THE MODEL OF EXTERNSHIP ORGANIZATION FOR FUTURE TEACHERS: QUALIMETRIC APPROACH
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-8-50-64
Abstract
The aim of the paper is to present author’s model for bachelors – future teachers of vocational training. The model is been worked out from the standpoint of qualimetric approach and provides a pedagogical training.
Methods. The process is based on the literature analysis of externship organization for students in higher education and includes the SWOT-analysis techniques in pedagogical training. The method of group expert evaluation is the main method of pedagogical qualimetry. Structural components of professional pedagogical competency of students-future teachers are defined. It allows us to determine a development level and criterion of estimation on mastering programme «Vocational training (branch-wise)».
Results. This article interprets the concept «pedagogical training»; its basic organization principles during students’ practice are stated. The methods of expert group formation are presented: self-assessment and personal data.
Scientific novelty. The externship organization model for future teachers is developed. This model is based on pedagogical training, using qualimetric approach and the SWOT-analysis techniques. Proposed criterion-assessment procedures are managed to determine the developing levels of professional and pedagogical competency.
Practical significance. The model is introduced into pedagogical training of educational process of Kalashnikov’s Izhevsk State Technical University, and can be used in other similar educational establishments.
About the Author
Taisiya A. IsaevaRussian Federation
PhD student, Department of Professional Pedagogy,
Izhevsk
References
1. Zagvjazinskij V. I. O svjazi metodologii i tehnologii v pedagogicheskom issledovanii. [Concerning communication of methodology and technology in pedagogical research]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2015. Vol. 5. Р. 4–14. (In Russian)
2. Zeer Je. F., Symanjuk Je. Je. Kompetentnostnyj podhod kak faktor realizacii innova-cionnogo obrazovanija. The competence-based approach as the factor of realisation of innovative education]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2011. Vol. 8. P. 3–14. (In Russian)
3. Isaeva T. A. O podgotovke studentov – budushhih pedagogov professional’nogo obuchenija k pedagogicheskoj praktike. [Conceerning preparation of students – the future teachers of vocational training to student teaching]. Fundamental’nye issledovanija. [Fundemantal researches]. 2014. Vol. 6–5. P. 1032–1036. (In Russian)
4. Isaeva T. A. Organizacija pedagogicheskogo treninga studentov k nauchno-issledovatel’skoj professional’noj dejatel’nosti. [The organisation of pedagogical training of students to research professional work]. Psihologija i pedagogika: metodika i problemy prakticheskogo primenenija. [Psychology and Pedagogics: a Technique and Problems of Practical Application]. 2015. Vol. 42. P. 72–83. (In Russian)
5. Isaeva T. A. Samoocenivanie v pedagogicheskoj dejatel’nosti na osnove SWOT- analiza. [Self-estimation in pedagogical activity on the basis of the SWOTanalysis]. Kazanskaja nauka. [Kazan Science]. 2015. Vol. 2. P. 135–141. (In Russian)
6. Isaeva T. A., Shihova O. F. Trening kak forma organizacii pedagogicheskoj praktiki studentov. [Training as the form of the student externship]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. Vol. 9 (118). P. 98–112. (In Russian)
7. Kleeva L. P. SWOT-analiz razvitija fundamental’noj nauki v Rossii. [he SWOT-analysis of development of fundamental science in Russia]. Kompetentnost’. [Competence]. 2012. Vol. 2 (93). P. 12–14. (In Russian)
8. L’vov L. V., Chernysheva M. V. Konkretno-nauchnyj uroven’ issledovanija upravlenija podgotovkoj pedagogov professional’nogo obuchenija. [Concrete-scientific level of management research of preparation of teachers of vocational training]. Innovacii v obrazovanii. [Innovations in Education]. 2010. Vol. 5. P. 25–43. (In Russian)
9. P’jankova Zh. A., Polujanov V. B. Primenenie kvalimetricheskogo podhoda v ocenke samostojatel’noj raboty studentov. Application of qualimetric approach to the estimation of students’ independent work]. Vestnik Krasnojarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’eva. [Bulletin of Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astaf’ev]. 2014. Vol. 2 (28). P. 84–88. (In Russian)
10. Verbickaja N. O., Kotova D. I., Romancev G. M., Fedorov V. A. K voprosu o strukturirovanii i standartizacii professional’nyh kompetencij. [To a question on structurization and standardization of professional competences]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. Vol. 5. P. 119–125. (In Russian)
11. Cherepanov V. S. Osnovy pedagogicheskoj jekspertizy. [Bases of pedagogical examination]. Izhevsk: Izhevsk State Technical University, 2006. 124 p.
12. Chernysheva M. V. Kvalimetricheskij podhod k issledovaniju problemy kachestva upravlenija podgotovkoj pedagogov professional’nogo obuchenija. [Qualimetric approach to research of a problem of management quality by preparation of teachers of vocational training]. Sovremennaja vysshaja shkola: innovacionnyj aspekt. [Modern Higher School: Innovative Aspect]. 2010. Vol. 1. P. 5–10. (In Russian)
13. Shihova O. F., Shihov Ju. A. Kvalimetricheskij podhod k diagnostike kompetencij vypusknikov vysshej shkoly. [Qualimetric approach to diagnostics of competences of higher school graduates].]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2013. Vol. 4 (103). P. 40–57. (In Russian)
14. Shihov Ju. A., Shihova O. F. Model’ monitoringa kachestva obrazovanija v uslovijah kompetentnostnogo podhoda. [Model of monitoring of education quality in conditions of competence-based approach]. Mezhdunarodnoe nauchnoe izdanie «Sovremennye fundamental’nye i prikladnye issledovanija. [Modern Basic and Applied researches]. 2013. № 4 (11). P. 35–39. (In Russian)
15. R. Leblanc. Good teaching: the top ten requirements. The Teaching Professor. 1998. Vol. 12? № 6. Available at: http://www.biz.colostate.edu/mti/tips/pages/GoodTeaching.aspx. (Translated from English)
16. D. Leigh. SWOT Analysis Handbook of Improving Performance in the Workplace. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2009. Vol. 2. P. 115–140. (Translated from English)
17. M. Smith «What is pedagogy?» The encyclopaedia of informal education Available at: http://infed.org/mobi/what-is-pedagogy/. (Translated from English)
18. F. Mogensen K. Schnack The action competence and the «new» discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Educational Research. 2010. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 59–74. (Translated from English)
19. R. Mendenhall What is competency-based education? Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-robert-mendenhall/competency-based-learning-_b_1855374.html. (Translated from English)
20. Marlene N. M. Filipe, Fernando A. F. Ferreira, S. P. Santos A multiple criteria information system for pedagogical evaluation and professional development of teachers. Available at: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/jors2014129a.html. (Translated from English)
21. A. Irina Pedagogical competences – the key to efficient education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2011. Vol. 3 (2). P. 411–423. Available at: http://www.iojes.net/userfiles/Article/IOJES_402.pdf. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Isaeva T.A. THE MODEL OF EXTERNSHIP ORGANIZATION FOR FUTURE TEACHERS: QUALIMETRIC APPROACH. The Education and science journal. 2015;(8):50-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-8-50-64