INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY PERFORMANCE: «OVERLOAD» EFFECT
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-10-20-38
Abstract
The aim of this research is to study the relationship between
frontal midline theta rhythm changes and individual differences in working memory performance.
Methods. The methods involve behavioural testing on the basis of the program for a presentation of stimulus and registration of answers «PsyTask»; method of EEG (electroencephalography); a technique of measurement of efficiency of working memory; the comparative analysis. Software packages EEGLab for Matlab and Fieldtrip are applied while data processing.
Results. After the behavioral test all subjects were separated into 2 groups according to their performance: with «highly productive» and «low productive» memory. Specially prepared author’s complete set of the tasks which complexity varied from average to ultrahigh level was offered to participants of experiment –students and employees of the Ural Federal University and Ural Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Working memory tasks included sets of verbal stimuli for memorizing in strict order without any mental manipulation and sets of similar stimuli for memorizing in alphabetical order (with manipulations). Measured characteristics of theta-rhythm of EEG during information deduction in memory were compared of two groups’ representatives. The obtained data has shown rather uniform and similar dynamics of decrease in quantity of right answers in process of increasing tasks’ complexity. However, changes of a thetarhythm in different groups had sharply expressed distinctions. «Highly productive» examinees have systematic expansion of a theta-rhythm in the central assignments with stabilisation on the most difficult tasks; «low productive» – while tasks performance of average complexity, a sharp falling of theta-rhythm activity is observed after achievement of its maximum activation.
Scientific novelty. The working memory «overload» effect and its EEG correlates are demonstrated on a big sample of subjects.
Practical significance. The work urgency is connected with increasing loadings for memory of the person in a modern information society. Research of the operating memory mechanisms is especially important for finding-out of pupils’ possibilities to renew their knowledge and independently solve various cognitive problems, including planning, orientation in verbal space, a mental manipulation objects, etc.
About the Author
Yuri G. PavlovRussian Federation
Teaching Assistant, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychophysiology
Research Staff Member, Institute of Medical Psychology and
Behavioral Neurobiology
References
1. Aftanas L. I., Golocheikine S. A. Human anterior and frontal midline theta and lower alpha reflect emotionally positive state and internalized attention: high-resolution EEG investigation of meditation. Neuroscience letters. 2001. Vol. 310. № 1. P. 57–60. (Translated from English)
2. Baddeley A. Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2003. Vol. 4. № 10. P. 829–839. (Translated from English)
3. Baddeley A. Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annual Review of Psychology. 2012. Vol. 63. № 1. P. 1–29. (Translated from English)
4. Barrett L. F., Tugade M. M., Engle R. W. Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind. Psychological Bulletin. 2004. Vol. 130. № 4. P. 553–573. (Translated from English)
5. Brouwer A.-M., Hogervorst M. A., van Erp J. B. F., Heffelaar T., Zimmerman P. H., Oostenveld R. Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task. Journal of Neural Engineering. 2012. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 45008. (Translated from English)
6. Bush G. et al. Anterior cingulate cortex dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder revealed by fMRI and the Counting Stroop. Biological
7. Psychiatry. 1999. Vol. 45. № 12. P. 1542–1552. (Translated from English)
8. Bush G., Luu P., Posner M. I. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2000. Vol. 4. № 6. P. 215–222. (Translated from English)
9. Chee M. W. L., Choo W. C. Functional Imaging of Working Memory after 24 Hr of Total Sleep Deprivation. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2004. Vol. 24. № 19. P. 4560–4567. (Translated from English)
10. D’Esposito M. From cognitive to neural models of working memory. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 2007. Vol. 362. № 1481. P. 761–772. (Translated from English)
11. Daffner K. R. et al. Mechanisms Underlying Age- and Performance-related Differences in Working Memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2011. Vol. 23. № 6. P. 1298–1314. (Translated from English)
12. Daneman M., Merikle P. M. Working memory and language comprehension: a meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1996. Vol. 3. № 4. P. 422–433. (Translated from English)
13. Dong S., Reder L. M., Yao Y., Liu Y., Chen F. Individual differences in working memory capacity are reflected in different ERP and EEG patterns to task difficulty. Brain Research. 2015. Vol. 1616. P. 146–156. (Translated from English)
14. Engle R. W., Tuholski S. W., Laughlin J. E., Conway A. R. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1999. Vol. 128. № 3. P. 309.(Translated from English)
