Subjective perceptions of personal safety among Russian university students
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-7-176-202
Abstract
Introduction. In recent years, there has been a rise in emotional tension and social anxiety among students, including those in the Russian Federation. This trend underscores the need to study the mechanisms of threat perception and the development of subjective notions of personal safety within the student community.
Aim. This study aims to reveal the content and identify the factors influencing the subjectively perceived personal safety of students at Russian universities.
Methodology and research methods. The empirical foundation of the study comprises qualitative data (12 interviews, purposive sampling) and quantitative data (n = 415, quota sampling) collected from a sample of Russian university students using a sequential mixed-methods approach (qual → QUANT).
Results. To a large extent, students fear direct threats to life and physical health, followed by concerns about mental well-being, while they are least worried about deferred threats related to the impact of environmental risk factors on health. A gender gap in the subjective perception of threats to life and health has been confirmed. The study found that the group under consideration exhibits a high level of perceived protection from external threats and views their lives as stable and predictable. Cluster analysis identified three groups of students based on subjective personal safety: those who feel (a) safe (39%), (b) unsafe (16%), and (c) uncertain (45%). It was also found that students consider unpredictable and poorly controlled events to be the most threatening to their life and health, yet they more often assume personal responsibility for ensuring safety rather than relying on social institutions or the state.
Scientific novelty. The current study challenges the thesis that alarmist sentiments prevail among Russian youth and that fears for their personal safety are spreading rapidly. The theoretical conceptualisation of the subjective perception of security broadens existing approaches and provides a foundation for further research in this field.
Practical significance. The study provides data to improve health programmes and help vulnerable groups adapt to risky environments.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. A. Lebedeva-NesevriaRussian Federation
Natalia A. Lebedeva-Nesevria – Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology
Perm
S. Yu. Sharypova
Russian Federation
Sofya Yu. Sharypova – Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology
Perm
A. S. Shlyapina
Russian Federation
Anastasiya S. Shlyapina – Teaching Assistant, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology
Perm
References
1. Shlykova E.V. Subjective safety assessment as an indicator of adaptation to the risks of social change: methodological and empirical justification of the research approach. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social’naya praktika = Sociological Science and Social Practice. 2020;8(4):105–120. (In Russ.) doi:10.19181/snsp.2020.8.4.7659
2. Simpson R. Neither clear nor present: the social construction of safety and danger. Sociological Forum. 1996;11:549–562. doi:10.1007/BF02408392
3. Krasnianskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Building the concept of personal security in the psychological space of modern challenges. Nauchnye trudy Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta = Scientific Works of the Moscow University of the Humanities. 2022;4:4–9. (In Russ.) doi:10.17805/trudy.2022.4.1
4. Krasnianskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Personal security concepts of law students. Psihologiya i pravo = Psychology and Law. 2023;13(3):108–118. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/psylaw.2023130308
5. Dashkin I.I. Sociodynamics of the situation of youth in a risk society. Obshchestvo: sociologiya, psihologiya, pedagogika = Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy. 2019;3:48–52. (In Russ.) doi:10.24158/spp.2019.3.6
6. Vílchez M, Trujillo F. The perception of security and youth: a practical example. Social Sciences. 2023;12(4):227. doi:10.3390/socsci12040227
7. Milić M., Vlajčić R., Križanić V. Perception of invulnerability, engaging in risky behaviors and life satisfaction among high school students. Kriminologija & socijalna integracija. 2019;2:177–203. doi:10.31299/ksi.27.2.2
8. Çıtak, Ş., Yazıcı, H. Risky behaviours of high school students and school counsellors’ interventions. Participatory Educational Research. 2022;6:453–473. doi:10.17275/per.22.148.9.6
9. Merenkov A.V., Sivkova N.I., Novgorodtseva A.N. Social well-being of the population in modern socio-political conditions. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Sociologiya. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = Bulletin of Udmurt University. Sociology. Political Science. International Relations. 2023;7(3):303–312. (In Russ.) doi:10.35634/2587-9030-2023-7-3-303-312
10. Kravchenko S.A., Svirskaya D.A. The becoming of the complex fears among young people: reflection through the prism of the genotype of the domestic culture. Sociologicheskaya nauka i social’naya praktika = Sociological Science and Social Practice. 2024;12(2):102–121. (In Russ.) doi:10.19181/snsp.2024.12.2.5
