Self-efficacy and readiness of future educational psychologists to support the cognitive activity of underachieving schoolchildren

Introduction. The decline in academic performance and engagement among schoolchildren is a global issue, highlighting the need not only for systematically organised activities to prevent school underachievement but also for a clear understanding of how well future educational psychologists are prepared – in terms of their beliefs, skills, and abilities – to support the cognitive activity of underachieving schoolchildren. Aim. The present paper aims to examine the relationship between self-efficacy and the components of readiness to support the cognitive activity of underachieving schoolchildren among future educational psychologists. Methodology and research methods. The research methodology was grounded in a competency-based approach, which considers future educational psychologists as active agents of professional development and practical engagement. The instruments and methods employed included analysis, comparison, and synthesis, complemented by the author’s interpretation of psychological and pedagogical literature related to vocational education methodology. Empirical methods comprised a questionnaire survey, testing, and statistical analysis. A total of 144 students participated in the study. Results and scientific novelty. It was found that future educational psychologists have developed a positive perception of their professional role in supporting the cognitive activities of underachieving schoolchildren. High scores on scales measuring attitudes, intentions, and perceived effectiveness indicate that these future professionals are motivated to provide cognitive support and confident in their ability to successfully address related professional challenges. Overall, except for the difficulty scale, the results demonstrate a consistent relationship between various indicators of self-efficacy and the readiness of future educational psychologists to support the cognitive activities of underachieving schoolchildren. Practical significance. The findings can be used to develop courses for educational psychologists designed to foster readiness to support the cognitive activity of underachieving schoolchildren, as well as to enhance self-efficacy in the context of contemporary challenges and social demands.

1. Tursunbayeva K.A., Lavrov N.A., Tazabek Sh.O., Temirbekova A.T. Қазақстандық оқушылардың оқу үлгерімі факторлары: аналитикалық есеп. Astana: National Center for Advanced Training “Orleu”; 2023. 124 p. (In Kazakh)

2. Emiru E.K., Gedifew M.T. The effect of teacher self-efficacy on learning engagement of secondary school students. Cogent Education. 2024;11(1). doi:10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308432

3. Runyon K., Stevens T., Roberts B., Whittaker R., Clark A., Chapman C.K., et al. The role of self-efficacy and autonomy support in school psychologists’ use of ABA. Contemporary School Psychology. 2018;22(1):51–62. doi:10.1007/s40688-017-0126-1

4. Glang A.E., McCart M., Moore C., Davies S.C. School psychologists’ knowledge and self-efficacy in working with students with TBI. Exceptionality Education International. 2017;27(2). doi:10.5206/eei.v27i2.7754

5. Wray E., Sharma U., Subban P. Factors influencing teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education: a systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2022;117:103800. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103800

6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997. 604 p.

7. Bandura A. Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1(2):164–180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x

8. Downes P.E., Crawford E.R., Seibert S.E., Stoverink A.C., Campbell E.M. Referents or role models? The self-efficacy and job performance effects of perceiving higher performing peers. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2021;106(3):422. doi:10.1037/apl0000519

9. Wiederkehr V., Darnon C., Chazal S., Guimond S., Martinot D. From social class to self-efficacy: internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance. Social Psychology of Education. 2015;18(4):769–784. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9308-8

10. Hoang T., Wyatt M. Exploring the self-efficacy beliefs of Vietnamese pre-service teachers of English as a foreign language. System. 2021;96:102422. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102422

11. Shu K. Teachers’ commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of work engagement and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;13:850204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850204

12. Campbell V.A., Antony M., Zulawski J., Foley K. The effects of attending high individual and collective teacher efficacy schools on ninth grade on-track. Education Sciences. 2024;14(5):546. doi:10.3390/educsci14050546

13. Duan S., Bissaker K., Xu Z. Correlates of teachers’ classroom management self-efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review. 2024;36(2):43. doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09881-2

14. Wang L. Exploring the relationship among teacher emotional intelligence, work engagement, teacher self-efficacy, and student academic achievement: a moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2022;12:810559. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.810559

15. Han Y., Wang Y. Investigating the correlation among Chinese EFL teachers’ self-efficacy, work engagement, and reflection. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:763234. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763234

16. Granziera H., Perera H. N. Relations among teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, engagement, and work satisfaction: a social cognitive view. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2019;58:75–84. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.02.003

17. Yada A., Tolvanen A., Savolainen H. Teachers’ attitudes and self-efficacy on implementing inclusive education in Japan and Finland: a comparative study using multi-group structural equation modelling. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2018;75:343–355. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.011

