The body of professional knowledge and skills within the competency-based model of higher education

Introduction. The study focuses on methods, grounded in the competency-based approach to education, for regulating the learning activities of higher education institutions through the utilisation of bodies of professional knowledge and skills. These are understood as codified (systematised and organised) bodies of knowledge recognised by members of the relevant professional and/or educational communities. Aim. Through an analysis of both Russian and international experience, this study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of integrating professional knowledge and skills into the documents governing the core of higher education, and to substantiate the practical significance of this approach. Methodology and research methods. The study includes an analysis of the contradictions between the knowledge-and-skills model and the competency-based model of higher education, as well as an examination of the possibilities for integrating bodies of knowledge and skills into documents regulating higher education. The analysis encompassed publications in Russian and international scientific journals indexed in the Scopus, Web of Science, and RSCI databases, alongside scientific monographs and reports from international research groups investigating the construction of bodies of knowledge and their alignment with professional competencies. Results and scientific novelty. It is demonstrated that there are neither fundamental nor technical obstacles to integrating bodies of knowledge and skills into educational standards and frameworks, which are considered both in the development and accreditation of educational programmes. The existence of a body of knowledge and skills defining the professional core of an educational programme, agreed upon by the educational community, would strengthen the cohesion of the national educational space, establish an optimal balance between the fundamental and applied components of professional training, thereby creating a barrier against the observed decline in the level of fundamental training in some higher education institutions, and provide tools for assessing the quality of professional training. Practical significance. The practical feasibility of integrating bodies of knowledge and skills into the competency-based model of higher education has been demonstrated. The results obtained can be utilised to enhance the quality management of higher education.

1. Sadovnichii V.A. Higher education in Russia: development vector. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya” = Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series “Problems of Higher Education”. 2021;2:5–11. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/educ/2023/02/2023-02-01.pdf

2. Bryzgalina E.V. Fundamental education in a modern university as a response to modern challenges. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya” = Bulletin of Voronezh State University. Series “Problems of Higher Education”. 2021;1:5–9. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/educ/2021/01/2021-01-01.pdf

3. Rudskoy A.I., Kabyshev S.V., Borovkov A.I., Romanov P.I., Grishina N.S. Fundamental foundations of success and prestige of domestic engineering education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2025;34(1):9–29. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-1-9-29

4. Galazhinskij E.V. Besedy o slozhnom. Upravlencheskie praktiki i refleksii: 2022–2023 = Conversations about Complexity. Management Practices and Reflections: 2022–2023. Tomsk: National Research Tomsk State University; 2023. 200 p. (In Russ). Accessed January 29, 2026. http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/koha:001009157

5. Knyaginina N.V., Puchkov E.V. Internal systems for assessing the quality of education in documents of Russian universities: quality assurance or its appearance? Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2024;3(2):100–135. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/vo-2024-17221

6. Sukhomlin V.A., Zubareva E.V. A new stage of international standardization of IT education. Sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii i IT-obrazovanie = Modern Information Technologies and IT Education. 2021;17(3):697–723. (In Russ.) doi:10.25559/SITITO.17.202103.697-72

7. Sukhomlin V., Zubareva E. Analytical review of the current curriculum standards in information technologies. Communications in Computer and Information Science. 2020;1201:3–41. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46895-8_1

8. Leidig P.M., Salmela H. The ACM/AIS IS2020 competency model for undergraduate programs in information systems: a joint ACM/AIS task force report. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 2022;50:470–480. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.05021

9. Kumar A.N., Becker B.A., Pias M., Oudshoorn M., Jalote P., Servin C., et al. A combined knowledge and competency (CKC) model for computer science curricula. ACM Inroads. 2023;14(3):22–29. doi:10.1145/3605215

10. Senashenko V.S., Struchkova E.P. Higher education and the needs of the real economy. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher Education Today. 2020;3:11–16. (In Russ.) doi:10.25586/RNU.HET-.20.03.P.11

11. Malinovsky S.S., Shibanova E.Yu., Maslova E.A. What is the difference between the “best” and “reasonably prestigious” universities? Career expectations of students at leading and non-selective universities. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Educational Studies Moscow. 2024;3(2):171–210. (In Russ.) doi:10.17323/vo-2024-18619

12. Leidig P.M. Connecting the docs: information systems model curricula and accreditation criteria. Issues in Information Systems Volume. 2023;24(3):35–42. doi:10.48009/3_iis_2023_104

13. Khenner E.K. Professional knowledge and professional competencies in higher education. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2018;20(2):9–31. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2018-2-9-31