11. Carroll P., Wichman A., Agler R., Arkin R. The regulation of personal security. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology. 2023;4:1–13. doi:10.1155/2023/7593709
12. Tylets V.G., Krasnyanskaya T.M., Iokhvidov V.V. Personal security scenarios of subject of conflict interaction. Social’naya psihologiya i obshchestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2022;13(1):159–173. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/sps.2022130110
13. Li Z., Zhou X., Wang X., Guo Z. Study on subjective and objective safety and application of expressway. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;96:1622–1630. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.184
14. Vileikienė E., Janušauskienė D. Subjective security in a volatile geopolitical situation: does Lithuanian society feel safe? Journal on Baltic Security. 2016;2(2):109–143. doi:10.1515/jobs-2016-0047
15. Stevens D., Bulmer S., Banducci S., Vaughan-Williams N. Male warriors and worried women? Understanding gender and perceptions of security threats. European Journal of International Security. 2021;6(1):44–65. doi:10.1017/eis.2020.14
16. Afanas’eva O., Afanas’ev P. Fear of violent crime: concept and essential features. Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya = The Bulletin of Academy of Law and Management. 2018;1(50):33–39. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/strah-pered-nasilstvennoy-prestupnostyu-ponyatie-i-osnovnye-harakteristiki
17. Kim Y., Park I., Kang S. Age and gender differences in health risk perception. Central European Journal of Public Health. 2018;26(1):54–59. doi:10.21101/cejph.a4920
18. Zhang C., Fan J. A study of the perception of health risks among college students in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013;10(6):2133–2149. doi:10.3390/ijerph10062133
19. Unguryanu T.N. Subjective evaluation and perception of risk by various population groups. Analiz riska zdorov’yu = Health Risk Analysis. 2013;3:82–87. (In Russ.) doi:10.21668/health.risk/2013.3.10
20. Didkovskaya Ya.V., Vishnevsky Yu.R., Zyryanova O.B. Social security of student youth as a subjective perception of risks. Nauchnyj rezul’tat. Sociologiya i upravlenie = Research Result. Sociology and Management. 2022;8(4):57–70. (In Russ.) doi:10.18413/2408-9338-2022-8-4-0-6
21. Verkeev A. Inequality in perceptions of street safety in Russia. Zhurnal sociologii i social’noj antropologii = Тhе Jоurnаl of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2021;24(3):169–192. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/neravenstvo-v-vospriyatii-u-lichnoy-bezopasnosti-v-rossii
22. Visser M., Scholte M., Scheepers P. Fear of crime and feelings of unsafety in European countries: macro and micro explanations in cross-national perspective. The Sociological Quarterly. 2013;54(2):278–301. doi:10.1111/tsq.12020
23. Velikaya N.M., Lisenkova A.A. Socio-cultural identity of student youth in the context of social uncertainty of Russian society. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociologiya = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology. 2023;16(4):374–390. (In Russ.) doi:10.21638/spbu12.2023.402
24. Luo Y.F., Shen H.Y., Yang S.C., Chen L.C. The relationships among anxiety, subjective well-being, media consumption, and safety-seeking behaviors during the COVID-19 epidemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(24):13189. doi:10.3390/ijerph182413189
25. Lyz N.A., Kupovykh Zh.G. Notions of security as a subject of empirical research. Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii = Modern Scientific Research and Innovation. 2015;8(2). (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2015/08/57172
26. Shlykova E.V. Subjective assessment of personal security as an indicator of adaptation to a risky environment. Sociologicheskij zhurnal = Sociological Journal. 2018;24(3):56–75. (In Russ.) doi:10.19181/socjour.2018.24.3.5993
27. Kharlamenkova N.E. Ponjatie psihologicheskoj bezopasnosti i ego nauchnye definicii = The concept of psychological safety and its scientific definitions. In: Sergienko E.A., Zhuravlev A.L., eds. Razrabotka ponyatiy v sovremennoy psikhologii: Sbornik statey = Development of Concepts in Modern Psychology. Collection of Articles. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2019;2:309–330. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=yyiguy
28. Mozgovaya A.V., Shlykova E.V. Human dimension of security: subjective assessments and personal meanings. Interaktsiya. Interv’yu. Interpretatsiya. = Interaction. Interview. Interpretation. 2022;14(4):29–40. (In Russ.) doi:10.19181/inter.2022.14.4.2
29. Smirnova O.V. Notions of safety in adolescence: sexual and gender aspects. Zhenshchina v rossiyskom obshchestve = Woman in Russian Society. 2020;1:85–100. (In Russ.) doi:10.21064/WinRS.2020.1.7
30. Korabelnikova Yu.L. Concept and content of personal security in a modern state. Trudy Akademii upravleniya MVD Rossii = Proceedings of the Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2023;3(67):39–48. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/2072-9391-2023-367-39-48
31. Ugolnikov V.V. Multidisciplinary approach to ensuring life safety, preserving health and life. Tekhniko-tekhnologicheskiye problemy servisa = Technical and Technological Problems of Service. 2015;3(33):105–110. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/multidistsiplinarnyy-podhod-k-obespecheniyu-bezopasnosti-zhiznedeyatelnosti-sohraneniyu-zdorovya-i-zhizni
