WHY GRADUATES OF PEDAGOGICAL INSTITUTES BECOME MANAGERS?
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-7-24-43
Abstract
The problems of future graduates’ motivation increase to their occupational work is investigated. The features of the educational process organization in schools and universities of the country on the basis of the cultural orientation of training and the author’s style of teaching are observed. In modern society, it is important to create new standards of moral and ethical rights as an essential component of the educational process and a new image of a man that should focus on pedagogical science. The system of continuous education «school – pedagogical university» should be expanded, the mode of university life should be changed and combined with the development and introduction if innovative processes in educational establishments. Practical steps of reform in higher pedagogical education are pointed out.
The purpose of the paper is to identify the causes of the crisis in pedagogy science and in the system of teacher working up.
Methods. Cultural, philosophical approaches are used to investigate the crisis of teacher education and teacher training.
Results. Theoretical and practical activities of teaching activity methodology are considered under the conditions of economic and spiritual crisis. Being at a stable condition of a society, the teacher follows traditions and represents self as the compiler of memory of generations. Cultural and historical influence of pedagogical events of previous years ceases to be a significant; the teacher needs to have non-standard decisions, real affairs and the acts are required, helping to avoid repeatability and stability of professional failures. Also it’s important to possess a high level of education, culture, emotions and relationships that would provide live and emotionally rich communication of participants of the educational process; the aim of such communication is to establish the authenticity of the moral and spiritual values.
Scientific novelty. Cultural bases of activity of the teaching staff of the university are considered. Ideological nature of pedagogic education as a base for self-actualization is shown.
Practical significance. The specific steps to overcome the crisis in the system of training of higher educational qualifications are pointed out: development of strategy of the given preparation as a whole, and tactics of its realisation in concrete high schools on the basis of a social consensus principle; information assurance of financing sources of high school and the reporting on financial and economic activity of its staff; cancellation of introduction practice of various “new generations of standards”, involving an avalanche of “make work”; educational process filling by student teaching in educational institutions of various types and kinds; development of an one-year cycle of a pedagogical education as the second higher education; granting of academic freedom to universities, etc. The importance of subject oriented education within the system «school – university» as a powerful tool to increase motivation of pedagogical work is highlighted.
About the Author
Leonid I. LourieRussian Federation
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Department of Mathematic Modeling of Systems and Processes;
Head of the Department «Theory and Methodology of Professional Education»;
Principal,
Perm
References
1. Aronov R. A., Baksanskii O. E. Novoe v epistemologii i horosho zabitoe staroe. [New in epistemology and well forgotten old]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2004. Vol. 5. P. 99–110. (In Russian)
2. Bim-Bad B. M. Pedagogicheskaia antropologiia. [Pedagogical anthropology]. Moscow: Publishing House URAO. [University of the Russian Academy of Education]. 1998. 576 p. (In Russian)
3. Zabrodin Y. M., Iamburg E. A., Gaiazova L. A. Professionalnyi standart. Pedagog, pedagogicheskaia deiatelnost v doshkolnom, nachalnom obshchem, osnovnom obshchem, srednem obshchem obrazovanii. Vospitatel, uchitel. [Professional standard. Teacher, teaching activities in pre-school, primary General, basic General, secondary General education. Educator, teacher]. Biulleten Uchebno-metodicheskogo obedineniia vuzov RF po psikhologo-pedagogichescomu obrazovaniiu. [Bulletin of the Educational and Methodological Association of Russian Universities on the Psychological and Pedagogical Education]. 2014. V. 4. № 1. Р. 20–39. (In Russian)