15. Gevins A., Smith M. E. Neurophysiological Measures of Working Memory and Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability and Cognitive Style. Cerebral Cortex. 2000. Vol. 10. № 9. P. 829–839. (Translated from English)
16. Gevins A., Smith M. E., McEvoy L., Yu D. High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of rocessing, and
17. practice. Cerebral Cortex. 1997. Vol. 7. № 4. P. 374–385. (Translated from English) 16. Griesmayr B., Gruber W. R., Klimesch W., Sauseng P. Human frontal midline theta and its synchronization to gamma during a verbal delayed match to sample task. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2010. Vol. 93. № 2. P. 208–215. (Translated from English)
18. Gur R. C. et al. Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8–21. Neuropsychology. 2012. Vol. 26. № 2. P. 251–265. (Translated from English)
19. Hyun J.-S., Luck S. J. Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2007. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 154–158.(Translated from English)
20. Itthipuripat S., Wessel J. R., Aron A. R. Frontal theta is a signature of successful working memory manipulation. Experimental Brain Research. 2012. Vol. 224. № 2. P. 255–262. (Translated from English)
21. Jaeggi S. M., Buschkuehl M., Etienne A., Ozdoba C., Perrig W. J., Nirkko A. C. On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience. 2007. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 75–89. (Translated from English)
22. Jensen O., Tesche C. D. Frontal theta activity in humans increases with memory load in a working memory task. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2002. Vol. 15. P. 1395–1399. (Translated from English)
23. Kennedy K. M., Raz N. Aging White Matter and Cognition: Differential Effects of Regional Variations in Diffusion Properties on Memory, Executive Functions, and Speed. Neuropsychologia. 2009. Vol. 47. № 3. P. 916–927. (Translated from English)
24. Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews. 1999. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 169–195. (Translated from English)
25. Michels L. et al. Simultaneous EEG-fMRI during a Working Memory Task: Modulations in Low and High Frequency Bands. PLoS ONE. 2010. Vol. 5. № 4. P. 10298. (Translated from English)
26. Missonnier P. et al. Frontal theta event-related synchronization: comparison of directed attention and working memory load effects. Journal of Neural Transmission. Springer, 2006. Vol. 113. № 10. P. 1477–1486. (Translated from English)
27. Nelson J., Reuter-Lorenz P. A., Persson J., Sylvester C.-Y. C., Jonides J. Mapping interference resolution across task domains: A shared control process in left inferior frontal gyrus. Brain research. 2009. Vol. 1256. P. 92–100. (Translated from English)
28. Onton J., Delorme A., Makeig S. Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory. NeuroImage. 2005. Vol. 27. № 2. P. 341–356. (Translated from English)
29. Pesonen M., Hämäläinen H., Krause C. M. Brain oscillatory 4–30 Hz responses during a visual n-back memory task with varying memory load. Brain Research. 2007. Vol. 1138. P. 171–177. (Translated from English)
30. Redick T. S. et al. Measuring Working Memory Capacity With Automated Complex Span Tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2012. Vol. 28. № 3. P. 164–171. (Translated from English)
31. Sammer G. et al. Relationship between regional hemodynamic activity and simultaneously recorded EEG-theta associated with mental arithmetic-induced workload. Human Brain Mapping. 2007. Vol. 28. № 8. P. 793–803. (Translated from English)
32. Sauseng P., Klimesch W., Schabus M., Doppelmayr M. Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2005. Vol. 57. № 2. P. 97–103. (Translated from English)
33. Scheeringa R., Petersson K. M., Oostenveld R., Norris D. G., Hagoort P., Bastiaansen M. C. M. Trial-by-trial coupling between EEG and BOLD identifies networks related to alpha and theta EEG power increases during working memory maintenance. NeuroImage. 2009. Vol. 44. № 3. P. 1224–1238. (Translated from English)
34. Schmidt H. et al. No gender differences in brain activation during the Nback task: An fMRI study in healthy individuals. Human Brain Mapping. 2009. Vol. 30. № 11. P. 3609–3615. (Translated from English)
35. Speck O., Ernst T., Braun J., Koch C., Miller E., Chang L. Gender differences in the functional organization of the brain for working memory. Neuroreport. 2000. Vol. 11. № 11. P. 2581–2585. (Translated from English)
36. Unsworth N., Spillers G. J. Working memory capacity: Attention control, secondary memory, or both? A direct test of the dual-component model. Journal of Memory and Language. 2010. Vol. 62. № 4. P. 392–406. (Translated from English)
37. White T. P. et al. Theta power during encoding predicts subsequent-memory performance and default mode network deactivation. Human Brain Mapping. 2013. Vol. 34. № 11. P. 2929–2943. (Translated from English)
38. Zhang J. X., Feng C.-M., Fox P. T., Gao J.-H., Tan L. H. Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection? NeuroImage. 2004. Vol. 23. № 2. P. 596–603. (Translated from English)
Review
For citations:
Pavlov Yu.G. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY PERFORMANCE: «OVERLOAD» EFFECT. The Education and science journal. 2015;(10):20-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2015-10-20-38