Preview

The Education and science journal

Advanced search

Modernisation of the methodological framework of andragogy within the context of continuing professional education

https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-8-88-116

Abstract

Introduction. The growing demand for advanced and vocational training for adults, from both employers and employees, necessitates a scientific understanding of contemporary adult education technologies. This includes the study of theoretical foundations and modern approaches to andragogy, as well as empirical research into the educational needs of learners and training providers (organisers). Aim. The present research aims to investigate the methods and technologies used for training adults in additional vocational education programmes, based on an analysis of the results of a survey of students and providers of continuing professional education (CPE) programmes. Methodology and research methods. Methodological approaches based on adult learning theory were employed (A. V. Darinsky, S. I. Zmeev, M. S. Knowles), alongside concepts of professional and personal self-determination and development under conditions of uncertainty (A. G. Asmolov, R. M. Ryan). The study utilised a cross-comparison method to analyse survey results from two independent respondent samples: students enrolled in CPE programmes (2,650 respondents from 25 constituent entities of the Russian Federation) and providers of additional professional programmes from 18 constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The results of each category’s survey were also analysed separately. Results. It has been established that both Russian and international adult education are evolving within a shared field of challenges. The key issues include the need to develop and implement mechanisms to promote educational autonomy and student motivation, as well as to provide organisational, scientific, and methodological support for the educational process. This support encompasses the use of generative artificial intelligence, augmented and virtual reality, microlearning, and contemporary tools for assessing student achievement. Scientific novelty. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the use of a comparative method to analyse the opinions of students and providers of educational programmes. This approach enabled the identification of shared perspectives between the two groups of respondents regarding the selection of teaching methods and technologies, which are focused on mass education rather than the personalisation of adult learning. Practical significance. The research findings can be utilised to inform management decisions regarding the development of the Russian CPE system at all levels, to enhance the methodological support for the design and implementation of CPE programmes, and to facilitate further applied scientific research in the field of andragogy.

About the Authors

E. Yu. Esenina
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Ekaterina Yu. Esenina – Dr. Sci. (Education), Leading Researcher, Scientific and Educational Centre for Educational Development of the Institute “Graduate School of Public Management”

Moscow



N. F. Rodichev
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Nikolay F. Rodichev – Cand. Sci. (Education), Leading Researcher, Scientific and Educational Centre for Educational Development of the Institute “Graduate School of Public Management”

Moscow



Yu. V. Ermachkova
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Yulia V. Ermachkova – Senior Researcher, Scientific and Educational Centre for Educational Development of the Institute “Graduate School of Public Management”

Moscow



K. G. Kuznetsov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation

Kirill G. Kuznetsov – Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Leading Researcher, Scientific and Educational Centre for Educational Development of the Institute “Graduate School of Public Management”; Leading Analyst, Laboratory of Modern Forms and Methods of Career Guidance

Moscow



References

1. Korshunov I.A., Shirkova N.N. Adult education programs in the context of social distancing: An analysis of continuous education platform data. Obrazovanie i samorazvitie = Education and Self-Development. 2022;17(2):203–218. (In Russ.) doi:10.26907/esd.17.2.16

2. Kolesnikova O.A., Maslova E.V., Okolelykh I.V. Workforce ballast: why the higher education system lags behind labor market transformation. Sotsial’no-trudovye issledovaniya = Social and Labor Research. 2023;52(3):153–164. (In Russ.) doi:10.34022/2658-3712-2023-52-3-153-164

3. Shepel M.O., Veledinskaya S.B., Diyskaya E.A., et al. Micro-qualification programs in universities: a new educational pathway for adult learning. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2024;33(11):29–55. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2024-33-11-29-55

4. Buchanan R. Networked professional learning in the postdigital age: asking critical questions of postgraduate education. In: Fawns T., Aitken G., Jones D., eds. Online Postgraduate Education in a Postdigital World. Cham: Springer; 2021:103–120. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2_7

5. Kukulska-Hulme A., Wise A.F., Coughlan T., Biswas G. Innovating Pedagogy 2024: Open University Innovation Report. United Kingdom: The Open University; 2024. 45 p. Accessed August 10, 2025. https://iet.open.ac.uk/files/innovating-pedagogy-2024.pdf

