Independence as a manifestation of a student’s subjectivity in the self-regulation of learning activities
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-5-91-110
Abstract
Introduction. The article explores independence as a manifestation of subjectivity in activity. It illustrates that the most essential characteristic of subjectivity is the capacity for self-regulation. This capacity emerges and develops when students are given the opportunity to make choices at each stage of self-regulation in their educational activities.
Aim. The aim of this study is to identify recommendations that enable teachers to foster student independence.
Methodology and research methods. The research employs a personality-oriented and systematic approach. The methodology is grounded in the theory of conscious self-regulation, which has been consistently developed in the works of O. A. Konopkin. The empirical data were collected through online surveys of teachers and students, as well as interviews with teachers.
Results. It has been established that student independence develops when individuals are given the opportunity to make choices, ranging from setting goals to evaluating outcomes. This process encourages them to clarify and form their own perspectives on both the external world and their personal identity. Furthermore, the educational environment should offer alternatives that extend beyond binary paths of development. The final stage of educational and cognitive activity should involve students actively correcting and refining their own self-regulation systems.
Scientific novelty. Recommendations for organising educational and cognitive activities for students, essential for fostering their independence, have been developed and substantiated.
Practical significance. The results obtained can be utilised by theoretical teachers to further advance the theory of subjectivity, as well as by practical instructors to reflect on their teaching practices with the aim of enhancing student independence.
About the Authors
A. P. UsoltsevRussian Federation
Alexander P. Usoltsev – Dr. Sci. (Education), Professor, Head of the Department of Physics, Technology and Methods of Teaching Physics, Institute of Mathematics, Physics, Computer Science and Technology
AuthorID 458383,
Scopus Author ID 56974191100
Ekaterinburg
O. P. Merzlyakova
Russian Federation
Olga P. Merzlyakova – Cand. Sci. (Education), Associate Professor, Department of Physics, Technology and Methods of Teaching Physics and Technology, Institute of Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science
AuthorID 774044
Ekaterinburg
B. M. Igoshev
Russian Federation
Boris M. Igoshev – Cand. Sci. (Education), Professor, Department of Physics, Technology and Methods of Teaching Physics and Technology, Institute of Mathematics, Physics, and Computer Science
AuthorID 330668
Ekaterinburg
References
1. Usotsev A.P. Principy razvitija myshlenija = Principles of Thinking Development. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University; 2023. 220 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. http://elar.uspu.ru/bitstream/uspu/18623/1/mon00168.pdf
2. Brushlinskij A.V. The subject in the psychological science (first article). Psihologicheskij zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 1991;12(6):3–11. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://psy.jes.su/s0205-95920000621-0-1-ru-156
3. Brushlinskij A.V. Psihologija sub’ekta i ego dejatel’nosti = Psychology of the subject and its activities. In: Druzhinin V.N., Aleksandrov I.O., eds. Sovremennaja psihologija: spravochnoe rukovodstvo = Modern Psychology: A Reference Guide. Moscow: Publishing House Infra-M; 1999:330–346. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35055234&pff=1
4. Brushlinskij A.V. Promising directions in the development of subject psychology. Vestnik Rossijskogo gumanitarnogo nauchnogo fonda = Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation. 1999;3:76–79. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42365834
5. Rubinshtein S.L. O myshlenii i putjah ego issledovanija = About Thinking and Ways to Explore It. Moscow: Publishing House AN SSSR; 1958. 147 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008356088
6. Uznadze D.N. Psihologicheskie issledovanija = Psychological Research. Moscow: Publishing House Nauka; 1966. 451 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01003351714
7. Bogojavlenskaja D.B. Psihologija tvorcheskih sposobnostej = The Psychology of Creativity. Moscоw: Publishing House Akademija; 2002. 320 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01004483193
8. Konopkin O.A. Mental self-regulation of arbitrary human activity (structural and functional aspect). Voprosy psihologii = Questions of Psychology. 1995;1:5–12. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://persev.ru/bibliography/psihicheskaya-samoregulyaciya-proizvolnoy-aktivnosti-cheloveka-strukturno-funkcionalnyy
9. Andrade H.L., Brookhart S.M., Yu E.C. Classroom assessment as co-regulated learning: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education. 2021;6. doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.751168
10. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency: pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2018;13(2):130–136. doi:10.1177/1745691617699280