18. Tran V.D. Impact of teachers’ self-efficacy on their work engagement: a case of Vietnam. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research. 2023;10(4):768–777. doi:10.20448/jeelr.v10i4.5202

19. Creely E., Henderson M., Henriksen D., Crawford R. Leading change for creativity in schools: mobilizing creative risk-taking and productive failure. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2024;27(6):1254–1277. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100951

20. Wahyuni S., Novembli M.S., Hasanah N. Self-efficacy: readiness of teachers in inclusive schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan. 2024;16(3):3018–3028. doi:10.35445/alishlah.v16i3.5354

21. Kiel E., Braun A., Muckenthaler M., Heimlich U., Weiss S. Self-efficacy of teachers in inclusive classes. How do teachers with different self-efficacy beliefs differ in implementing inclusion? European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2020;35(3):333–349. doi:10.1080/08856257.2019.1683685

22. Wray E., Sharma U., Subban P. Factors influencing teacher self-efficacy for inclusive education: a systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2022;117:103800. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2022.103800

23. Yada A., Leskinen M., Savolainen H., Schwab S. Meta-analysis of the relationship between teach-ers’ self-efficacy and attitudes toward inclusive education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2022;109:103521. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2021.103521

24. Alekhina S.V. Professional position of a teacher-psychologist in designing an inclusive educational environment. Vestnik prakticheskoj psihologii obrazovanija = Bulletin of Practical Psychology of Education. 2024;21(1):162–171. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/bppe.2024210113

25. Samsonova E.V., Shemanov A.Y., Alekhina S.V., Bystrova Y.A. Pilot study of self-assessment by teacher-psychologists of the conditions and deficiencies of their professional activity in an inclusive school. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovanija = Psychological and Pedagogical Research. 2024;16(4):76–95. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/psyedu.2024160406

26. Lautkina S.V., Mukhina V.A. Readiness of future teachers and psychologists to implement the principle of inclusion in education: structural and substantive characteristics. Psihologicheskij Vademecum. Psihologija: refleksija nastojashhego v kontekste budushhego: sbornik nauchnyh statej = Psychological Vademecum: Psychology: Reflection of the Present in the Context of the Future: Collection of Scientific Articles. Vitebsk: Vitebsk State University named after P. M. Masherov; 2024:194–198. (In Russ.)

27. Bogdanova V.V., Kolomenskaya E.V. Features of the formation of cognitive activity in low-achieving primary school students. Nauchnyj vestnik Gumanitarno-social’nogo institute = Scientific Bulletin of the Humanitarian and Social Institute. 2017;6:3. (In Russ.) Accessed May 25, 2026. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32336145

28. Shilova T.A. psychological characteristics of the personality of students with learning difficulties. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Serija: Psihologija i pedagogika = Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Psychology and Pedagogy. 2014;4:101–107. (In Russ.) Accessed May 25, 2026. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22649020

29. Alipbek A.Z., Balazhanova Zh.B., Zhumadilla M.K., Muratbek B.M., Sagynbek S.D., Eradilova G.A. Current state of inclusive education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2023;5-4(80):78–82. (In Russ.)

30. Bugubaeva R.O., Turlubekova M.B. Comparative analysis of the process of organizing inclusive education in foreign countries and its application in Kazakhstan. Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk = International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021;1-1:109–115. (In Russ.)

31. Shemanov A. Yu., Samsonova E.V., Bystrova Yu.A., Kutepova E.N. An approach to assessing the characteristics of a tutor’s professional competence in the context of inclusive education: a pilot study. Klinicheskaja i special’naja psihologija = Clinical and Special Psychology. 2022;11(4):233–263. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/cpse.2022110410

32. Samsonova E.V., Bystrova Y.A., Shemanov A.Y., Prokopyeva L.M. A study of the subjective assessment of the readiness and ability of students and working tutors for tutoring support in the context of inclusive education. Psihologo-pedagogicheskie issledovanija = Psychological and Pedagogical Studies. 2023;15(4):43–61. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/psyedu.2023150403

33. Song J., Sharma U., Choi H. Impact of teacher education on pre-service regular school teachers’ attitudes, intentions, concerns and self-efficacy about inclusive education in South Korea. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2019;86:102901. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102901

34. Sharma U., Sokal L., Wang M., Loreman T. Measuring the use of inclusive practices among pre-service educators: a multi-national study. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2021;107:103506. doi:10.13128/form-1045110.1016/j.tate.2021.103506

35. Enin V.V. Development and validation of the questionnaire “Types of role self-efficacy of the individual”. Social’naja psihologija i obshhestvo = Social Psychology and Society. 2025;16(1):175–192. (In Russ.) doi:10.17759/sps.2025160110