4. Zagviazinskii V. I. O sviazi metodogii i tekhnolodii v pedagogicheskom issledovanii. [On communication methodologies and technologies in pedagogical research]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2015. Vol. 5 (124). P. 4–14. (In Russian)
5. Kogan L. A. Svoboda – samost’ sozidanija. [Freedom – self creation]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2009. Vol. 7. P. 78–90. (In Russian)
6. Kontceptciia Federalnoitcelevoi programmy razvitiia obrazovaniia na 2016–2020 body. Utv. Rasporiazheniem Pravitelstva RF ot 29 dekabria 2014. No 2765-r. [The concept of the Federal target program of education development for 2016 – 2020. Approved by the order of the Government of the Russian Federation, d.d. 29 December, 2014. № 2765-R]. Available at: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/. (In Russian)
7. Lukasheva E. A., Lektorsky V. A. Pravo, zakonnost’, nravstvennost’. [Rules, laws, morality]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2003. Vol. 11. P. 19–27. (In Russian)
8. Novikov A. M. Postindustrialnoe obrazovanie. [Post-industrial education]. Moscow: Publishing House Egves, 2008. 136 p. (In Russian)
9. Novichkova G. A. Antropologicheskaja interpretazija pedagogiki. [Anthropological interpretation of pedagogy]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2004. Vol. 5. P. 99–110. (In Russian)
10. Ogorodnikov A. Y. Formirovanije innovazionnogo potenziala rykovoditelei v sisteme obrazovanija. [Formation of innovative potential in the education system]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2014. Vol. 9 (118). P. 34–50. (In Russian)
11. Osmolovskaya I. M. O naychnov statyse didaktiki. [About the scientific status of didactics]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2014. Vol. 9 (118). P. 85–97. (In Russian)
12. Potashnik M. M., Levit M. V. Kak pomoch uchiteliu v osvoenii FGOS. [How to help the teacher in mastering of the Federal State Educational Standard]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoe obshchestvo Rossii. [Pedagogical society of Russia]. 2014. 320 p. (In Russian)
13. Rozin V. M. Konstryirovanije sebja i real’nosti kak sposob zhizni novoevropeiskogoi lichnosti i filosofa. [The constitution of self and the reality of life as a way of modern European identity and philosopher]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2009. Vol. 7. P. 91–106. (In Russian)
14. Serikov V. V. Lichnostno-orientirovannoe obrazovanie – poisk novoi paradigmy. [Student-oriented education – the search for a new paradigm]. Moscow: Volgogradskij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet. [Volgograd State Pedagogical University], 1998. 180 p. (In Russian)
15. Stolovich L. N. Filosofija v poezii i poezija v filosofii. [The philosophy in poetry and poetry in philosophy]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2009. Vol. 7. P. 67–77. (In Russian)
16. Fedotova V. G. Sozial’noje konstryirovanije priemlemogo dlja zhizni obzhestva (K voprosu o metodologii). [Social Construction of the society, suitable for living (To the question of methodology)]. Problemi filosofii. [Problems of Philosophy]. 2003. № 11. P. 3–18. (In Russian)
17. Khaidegger M. Raboty I razmyshleniia raznykh let. Slovari I entciklopedii na Akademike – Germenevtika. [Working and thinking in different years. Dictionaries and encyclopaedias on the Academician – Hermeneutics]. Available at: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy. (In Russian)
18. Schopenhauer A. Mir kak volja i predstavlenije. Aforizmi i maksimi. Novije aforizmi. [The World as Will and Representation. Aphorisms and maxims. New aphorisms]. Translated from German by Yu. Eichenwald, F. Chernigovets, R. Kresin. Minsk: Publishing House Sovremennii literator. [A modern writer], 1999. 1408 p. (In Russian)
19. Advanced Mathematics (Updated Edition) by Martin Perkins Paperback. 1992. 384 р. (Translated from English)
20. Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education: From Piaget to the Present Day (Routledge Key Guides) (First Edition) by Liora Bresler (Editor), David Cooper (Editor), Joy Palmer (Editor), Editor-Liora Bresler, Editor-David Cooper, Editor-Joy Palmer, Joy Palmer, David Edward Cooper Paperback. 2001. 320 р. (Translated from English)
21. Urofsky M. I. Basic readings in U. S. Democracy. Published by the United States Information Agency. Division for the Study of the United States. Washington, D. C. 20547. 1994. 430 р. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Lourie L.I. WHY GRADUATES OF PEDAGOGICAL INSTITUTES BECOME MANAGERS? The Education and science journal. 2015;(7):24-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-7-24-43