501. doi:10.1111/bjep.12511

23. Rulann E. Kak ostanovit’ travlyu v shkole: Psikhologiya mobbinga = How to Stop Bullying at School: Psychology of Mobbing. Moscow: Publishing House Genezis; 2012. 264 p. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. https://www.psychol-ok.ru/lib/roland_e/kotvs/kotvs_03.html

24. Berkowitz R., Winstok Z. The association between teacher-student and peer relationships and the escalation of peer school victimization. Child Indicators Research. 2022;15:2243–2265. doi:10.1007/s12187-022-09961-1

25. van Gils F.E., Verschueren K., Demol K., ten Bokkel I.M., Colpin H. Teachers’ bullying-related cognitions as predictors of their responses to bullying among students. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2023;93:513–530. doi:10.1111/bjep.12574

26. Chetverikova T.Yu. Bullying in an inclusive educational environment of a school: assessment of pedagogical tactics. Pis’ma v Jemissija. Offlajn = Letters to Emissia. Offline Letters: Electronic Scientific Journal. 2023;7. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. http://emissia.org/offline/2023/3272.htm

27. Pham Y.K., Murray C., Gau J. The inventory of teacher-student relationships: factor structure and associations with school engagement among high-risk youth. Psychology in the Schools. 2022;59:413–429. doi:10.1002/pits.22617

28. Lepeshev D.V. Pedagogical bullying as a socio-psychological problem. Nauka i realnost’ = Science and Reality / Science & Reality. 2022;2(10):6–11. (In Russ.) Accessed December 12, 2024. https://zhurnalnir.ru/

29. Norkina E.G. Methodology for identifying the “bullying structure”. Tavricheskiy nauchnyy obozrevatel = Tavrichesky Scientific Observer. 2016;3(8):170–174. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. http://tavr.science

30. Rezapkina G.V. On the issue of the relationship between internal and external motives of behavior. Psikhologo-ekonomicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological and Economic Research. 2020;7(3):79–84. (In Russ.) Accessed December 15, 2024. http://www.cper.ru

31. Romanova M.V., Frolkina A.V. Peculiarities of manifestation of school bullying in adolescents.russian Journal of Education and Psychology. 2021;12(3):63–73. (In Russ.) doi:10.12731/2658-40342021-12-3-63-73

32. Wandera S.O., Clarke K., Knight L., Naker D., Devries K. Violence against children perpetrated by peers: a cross-sectional school-based survey in Uganda. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2017;68:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.04.006

33. Waasdorp T.E., Fu R., Clary L.K., Bradshaw C.P. School climate and bullying bystander responses in middle and high school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. 2022;80. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101412

34. Strindberg J., Horton P., Thornberg R. Coolness and social vulnerability: Swedish pupils’ reflections on participant roles in school bullying. Research Papers in Education. 2020;35(5):603–622. doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1615114


Review

For citations:


Ogoltsova E.G. Features of bullying manifestation among university students. The Education and science journal. 2025;27(4):122-148. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-4-122-148

Views: 308


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)