11. Heckhausen J. Integrating and instigating research on person and situation, motivation and volition, and their development. Motivation Science. 2020;6(3):185–188. doi:10.1037/mot0000166
12. Inzlicht M., Werner K.M., Briskin J.L., Roberts B.W. Integrating models of self-regulation. Annual Review of Psychology. 2021;72(1):319–345. doi:10.31234/osf.io%2Fdpjye
13. Koole S.L., Schlinkert C., Maldei T., Baumann N. Becoming who you are: an integrative review of self-determination theory and personality systems interactions theory. Journal of Personality. 2019;87(1):15–36. doi:10.1111/jopy.12380
14. Panadero E.A Review of self-regulated learning: six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:422. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
15. Seli H., Dembo M.H. Motivation and Learning Strategies for College Success: A Focus on Self-Regulated Learning. New York: Routledge; 2020. doi:10.4324/9780429400711
16. Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. Facilitating and hindering motivation, learning, and well-being in schools: research and observations from self-determination theory. In: Wentzel K.R., Miele D.B., eds. Handbook of Motivation at School. New York: Routledge; 2016:96–119. doi:10.4324/9781315773384
17. Zimmerman B.J. Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In: Schunk D.H., Zimmerman B., eds. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge; 2011:49–64. Accessed December 17, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284023768
18. Pintrich P.R. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review. 2004;16(4):385–407. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
19. Winne P.H., Hadwin A.F. The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2008:297–314. Accessed December 17, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284503687
20. Petrovskij V.A. Activity, activity, individuality: between yesterday and tomorrow (methodological notes). Mir psihologii = The World of Psychology. 2020;2(102):20–31. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://publications.hse.ru/articles/433698317
21. Petrovskij V.A. Subjectivity I in personological retrospective. Mir psihologii = The World of Psychology. 2021;1-2(105):174–193. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://publications.hse.ru/articles/554873507
22. Baumeister R.F. Free will in scientific psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2008;3(1):14– 19. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00057.x
23. Maturana U. The Theory of Autopoiesis Systems in the Social Sciences. Frankfurt; New York; 1980. 229 p.
24. Homskij N. Jazyk i myshlenie = Language and Thinking. Moscоw: Moscow State University; 1972. 123 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://djvu.online/file/XCVWuLl4c2Jwc
25. Gurina I.A. Ponjatie “poznavatel’naja samostojatel’nost’” v otechestvennoj pedagogicheskoj nauke: istorija, genezis, sovremennaja traktovka (vtoraja polovina XIX–XX vv.) = The Concept of “Cognitive Independence” in Russian Pedagogical Science: History, Genesis, Modern Interpretation (The Second Half of the XIX–XX Centuries). Moscоw: Publishing House Ileksa; 2009. 272 p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01004389132
26. Heckhausen J., Wrosch C., Schulz R. Agency and motivation in adulthood and old age. Annual Review of Psychology. 2019;70:191–217. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103043
27. Rydzik A., Anitha S. Conceptualising the agency of migrant women workers: resilience, reworking and resistance. Work, Employment and Society. 2019;34(5):883–899. doi:10.1177/0950017019881939
28. Shiner R.L., Soto Ch.J., De Fruyt F. Personality assessment of children and adolescents. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology. 2021;3:113–137. doi:10.1146/annurev-devpsych-050620-114343
29. Cavazzoni F., Fiorini A., Veronese G. How do we assess how agentic we are? A literature review of existing instruments to evaluate and measure individuals’ agency. Social Indicators Research. 2022;159:1125–1153. doi:10.1007/s11205-021-02791-8
30. Morosanova V.I. Differential psychological foundations of self-regulation in the training and upbringing of the younger generation. Mir psihologii = The World of Psychology. 2013;2(74):189–199. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. http://sr-psylab.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Mir-psihologii-2012.pdf
31. Usoltsev A.P. Constructing lessons according to Federal State Educational Standards (FSES). Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2017;19(5):55–71. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/19945639-2017-5-55-71
32. Aronova E.A., Morosanova V.I. Subject’s self-regulation and self-consciousness. Psihologicheskij zhurnal = Psychological Journal. 2008;29(1):14–22. p. (In Russ.) Accessed November 15, 2024. https://psy.jes.su/s0205-95920000617-5-1-ru-38
33. Arnold I. John Hattie: visible learning: а synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. International Review of Education. 2008;57:219–221. doi:10.1007/s11159-011-9198-8
Review
For citations:
Usoltsev A.P., Merzlyakova O.P., Igoshev B.M. Independence as a manifestation of a student’s subjectivity in the self-regulation of learning activities. The Education and science journal. 2025;27(5):91-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-5-91-110