INFLUENCE OF TYPE OF ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE IN INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION ON LEVEL OF PROFESSIONAL DEFORMATION OF TEACHERS

The aim of presented article – identification of interrelation of certain type of organizational culture in institute of education (closed, accidental, open or synchronous) and level of development of professional deformation of personality of teachers (authoritativeness, rigidity and noncriticality of self-perception).

The basis for methodology of research is sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical approach of V. A. Yanchuk. In the course of research psychodiagnostic techniques were applied: technique of diagnostics of professional deformation of personality of teacher (V. E. Orel, S. P. Andreyev) and questionnaire of «Scale of organizational paradigms» of L. L. Konstantin.

Results of research of six institutes of education (schools and gymnasiums) showed that elements of deformation have higher level of manifestation in institutes with closed type of organizational culture, revealed in three institutes, and insignificant level in two institutes with open type of culture. In institutes with prevalence of synchronous and accidental types of organizational culture significant
exceeding on the level of deformation didn’t find. The greatest development of deformation of teachers is observed on elements of authoritativeness and rigidity, the smallest – on noncriticality of self-perception.

Scientific novelty of material is presented for the first time applied sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical approach to research of professional deformation of personality, that psychological interdeterminant of deformation are allocated, one of structural components of model of ecocultural educational environment – open type of organizational culture in institute of education are described.

Practical significance of results consists in detection of opportunities and criteria of formation in institute of formation of ecocultural dialogical environment and its structural component for purpose of timely prevention and overcoming of professional deformation of personality of teachers, to creation of prerequisites for increase of efficiency of interaction among participants of educational process.

1. Andreev S. P., Orel V. E. Razrabotka metodiki diagnostiki professional’noi deformatsii uchitelya. [Development of technique of diagnostics of professional deformation of teacher]. Nauchnyi poisk. Vyp. 3. [Scientific search. Release 3]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl state University, 2002. P. 165–173. (In Russian)

2. Zeer E. F. Psikhologiya professional’nogo razvitiya. [Psychology of professional

3. development]. Moscow, 2009. 240 p. (In Russian)

4. Il’in E. P. Psikhologiya dlya pedagogov. [Psychology for teachers]. St.-Petersburg, 2012. 640 p. Available at: http://www.klex.ru/fnr (Accessed 17 September 2015). (In Russian)

5. Kameron K., Kuinn R. Diagnostika i izmenenie organizatsionnoi kul’tury. [Diagnostics and modification of organizational culture]. St.-Petersburg, 2001. 320 p. Available at: http://hrm.ru/hrm%5Chrm_new_forum.nsf/ 0014B0BEFF57 AA71C32578B0002CA7F9/$File/камерон_куин_ок.pdf (Accessed 11 August 2015). (In Russian)

6. Kartrait S., Kuper K. Stress na rabochem meste. [Work place stress]. Kharkiv, 2004. 236 p. (In Russian)

7. Lipatov S. A. Oprosnik «Shkaly organizatsionnykh paradigm» L. L. Konstantina. [Questionnaire of «Scale of organizational paradigms» of L. L. Constantine]. Zhurnal prakticheskogo psikhologa. [Journal of practical psychologist]. 2005. № 2. P. 186–198. Available at: http://www.hse.ru/data/278/ 325/1234/ ОпросникЛКонстантина(Липатов).doc (Accessed 30 August 2015). (In Russian)

8. Maisak N. V. Profilaktika lichnostnykh deformatsii i destruktsii spetsialistov stressogennykh professii. [Prevention of personal deformations and destructions of specialists of stressful professions]. Moscow, 2012. 288 p. (In Russian)

9. Rozenshtil’ L. fon, Mol’t V., Ryuttinger B. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya. [Organizational psychology]. Kharkiv, 2014. 464 p. (In Russian)

10. Yanchuk V. A. Ekokul’turnaya obrazovatel’naya sreda: formirovanie i razvitie. Chast’ 1. Obrazovanie. Nauka i innovatsii [Ecocultural educational environment: formation and development. Part 1. Education. Science and innovations]. Adukatsyya i vykhavanne [Education and upbringing]. 2013. № 1. P. 69–76.(In Russian). Available at: http://www.yanchukvladimir.com/docs/Edu/2013_EcoCultEdu.pdf (Accessed 14 August 2015). (In Russian)

11. Yanchuk V. A. Sotsiokul’turno-interdeterministskaya dialogicheskaya perspektiva formirovaniya mezhkul’turnoi kompetentnosti [Socio-cultural-interdeterministic dialogical perspective of forming intercultural competence]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Akmeologiya obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya razvitiya [Proceedings of the Saratov university. New series. Akmeology of education. Developmental psychology]. 2014. Vol. 3. № 3. P. 241–253. (In Russian). Available at: http://www.yanchukvladimir.com/docs/Methodology/2014–3%20SCIDP-Cult_comp.pdf (Accessed 29 June 2015). (In Russian)

12. Bandura A. Toward Psychology of Human Activity. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006. Vol. 1. № 2. Р. 164–179. (Translated from English). Available at: http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura2006PPS.pdf (Accessed 12 June 2015).

13. Barab Sasha A., Roth Wolff-Michael Curriculum-Based Ecosystems: Supporting Knowing From an Ecological Perspective. Educational Researcher, 2006. Vol. 35 (5). P. 3–13. (Translated from English). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035005003 (Accessed 14 June 2015).

14. Goertzen J. R. Dialectical pluralism: a theoretical conceptualization of pluralism in psychology. New Ideas in Psychology. 2010. Vol. 28 (2). Р. 201–209.

15. (Translated from English). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.09.013 (Accessed 18 August 2015).

16. Martinyak L. T. Stanovlenie prepodavatelya. Interaktsionistsko-simvolicheskii analiz. [Formation of teacher. Interaktsionistsko-symbolical analysis]. Obzor kachestvennoi sotsiologii. [Review of qualitative sociology]. 2008. Vol. 4. № 2. 131 p. (Translated from Polish). Available at: http://repozytorium.uni.lodz.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11089/2674/PSJ_monografie_3.pdf? sequence=1&isAllowed=y (Accessed 10 September 2015).

17. Weaver-Hightower Marcus B. An Ecology Metaphor for Educational Policy Analysis: A Call to Complexity. Educational Researcher. 2008. Vol. 37 (3). P. 153–167. (Translated from English). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08318050 (Accessed 26 May 2015).