6. Matusov E. A list of post-enlightenment self-education principles. In: Post-Enlightenment Self-Education. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2025:145–167. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90675-6_7

7. Kozikhina M.N. Challenges in developing professional development systems for vocational educators. In: Innovatsii v professional’nom obrazovanii: teoriya i praktika: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Innovations in Vocational Education: Theory and Practice: Materials of the Scientific and Practical Conference. Kazan: ISSO RAO; 1997:86–88. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://elar.uspu.ru/bitstream/ru-uspu/18922/1/pau_1997_2_16.pdf

8. Zhukova G.S., Nikitina N.I., Volkhin S.N. Recurrent education for social sector professionals: phenomenology and development context. Uchenye zapiski RGSU = Scientific Notes of RSSU. 2012;7:104–109. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_18736715_71602761.pdf

9. Agrawal S., De Smet A., Poplawski P., Reich A. Beyond hiring: how companies are reskilling to address talent gaps. McKinsey Global Institute; 2020. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/beyond-hiring-howcompanies-are-reskilling-to-address-talent-gaps

10. Vershlovsky S.G. On the andragogical competence of adult education specialists. Obrazovanie cherez vsyu zhizn’: nepreryvnoe obrazovanie v interesakh ustoychivogo razvitiya = Lifelong Education for Sustainable Development. 2013;11(1):277–281. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-ob-andragogicheskoy-kompetentnosti-spetsialistov-obuchayuschih-vzroslyh

11. Gorshkova V.V. Modern individuals: the format of lifelong education. Akademiya professional’nogo obrazovaniya = Academy of Professional Education. 2015;2:7–15. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nepreryvnoe-obrazovanie-v-usloviyah-novoy-sotsialnoy-realnosti

12. Ryan R.M. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development and health. Canadian Psychology. 2008;49:182–185. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://www.academia.edu/24470439/Self_determination_theory_A_macrotheory_of_human_motivation_development_and_health

13. Shapovalov V.K. Sotsial’noe obuchenie vzroslyh: istoriya, teoriya, tehnologiya = Social Adult Learning: History, Theory, and Technology. Moscow: Dashkov i K; 2014. 261 p. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01007553462?ysclid=mebaw5j71n260033364

14. Bondarenko N.V. Corporate staff training. Monitoring ekonomiki obrazovaniya = Education Economics Monitoring. 2019;5(90):1–12. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://memo.hse.ru/data/2019/02/21/1194629590/iam_5_2019(90).pdf

15. Korshunov I.A., Kuzheleva K.S., Grachev B.A., Sergeev K.A. Adult learning and education: sought-after programs, age and industry structures. Fakty obrazovaniia = Facts of Education. 2018;1(16). (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://ioe.hse.ru/pubs/share/direct/409672910.pdf

16. Korshunov I.A., Gaponova O.S. Adult lifelong education in the context of economic development and governance quality. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2017;4:36–59. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2017-4-36-59

17. Baranov I.N., Korshunov I.A., Litvinov A.S., Yurchenkov V.I. Perepodgotovka kak otvet na vyzovy novogo mira raboty: analiticheskij otchet = Retraining as a Response to the Challenges of the New World of Work: Analytical Report. Moscow: Sberbank Corporate University; 2021. 78 p. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://sberuniversity.ru/upload/iblock/abc/Report_reskilling.pdf

18. Kuzminov Ya.I., Froumin I.D., Ovcharova L.N. Twelve solutions for new education. Moscow: CSR; 2018. 105 p. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://www.hse.ru/data/2018/04/06/1164671180/Doklad_obrazovanie_Web.pdf

19. Chabeli M., Nolte A., Gugu N. Authentic learning: a concept analysis. Global Journal of Health Science. 2021;13(4):12. doi:10.5539/gjhs.v13n4p12

20. Martynova S.E., Lavrova T.B., Evarovich S.A., Kolesnikov A.M. Global trends in the organization and methodology of professional development for civil servants. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = Public Administration. Scientific Notes. 2024;4:67–85. (In Russ.) doi:10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-4-67-85