14. Musaelyan L.A., Zyryanov S.G. Global challenges facing Russia and some problems in the domestic higher education system. Socium i vlast’ = Society and Power. 2022;2:40–52. (In Russ.) doi:10.22394/1996-0522-2022-2-40-52

15. Gutorov V.A. Neoliberalism and the prospects of education in the modern world: current moments of theoretical discussions. Bol’shaya Evraziya: razvitie, bezopasnost’, sotrudnichestvo = Greater Eurasia: Development, Security, Cooperation. 2022;5(1):1020–1024. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/neoliberalizm-i-perspektivy-obrazovaniya-v-sovremen-nom-mire-aktualnye-momenty-teoreticheskih-diskussiy

16. Testov V.A. The content of modern education: choosing the path. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science Journal. 2017;19(8):29–46. (In Russ.) doi:10.17853/1994-5639-2017-8-29-46

17. Aleksandrova O.A. Problems of higher education: inside and outside the education system. Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Standard of Living of the Population of Russian Regions. 2023;19(2):157–168. (In Russ.) doi:10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_2_1_157_168

18. Zhilin A.S., Kovalenko S.V., Rebrin O.I., Sholina I.I., Pechurin M.S. Personnel crisis and the exit model in the competence-oriented structure of transformation of higher education programs. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2023;12:87–91. (In Russ.) doi:10.17513/fr.43539

19. Lyubetskii N.P., Samygin S.I., Kasyanov V.V. The crisis of higher education in Russia as a socio-cultural catastrophe. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Socio-Economic and Social Sciences. 2017;8-9:99–104. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/krizis-vysshego-obrazovaniya-v-rossii-kak-sotsiokulturnaya-katastrofa

20. Minina V.N. Digitalization of higher education and its social results. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sociologiya = Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Sociology. 2020;13(1):84–101. (In Russ.) doi:10.21638/spbu12.2020.106

21. Petruneva R.M., Vasilyeva V.D., Petruneva Yu.V. Problems of higher education didactics: uncut pages. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2021;30(8-9):56–68. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-8-9-56-68

22. Danilov V.A., Kudakov O.R., Matushanskii G.U. About the concepts of “competence” and “competency”. In: Innovacii i kachestvo professional’nogo obrazovanija. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov 15-oj Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii = Innovation and Quality of Professional Education. Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific and Practical Conference. Kazan; 2021:322–325. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_46433342_91494882.pdf

23. Khutorskoi A.V. Key competencies as a component of the personality-oriented paradigm of education. Narodnoe obrazovanie = Public Education. 2003;2:58–64. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://narodnoe.org/journals/narodnoe-obrazovanie/2003-2/klyuchevie-kompe-tencii-kak-komponent--lichnostno-orientirovannoiy-paradigmi-obrazovaniya

24. Vitello S., Greatorex J., Shaw S. What is Competence? A Shared Interpretation of Competence to Support Teaching, Learning and Assessment. Cambridge University Press & Assessment; 2021. 22 p. Accessed January 29, 2026. https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/645254-what-is-com-petence-a-shared-interpretation-of-competence-to-support-teaching-learning-and-assessment.pdf

25. Dobryakova M., Ziil N., Moss J., Barannikov K., Remorenko I., Frumin I. Ramka universal’nyh kompetentnostej i novoj gramotnosti = Framework of universal competencies and new literacy. In: Dobryakova M., Frumin I., eds. Universal’nye kompetentnosti i novaja gramotnost’: ot lozungov k real’nosti = Universal Competencies and New Literacies: From Slogans to Reality. Moscow: Higher School of Economics; 2020:34–65 (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://ioe.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/360763569.pdf

26. Yakovleva I.V., Kosenko T.S. Competence-based and knowledge-based approaches: philosophical and educational problems of understanding and application. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional Education in the Modern World. 2020;10(1):3474–3480. (In Russ.) doi:10.15372/PEMW20200110

27. Kudakov O.R. Metodologicheskie podhody v rossijskom obrazovanii (predposylki teorii podhodov) = Methodological Approaches in Russian Education (Prerequisites for the Theory of Approaches). Kazan: Kazan State Energy University; 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://lib.kgeu.ru/irbis64r_15/scan-new/5066.pdf

28. Rajendra K., Raj R.K., Sabin M., Impagliazzo J., Bowers D., Daniels M., et al. Professional competencies in computing education: pedagogies and assessment. In: ITiCSE-WGR ’21: Proceedings of the 2021 Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery; 2021:133–161. doi:10.1145/3502870.3506570