32. Slovic P. The Perception of Risk. London: Earthscan Ltd; 2000. 512 p. doi:10.4324/9781315661773
33. Atanesyan A.V. “Human security”: conceptual approaches and local dimensions (using Armenia as an example). Chelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravleniye. = Man. Community. Management. 2014;4:30–44. (In Russ.) doi:10.31857/S013216250004280-1
34. Makhov S.Yu. Formation of personal security: functional components. Nauka-2020 = Science-2020. 2018;5(21):108–114. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/formirovanie-lichnoy-bezopasnosti-funktsionalnye-komponenty
35. Maksimova S.G., Goncharova N.P., Noyanzina O.E. Features of risk perception in the structure of personal and social security assessment. Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Altai State University. 2012;2-1:211–215. (In Russ.) Accessed May 14, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-vospriyatiya-riska-v-strukture-otsenki-lichnoy-i-sotsialnoy-bezopasnosti
36. Syropoulos S., Leidner B., Mercado E., Li M., Cros S., Gomez A., et al. How safe are we? Introducing the multidimensional model of perceived personal safety. Personality and Individual Differences. 2024;224(3):112640. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112640
37. Polukhina E.V., Prosyanyuk D.V. Mixed methods research: integration of quantitative and qualitative approaches. Politicheskaya kontseptologiya: zhurnal metadistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy = Political Conceptology: Journal of Metadisciplinary Research. 2017;1:49–56. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovaniya-so-smeshannymi-metodami-mixed-methods-research-integratsiya-kolichestvennogo-i-kachestvennogo-podhodov
38. Worsley J.D., Harrison P., Corcoran R. The role of accommodation environments in student mental health and wellbeing. BMC Public Health. 2021;21:573. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10602-5
39. Baeva I.A. Psychological safety of foreign students in society: problems and resources. Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A. I. Gercena = Bulletin of the A. I. Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University. 2015;174:36–44. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskaya-bezopasnost-studentov-prozhivayuschih-v-obschezhitii-problemy-i-resursy
40. Hart T.C., Chataway M., Mellberg J.A. Measuring fear of crime during the past 25 years: a systematic quantitative literature review. Journal of Criminal Justice. 2022;82:101988. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101988
41. Maier S.L., DePrince B.T. College students’ fear of crime and perception of safety: the influence of personal and university prevention measures. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2019;31(1):63–81. doi:10.1080/10511253.2019.1656757
42. Ivanov M.S. Attitude to personal security during identity formation in university students. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = The Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. 2022;24(1):83–91. (In Russ.) doi:10.21603/2078-8975-2022-24-1-83-91
43. Keating A., Melis G. Youth attitudes towards their future: the role of resources, agency and individualism in the UK. Journal of Applied Youth Studies. 2022;5(1):1–18. doi:10.1007/s43151-021-00061-5
44. Johnson R.J., McCaul K.D., Klein W.M. Risk involvement and risk perception among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2002;25(1):67–82. doi:10.1023/a:1013541802282
45. Kudaka M.A., Мaralov V.G., Nurtayev Y.R. Kazakhstan and Russian students’ attitude to danger. Rossijskij social’no-gumanitarnyj zhurnal = Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. 2018;3:156– 173. (In Russ.) doi:10.18384/2224-0209-2018-3-904
46. Gorczyca P.W., Adamiec M., Leksowski W. Relation of health threats to other threats in everyday life. Studies performed among students of the faculties of medicine and psychology. Wiadomości Lekarskie. 2002;55(1):97–101. Accessed May 18, 2025. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15002226/
47. Johansson S., Haandrikman K. Gendered fear of crime in the urban context: a comparative multilevel study of women’s and men’s fear of crime. Journal of Urban Affairs. 2021;45(7):1238–1264. do i:10.1080/07352166.2021.1923372
48. Emelyanova T.P. Health threats in social perceptions of students. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. 2013;4:226–232. (In Russ.) Accessed May 18, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ugrozy-zdorovyu-v-sotsialnyh-predstavleniyah-studentov
49. Zakour M.J., Gillespie D.F. Vulnerability Theory. In: Community Disaster Vulnerability. New York: Springer; 2013:17–35. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5737-4_2
50. Perlstein S. Risk perception and interpersonal discussion on risk: a systematic literature review. Risk Analysis. 2024;44(7):1666–1680. doi:10.1111/risa.14264
Review
For citations:
Lebedeva-Nesevria N.A., Sharypova S.Yu., Shlyapina A.S. Subjective perceptions of personal safety among Russian university students. The Education and science journal. 2025;27(7):176-202. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-7-176-202