21. Mironova O.A. Generational aspects of post-industrial society formation. Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta = Rostov State University of Economics Bulletin. 2017;3(59):45–52. (In Russ.) Accessed August 10, 2025. https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_32248312_90099618.pdf

22. Haiyan H., Kerti P., Nanci P., Riastini, Mahayanti N.W.S. Global research trends on lifelong learning framework in posthuman education: a bibliometric approach. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology. 2025;9(6):2568–2582. doi:10.55214/25768484.v9i6.8433

23. Katane I., Katans E., Vāvers V.J. The diversity and multifunctionality of lifelong guidance services in distance education secondary school. Diversity. 2024;1(8):62–78. doi:10.17770/eid2024.1.7776

24. Shin M., Lee K., Kim D. Analysis of the awareness and request of adults with disabilities and staff in charge of lifelong education regarding integrated education. The Korean Society for the Study of Lifelong Education. 2024;30(4):173–207. doi:10.52758/kssle.2024.30.4.173

25. Deming D.J. Four facts about human capital. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2022;36(3):75–102. doi:10.1257/jep.36.3.75

26. Vrdoljak I. The importance of lifelong education in modern economy. ENTRENOVA. 2024;10(1):601– 617. doi:10.54820/entrenova-2024-0045

27. Hillman Ch.R., Ward L. Outreach to distance learning faculty: a scoping review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2023;49(3):102681. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102681

28. Kongpha R., Hinon K., Wannapiroon P. HyFlex learning ecosystem with social emotional learning. International Education Studies. 2025;18(1):67–78. doi:10.5539/ies.v18n1p67

29. Beatty B.J. Hybrid-Flexible Course Design: Implementing Student-Directed Hybrid Classes. EdTech Books; 2019. 312 p. doi:10.59668/33

30. Lapina I.V., Voronushkina O.V. Blended and hybrid learning: distinctive features of implementation in universities. The World of Science, Culture and Education. 2024;4(107):250–253. (In Russ.) doi:10.24412/1991-5497-2024-4107-250-253

31. Drugova E.A., Zhuravlyova I.I., Ayusheeva M.G. Challenges of designing blended learning in higher education: lessons from “Schools of Instructional Design”. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2023;32(6):93–115. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-93-115

32. Li Y.J. Research on the reform of computer basic teaching in colleges and universities under the mode of mixed teaching. Computer Knowledge and Technology. 2017;13(1):128–129. doi:10.12783/dtssehs/eiem2017/16072

33. Blinov V.V., Sergeev I.S., Rodichev N.F. The microlearning – from business to education: a promising direction for the development of didactics. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2022;24(9):43–68. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2022-9-43-68

34. Darinsky A.V. Who and how to include in the adult education system. Pedagogika = Pedagogy. 1995;2. (In Russ.) Accessed August 12, 2025. https://unilibrary.ru/articles/journals/ped/pedagogika-1995/pedagogika-1995-02/darinskij-av-kogo-i-kak-vkljuchat-v-sistemu-obrazovanija-vzroslih.html

35. Zmeev S.I. Andragogy and adult education: basic concepts and terms. In: Ponjatijnyj apparat pedagogiki i obrazovanija: sbornik nauchnyh trudov = Conceptual Apparatus of Pedagogy and Education: Collection of Scientific Papers. Issue 2. Ekaterinburg, 1996:308–324. (In Russ.) Accessed August 12, 2025. https://elar.uspu.ru/handle/ru-uspu/39636?ysclid=meu91ioxzf727802693

36. Knowles M.S. The Modern Practice of Adult Education. New York: Association Press; 1970. 379 p. Accessed August 12, 2025. https://colllearning.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/The-Modern-Practice-of-Adult-Education.pdf


Review

For citations:


Esenina E.Yu., Rodichev N.F., Ermachkova Yu.V., Kuznetsov K.G. Modernisation of the methodological framework of andragogy within the context of continuing professional education. The Education and science journal. 2025;27(8):88-116. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-8-88-116

Views: 9


ISSN 1994-5639 (Print)
ISSN 2310-5828 (Online)