29. Gilyazova O.S., Zamoshanskaya A.N., Zamoshansky I.I. Competency-based approach in educational policy: between national identity and globalism, knowledge and competencies. Problemy vysshego obrazovaniya = Problems of Modern Education. 2024;5:99–111. (In Russ.) doi:10.31862/2218-8711-2024-5-99-111

30. Bowers D.S., Sabin M. Demonstrating the use of a professional skills framework to support the assessment of dispositions in IT education. Education and Information Technologies. 2024;29:7595– 7632. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11933-z

31. Senashenko V.S., Struchkova E.P. Peculiarities of the conjugation of higher education and the sphere of labor in the context of structural transformations of the domestic system of higher education. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2025;34(3):31–51. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-3-31-51

32. Volpyan N.S., Tikhomirov V.V., Razgulin A.V., Parchevskaya L.N., Sergeev S.F., Kharitonova I.Yu., Chernyshenko S.V. Proektirovanie sektoral’nyh ramok kvalifikacij v oblasti Informatika = Design of a Sectoral Framework of Qualifications in the Field of Computer Science. Moscow: MAKS Press; 2015. 218 p. (In Russ). Accessed January 29, 2026. https://cs.msu.ru/sites/cmc/files/attachs/proektiro-vanie_sektoralnyh_ramok_kvalifikaciy_v_oblasti_informatika.pdf

33. Fridley K.J., Hains D.B., Barry P.E., Kristen L., Nolen L. The third edition of the civil engineering body of knowledge: an update and overview. In: 2018 ASEE Annual Conference and Dispositions. Accessed January 29, 2026. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=The+Third+Edi-tion+of+the+Civil+Engineering+Body+of+Knowledge%3A+An+Update+and+Overview&btnG=

34. Moore T., Etheridge J.R., Dale G.T., McMillan S.W., Aryal N., Austin D., Thompson T. An ecological engineering (EcoE) body of knowledge to support undergraduate EcoE Education. In: 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Portland, OR; 2024. Accessed January 29, 2026. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=ru&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=An+Ecological+Engineering+%28EcoE%29+Body+of+K-nowledge+to+Support+Undergraduate+EcoE+&btnG=

35. Rahayu N.W., Ferdiana R., Kusumawardani S.S. An enhanced domain ontology model of database course in computing curricula. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI). 2024;13(2):1339‒1347. doi:10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp1339-1347

36. Khenner E., Nasraoui O. A bilingual semantic network of computing concepts. Procedia Computer Science. 2016;80:2392‒2396. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.460

37. Kulikova T.I. “Digital” teacher: new roles, functions and competencies. Rossijskij zhurnal obrazovaniya i psihologii = Russian Journal of Education and Psychology. 2024;15(4):482–497. (In Russ.) doi:10.12731/2658-4034-2024-15-4-560

38. Domínguez-González M.Á., Luque de la Rosa A., Hervás-Gómez C., Román-Graván P. Teacher digital competence: Keys for an educational future through a systematic review. Contemporary Educational Technology. 2025;17(2):1–13. doi:10.30935/cedtech/16168

39. Druzhilovskaya T.Yu., Druzhilovskaya E.S. Will the competency-based approach to education be preserved in the context of changes in the organization of higher education in Russia? Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2025;34(10):78–102. (In Russ.) doi:10.31992/0869-3617-2025-34-10-78-102

40. Drondin A.L. Domestic higher education in light of Russia’s withdrawal from the Bologna Process. Vestnik Marijskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Mari State University. 2024;18(2):175-180. (In Russ.) doi:10.30914/2072-6783-2024-18-2-175-180

41. Gretchenko A.I., Odegov Yu.G. Bolognaization of education – should modernization continue along this path? Uroven’ zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii = Standard of Living of the Population of Russian Regions. 2023;19(1):61–69. (In Russ.) doi:10.52180/1999-9836_2023_19_1_5_61_69

42. Asmolov A.G. Overspecification: don’t turn a standard into a “corset”. Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy. 2019;1-2:18–23. (In Russ.) Accessed January 29, 2026. https://asmolovpsy.ru/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/izbytochnaya-konkretizacziya-nelzya-prevrashhat-standart-i-kor-set.pdf

43. Sirenko Yu.S. Implementation of the “core of higher pedagogical education” in the perspectives of management, teaching and methodological work. Nauka i shkola = Science and School. 2022;4:45–50. (In Russ.) doi:10.31862/1819-463X-2022-4-45-50

44. Petrova G.I., Ovsyannikova Yu.N., Plyusnin L. V. The fundamental nature of modern university education: approaches to definition and specificity of content. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis. 2024;28(2):7–16. (In Russ.) doi:10.15826/umpa.2024.02.011